The true cost of healthy eating in the UK
Food plays a major role in maintaining and improving our health and wellness, with all health authorities recommending we eat a balanced diet to keep ourselves in top form.
However, new research suggests it is easier said than done as eating healthily has become significantly more expensive than the alternative. A study conducted by The Food Foundation found that, on average, healthier foods are more than twice as expensive per calorie as less healthy foods.
Foods that are considered healthier, as defined by the government's Nutrient Profile Model, are increasing in price at twice the rate of foods considered to be unhealthy over the past two years.
The price of more healthy foods rose by 21% between 2022 and 2024, compared to less healthy foods which saw a price increase of just 11%.
The Food Foundation's report makes a distinction between healthy and unhealthy foods according to the UK Nutrient Profiling Model, as well as the Eatwell Guide, which is the government's official guidance on the types and proportions of food needed for a healthy diet.
By and large, foods that are high in fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) are considered unhealthy. Many of these are also considered UPFs, as they contain ingredients such as sweeteners, emulsifiers, flavours and artificial colours.
But despite the growing evidence that HFSS foods and UPFs are contributing to obesity in the UK - 26% of the UK population are classified as obese, equivalent to approximately 22.5 million people - the price of healthier foods continue to be higher and are increasing at a faster rate.
This means that families struggling with financial insecurity are finding it harder to afford and access healthier options. The Food Foundation found that 60% of households experiencing food insecurity have reduced their purchases of fruit, while 44% cut back on vegetables, and 59% on fish.
The report revealed that the most deprived households would need to spend 45% of their disposable income on food to afford the government-recommended healthy diet. This figure rises to 70% for families with children.
The impact on children from the most deprived families is also clear through the report. On average, children consume less than half the recommended amount of fruit and vegetables, but over twice the recommended amount of sugar.
Those from the most deprived families consume 20% less fruit and vegetables and 17% less fibre compared to the least deprived.
On average, children consume less than half the recommended amount of fruit and vegetables, but over twice the recommended amount of sugarThe Food Foundation
Britons have been warned that they will feel the pinch even more in the latter half of the year, after the British Retail Consortium predicted that food prices will rise by an average of 4.2%. Inflation across a number of areas, including food, mean many people have been struggling with the cost of living crisis since late 2021, with few signs of relief.
Commenting on the findings, Sophie Tebbetts, CEO of FoodCycle, says it's not just the rising cost of food that is impacting the poorest individuals. "It's also the cost of cooking and preparing that food," she tells Yahoo UK. "Some 41% of FoodCycle guests don't own an oven and 70% of our guests have had to access other services so that they can eat - this includes accessing food banks and borrowing money.
"Both FoodCycle and the Food Foundation agree that in order to create a fairer food system we have to make access to healthy food choices accessible to everyone."
FoodCycle has an forthcoming report that will reinforce The Food Foundation's findings and highlight the "urgent issue" of poor diet in the UK, Tebbetts tells Yahoo UK exclusively.
She adds that poor diets are responsible for 13% of all deaths and contribute to over 75,000 premature deaths each year.
"The Food Foundation report reinforces these findings, highlighting how children in the most deprived areas are nearly twice as likely to be obese by their first year of school; there was a 68% increase in diabetes-related amputations since 2009 and the annual cost of obesity is £58 billion," Tebbetts adds.
Evidence showing the negative impact of unhealthy food has been growing in recent years, linked to illnesses caused by being overweight or obese. Poor diets and obesity have been blamed for a 39% rise in cases of diabetes among people under 40, for example, while ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are linked to 30 different dangerous health outcomes, including heart problems and mental disorders.
Last year, a report by the Food, Farming and Countryside Commission (FFCC) found that the UK's high consumption of foods high in fat, salt and sugar is costing the NHS and the economy £268 billion per year.
Poor diets are responsible for 13% of all deaths and contribute to over 75,000 premature deaths each yearSophie Tebbetts, CEO of FoodCycle
Within that figure, which was described as "staggering", the FFCC included the direct cost to the government of tackling the impact of diet-related diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular problems. This amounted to £92 billion.
The rest of the costs are derived from loss of productivity from individuals who are too ill to work because of diet-related disease and 'human costs', which include chronic pain and early death.
Yet, a 2022 YouGov survey revealed that 7% of Britons eat junk food "every day", while a much higher percentage (40%) eat it at least once a week.
There are no easy solutions to food inequality, as it is deeply tangled with income inequality. But The Food Foundation to changes that can be made around the promotion of unhealthy foods, as well as improving affordability of healthier foods that can make a difference.
"This report exposes a troubling reality," the charity said. "But we can change this. Our food system can be reshaped so that the healthiest and most sustainable options are the most affordable, available and appealing."
It called on the UK government to take action and pay attention to the policies recommended in the report, which "can improve access and affordability of nutritious food and shape healthy and sustainable food environments".
Tebbetts adds that FoodCycle's upcoming report, in collaboration with the British Nutrition Foundation, reveals how things can be improved from a grassroots level. It looks at how community dining can improve access to healthy foods and support healthier eating choices.
"It shows how community dining provides a stable, dependable, inclusive and dignified service that supports both physical and financial access to food, helping to meet dietary needs and empowering communities to play an active role in their wellbeing," she explains.
Read more about healthy eating:
Six healthy eating 'rules' to follow in 2025 (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read)
12 ways to eat more cheaply and healthily as food prices rise (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)
One food you really need to eat more of — it's not protein (SurreyLive, 5-min read)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Mental health sick days soar by 5m in just a year
Britons took an extra 5m sick days for mental health reasons last year after a surge in conditions including stress, anxiety and depression. Staff took a record 20.5m days off because of mental health in 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics, up from 14.8m in 2023. This accounted for 13.7pc of all sick days taken in Britain, the highest proportion since 2019. Jamie O'Halloran, senior research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the figures reflect 'the tip of the iceberg' as many employees continue working even when they are unwell. He said: 'We must do more to prevent avoidable ill health and create workplaces that support people with health conditions to get into – and stay in – work. 'The lack of progress on mental health is particularly alarming and must become a greater priority for both public health policy and employer strategy.' Poor mental health appears to be more prevalent in the public sector, where it accounted for 16.4pc of absences last year – compared with 6.7pc in the private sector. There has been a surge in diagnoses of mental health conditions such as anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Overall ill health is also more problematic in the public sector, where it accounts for an absence rate of 2.9pc compared with 1.8pc for private companies. The latest figures also show that it is not only those in work taking time off because of sickness. The number of people of working age who are economically inactive – neither in work nor looking for a job – because of ill health has surged to 2.8m, up from 2.1m before the Covid pandemic. In total, workers took 149m sick days in 2024, which is down 10pc on the previous year. The number of days taken for minor illnesses dropped by a third to 33m, while workers took 26.5m days for musculoskeletal problems, roughly the same as 2023. The overall sickness rate, which charts absences as a share of all working hours, fell to 2pc. As a result the proportion of sick days is back to its pre-pandemic level. Sam Atwell, at the Health Foundation, a charity, said sick employees must be supported to prevent them from dropping out of work altogether. 'Employers and government alike should be concerned by these findings as extended or repeated episodes of sickness absence can be a warning sign that an employee is at risk of leaving the workforce and becoming economically inactive,' he said. 'Employers have a key role to play in ensuring that workers are provided with adequate sick pay and are actively supported during sickness absence. 'Our analysis shows that the UK statutory sick pay rate is among the least generous across all OECD countries. 'Workers without occupational sick pay are at a greater risk of either working through illness or leaving work altogether.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Mental health sick days soar by 5m in just a year
Britons took an extra 5m sick days for mental health reasons last year after a surge in conditions including stress, anxiety and depression. Staff took a record 20.5m days off because of mental health in 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics, up from 14.8m in 2023. This accounted for 13.7pc of all sick days taken in Britain, the highest proportion since 2019. Jamie O'Halloran, senior research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the figures reflect 'the tip of the iceberg' as many employees continue working even when they are unwell. He said: 'We must do more to prevent avoidable ill health and create workplaces that support people with health conditions to get into – and stay in – work. 'The lack of progress on mental health is particularly alarming and must become a greater priority for both public health policy and employer strategy.' Poor mental health appears to be more prevalent in the public sector, where it accounted for 16.4pc of absences last year – compared with 6.7pc in the private sector. There has been a surge in diagnoses of mental health conditions such as anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Overall ill health is also more problematic in the public sector, where it accounts for an absence rate of 2.9pc compared with 1.8pc for private companies. The latest figures also show that it is not only those in work taking time off because of sickness. The number of people of working age who are economically inactive – neither in work nor looking for a job – because of ill health has surged to 2.8m, up from 2.1m before the Covid pandemic. In total, workers took 149m sick days in 2024, which is down 10pc on the previous year. The number of days taken for minor illnesses dropped by a third to 33m, while workers took 26.5m days for musculoskeletal problems, roughly the same as 2023. The overall sickness rate, which charts absences as a share of all working hours, fell to 2pc. As a result the proportion of sick days is back to its pre-pandemic level. Sam Atwell, at the Health Foundation, a charity, said sick employees must be supported to prevent them from dropping out of work altogether. 'Employers and government alike should be concerned by these findings as extended or repeated episodes of sickness absence can be a warning sign that an employee is at risk of leaving the workforce and becoming economically inactive,' he said. 'Employers have a key role to play in ensuring that workers are provided with adequate sick pay and are actively supported during sickness absence. 'Our analysis shows that the UK statutory sick pay rate is among the least generous across all OECD countries. 'Workers without occupational sick pay are at a greater risk of either working through illness or leaving work altogether.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
How to be more assertive and stop saying sorry
'Are you paying cash or card?', asked the man behind the counter of my local corner shop when I popped in to buy a carton of milk a couple of weeks ago. 'Oh, I'm so sorry,' I said, 'I don't carry cash any more, so I'll need to pay by card.' At this the man, who's previously told me he comes from Turkey, looked at me quizzically and responded: 'Why are you saying sorry? You British are always saying sorry to everything! I just told you, it's fine to pay by card.' Over the next couple of days, I realised he had a point as I caught myself saying 'sorry' on multiple occasions when I had nothing to apologise for. At my group tennis coaching class, every time I hit a ball out of the court, I'd yell out an apology to the person on the other side of the net, despite the fact they were mis-hitting as many balls as I was. In the train carriage on my way to a meeting when hay fever got the better of me, I followed each sneeze with a 'sorry', even though the carriage was fairly empty and nobody was sitting next to me. When I replied to a work email requesting me to invoice for an article I'd written, I began: 'Sorry it's taken me a while to get this over to you', even though my response was written less than three hours after the original message popped into my inbox. And, most dramatically, when my next-door neighbour reversed straight into my car on our shared drive – even though I was stationary – I got out and found myself saying 'sorry' to him, although the prang was clearly his fault. (Fortunately, he admitted this and only a tiny bit of damage was done.) While my enthusiasm for apologising may at first glance sound over the top, in fact, there is nothing at all unusual about it, according to new research. Indeed, Britons typically utter the word 'sorry' nine times a day – adding up to an incredible 3,285 times a year, the study commissioned by Interflora found. And, just as I do, the researchers discovered 90 per cent of Britons routinely apologise for things which aren't their fault, such as someone bumping into them, trying to squeeze past a person in a queue, or accidentally interrupting someone. Psychotherapist Tim Arthur confirms, 'the phenomenon of excessive apologising is something I encounter frequently in my practice'. He adds that the prevalence of a 'cultural script' of politeness is one of the most distinctive aspects of Britishness. A 'cultural script', he explains, is a socially shared pattern of behaviour and communication that becomes almost automatic. 'In Britain, this often manifests as a reflexive tendency to apologise, even when no harm has been caused or when the fault clearly lies elsewhere.' According to Arthur, ours is not the only culture where the frequency and reflexivity of apologising are particularly marked, with Japan and New Zealand being the other two countries with a similar tendency. 'In Japan, for example, apologising is integral to maintaining social harmony, often functioning as a ritualistic expression of respect rather than an admission of guilt,' he says. 'Meanwhile, in New Zealand, there is also a notable tendency towards modesty and self-effacement, partly influenced by Maori cultural values that emphasise humility and collective well-being. Similar to Britain, New Zealanders may apologise pre-emptively to mitigate any perceived disruption or imposition.' But, while we may find apologetic companions in these places, they are far from typical, says Arthur. In cultures with more individualistic orientations, such as the United States or most European countries, directness is often valued over excessive politeness. 'Here, apologies are more likely to be seen as an admission of culpability rather than a routine social lubricant.' The roots of our excessive politeness in the UK can often be traced back to childhood and early family dynamics, suggests Arthur. Individuals raised in environments where conflict was minimised or where there was a high value placed on keeping the peace may develop a conditioned response to avoid confrontation at all costs. This certainly strikes a chord with me. My early upbringing was very much focused on living in a harmonious household, avoiding arguments – even when an occasion could have easily warranted one. Moreover, educational settings can reinforce this pattern, says Arthur. 'In many British schools, children are encouraged to be 'good' and 'polite', with non-compliance often framed as problematic. This early conditioning can make assertiveness feel socially risky or even transgressive,' he says. Again, I recognise that the ethos of my girls' school would definitely fit with this description and also helps explain my adult behaviour. But if repeatedly saying 'sorry' and displaying politeness are such norms in our society, where's the harm? Why can't we just keep apologising and carry on as we are? Unfortunately, says Arthur, over-apologising can have several negative psychological repercussions. 'Firstly, it may undermine self-worth, as the habitual admission of fault can erode one's sense of competence,' he says. 'My clients often report feeling 'invisible' or taken advantage of when their apologies become a reflex rather than a considered response.' He adds that from an interpersonal standpoint, habitual apologising can also alter power dynamics. 'In professional settings, it may signal submissiveness or lack of confidence, inadvertently leading to being overlooked or undervalued. As one of my client's insightfully noted, 'It's like I'm constantly taking up less space, just in case someone else needs more',' he says. So, it's clearly time for me and my fellow sorry-sayers to get a grip and learn some techniques to prevent ourselves from becoming doormats. Not that I'd ever want to become rude or aggressive, but rather it would be helpful to reframe our behaviour so as not to perennially suggest that we are at fault for whatever life throws at us. Arthur points to a technique called 'cognitive restructuring' as being helpful in this regard. This challenges the belief that politeness requires self-deprecation and instead of defaulting to 'sorry', this is replaced with affirmative language that maintains respect without implying any sort of mistake. 'For example, instead of saying 'sorry for taking up your time', you could try saying 'thank you for your patience',' Arthur suggests. He also encourages 'mindfulness' when speaking – or, put simply, being aware of the automatic responses that come out of our mouths. 'When you notice an apology forming, make yourself pause, assess the situation, and consciously choose a response that reflects your true intent.' Clearly this is going to take some practice after years of ingrained behaviour and, indeed, Arthur says in his practice the training often involves repetitive role-play scenarios, where his clients practice replacing apologies with clear statements of intent. 'This can involve using 'I' statements to express feelings without attributing blame, such as: 'I'd like to share my perspective on this,' or 'I prefer to approach it this way'.' Keen to work this through, I also book in a session with executive coach Sara Cremer who, like Arthur, works closely with clients to achieve the sweet spot between politeness, respect and assertiveness and who has some useful tips to incorporate into daily and working life (see below). Armed with their expert advice, have I noticed any change in recent days? I have indeed consciously stopped myself beginning emails with the word 'Sorry'. I was also rather chuffed with what I managed to say at my last tennis coaching session about one of my wayward shots. Rather than the 's' word, I joked, 'Well, that's not going to give Roger Federer anything to worry about!' Meanwhile, back at my corner shop this morning, as I bought a loaf of bread and was asked, 'Cash or card?', I simply replied: 'Card, please.' My reward was a friendly smile and a nod from the shopkeeper. I seem to be making progress. Think about your body language: standing tall, maintaining eye contact and using open gestures can communicate confidence and assertiveness, even when words are kept polite. Use positive words: replace 'sorry' with affirmative language that avoids suggestion of a mistake. For example, instead of saying 'sorry the meeting has overrun', you could try saying, 'what a fascinating discussion we've had'. Think before you speak: rather than talking on autopilot, consider what you're saying and each time you sense an apology coming, force yourself to pause and replace it with a positive phrase instead. State how you feel: to get your point across, think of a three-point script, with the three points starting: 'When you', 'I feel' and 'The consequences are'. So, for example, 'When you don't stand up for me when your mother is criticising my parenting, I feel deeply hurt and unsupported. As a consequence, I will let you take the children to your parents on your own next time.' In this way, you are noticing a behaviour, not ascribing intent or emotion to it. And the consequence adds in a boundary. Don't use email or WhatsApp: these are terrible methods for complex or nuanced communication, fraught with the possibility for misunderstanding, particularly if you want to be assertive about something you're not happy with. Instead arrange a time to have a face-to-face conversation to talk it through. Don't assert in anger: wait 20 minutes. If you're properly wound up by something get out of the house or office, go get a coffee, walk about for a while. Don't be assertive while you're still wound up as you won't come across as assertive, you'll come across as ranty. It's much better to be calm when making your point. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.