China says it may speed up rare earths application approvals from EU
[SHANGHAI] China is willing to accelerate the examination and approval of rare earth exports to European Union firms and will also deliver a verdict on its trade investigation of EU brandy imports by Jul 5, its commerce ministry said on Saturday (Jun 7).
Price commitment consultations between China and the EU on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs) exported to the EU have also entered a final stage but efforts from both sides are still needed, according to a statement on the Chinese Commerce Ministry's website.
The issues were discussed between Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Paris on Tuesday, according to the statement.
The comments mark progress on matters that have vexed China's relationship with the EU over the past year.
Most recently, China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world.
The ministry said China attached great importance to the EU's concerns and 'was willing to establish a green channel for qualified applications to speed up the approval process'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In a separate statement the commerce ministry issued later on Saturday, it said China was willing to further strengthen communication and dialogue with relevant countries on rare earth export controls as it recognised that demand from sectors such as robotics and EVs had risen.
Brandy, EVs
The ministry earlier said that Commerce Minister Wang during the meeting 'expressed the hope that the EU will meet us halfway and take effective measures to facilitate, safeguard and promote compliant trade in high-tech products to China'.
Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39 per cent on imports of European brandy – with French cognac bearing the brunt – have also strained relations between Paris and Beijing.
The brandy duties were enforced days after the EU took action against Chinese-made EV imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of 'pure retaliation'.
The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell and Remy Cointreau.
Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the brandy duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to Jul 5.
China's Commerce Ministry said on Saturday that French companies and relevant associations had proactively submitted applications on price commitments for brandy to China and that Chinese investigators had reached an agreement with them on the core terms.
Chinese authorities were now reviewing the complete text on those commitments and would issue a final announcement before Jul 5, it said.
In April, the European Commission said the EU and China had also agreed to look into setting minimum prices of Chinese-made EVs instead of tariffs imposed by the EU last year.
China's commerce ministry said the EU had also proposed exploring 'new technical paths' relating to EVs, which the Chinese side was now evaluating. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
23 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Abbas tells Macron he supports demilitarisation of Hamas
In a letter addressed to the French president, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas outlined the steps he thinks are necessary to end the war in Gaza and achieve peace in the Middle East. PHOTO: REUTERS PARIS - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said that Hamas 'must hand over its weapons' and called for the deployment of international forces to protect 'the Palestinian people', France announced on June 10. In a letter addressed on June 9 to French President Emmanuel Macron and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who this month will co-chair a conference on a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, Mr Abbas outlined the main steps that he thinks must be taken to end the war in Gaza and achieve peace in the Middle East. 'Hamas will no longer rule Gaza and must hand over its weapons and military capabilities to the Palestinian Security Forces,' wrote Mr Abbas. He said he was 'ready to invite Arab and international forces to be deployed as part of a stabilisation/protection mission with a United Nations (UN) Security Council mandate.' The conference at UN headquarters later this month will aim to resurrect the idea of a two-state solution – Israel currently controls large parts of the Palestinian territories. 'We are ready to conclude within a clear and binding timeline, and with international support, supervision and guarantees, a peace agreement that ends the Israeli occupation and resolves all outstanding and final status issues,' Mr Abbas wrote. 'Hamas has to immediately release all hostages and captives,' he added. In a statement, the Elysee Palace welcomed 'concrete and unprecedented commitments, demonstrating a real willingness to move towards the implementation of the two-state solution.' Mr Macron has said he is 'determined' to recognise a Palestinian state, but also set out several conditions, including the 'demilitarisation' of Hamas. In his letter, Mr Abbas reaffirmed his commitment to reform the Palestinian Authority and confirmed his intention to hold presidential and general elections 'within a year' under international auspices. 'The Palestinian State should be the sole provider of security on its territory, but has no intention to be a militarised State.' France has long championed a two-state solution, including after the October 7, 2023 attack by Palestinian militants Hamas on Israel. But formal recognition by Paris of a Palestinian state would mark a major policy shift and risk antagonising Israel, which insists that such moves by foreign states are premature. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Why Trump's deployment of military in California is so controversial
US President Donald Trump ordered California National Guard to dispatch at least 2,000 soldiers to LA to control thousands of demonstrators. PHOTO: REUTERS Why Trump's deployment of military in California is so controversial President Donald Trump ordered the California National Guard on June 7 to dispatch at least 2,000 soldiers to the Los Angeles area as thousands of people demonstrating against immigration raids clashed with security forces. After vandalism and violence broke out, the Pentagon escalated the federal response by also mobilising 700 active-duty Marines. The president said on his Truth Social platform that federal agencies were to take 'all such action necessary' to stop what he called 'migrant riots'. The rare move by a president to mobilise military forces to quell domestic unrest was quickly condemned as unnecessary and counterproductive by local authorities, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom. On June 9, California sued the Trump administration over its 'illegal' deployment of state troops and US Marines, claiming it had overstepped its authority. What is the National Guard? The National Guard has its roots in the colonial militias formed in the 1600s to defend the colonies against Native Americans and European powers, making it the oldest component of the US military. As the militias evolved and became more organised and professional, National Guard units were founded in all the states and US territories. Presently, the National Guard comprises more than 325,000 members recruited mostly from the communities they serve as a state-based reserve force to assist with emergency responses to natural disasters and civil unrest. Most members are civilians who volunteer to serve part-time. They are also available for federal service, including overseas deployments. Who normally calls on the National Guard, and why? State governors typically coordinate the activation of guard troops to respond to local events, from wildfires to floods, when civil authorities are overwhelmed. When the guard is called in to help restore order, state and local law enforcement agencies remain responsible for security. On some occasions, the president has deployed National Guard troops to respond to civil unrest and rioting. President Lyndon Johnson, for example, deployed National Guard soldiers under federal control in Detroit, Chicago and Baltimore to help quell race riots in the late 1960s. This was in response to requests for federal assistance from state and territorial governors. Likewise, President George H.W. Bush activated the California National Guard in 1992 at the request of Governor Pete Wilson and Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley when rioting broke out in the city following a jury's acquittal of police officers charged with severely beating a Black man, Rodney King, after a high-speed car chase. The last time a president has activated a state's National Guard without a request from the governor was in 1965, when President Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators. Under what circumstances can the president call on the military? The law strictly limits the federal deployment of troops within US borders. The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, along with amendments and supporting regulations, generally bars the use of the active-duty US military - the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines - from carrying out domestic law enforcement. Important exceptions to the 1878 law are contained in the 1807 Insurrection Act and its modern iterations, which allow the president, without congressional approval, to employ the military for domestic use in certain circumstances. The Insurrection Act has been used very rarely to deploy troops under federal control domestically without a request from a state government, with examples mostly dating from the Civil Rights era. The law on which Trump relied to unilaterally dispatch California National Guard troops to Los Angeles - a provision of Title X of the US Code - permits domestic deployment only in cases of invasion by a foreign nation, rebellion, or danger of a rebellion. The president's June 7 proclamation gives Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth the authority to direct troops to take 'reasonably necessary' actions to protect immigration agents and other federal workers and federal property. It also permits him to use members of the regular armed forces 'as necessary to augment and support the protection of federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion'. Mr Trump and top officials in his administration have sought to justify the current Los Angeles deployments by arguing that local and state officials have failed to restore order. The president joined White House border czar Tom Homan in suggesting that Newsom should be arrested over his handling of the unrest. In its legal challenge, California is arguing that the president has abused his authority, saying there is no rebellion or invasion that justifies Mr Trump sending troops into Los Angeles. How else has the National Guard been controversial? Perhaps the most infamous deployment in modern history was in May 1970 when the Ohio National Guard opened fire on a crowd of students at Kent State University, who were protesting the Vietnam War and President Richard Nixon's announcement of an invasion into Cambodia. The resulting deaths of four students and injuries to nine others sparked widespread outrage. In his first term, Mr Trump asked state governors to send troops to Washington to curb protests that erupted after the murder of Mr George Floyd in 2020. Years later, former Defence Secretary Mark Esper testified to a House committee that he and others had to convince Mr Trump there was no legal justification for that use of the military. At the time Mr Trump felt the unrest in the wake of Mr Floyd's murder in Minnesota made the US look weak, Esper told the committee. As he campaigned for a second term, Mr Trump made clear he wanted to be more aggressive in using the military. At an event in Iowa in 2023 he labelled several big cities 'crime dens' and said he previously held back from sending in the military. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Chinese tourists ramp up European summer trips, as Americans cut back
Overall, Chinese tourists are being tighter with their budgets than most of their global counterparts. PHOTO: REUTERS Newly cost-sensitive Americans may be hitting the breaks on their big European vacations this summer, but another group is taking up the slack: Chinese travellers. According to a survey about long-haul trips the European Travel Commission (ETC) is publishing on June 10, which was previewed exclusively with Bloomberg, 72 per cent of Chinese respondents say they plan to travel to Europe this summer – up 10 per cent from 2024. The figures reflect the highest demand from Chinese travellers since the pandemic. That should elicit a sigh of relief for hoteliers, restaurateurs and other business owners across the continent who depend on big-spending foreign tourists. Before Chinese outbound tourism ground to a halt in 2020, it represented a particularly lucrative sector in Europe, with Chinese travellers coming in second to Americans in spending. Chinese tourists spent US$251 billion (S$323 billion) abroad in 2024, according to UN tourism, surpassing pre-2020 levels. That makes China the largest market in terms of overall tourism spending, even if until recently most of this revenue was spent on trips within Asia. But there's a significant catch in ETC's findings: Chinese tourists do not plan to spend like they used to. That is notable, given the group's previous propensity for luxury shopping. In fact, just 29 per cent of respondents say they plan to spend more than €200 ($290) per day, a 44 per cent drop compared to last summer, and a majority of Chinese travelers – 54 per cent – plan to limit their budgets between €100 to €200 a day. Even still, at least 53 per cent of Chinese respondents in ETC's report indicate shopping will play at least some role on their trips, and budgets are more generous among business travellers, 36 per cent of whom expect to spend more than €200 a day. Overall, Chinese tourists are being tighter with their budgets than most of their global counterparts. The ETC's survey queried 7,100 long-haul travellers from Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, South Korea and the US about their summer travel intentions – and results show that a total of 11 per cent of travellers to Europe will be lowering their spending this summer. The overall ratio of travellers spending only €100 to €200 per day – 40 per cent – was lower than the Chinese traveller percentages. The reality is that in a climate of economic uncertainty, few travellers are splurging – regardless of their origins. That is echoed in data from the World Travel & Tourism Council showing that tourism growth is expected to slow sharply in 2025. Only a third of the ETC's American respondents are planning trips to Europe this summer, which is 7 per cent fewer than in 2024. And yet another three markets surveyed in the ETC report – Brazil, Canada and Japan – are on the decline, to a lesser degree. High travel costs and plans to vacation locally are the primary deterrents. Mr Eduardo Santander, chief executive officer of the ETC, sees reasons for optimism. 'While recovery from China has been more gradual than other long-haul markets, momentum is clearly building,' he said. Building back business with these travelers, he added, 'remains a top priority for many European destinations.' In other words, it's a relief that Chinese travellers are coming at all. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
