How to be more assertive and stop saying sorry
'Are you paying cash or card?', asked the man behind the counter of my local corner shop when I popped in to buy a carton of milk a couple of weeks ago. 'Oh, I'm so sorry,' I said, 'I don't carry cash any more, so I'll need to pay by card.'
At this the man, who's previously told me he comes from Turkey, looked at me quizzically and responded: 'Why are you saying sorry? You British are always saying sorry to everything! I just told you, it's fine to pay by card.'
Over the next couple of days, I realised he had a point as I caught myself saying 'sorry' on multiple occasions when I had nothing to apologise for. At my group tennis coaching class, every time I hit a ball out of the court, I'd yell out an apology to the person on the other side of the net, despite the fact they were mis-hitting as many balls as I was.
In the train carriage on my way to a meeting when hay fever got the better of me, I followed each sneeze with a 'sorry', even though the carriage was fairly empty and nobody was sitting next to me.
When I replied to a work email requesting me to invoice for an article I'd written, I began: 'Sorry it's taken me a while to get this over to you', even though my response was written less than three hours after the original message popped into my inbox.
And, most dramatically, when my next-door neighbour reversed straight into my car on our shared drive – even though I was stationary – I got out and found myself saying 'sorry' to him, although the prang was clearly his fault. (Fortunately, he admitted this and only a tiny bit of damage was done.)
While my enthusiasm for apologising may at first glance sound over the top, in fact, there is nothing at all unusual about it, according to new research. Indeed, Britons typically utter the word 'sorry' nine times a day – adding up to an incredible 3,285 times a year, the study commissioned by Interflora found.
And, just as I do, the researchers discovered 90 per cent of Britons routinely apologise for things which aren't their fault, such as someone bumping into them, trying to squeeze past a person in a queue, or accidentally interrupting someone.
Psychotherapist Tim Arthur confirms, 'the phenomenon of excessive apologising is something I encounter frequently in my practice'. He adds that the prevalence of a 'cultural script' of politeness is one of the most distinctive aspects of Britishness. A 'cultural script', he explains, is a socially shared pattern of behaviour and communication that becomes almost automatic. 'In Britain, this often manifests as a reflexive tendency to apologise, even when no harm has been caused or when the fault clearly lies elsewhere.'
According to Arthur, ours is not the only culture where the frequency and reflexivity of apologising are particularly marked, with Japan and New Zealand being the other two countries with a similar tendency.
'In Japan, for example, apologising is integral to maintaining social harmony, often functioning as a ritualistic expression of respect rather than an admission of guilt,' he says. 'Meanwhile, in New Zealand, there is also a notable tendency towards modesty and self-effacement, partly influenced by Maori cultural values that emphasise humility and collective well-being. Similar to Britain, New Zealanders may apologise pre-emptively to mitigate any perceived disruption or imposition.'
But, while we may find apologetic companions in these places, they are far from typical, says Arthur. In cultures with more individualistic orientations, such as the United States or most European countries, directness is often valued over excessive politeness. 'Here, apologies are more likely to be seen as an admission of culpability rather than a routine social lubricant.'
The roots of our excessive politeness in the UK can often be traced back to childhood and early family dynamics, suggests Arthur. Individuals raised in environments where conflict was minimised or where there was a high value placed on keeping the peace may develop a conditioned response to avoid confrontation at all costs. This certainly strikes a chord with me. My early upbringing was very much focused on living in a harmonious household, avoiding arguments – even when an occasion could have easily warranted one.
Moreover, educational settings can reinforce this pattern, says Arthur. 'In many British schools, children are encouraged to be 'good' and 'polite', with non-compliance often framed as problematic. This early conditioning can make assertiveness feel socially risky or even transgressive,' he says. Again, I recognise that the ethos of my girls' school would definitely fit with this description and also helps explain my adult behaviour.
But if repeatedly saying 'sorry' and displaying politeness are such norms in our society, where's the harm? Why can't we just keep apologising and carry on as we are?
Unfortunately, says Arthur, over-apologising can have several negative psychological repercussions. 'Firstly, it may undermine self-worth, as the habitual admission of fault can erode one's sense of competence,' he says. 'My clients often report feeling 'invisible' or taken advantage of when their apologies become a reflex rather than a considered response.'
He adds that from an interpersonal standpoint, habitual apologising can also alter power dynamics. 'In professional settings, it may signal submissiveness or lack of confidence, inadvertently leading to being overlooked or undervalued. As one of my client's insightfully noted, 'It's like I'm constantly taking up less space, just in case someone else needs more',' he says.
So, it's clearly time for me and my fellow sorry-sayers to get a grip and learn some techniques to prevent ourselves from becoming doormats. Not that I'd ever want to become rude or aggressive, but rather it would be helpful to reframe our behaviour so as not to perennially suggest that we are at fault for whatever life throws at us.
Arthur points to a technique called 'cognitive restructuring' as being helpful in this regard. This challenges the belief that politeness requires self-deprecation and instead of defaulting to 'sorry', this is replaced with affirmative language that maintains respect without implying any sort of mistake. 'For example, instead of saying 'sorry for taking up your time', you could try saying 'thank you for your patience',' Arthur suggests.
He also encourages 'mindfulness' when speaking – or, put simply, being aware of the automatic responses that come out of our mouths. 'When you notice an apology forming, make yourself pause, assess the situation, and consciously choose a response that reflects your true intent.'
Clearly this is going to take some practice after years of ingrained behaviour and, indeed, Arthur says in his practice the training often involves repetitive role-play scenarios, where his clients practice replacing apologies with clear statements of intent. 'This can involve using 'I' statements to express feelings without attributing blame, such as: 'I'd like to share my perspective on this,' or 'I prefer to approach it this way'.'
Keen to work this through, I also book in a session with executive coach Sara Cremer who, like Arthur, works closely with clients to achieve the sweet spot between politeness, respect and assertiveness and who has some useful tips to incorporate into daily and working life (see below).
Armed with their expert advice, have I noticed any change in recent days? I have indeed consciously stopped myself beginning emails with the word 'Sorry'. I was also rather chuffed with what I managed to say at my last tennis coaching session about one of my wayward shots. Rather than the 's' word, I joked, 'Well, that's not going to give Roger Federer anything to worry about!'
Meanwhile, back at my corner shop this morning, as I bought a loaf of bread and was asked, 'Cash or card?', I simply replied: 'Card, please.' My reward was a friendly smile and a nod from the shopkeeper. I seem to be making progress.
Think about your body language: standing tall, maintaining eye contact and using open gestures can communicate confidence and assertiveness, even when words are kept polite.
Use positive words: replace 'sorry' with affirmative language that avoids suggestion of a mistake. For example, instead of saying 'sorry the meeting has overrun', you could try saying, 'what a fascinating discussion we've had'.
Think before you speak: rather than talking on autopilot, consider what you're saying and each time you sense an apology coming, force yourself to pause and replace it with a positive phrase instead.
State how you feel: to get your point across, think of a three-point script, with the three points starting: 'When you', 'I feel' and 'The consequences are'. So, for example, 'When you don't stand up for me when your mother is criticising my parenting, I feel deeply hurt and unsupported. As a consequence, I will let you take the children to your parents on your own next time.' In this way, you are noticing a behaviour, not ascribing intent or emotion to it. And the consequence adds in a boundary.
Don't use email or WhatsApp: these are terrible methods for complex or nuanced communication, fraught with the possibility for misunderstanding, particularly if you want to be assertive about something you're not happy with. Instead arrange a time to have a face-to-face conversation to talk it through.
Don't assert in anger: wait 20 minutes. If you're properly wound up by something get out of the house or office, go get a coffee, walk about for a while. Don't be assertive while you're still wound up as you won't come across as assertive, you'll come across as ranty. It's much better to be calm when making your point.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at
Jun. 6—John D.H. Harris John D.H. Harris passed away May 4, 2025 at a local hospital. He was in poor health for some months prior. Survivors are wife of 41 years, Mary Harris, son David Minall (Tracey), daughter Pam Gilsenan, grandchildren Leanne Minall (Tom), Ross Minall, Liam Gilsenan, Kerry Gilsenan. Katharine Ofcarzik (Rick). John was born April 1933 in Surrey, England. He received a Technical degree in England and rose to chief engineer at Decca Radar in London with a specialty in telecommunications. He emigrated to the U.S. in 1968 and began working in various technical fields, leading to a long career in General Instrument. He was remarkable for his contributions to many branches of creative engineering: if you ever used high definition television, a satellite dish, an IBM machine, a programmable thermostat, or driven a GM or Ford card with computerized dashboard, you have met John Harris. After retiring from GI, he worked for a local firm producing medical research equipment, including Laser Tweezers. In his own LLC company, he completed diverse projects for Los Alamos, Sandia, as well as for private individuals and companies. He was coding on his computer well up until poor health overtook him. At home, he also crafted model airplanes and grew tomatoes. Friends and acquaintances recall John as a warm and generous man, with a British wit and sense of humor that never quit. He was dedicated to high technology that has improved daily life for mankind. And no job was too small for him to lend a hand. John loved the East Mountains. It reminded him of England and Wales. He will remain with us in the East Mountains where he wished to stay. A Celebration of Life service is planned and will be announced in the near future.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
As King Charles prepares to put on a united front with his family at this year's Trooping the Colour, the monarch and estranged son Prince Harry are nowhere near ending their rift. "There is no turning back," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital. "King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication," she shared. "Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." King Charles, Prince Harry's Painful Feud 'Damaging' Monarch's Reign As Gutted Son Remains Furious: Expert "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it," Fordwich added. Fordwich's comments came shortly after insiders told People magazine that the monarch, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, is hesitant to reconnect with his son. Many royal observers believe it's the monarch who should take the first step in igniting a royal reconciliation. Read On The Fox News App "The underlying issue is trust," royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the outlet. "The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders told the outlet that the king, 76, isn't surrounded by palace aides urging him to reconcile with his son. Meanwhile, William is said to have "no interest" in extending an olive branch. "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'" royal author Valentine Low told the outlet. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY Fordwich claimed that Harry has crossed such a deep line in Charles's eyes that it's been difficult for the king to forgive his son. Sources close to Harry previously claimed to People magazine that Charles won't respond to his letters or phone calls. "It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, 'Spare'], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him," Fordwich claimed. "The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son." Harry's troubled relationship with his family and the U.K. establishment has played out in public for years – in books, interviews, TV programs and the courts. Harry and his wife, Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. That same year, they moved to California. Since the couple's royal exit, they have aired their grievances and made blistering allegations against the royal family. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir, "Spare," was stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations. Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Harry's rift with his family burst into the open once more with a raw interview he gave to the BBC in May after losing a court case over his security. In a long and at times emotional conversation, Harry said he wanted reconciliation. He admitted that his father, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, won't speak to him. "Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have." "The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them," said Fitzwilliams. "Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them." Low told People magazine that despite Harry's call for peace on the BBC, his comments were seen as another blow to the royals. During the interview, Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said, "I don't know how much longer my father has." "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," said Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royals take great pride in protecting their public image. They've maintained the late Queen Elizabeth II's motto of keep calm and carry on. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "The royals play a positive role to the cameras," he explained. "[But] behind the scenes, they allegedly are constantly bickering with each other… King Charles has a past reputation for not making advances on difficult decisions." A source recently claimed to Us Weekly that William was "absolutely appalled" by Harry's comments to the BBC about their father's health. The insider claimed that the 42-year-old feels like Harry stooped "so low." Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that William is fiercely protective of Charles. The source also told the outlet that it's unlikely that the feuding brothers will reunite while their father is still alive. "The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting]," said the insider. "I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation." Despite infrequent updates from the palace about his health, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. During his sit-down with the BBC, Harry held out little hope of another meeting with his father. "The only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases," he said. Fitzwilliams said that Charles must address his ongoing rift with Harry, 40, as it remains a dark cloud over his reign. "We are now less than a fortnight away from Trooping the Colour, which celebrates the monarch's birthday," he said. "King Charles can surely congratulate himself on negotiating a year where he has worked so hard and achieved a great deal despite battling cancer." "The one area that remains problematic is the rift with the Sussexes. He has only seen Prince Harry once after his diagnosis and then fleetingly." Back in 2024, Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," claimed to Fox News Digital that the king is still unable to forgive his son for casting Camilla as the villain in "Spare." "I think people have to realize that the one thing that Charles finds unforgivable is criticism of Camilla," said Andersen at the time. "There's no criticism of Camilla," Andersen claimed. "And unfortunately for Harry… Harry said some pretty devastating things about her. He made it clear that he felt she was… the villain in the piece. I think that still bothers the king, and I don't know that it will be easy for him to [forgive]. I don't think they'll ever forgive Harry for that." WATCH: PRINCE HARRY'S JABS AT QUEEN CAMILLA UNFORGIVABLE FOR KING CHARLES: EXPERT "[He's] on his own," Andersen added, referring to the Duke of Sussex. In televised interviews to promote the book, Harry accused his stepmother, 77, of leaking private conversations to the media to burnish her own reputation. He accused members of the royal family of getting "into bed with the devil" to gain favorable tabloid coverage, singling out Camilla's efforts to rehabilitate her image with the public after her longtime affair with his father. "That made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press," Harry told CBS ahead of his book launch. "There was open willingness on both sides to trade information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street." The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reside in the wealthy coastal city of Montecito with their two young article source: King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

Hypebeast
20 hours ago
- Hypebeast
The Reebok x MANORS Collaboration Lights Tradition on Fire
Summary Reebokand British golf brandMANORShave teamed up for the first time on a capsule that pulls golf style forward by looking back. Rooted in British sportswear heritage, the Reebok x MANORS collection reimagines '90s performance through a modern golf lens. This is to say, less focused on etiquette and more on exploration. The footwear lineup is led by the OG Pump Golf ($225 USD), a saddle-style silhouette that blends Reebok's iconic basketball tech with classic golf design cues. Crafted from premium, weatherproof leather in navy and white, it's finished with yellow accents, embossed, all-over MANORS detailing and a spikeless traction outsole. It's a nod to traditional golf style, but with a touch of flair. The Club C Revenge Vintage ($130 USD) completes the set in navy and burgundy colorways built for the clubhouse, city or wherever the round ends. On the apparel side, Reebok's sport DNA meets MANORS' utility-first mindset. Relaxed shooter shirts, straight-leg nylon pants, and tech-infused caps with zip cords and zippered pockets lean into functional style that moves beyond the course. It's all built around MANORS core pieces with intentional additions on behalf of Reebok that speak to a true partnerships. The result is a collection that brings energy back to golf through design that remembers its roots as a simple game played on foot. The Reebok x MANORS collection drops globally on June 10 at 10AM EST