Trump's Anti-Immigrant Policies Are Impacting Asylum Seekers, US Citizens, and More: What to Know
Bloomberg/Getty Images
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
Disappearing students off of city streets, sending asylum seekers to third-country prisons, storming sanctuary cities, and even deporting a US citizen child who has cancer. That's the Trump administration's 'mass deportation' agenda in action. Now, in an effort to stomp out righteous dissent from communities demanding an end to these cruel tactics, the administration's tactics include sending in the National Guard and active-duty US Marines against the very people they have sworn to protect.
These are scary times, and Trump's actions hurt everyone, regardless of immigration status. When we deny due process to some, it erodes access to due process for us all.
Our job as litigators is to defend our clients in court, regardless of who is in office. We've done that under Republican and Democratic administrations alike, and we have already secured critical victories. We know we are on the right side of the law and the right side of history. But we also know that courtroom success is only truly powerful if the community is in the fight with us.
As tensions escalate in Los Angeles and nationwide, we need to stay grounded and educated on how we can best show up for one another. Each of us, regardless of where we live and where we were born, should take a stand today in defense of due process and dignity for our immigrant communities.
Here's what we know about who is being swept up in Trump's immigration dragnet, and what we can all do to push back and keep one another safe.
Trump has always focused his attention on those here without authorization — this is nothing new. It's also not new that this rhetoric lacks any nuance or room for facts. When you paint an entire population as 'illegal,' you make it more permissible to strip them of rights or due process. This administration has also been frustrated by what it sees as the slow pace of deportations, and representatives are widening their definition of who is 'illegal' so they can deport as many people as possible.
The first thing to know is that seeking asylum is a legal process, and the United States has a legal and moral obligation to ensure that people seeking asylum are not sent back to danger. The Trump administration is ignoring this obligation, and it's using to its advantage the fact that the asylum system is unnecessarily and wildly complex.
As advocates and members of immigrant communities know well, politicians have a long-standing obsession with doing things 'the right way' that is not grounded in reality, nor an earnest desire for practical solutions that provide accessible pathways to lawful immigration status.
Caught up in the administration's broad definition of 'illegal' are people who are actively trying to apply for asylum or adjust their legal status by applying for more long-term status, which can take years — if not decades — to achieve, even when they do everything the government asks of them. If you don't believe us, just look at some of the many examples of people who have been detained and deported when they show up for a check-in with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or to their immigration-court hearings.
This includes people like Andry José Hernández Romero, a gay hairdresser from Venezuela who was unlawfully deported to CECOT, a mega-prison in El Salvador, alongside hundreds of other men. Andry, a client of Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), was seeking asylum in the United States, and our colleagues only learned of his disappearance after they showed up to defend him at his scheduled court hearing and he wasn't there.
Also caught up in this administration's definition of 'illegal' are unaccompanied immigrant children who may have to represent themselves in court after the Trump administration revoked federal funding for legal services for infants and kids seeking asylum in the US. This unlawful action removed attorneys and legal support from at least 26,000 children for over a month, in direct violation of the law and a federal court order. It's villainous and morally corrupt, but it's also a clear violation of federal law under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.
Justice Action Center (JAC), ImmDef, and Amica Center for Immigrant Rights have come together with partners and service providers to sue the Trump administration for its failure to provide funding for children's legal representation, and a court has already told Trump that it must continue to do so.
But the government openly refused to comply with the court's order for almost a month — just as it refused to comply with another court's order to facilitate the return of Kilmar Garcia Abrego, just as it refused to comply with yet another court's order not to remove people to CECOT in El Salvador.
In recent weeks an appeals court denied the government's attempt to pause the district court's ruling in our case. Every day that the Trump administration tries to evade its obligations to fund legal representation for unaccompanied children, it prevents kids from having their best advocates with them and compounds the risks and impacts to children and legal-service providers.
This administration is feverishly pushing its deportation agenda, and in order to do that, its representatives are the ones who are flouting the law: recklessly stripping away lawful protections and yanking the rug out from under millions of people who have overcome tremendous legal obstacles and personal hardship to call this country home.
The Trump administration is both ignoring and trying to remove the rights of immigrants with active lawful status. This includes the 875,000 migrants who came to the United States through a humanitarian parole process Trump is attempting to end.
Many of these individuals came to the US via a sponsorship model grounded in legal authority that has been used by Republican and Democratic administrations alike for more than 70 years. The JAC team is currently fighting the administration's unlawful attempts to revoke humanitarian parole pathways and strip participants of their lawful status; and JAC and partners had secured critical victories in federal court before the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to continue with its plans to remove protections from hundreds of thousands of people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
The administration is also attempting to remove the protections of hundreds of thousands of people with temporary protected status, or TPS, which has provided a safe and legal way to offer protections for people who need refuge from certain countries embroiled in violence or instability. Litigators and their clients also made significant headway in the courts to block the Trump administration's moves before the Supreme Court once again allowed the administration to proceed with its cruel agenda.
These are people who have done everything the US government has asked of them, and the government is now failing to uphold its side of the bargain. As we said before, it was never about immigrants just needing to do things 'the right way.'
We've been hearing from many folks who wonder whether and how this will impact them — and how we can fight back, especially as the president escalates his rhetoric and actions against immigrants and those who vocally support them.
We should all be wary of a presidential administration that is actively and unlawfully seeking to widen the definition of who it considers 'illegal' or 'criminal' and therefore subject to removal from the US — an administration that is also willing to resort to drastic tactics to remove people from their homes, schools, and communities.
Administration representatives are actively creating a larger class of people to subject to their mass-deportation fantasy, and that should concern us all. It's already impacting tourists and students with valid visas, naturalized US citizens who have reported being detained upon reentering the country, and US citizen children of undocumented immigrants.
But there is also a whole lot we can do to fight back and keep one another safe. The first thing to remember is that we do have rights — and knowing them is the first line of defense. Immigrant-community leaders have been doing this work for decades, and we should look to them for guidance.
The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights has an easy-to-access library of actionable Know Your Rights resources in English and Spanish, as does the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Immigrant Defenders Law Center also has a robust compilation of resources and forms for immigrants and their loved ones. Immigrants Rising has shared guidance for undocumented travelers.
For resources in other languages, Asian Americans Advancing Justice has Know Your Rights resources in Arabic, Bengali, Burmese, Chinese, English, Gujarati, Hindi, Karen, Khmer, Korean, Nepali, Punjabi, Urdu, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Thai, and Spanish. Haitian Bridge Alliance is compiling and sharing information in Haitian Kreyol, including specific resources for Haitians impacted by the administration's attacks on TPS and humanitarian parole. ImportaMí also includes resources in Indigenous languages.
Additionally, there are community groups providing resources and training opportunities throughout the country, including in New York, Colorado, Wisconsin, and Tennessee.
If you are worried about your current or pending immigration status, know that you are not alone. Continue to work with your attorney or a local organization like the ones named above for support.
Our inspiration comes from our many incredible clients, people who courageously choose to hold the president to account in the court of law at great risk to themselves, hoping they can make life better for others like them.
Everyone should take inspiration from these clients. They come from all political walks of life. Some were born here; others have arrived recently. But they believe in the promise of a country where no one — not even the president — is above the rule of law.
Collectively, we must continue to fight tirelessly in court and on the streets to shield our communities from this administration's brazen attacks. A more just future is possible, but it's going to take all of us doing our part to make it a reality.
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Want more Teen Vogue immigration coverage?
The School Shooting That History Forgot
I Was Kidnapped After Coming to the U.S. Seeking Asylum
Ronald Reagan Sucked, Actually
The White Supremacist 'Great Replacement Theory' Has Deep Roots
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Takeaways from AP's investigation of US death benefits program for public safety officers
A federal program that provides benefits to families of police officers and firefighters who die and become disabled on duty is rapidly growing while facing criticism for increasing delays in deciding claims. Congress created the Public Safety Officers' Benefits program in 1976 to guarantee that the spouses and children of officers who put their lives on the line would receive financial support. But repeated expansions in eligibility approved by Congress, including three passed in the last five years, have made the program more popular and complex to administer. Critics say the program fails some families by taking too long to grant or deny benefits and making inconsistent rulings. An Associated Press analysis found that hundreds of families are waiting years to learn whether they qualify for payments, and more are ultimately being denied. For one widow, payment came just as she'd given up hope New Jersey widow Sharline Volcy learned this month that she'd been awarded the benefits, more than 3 1/2 years after her husband, Ronald Donat, died while training at the Gwinnett County Police Academy in Georgia. Volcy said she was grateful for the aid, which will provide some financial security and help pay for her two daughters to go to college. But she said the long wait was stressful, when she was told time and again the claim remained under review and ultimately saw her inquiries ignored. 'They told me they didn't know how long it would take because they don't have a deadline. That's the hardest thing to hear,' she said. 'I felt defeated.' She said lawyers didn't want to take the case, and a plea for help to her congressperson went nowhere. She said she'd given up hope and was lucky she had a job as an airport gate agent in the meantime. The benefits program isn't meeting its timeframe goal Volcy's experience isn't unique, and some cases take longer. As of late April, more than 120 claims by surviving relatives or disabled first responders have been awaiting initial determinations or rulings on their appeals for more than five years, according AP's findings. About a dozen have waited over a decade for an answer. The program has a goal of making determinations within one year but has not taken steps to track its progress, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. But roughly three in 10 cases have not met that timeframe in recent years. As of late late April, 900 claims had been pending longer than one year. That includes claims from nearly every state. Republican lawmakers have introduced a bill to require the program to make determinations within 270 days. The denial rate for benefits is up, too Over the last year, the denial rate has increased, with roughly one in three death and disability claims getting rejected. Applicants can appeal to a hearing officer and then the director if they choose, but that isn't common. Many say they can't afford attorneys or want to get on with their lives. Justice Department officials, who oversee the program, say they're making complicated decisions about whether cases meet legal criteria. 'Death and disability claims involving complex medical and causation issues, voluminous evidence and conflicting medical opinions, take longer to determine, as do claims in various stages of appeal,' they said in a statement. Claims have doubled in recent years The program started as a simple $50,000 payout for the families of officers who were fatally shot on duty or died as a result of other violence or dangers. But Congress expanded the program in 1990 to cover some first responders who were disabled on duty, which made some determinations harder to reach. A 1998 law added educational benefits for the spouses and children of those deceased and disabled officers. Since 2020, Congress has passed three laws making many other types of deaths and disabilities eligible, including deaths related to COVID-19, deaths and injuries of those working rescue and cleanup operations after the September 2001 attacks, and responders who committed suicide under certain circumstances. Annual claims have more than doubled in the last five years, from 500 in 2019 to roughly 1,200 today. Critics say a key partnership creates a conflict of interest While many applicants have criticized the increasing delays, the leading group that represents the relatives of officers who die on duty has been silent. Critics say that's because the group, Concerns of Police Survivors, has a financial incentive not to criticize the program, which has awarded it tens of millions of dollars in grant funding in recent decades. The Missouri-based nonprofit recently received a new $6 million grant from the program to for its work with deceased officers' relatives, including counseling, hosting memorial events, educating agencies about the program and assisting with claims. The group's founder and retired executive director, Suzie Sawyer, said she was warned many years ago that fighting too hard for claimants could jeopardize its grant funding. But current spokesperson Sara Slone said advocacy isn't the group's mission and that it works 'hand in hand' with PSOB to assist applicants and provide education about benefits. One widow's fight has been remarkable, supporters say Lisa Afolayan's husband died after a training exercise at the Border Patrol academy more than 16 years ago, but she's still fighting the program for benefits. An autopsy found that Nate Afolayan died from heat illness after completing a 1.5-mile test run in 88 degree heat, at a high altitude in the New Mexico desert. The program had awarded benefits to families after similar training deaths, dating back to an officer who died at an academy in 1988. But its independent investigation blamed Nate's death on sickle cell trait, a genetic condition that's usually benign but has been linked to rare exertion-related deaths in police, military and sports training. The program denied Lisa's claim and her subsequent appeals, arguing the death wasn't the result of heat along and didn't qualify. The program stood by its denial in 2024, even after a federal appeals court said it may have failed to adequately consider the weather's role and violated a law barring discrimination on the basis of genetic information.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gets played as world leaders he admires see through his theatrics
Jen Psaki looks at the effort Donald Trump is putting into trying to make himself look like a third world tough guy even as the tough guy world leaders he admires keep making it clear they don't respect him.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump
A string of protests is planned throughout Greater Cincinnati as part of a nationwide movement opposed to President Donald Trump and his administration. The June 14 "No Kings" protests, organized by activist group Indivisible and its partners, are described as a "nationwide day of defiance." Events are slated to take place in nearly 2,000 communities across the nation to oppose what organizers describe as "corrupt, authoritarian politics." Numerous protests are scheduled to take place in the afternoon locally throughout Greater Cincinnati, including: Cincinnati – University Pavilion (University of Cincinnati): 2618 University Circle, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. Union Township – Veterans Memorial Park: 906 Clough Pike, 45245. Loveland – Loveland Elementary School: 600 Loveland-Madeira Road, Loveland, Ohio 45140. Mason – Intersection of Mason Montgomery Road and Tylersville Road, 45040. West Chester Township – Intersection of Tylersville Road and Cox Lane, 45069. Hamilton – Intersection of South Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard and High Street, 45011. Middletown – Towne Mall: 3461 Towne Blvd., 45005. Oxford – Uptown Park: intersection of Main Street and High Street, 45056. Falling on Flag Day and Trump's birthday, the day of protest is intended to help counter Trump's planned Washington, D.C. military parade. It also coincides with large-scale protests in Los Angeles, which erupted in response to Trump's immigration policy. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. The aggressive crackdown has fueled anger and protests in Los Angeles and across the country, which have led to hundreds of arrests amid occasional violent clashes, vandalism and looting. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on June 8 outside the Butler County Jail to protest the arrest of 19-year-old Honduran immigrant Emerson Colindres, who was detained by ICE agents on June 4 during a routine check-in with immigration officials at the agency's office in Blue Ash. The Enquirer will have reporters covering the protests and will update this story. USA TODAY contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: 'No Kings' protests on June 14 to counter Trump, military parade in DC
