Tech firms face fines up to £60,000 for failing to remove knife crime content
Social media companies will be fined up to £60,000 each time a post relating to knife crime is not removed from their sites in a bid to stop children viewing "sickening" content.
The new sanction expands on previously announced plans to fine individual tech executives up to £10,000 if their platforms fail to remove material advertising or glorifying knives following 48 hours of a police warning.
It means tech platforms and their executives could collectively face up to £70,000 in penalties for every post relating to knife crime they fail to remove, with the new laws applying to online search engines as well as social media platforms and marketplaces.
Crime and policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said the content that young people scroll through every day online "is sickening" adding: "That is why we are now going further than ever to hold to account the tech companies who are not doing enough to safeguard young people from content which incites violence, particularly in young boys."
The sanctions for tech platforms will be introduced via an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill.
It is separate to the Online Safety Bill, which aims to protect children from online harm, which some campaigners and parents have criticised for not going far enough.
The Home Office said today's announcement follows "significant consultation" with the Coalition to Tackle Knife Crime, launched by Sir Keir Starmer in September as part of his bid to half knife offences in a decade.
Patrick Green, chief executive of The Ben Kinsella Trust, a knife prevention charity which is part of the coalition, welcomed the measure, telling Sky News social media companies have "proved themselves to be incapable of self-regulation".
"There's been a real reluctance of social media companies to take action sufficiently quickly. It's shameful, we shouldn't need legislation," he said.
4:05
The Ben Kinsella Trust is named after teenager Ben Kinsella who was fatally stabbed in 2008 on the way home from the pub after celebrating his GCSEs.
Months earlier, Ben had written to then prime minister Gordon Brown to urge his government to tackle knife crime.
Knife crime rates soar
However, the problem has soared since then.
In the year to March 2024, there were 53 teenage victims aged 13-19 in England and Wales, according to the Office for National Statistics. That is a 140% increase on the 22 teenage victims a decade earlier.
Overall, police recorded 54,587 knife-related offences in 2024, up 2% on the previous year and more than double the 26,000 offences recorded in 2014.
Mr Green told Sky News that while knife crime has been happening "long before social media took hold", online content glamorising the possession of a knife is hindering efforts to reduce it.
"There will be pictures of these knives [on social media] with 'follow me' luring young people onto places where these knives are sold. It's never been easier for a child to buy a knife."
'One part of a larger problem'
However, while welcoming today's announcement he said social media was "one part of a larger problem", adding that "provisions of youth services have been decimated" and "much more needs to be done".
The government's plan to halve knife crime in a decade includes banning zombie-style knives and ninja swords, with a nationwide surrender scheme launching in July, and stronger laws for online retailers selling knives.
Ministers also want to increase prison sentences for selling weapons to under-18s and introduce a new offence for possessing a weapon with intent for violence, with a prison sentence of up to four years.
Government 'can't police the internet'
Last month, Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty suggested violent videos viewed online should be used as evidence to prosecute under the new law. He was speaking during a debate he secured on knife crime, in which he criticised a wider culture which "valorises" criminality and gangs in music and the media.
On the measures announced today, the Huntingdon MP told Sky News that while "any measures to help reduce instances of knife crime are hugely welcome", he was doubtful that the sanctions could be effectively enforced.
"The sheer scale of content on social media that glorifies or incites violence is staggering, let alone content returned by search engines," he said.
"The government can't possibly hope to realistically police the internet.
"The government must tackle the culture that promotes and encourages the use of knives and ensure that there are robust consequences to doing so, not simply pretend they will have online content removed."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Keir Starmer grilled by schoolchildren on Messi v Ronaldo debate
Prime Minister Keir Starmer was grilled by schoolchildren during a visit on Thursday - with many keen to know his verdict on the Messi v Ronaldo debate. He visited a school in Essex as he declared the free school meal expansion as a 'down payment' on child poverty and was 'determined' to drive down child poverty and identify its root causes. As the Prime Minister sat with schoolchildren, one child asked him who his favourite footballer was. Mr Starmer, a keen Arsenal fan, said: 'My favourite player at the moment is Saka'. Another child asked who he thought was better: Messi or Ronaldo. After some hesitation, Mr Starmer replied: 'I'm going to go with Messi.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer to pursue bereaved families for tax after winter fuel U-turn
Sir Keir Starmer could pursue bereaved families for tax after his about-turn on winter fuel payments. The Prime Minister promised to make more pensioners eligible for the winter fuel allowance after Rachel Reeves removed it from nearly 10 million people in 2024. Ministers are looking at restoring the payments as a universal benefit and then recouping the money from high-income pensioners when they fill in their tax returns. They have been forced down that route because creating a new means test would be highly complex. However, some in the Government are concerned about a time lag of at least six months between the payment of up to £300 being made and then clawed back. Thousands of people could die in that period, leaving grieving families to pick up the bill. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: ' Chaos reigns in Number 10 with pensioners picking up the bill again. It beggars belief that they're considering slapping a stealth tax on pensioners to clear up their winter fuel mess. 'Not content with that, they're going to come after the bereaved families of deceased pensioners for the money. This is the party that wouldn't stand up to the unions demanding inflation-busting pay rises. 'It's clear there is no plan, Labour just lurch from one disaster to the next. It seems that whichever way they go, pensioners end up battered.' In July 2024, the Chancellor announced that pensioners would not receive the winter fuel payment of up to £300 if they had incomes of more than £11,500. After a disastrous series of local election results, Sir Keir announced plans to hand the payment to more people but did not give any details on numbers. The Chancellor has said she will outline how the new system will work next week when she unveils the spending review, and promised the new system will be in place by this winter. A government source told The Guardian: 'We should never have scrapped the winter fuel payment in the first place, but the whole process of reinstating it has been completely chaotic. 'The optics of us demanding the money back from grieving families are just dire.' Asked on Wednesday about the winter fuel payment, Ms Reeves said: ' We have listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means test, and so we will be making changes to that; they will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter. ' We'll announce the detail of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can. But people should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get a winter fuel payment this winter.' The option of paying to all then asking wealthier people to repay is a similar approach to that taken by Tory chancellor George Osborne when he reduced child benefit eligibility for better-off parents. A senior official at HMRC, Jonathan Athow, told the Treasury select committee that if the tax system were used to make the changes, it would not be possible until 2026. 'We'd have to get to April next year before we knew somebody's income, before we could then make any decisions about how [recouping the payment] would then be implemented,' he told MPs.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer agrees to spend 3.5pc on defence after bowing to Nato pressure
Britain has agreed to significantly ramp up defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP after bowing to pressure from Nato. Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary-general, said a 'historic' decision had been made to invest more on tanks, fighter jets, air defence, drones and long-range missiles at a meeting of defence ministers in Brussels. The Dutchman proposed a rise in defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, and a further 1.5 per cent on related infrastructure, to meet the challenges posed by a resurgence of Moscow. It was only on Monday that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in his strategic defence review promised to spend 3 per cent of GDP on the military by the end of the next parliament, but failed to explain how that would be funded. That plan was undermined within 24 hours, after Nato demanded the Government raise that figure to 3.5 per cent. Now that Sir Keir has agreed to the further increase, he will face renewed pressure to set out concrete plans on how he can pay for it. It is expected that Nato's first spending plan in over a decade will be signed off when the alliance's leaders gather for their annual summit in The Hague later this month. The dramatic increase in defence spending was brokered under pressure from US president Donald Trump, who has suggested he could withdraw American support for the alliance if its members fail to hit expenditure targets. Mr Rutte acknowledged that governments started to spend more on defence in the wake of complaints by the US president during his first term in the White House. But the Nato chief added: 'We don't have to do this because of an audience of one, we have to do this to keep one billion people safe.' 'It's important the UK gets there' Earlier, Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence, singled out the importance of Britain meeting the new goals in response to a question over Sir Keir's pledge to spend only 3 per cent of GDP on defence. 'We think everyone is going to get there, we really do. It's important they do. It's important that the UK gets there,' Mr Hegseth told reporters on the sidelines of the meeting in Brussels. He argued the extra investment by European allies and Canada was crucial to keep pace with a pledge by Mr Trump to spend $1 trillion on defence in an upcoming budget. 'When you consider the threats that we face, the urgency in the world, it's critical,' Mr Hegseth said. 'We don't need more flags, we need more fighting formations. We don't need more conferences. We need more capabilities, hard power.' Critics have argued that American demands for European governments to invest more in defence will hurt spending on hospitals, schools and other civilian projects. But Mr Rutte said the investment in weapons was needed more than ever, as Russia currently produces as much ammunition every three months as Nato does in a year. 'For the next three years, we are fine, but we have to start now. Otherwise three, four, five years from now, we are really under threat,' he added. 'I may be using rhetoric here, but I really mean it that you will have to get your Russian language course or go to New Zealand.' Talks on the exact details of the defence spending pledge to be made in The Hague will continue in the weeks running up to the summit. Departing the meeting in Brussels, Mr Hegseth said he was confident that there would be a deal. 'Countries in there are well exceeding 2 per cent, and we think very close, almost near consensus, on a 5 per cent commitment for Nato in The Hague later this month,' he said. Mr Hegseth said it was 'heartening' to hear his European counterparts agree to White House demands to become less reliant on America for the continent's security. The Pentagon chief earlier this year shocked Nato allies by insisting that America could no longer be Europe's main security guarantor, as it had to focus Washington's attention on the growing threat posed by China. 'I have total confidence we will get there,' Mr Rutte said on Thursday. 'Look at the Russian threat. The Chinese build-up. We live in a different world. We live in a more dangerous world.' Spain emerged as the country diplomats were most concerned about hitting the target, after its defence minister claimed it could meet the new capability targets while spending just 2 per cent of GDP. Margarita Robles later insisted Madrid would not veto any agreement, even if it did not agree with setting a 'fixed percentage' figure. The new capability targets will see a number of dramatic changes to European defence, including Germany increasing the size of its armed forces by 'around 50,000 to 60,000' more soldiers, according to defence minister Boris Pistorius. The Netherlands also expects to more than double its military from 70,000 to 200,000 personnel in the next five years. Without any reference to the 5 per cent spending goal, Defence Secretary John Healey said 'war-fighting readiness' was at the centre of future plans for Britain's armed forces.
