logo
We're still winning the climate fight. Yes, really.

We're still winning the climate fight. Yes, really.

Vox21-04-2025
is a news editor with Vox's politics and policy team. He's helped cover elections, Congress, and both the Biden and Trump administrations. Previously, Sean was Vox's weekend editor.
The Trump administration came to power and promised to shift the US's energy policy to one centered on the mantra 'drill baby drill.'
That raised the question — will President Donald Trump undo all the progress the US has made in recent years transitioning to renewable energy?
To find the answer, Vox's climate and tech teams worked for weeks reporting a series of stories all about where the world stands with respect to renewable energy technologies, what might hasten or slow progress, and what the green revolution will really look like.
They found that humanity has reached what they call 'escape velocity' when it comes to the green energy revolution. I recently talked with climate editor Paige Vega about how her team came to this conclusion, and what it means for the future.
Check out all the excellent Escape Velocity stories here! I hope this Q&A brings additional insights.
Where are we right now with energy under the new Trump administration?
Donald Trump's administration has made several moves to dismantle a suite of environmental regulations and really slow down climate progress, including taking us out of the Paris agreement.
He's moved really, really quickly to incentivize this vision of an energy future that takes us back to reliance on fossil fuels. And he seems to want to advance a version of American energy dominance that represents a retroactive vision.
Despite all that, in a new project, your team explains that Trump's efforts might be diminished by the fact that we've hit a kind of 'escape velocity' on climate?
That's right. Trump campaigned on all of the things he's beginning to implement now, and we know how his first term went. However, we've really gotten to this point where market forces, economics, and scalability of green technologies are converging to give climate progress enormous momentum.
For instance, we're seeing the price of solar energy come down drastically, and that's making it a very attractive and cheap energy source. Companies and countries that are building new facilities and structures now, or that are looking to add energy to the grid, are finding that the easiest thing for them to do is to tap into energy sources like solar or wind, because they're abundant and very, very cheap.
We've also seen a ton of advancement in batteries and grid scale energy capacity. For a long time, one problem with solar or wind energy was that they are intermittent energy sources. It was difficult to power a home using wind energy when it wasn't windy.
But now, we've enhanced our ability to create what are essentially giant batteries that can store energy from intermittent energy sources. And we've done that rapidly — since 2021, the utility scale battery capacity, meaning the ability for us to build big batteries and how much energy capacity they have, has accelerated at a rate of more than 30 times.
And that means now we have a lot more capacity to harness the energy from a very windy day and store it when we need it.
So, we chose Escape Velocity as the name of our project because we think of this as a moment in which — like a rocket with all of this momentum that's like about to leave the atmosphere — we're on a trajectory to leave behind the energy regime of the past and move towards something else.
Related Escape Velocity
That's astounding about the batteries. What led to such rapid advances?
It's really a case of technological innovation being stoked by the low cost of solar and wind. The price of harnessing that energy dropped so much that there was suddenly a strong market incentive, global dynamics and good policies in place for companies to really figure out this battery thing.
Tell me more about the economic forces here.
There's a couple of different parts to that, and we have to widen the lens a little bit beyond America.
The cheapness of solar and wind are one part of the picture. Many states have capitalized on that type of energy, and still remain committed to it, despite what the federal government is trying to do right now.
In part because of that, there's an entire labor sector that is building up around this massive shift towards clean energy. We're seeing fewer jobs in fossil fuels, while in 2023, nearly 150,000 new clean energy jobs were created in a single year alone. 2021 was actually a really important year — that year clean energy jobs outnumbered jobs in fossil fuels.
There's also the whole movement towards electric vehicles, and the expansion of infrastructure to support getting people out of gas-guzzling cars. America is in an interesting inflection period for this: If Trump succeeds in taking away the incentives for people to buy EVs, that could have a negative effect on the industry here in America. But those rebates were actually pretty narrow anyway, and we're seeing more and more people invest in hybrid cars.
There's a lot of consumer desire and interest and excitement around different alternative types of vehicles that are hitting the market, worldwide. In China, there are several companies — mostly famously BYD — that are making really attractive and affordable consumer cars that are entirely electric. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles are picking up in Mexico, Pakistan, and in European countries, too. And that's because these vehicles are cheap and easy to charge.
You mention a lot of other countries there. Is the US in danger of getting left behind under Trump?
Regardless of what the US does, the rest of the world is going to zoom ahead with this. The United States actually has a strong hand to play here, but right now we're actively sabotaging it.
There is a real risk that we come to a situation where much of the world has cheap, clean energy that's out of reach for Americans.
China in particular has clearly seen the writing on the wall, is investing in clean energy as well as the infrastructure to support EVs, and so on. They have the infrastructure to manufacture the batteries and technology the transition requires. And so they're a leader in this space.
Now is actually a good time for the US to make a shift. We're at a time where much of our energy grid and our transmission lines are aging. They need to be refurbished, and that's going to be really, really expensive. To do the necessary work would mean pouring a lot of money into an energy system that was designed to utilize fossil fuels and not to harness the potential of emerging energy sources.
If we're going to spend so much money doing that, why not use the money instead to realize a version of a US power system that is better able to harness renewable energy? There is no avoiding the fact that we're going to have to switch over to these renewable energy sources at some point.
Might some states decide to make this transition on their own, regardless of federal policy?
We're seeing some Republican politicians standing up for certain provisions within the Inflation Reduction Act — Biden's huge climate law — that invested billions of dollars into making that shift to renewables. And that creates an interesting tension with the White House.
Places like Alabama, Kentucky, and Texas, all predominantly red states, are seeing a real boom in the shift to clean energy jobs. And some red states get an important share of their power from solar and wind — Iowa, for example, gets 60 percent of its energy from wind alone.
Because of all this, I think we may see Trump becoming more open to maintaining certain federal clean energy policies than we think, maybe by rebranding them. We already see Trump embracing a few types of renewable energies, like geothermal and nuclear, which seem to be in Trump's good graces.
I think politicians, governors across the country, nonprofits, and businesses have figured out that Trump's dislike of renewable energy is partially a branding issue, and you see different entities trying to repackage these technologies in a way that they think Trump would like better.
That's a hopeful note.
I think readers can find a lot of hope within our package of stories, and a lot of rebellion in it. Escape Velocity is really all about rejecting the idea that climate action lives and dies by who holds power for just four years. The future is still being shaped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Nominates Tammy Bruce for U.N. Role
Trump Nominates Tammy Bruce for U.N. Role

New York Times

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Nominates Tammy Bruce for U.N. Role

President Trump said on Saturday that he was nominating Tammy Bruce, a spokeswoman for the State Department, as the next deputy representative of the United States to the United Nations. Mr. Trump said on Truth Social that Ms. Bruce had done a 'fantastic job' in her State Department role and that she would 'represent our Country brilliantly at the United Nations.' Ms. Bruce has served as the State Department's spokeswoman since January and has conducted regular press briefings on U.S. foreign policy. She has defended the Trump administration's response to Israel's war in Gaza, as well as its decisions to withdraw from UNESCO, the U.N. cultural agency, and to freeze nearly all U.S. foreign aid funded by the United States Agency for International Development and the State Department. 'I'm blessed that in the next few weeks my commitment to advancing America First leadership and values continues on the global stage in this new post,' Ms. Bruce said on X after the announcement. Ms. Bruce was a political commentator and a contributor to Fox News for more than 20 years before joining the Trump administration. She had been a longtime organizer for the Democratic Party before breaking away to 'expose and help defeat the leftist agenda,' according to her website. She has written several books criticizing the American left. Her nomination for the role, which requires Senate confirmation, comes weeks after the confirmation hearing of Michael Waltz, Mr. Trump's former national security adviser, to serve as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Mr. Trump nominated Mr. Waltz in May after Mr. Waltz stepped down from the national security role, where he faced intense scrutiny earlier this year for a group chat on Signal in which senior officials discussed sensitive details of a military operation in Yemen. His nomination is still awaiting Senate confirmation.

Midterms are more than a year away, but Trump is already challenging them
Midterms are more than a year away, but Trump is already challenging them

USA Today

time38 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Midterms are more than a year away, but Trump is already challenging them

Trump's DOJ and Republicans are building the machine now to meddle in the 2026 midterm elections 15 months from now. The 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act came and went on Aug. 6 amid a massive mission shift within the U.S. Department of Justice. That agency spent six decades using the Civil Rights Movement law to protect the ability of all Americans to cast ballots in elections. Now, the people President Donald Trump put in charge at the DOJ have shifted that mission entirely to protecting him from election results he dislikes. The DOJ is out of the civil rights business. Now its officials making demands, with not-so-veiled threats, for data from state election administrators while regurgitating Trump's oldest lie about elections – that hoards of noncitizens cast ballots, changing who wins and loses. They're building the machine now to meddle in the 2026 midterm elections 15 months from now. And those machinations are built on two lessons learned from 2020: Attack the election with everything you have before it happens, and stock the Trump administration only with officials who will do exactly what he says on elections, no matter what the law says. Election denial and mistrust are baked into the Trump administration Trump's team of election deniers, including Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, represent both of these lessons. The first they learned in 2020, when they failed while trying to help Trump overturn a free and fair election. It was all so careless and chaotic back then, a dizzying series of unsubstantiated claims and discombobulated news conferences punctuated by judge after judge tossing out Trump's challenges as meritless. I was reminded recently of a news conference I attended at Philadelphia's airport on the day after the 2020 election. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, then working as Trump's lawyer doing work that eventually got him disbarred, was the ringmaster for the election deniers that day. And Bondi was right by his side. I watched on Nov. 4, 2020, as Bondi started and ended her remarks by insisting twice that Trump had already won Pennsylvania … while everyone knew that the state's election officials were still counting the votes. Trump lost Pennsylvania in 2020 when the race there was called three days later. The Trump team's takeaway from all that: Set up the infrastructure to destabilize the administration of elections at the state level well before Election Day, not just after the polls close. The second lesson was to purge the team of lawyers and officials who will follow the law, even if that means an election result that infuriates Trump. He had top aides who held the line during his first term, acknowledging his loss in 2020. They're all gone now, leaving only Trump's unquestioning sycophants in the second term. And that's exactly who has been bombarding state election administrators with letters for months, demanding copies of the voter rolls for those states, along with records from previous elections when Trump was on the ballot. This is the plodding setup that will eventually lead to Trump and his team making new – and still unsubstantiated – claims that they're trying to protect the 2026 midterm elections from looming fraud. Expect Trump to bully Republicans into interfering with elections Trump has already made clear he'll use any political power he has to influence who wins control of Congress in 2026, even if that means taking actions he has no legal authority to take as president. Wendy Weiser, vice president for democracy at The Brennan Center for Justice, told me that Trump and his team appear to be building a "pretext" on the false claim of rampant election fraud as justification for their potential meddling in the elections. They're systematically removing "the brakes" that protect democracy during the voting process, she said. "They're taking aim at all of the brakes that applied before. And they're starting earlier," Weiser said. "That just shows you he's laser-focused on interfering in elections here by any means necessary. Bend the rules. Throw out the playbook." David Becker, a former Department of Justice lawyer who founded The Center for Election Innovation and Research, has been hosting monthly webinar meetings with hundreds of state election officials since March. Those officials – Republicans and Democrats – have plenty of questions and concerns about the "unprecedented level of federal interference in state election processes," he told me. "They're not sure where all this is leading," Becker said. "They hear the rhetoric coming out of the White House. They hear the continued false statements about past elections and election security in the United States." It's worth noting here, as Weiser told me, that presidents have no role in running or overseeing elections in America, except for enforcing voting laws passed by Congress. And Becker noted that Congress, now controlled by Trump's Republican allies, has not authorized the DOJ intrusions into state election systems. "This is not so much about election policy as it is about a completely radical rebalancing of the balance of power between the White House and the states," Becker said. "And the Constitution has said, with regards to elections in particular, that the balance of power is tilted toward the states." As with so many Trump scams in his second term, Democrats in the minority in Congress will howl but have no real power now to stop him. And Republicans in Congress have surrendered any real authority as a coequal branch of government. They just do what Trump tells them now. So it falls to election officials in the states, appointed or elected, Republican or Democrat, to engage with Trump's DOJ election deniers while insisting that everyone follows the law. These officials have faced an extraordinary increase of repulsive abuse from Trump's supporters that he egged on. That was Trump's objective, then and now, to intimidate them into submission. We can only hope they hold the line, like the Trump officials in his first term who refused to endorse his lies about the election. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.

As Washington axes aid for the most vulnerable, legislation in Mass. would tackle inequities
As Washington axes aid for the most vulnerable, legislation in Mass. would tackle inequities

Boston Globe

time38 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

As Washington axes aid for the most vulnerable, legislation in Mass. would tackle inequities

It's vital work, and many of its recommendations are worth enacting. Advertisement This proposed legislation comes at a time when the Trump administration is seeking to limit diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and racial preferences. The work of the Health Equity Compact is not that. It's about finding practical solutions to address the health needs of places like Brockton, where the according to the Atrius Health Equity Foundation. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up One of the Compact's specific proposals, for which this editorial board Advertisement In general, anything the state can do to advance career ladders for health care workers is valuable. For example, UMass Chan Medical School just The health equity bill allows the public health commissioner to have a role in creating 'stackable' credentials for health care workers, where one credential can be added to the next, creating a career path. Another intriguing idea in the proposed bill is the creation of a trust fund to give grants to 'health equity zones,' specific communities with poor health outcomes. This is a model The In particular, at least for now, lawmakers should resist the temptation to pass new health insurance mandates. Advertisement The bill would require insurance coverage for interpreters, community health workers, and patient navigators. It is important for hospitals and health centers to be able to employ staff who help patients, including non-English speakers, navigate a complex health care system. These positions are typically funded through grants and, in some cases, by insurance under negotiated agreements or payment models. But a wide-ranging insurance mandate like the one in this bill would increase premiums for all payers — including those who can least afford them. In 2023, the Division of Insurance The bill would also require insurers to reimburse equally for telehealth and in-person care for primary care and chronic disease visits. There is ongoing debate over reimbursement rates for telehealth, which exploded in popularity during the pandemic. It's worth studying the costs and benefits of telehealth in specific specialties before mandating payment parity because ideally, telehealth would provide opportunities for cost savings. Those quibbles aside, the proposed health equity bill would move the state in the right direction. At a time when the federal government is cutting health care spending and eliminating benefits that help the poorest citizens, it would be a strong statement if Massachusetts were to take the lead in passing a bill to improve the health of people in communities that today suffer the most. Advertisement Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store