
Sturgeon's ‘Stalinist' approach disastrous for SNP, claims Joanna Cherry
She said that unlike her predecessor Alex Salmond, Ms Sturgeon had shut down debate within the party on strategy and policy discussions, and that 'it was her way or the highway', and dissenters were viewed with 'deep suspicion'.
The former Edinburgh South West MP added that she had never been friends with Ms Sturgeon, but that their differences were political rather than personal.
'I've never been close to her. This is not a personality clash. This is a clash based on the way that we do politics,' she said.
'I believe in open debates and discussion. And I don't think she does. I think she was Stalinist in the way in which she ran the party and the country.'
She also criticised Ms Sturgeon's strategy for securing a Scottish independence in the post-Brexit period, when she said she 'repeatedly' pursued a mandate for a second referendum from the UK Government without considering a plan B.
'The ideal thing would have been to get a second referendum, but it was unwise to close down other options, and we needed to discuss other options,' Ms Cherry said.
'She never wanted to discuss a plan B, and she never wanted to discuss the possibility of treating an election as a de facto referendum.
'And when she eventually decided to do that, it was only because she'd run out of options, and she did it without any debate or discussion.'
She added: 'The reason that I feel that her strategy failed and was so wrong was it was very narrow, and she repeatedly banged her head off the brick wall of the British Government's refusal to grant a section 30 order, rather than having a multi-faceted strategy to put pressure on them to do so, whilst also having a back-up plan if they said no.
'A more skilled politician of the sort of person that Alex Salmond was would have had that kind of a plan, and she didn't have it.'
Ms Cherry also described the independence referendum in 2014 as a 'flowering of ideas' that had come about from the 'grassroots up'.
She said: 'I think Nicola and her husband, as chief executive of the party, set out to undermine that grassroots power because it scared them, and to make everything imposed in the top-down, and that has had disastrous results for the SNP and for the independence movement.'
Ms Cherry also said it was 'irritating' that in her recent autobiography Ms Sturgeon conceded some of the problems with gender self-identification were valid, given, she said, there had been multiple attempts to get her to 'press pause' on the policy at the time.
These included, she said, an open letter in the Scotsman newspaper in 2019 by herself and 'quite a few other SNP MPs, MSPs and councillors', and separate calls from herself for a citizens' assembly to examine the issue.
She said of Ms Sturgeon's response: 'Not only did she close her ears to them, she demonised those of us who raised concerns.
'She said first of all that our concerns weren't valid. And then she actually compared us to the far-right, said we're misogynist, racist, homophobes.'
Joanna Cherry was first elected to the UK Parliament in 2015, and was her party's spokesperson for justice and home affairs until 2021.
She lost her seat to Labour in the 2024 general election.
The Scottish Government and the SNP have been asked for comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
11 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Plans for 1400 new homes in Cumbernauld take step forward
The development, intended for a site on the eastern edge of the town, is one of the council's community growth area initiatives which are part of the North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2022. Some 20% of the housing would be designated for the affordable housing sector. Other features of the development include new or upgraded road and footpath access, shops, and play areas with significant amounts of existing woodland to be retained. The committee was not unanimous as Councillor Adam Smith (SNP, Cumbernauld East) moved against granting planning permission. He said the community growth area sites has experienced problems with polluted water courses, flooding and disruption from road closures. Councillor Smith also said that he was under the impression the required amount of affordable housing was 25% rather than 20, although he was advised the proposed amount was in keeping with current policy. READ MORE: Major plans revealed to close two police stations Other members expressed concern over the impact on education and health services, particularly given the current shortage of GPs. Councillor Smith then tabled to refuse on the grounds that the proposed £5.6 million contribution to enhance education provision in the area was inadequate, but this was outvoted 17-3 by the committee in favour of granting the application in principle and subject to a list of conditions. The report on the proposals also gave details of 72 representations received during public consultation, of which 71 were objections and one was in support. Among the objectors were Carbrain and Hillcrest Community Council, which cited environmental damage and potential impact on society, local services and infrastructure and community group People Opposing Palacerigg Planning Application. In addition to the concerns raised by the community council, objectors mentioned loss of greenbelt, traffic and road safety, noise and loss of privacy, and drainage while also claiming insufficient effort had been made to engage with the public about the proposals. The letter of support referred to safe pedestrian links, including through the industrial area to the train station and town centre, traffic control, active travel including safe routes to school and the phased approach to the development. The report responded to the other points of objection, saying the site was not designated greenbelt, the proposals included several improvements to travel networks, and other issues could be adequately addressed through the conditions attached to planning permission. The report also highlighted the job creation aspect of the development which is expected to see a monthly average of 147 people employed during construction, predominantly residents of North Lanarkshire.


Scotsman
41 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why exclusion of 400,000 Scots from jury duty is an affront to democracy
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Some 2,500 years ago, arguably the most important development in all human history took place in Athens. Rather than obey a king, a dictator or a group of the most powerful people, it was agreed that every citizen should have a say in the running of the city state. The birth of democracy, imperfect as it was, has long been celebrated by those who value freedom. A less well known aspect of this revolutionary new form of government was the invention of juries. The ancient Athenians thought so much of this way of reaching a verdict in criminal and other legal cases that they paid their jurors so the poorest citizens could take part. Indeed, it was their duty to do so. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The US National Judicial College puts a similar importance on jury trials, spelling out why they are important to democracy: 'The definition of tyranny is oppressive power exerted by the government. Tyranny also exists when absolute power is vested in a single ruler. Jury trials are the opposite of tyranny because the citizens on the jury are given the absolute power to make the final decision.' Serving on juries has long been associated with democracy (Picture: Hulton Archive) | Getty Images 'Totally bonkers' Yet in Scotland today, approximately 400,000 potential jurors are unable to perform this crucial role because of an outdated system used by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS), which is unable to include many people who live in new-build properties. In an interview we publish today, David Fraser, the SCTS's executive director of court operations, said: 'There's definitely an element of exclusion, because if those people have an address which cannot be ingested into our system, they are excluded. That's what we are trying to avoid...' This comes at a time when just under half of citations for jury duty receive no response and courts are struggling to deal with a large backlog of cases. A new 'effective and modern' system had been planned, but it was put on hold last year because of Scottish Government funding cuts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesperson, Liam McArthur, surely spoke for us all when he said it was 'totally bonkers' that people in new houses were being 'effectively excluded from jury duty because the computer system can't handle your address'.


Scotsman
41 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Ministers have a duty to protect freedom of speech and end this insanity
The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht is a collection of essays edited by Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As is often the case during the Edinburgh Fringe, the material was weak and the delivery unconvincing. While authoritarian bullies rampaged across Scotland's cultural landscape last week, the response from senior politicians was predictably - depressingly - poor. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In saner times, an apology from a publicly-funded venue for allowing the Deputy First Minister to enter the premises would have provoked justifiable outrage from the very top of Government. Likewise, the decision to ban a book from an exhibition at the National Library of Scotland would, surely, have seen the personal intervention of the First Minister. Instead, last week we witnessed yet more of the lack of leadership which has allowed trans activists to wreak havoc across the public sector. First, and I cringe for those involved as I type these words, we learned that management at the Summerhall venue in Edinburgh set up a 'safe space' for staff and performers while Deputy FM Kate Forbes was in the building. The presence of Forbes, a devout Christian who previously revealed that, had she been an elected member at the time the law was changed, she would have voted against gay marriage, was dangerous. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Picture: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire) Management at the venue later apologised for letting her in. 'Summerhall Arts' primary concern,' said a spokesperson, 'is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again.' This is insanity. Kate Forbes is a democratically elected politician whose faith-born opposition to gay marriage, while controversial, is perfectly legal. Her presence in Summerhall created no danger for anyone, LGBTQ+ or otherwise, and those claiming otherwise should be embarrassed. The only danger, here, is in Summerhall management's attack on free speech. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Another enthusiast for undermining this fundamental freedom is National Librarian, Amina Shah. It emerged last week that the excellent book 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht' had been withdrawn by Shah from an exhibition highlighting the importance of libraries and the ways in which they can 'empower individuals and the communities they belong to'. The editors of the book, a collection of essays by women involved in the ultimately successful campaign to defeat the SNP's plan to allow anyone to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their choosing, discovered through a freedom of information request that it had received more public nominations for inclusion that any other. They learned that the book had, initially, been selected for inclusion in the 'Dear Library' exhibition but that, after protests from members of staff, Shah - with the backing of the board, chaired by Sir Drummond Bone - withdrew it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shah's actions are indefensible and stand fully in contradiction to the responsibilities that come with the position she is unfit to hold. I suspect the National Librarian's decision is one that will whisper in her ear for years to come. Faced with threats of disruption from staff if 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest' had been included in the exhibition, Shah should have turned to the National Library's disciplinary code. Rather than capitulating to authoritarian bullies, she should have reminded them that gross misconduct is a real thing with real consequences. As these twin scandals unfolded, finance secretary Shona Robison spoke of the need for 'tolerance'. In her reaction to the Summerhall scandal, Robison revealed at least some of the reason that we find ourselves where we do. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I don't think,' said Robison, 'it sends out the right signal over freedom of speech.' Any weaker and the pulse would be undetectable. Something that sends out entirely the wrong signal over freedom of speech is members of the Government sitting back while others deny the free speech of others. When culture secretary Angus Robertson eventually spoke up, he served a weak cocktail of bromides. While he was a 'strong supporter' of free speech, there would always be 'tensions' between that right and views that some people might find 'unpopular or unjustifiable'. It would not, he added, 'be easy all of the time to please everybody'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Robertson waffled: he was a strong supporter of freedom of speech and expression; there was an important distance between government and cultural organisations; there were issues of 'public concern' and 'public debate'. Over the two decades that I've known former journalist Robertson, I've always considered him - in common with most in our trade - a fundamentalist on freedom of speech. His unwillingness to take a stronger stance, here, does not chime with the values I've long understood him to hold. Robertson spoke about the important distance between government and cultural organisations and it is, of course, correct that ministers should have no say in the decision making of bodies such as Creative Scotland but that does not mean he should not intervene when things are going catastrophically wrong. Robertson is entitled to demand the presence in his ministerial office of Summerhall chief executive Sam Gough. The culture secretary is perfectly within his rights to point out to Gough that Summerhall - a venue recently propped up with more than £600,000 of public money - must operate within the law and that failure to do so will mean the tap's turned off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The National Library of Scotland is funded by the Scottish Government and answerable to the Scottish Parliament. Robertson has the right - the duty - to act here, too. Amina Shah, cowed by activists, removed a book from an exhibition that includes, satire fans, George Orwell's '1984'. She's a censor and Angus Robertson should sack her and remove Sir Drummond Bone from the library's board. Freedom of speech is under attack as never before in living memory. The culture secretary's presence on the frontline of this battle would be very much appreciated.