6 Bulgarian nationals sentenced in the UK for spying for Russia
The convictions mark a significant development in Britain's efforts to counter Russian intelligence operations amid heightened tensions stemming from Moscow's war against Ukraine and repeated Kremlin threats toward Kyiv's allies.
Orlin Roussev, 47, identified as the ringleader, was sentenced to 10 years and 8 months for conducting six espionage operations that threatened U.K. national security. Judge Nicholas Hilliard described Roussev's actions as posing a serious threat to the country.
Roussev's deputy, Bizer Dzhambazov, 44, received a sentence of 10 years and 2 months. Both men had pleaded guilty.
Katrin Ivanova, 33, who was recruited by Dzhambazov, was sentenced to 9 years and 8 months, while Vanya Gaberova, 30, received 6 years, 8 months, and 3 weeks.
Tihomir Ivanchev, 39, was sentenced to 8 years after the court acknowledged that he had ceased his involvement before the group's 2023 arrest. Ivan Stoyanov, 33, who entered a late guilty plea, was sentenced to 5 years and 3 weeks.
Prosecutors said the network acted not directly as part of the Russian intelligence network but rather for financial gain. The Russian embassy in London did not comment on the verdict.
The Kremlin has traditionally denied espionage allegations.
Police uncovered thousands of communications linking Roussev to fugitive Jan Marsalek, a former executive at financial services company Wirecard, accused of coordinating the Bulgarian network from abroad.
Marsalek, suspected of being an agent of Russian intelligence, fled to Belarus and reportedly remains in Russia under Federal Security Service (FSB) protection.
Western intelligence agencies believe Marsalek used Wirecard to funnel money supporting covert Russian operations worldwide. Wirecard collapsed in 2020 after 1.9 billion euros ($2.1 billion) vanished from its accounts.
The verdict comes as British officials have reportedly been ordered to revise contingency plans to put the country on war alert following repeated Russian threats.
The U.K. has remained one of Ukraine's staunchest allies since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying advanced weaponry, military training, and diplomatic support for Kyiv's sovereignty.
Read also: Upping pressure on Putin, Trump says 'both leaders' will be at Russia-Ukraine peace talks in Istanbul
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zelenskyy Says U.S. Talks Brought 'Very Important' Advance
KYIV, Ukraine -- The last time Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy returned to Kyiv from Washington, Ukraine had been plunged into its biggest diplomatic crisis of the war. A disastrous meeting with President Donald Trump had prompted the United States to temporarily freeze all military aid and intelligence sharing with the war-torn nation, leaving Kyiv scrambling to repair the fallout. Zelenskyy's return this week from another high-stakes meeting at the White House could not have been more different. Although Russia would unleash one of the largest air attacks of the war in the early hours of Thursday morning, on Wednesday, Zelenskyy projected cautious optimism, pointing to how the United States had agreed to participate in security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a postwar settlement intended to deter further Russian aggression. 'Before our meeting in Washington, the United States had not been involved in the security guarantees,' Zelenskyy, looking tired but resolute after the long trip home, said as he sat down with reporters. 'Now we have heard about their readiness to join. This is very important for Ukraine and for all of Europe. I am very grateful to President Trump for this.' What the guarantees will entail remains unclear, and Russia on Wednesday threw a wrench in the works by insisting that it must be part of these assurances. That demand would effectively give the aggressor a say in the victim's future security architecture, an obvious nonstarter for Kyiv. And not long after Zelenskyy had gotten back to Kyiv, Russia launched a barrage of nearly 600 drones and 40 missiles at Ukrainian cities, according to data from the Ukrainian air force. It was the largest air attack since peace talks intensified about two weeks ago. The attack hit several western Ukrainian cities that are rarely targeted, including Mukachevo, in the mostly unscathed Transcarpathia region. A large electronics manufacturing plant there, operated by the U.S.-founded company Flex, was set ablaze in the attack, leaving some 15 people injured, according to local authorities. One person was killed in another strike on the western city of Lviv, the local military administration said. 'Putin talks about peace, but he doesn't take any steps to achieve it,' Andriy Yermak, Zelenskyy's chief of staff, wrote on social media Thursday morning. Still, Zelenskyy was guardedly upbeat over the direction of the talks. The White House meeting, which included a flurry of European leaders who attended to back Zelenskyy, has allowed Kyiv to approach future peace talks more confidently. It is a marked turn from last week, when Trump appeared to side with the Kremlin's demands to push for a direct peace agreement requiring Ukraine to cede parts of the Donbas region in the east that it still controls. Trump softened these demands at the White House on Monday and instead pivoted to organizing a bilateral meeting between Zelenskyy and President Vladimir Putin of Russia, saying it would help advance the talks. On Wednesday, Zelenskyy reiterated that he was ready for such a meeting, as the Kremlin has remained noncommittal. He suggested that the meeting take place 'in neutral Europe,' naming Austria, Switzerland and Turkey as potential hosts, while dismissing Moscow and Budapest, Hungary, another city that has been mentioned as a possible site, as off the table. Zelenskyy said he wanted the meeting to take place after Ukraine and its Western allies had hammered out exactly what kind of security guarantees Kyiv could obtain. 'We want to have an understanding of the security guarantees architecture within seven to 10 days,' he said. NATO military chiefs and national security advisers have been meeting this week to draft possible guarantees. The Ukrainian leader called guarantees modeled on NATO's Article 5, which obliges members to defend an ally under attack, 'an approximate framework' agreed upon in Washington. But he stressed that Ukraine needed 'to understand which country will be ready to do what at each specific moment' so that these guarantees are more than just a vague pledge. Some countries may deploy troops in Ukraine, while others could provide air defense or secure Ukrainian airspace with their fighter jets, Zelenskyy said. He added that the U.S. commitment had helped overcome hesitancy among other European countries to participate. He noted, for instance, that Turkey had signaled that it would be ready to provide security in the Black Sea after Trump's remarks. The Ukrainian hope is that bilateral talks would evolve into a trilateral meeting with Trump to help advance a peace agreement. Zelenskyy said he was counting on the United States to use the threat of additional economic penalties to pressure Russia into agreeing to such a framework. 'My message to President Trump was very direct,' Zelenskyy said. 'We are ready for a configuration of bilateral and trilateral meetings. And if the Russians are not ready for this, we ask for tariffs to be imposed. We are requesting additional sanctions and tariff measures from the U.S. because they will really work.' That may be an elusive goal. Trump's repeated threats of new sanctions to force Russia into a ceasefire have so far gone unenforced, even as the fighting continues unabated. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Gavin Newsom and Zohran Mamdani can bring about the ruin of California and New York
It was in December 1777 that the great Scottish economist Adam Smith learned of General Burgoyne's defeat at Saratoga. Smith's correspondent said that he feared Smith's own nation of Great Britain, was ruined. The economist's reply was: 'There is a great deal of ruin in a nation.' Ever since that quote became famous, it has been both consoling and misleading. Consoling because it is true that while some people always claim the sky is falling down, more often than not, it stays up perfectly nicely. Adam Smith's own nation more than survived the defeat at Saratoga. Advertisement At the same time, the quote is misleading. Nations cannot cope with an infinite amount of ruin. Cities and states can tolerate even less. In our own country, there are many politicians who think that US cities in particular can put up with almost anything. Take Governor Gavin Newsom of California. In recent days, he has been trying to 'win' the internet. That's because, having failed at his job of governing an actual state, he seems to have decided to become chief troll online. Democrat pundits are 'LOLing' all over the place at Newsom's alleged brilliance in aping the internet manners of President Trump. Advertisement It would be a lot more fun if the situation in Gavin's own state were sunnier. As it is, while Newsom plays cute online, California is in a disastrous state. Just this year, it has suffered ruinous wildfires, causing billions of dollars worth of damage. And even if the areas of Los Angeles that burned to the ground are rebuilt, good luck to anyone trying to get home insurance. Then there are the riots — stoked along by Democrat politicians, who seem to think that it is the natural-born right of every illegal alien to riot against ICE and other law-enforcement officers and wave the flags of Mexico and other countries to demonstrate just how many rights they think they should get in America. Advertisement All this comes as the state of California still struggles to recover from the disastrous COVID-19 lockdown policies that Newsom tried to install in his state. For everyone but himself, naturally. Perhaps Newsom and the sycophants in his party think that some winsome online behavior will bring back the 2.1 million registered Democrats who seem to have been lost by the party in the years between 2020 and 2024. But the reality is that Newsom's policies — from taxation to homelessness and law and order — have seen a great exodus of the people the state needs most. In recent years, California has lost even more wealthy millennials than New York has. Some 10,000 millennial households bringing in more than $200,000 a year fled California in a single year. A figure almost twice the size of the exodus from New York of the same demographic in the same year. Of course, in part, that is because of the genius of the federal system in this country that makes moving between states so relatively easy. Advertisement A British person afflicted by high taxes and high crime cannot just up sticks and move to a different jurisdiction in their country. It's all going to be the same. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But if California or New York decides to tax the successful beyond their endurance and fails to give them a decent quality of life in return, then Florida or Texas will never look so appealing. That is a fact that Democrats in New York, as much as in California, should keep at the top of their minds. Even as New York is considering the possibility of electing a high-taxing, radical socialist mayor, there are people who say that it is an empty threat that people will actually leave this city. These are the same people who seemed to think that the Golden State would be endlessly attractive, even if there were syringes all over the sidewalks and the place was on fire. The same people seem to think that you can test and test New York as much as you like, and it doesn't matter because people will still want to live here. Tell that to the people who had to live through the city's downturn in the 1970s. In fact, tell that to the citizens of the numerous cities in this country that have managed to fall through the floor. Advertisement There was a time when Detroit seemed like the city of the future. There was a time when St. Louis seemed like a good bet. But these places should be reminders that what seems enduring can in fact be stress-tested to death in front of your eyes. I mentioned the country of Adam Smith, and it is still worth looking to it for a lesson in what could happen here. The left-wing Labour government in the UK came into power last year, promising to tax the rich to fill its fiscal deficits. Of course, it hasn't worked. But the threat has certainly chased money out of the country. The UK is expected to lose some 16,500 millionaires this year alone. An uptick of over 50% just in the year before. All driven away by the brilliant tax policies of a government that doesn't even say it is socialist. Advertisement What Zohran Mamdani and Co. would do to this city is orders of magnitude worse than anything Labour has achieved in the UK. But there is another lesson still to learn. Which is that, having chased the wealthy out of the UK, the Labour government is now suddenly hoping to woo them back. They are learning in real time the old conservative lesson that it is much easier to destroy than it is to build. Easier to chase people away than to give them the long-term confidence that would be needed to encourage them back. Which returns me to Adam Smith. There may be a great deal of ruin in a nation. But there isn't an endless amount of ruin in a state. Much less of a city. Come November, New Yorkers should remember that.
Bloomberg
8 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump and Carney Talk About Trade, Agree to Speak Again Soon
US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had a 'wide-ranging conversation' Thursday that included trade and the war in Ukraine, according to Carney's office. The two leaders talked about 'trade challenges, opportunities, and shared priorities in a new economic and security relationship between Canada and the US,' according to the statement.
