
'Move fast and break things': Trump's first 100 days
The first 100 days of Donald Trump's second presidency have seen an unprecedented level of chaos with global repercussions, writes DrNorm Sanders.
WHATEVER HAPPENS from here on in, the world will never be the same. From Social Security to theFederal Aviation Administration, theDOGEteam has run a bulldozer through the U.S. Government and the wreckage will be smouldering for a long time. The damage was done by tech nerdElon Musk, using a concept developed by another nerdy Trump oligarch,Mark Zuckerbergof Facebook (now Meta).
Move fast and break things (MFABT) is a philosophy advocating for rapid innovation and experimentation, even if it means making mistakes along the way. It's often associated with tech companies, where the speed of development and iteration is seen as crucial to staying ahead of the competition.
In essence, the idea is that:
Speed is prioritised: Companies should move quickly to get products and services into the market and gather user feedback.
Mistakes are accepted: The focus is on learning from errors and improving, rather than being paralysed by the fear of failure.
Continuous improvement: The mantra encourages a mindset of constant iteration and adaptation.
Zuckerberg is credited with popularising this philosophy in a 2012 letter to investors, according to a report inLeadDev.
President Trump has suggested the reopening of Alcatraz prison to house America's most dangerous criminals, with some recommending him as the first inmate.
Zuckerberg argued:
According to the article in LeadDev, MFABT is seen as a way to quickly develop and iterate on new products and features. The philosophy encourages companies to challenge the status quo and disrupt existing industries.
It's a way to learn from mistakes and quickly adapt to changing market conditions. But some argue that the focus on speed can lead to neglecting safety and ethical considerations.
Rapid innovation can also lead to unintended negative consequences for users or society with some critics arguing that the focus on metrics and growth can overshadow other important values.
In conclusion, MFABT is a philosophy that has been influential in the tech industry, but it's not without its potential drawbacks. It's a way of thinking that emphasises speed, experimentation and continuous improvement, but it also requires careful consideration of the potential risks and consequences.
I started the journalistic phase of my life 50 years ago when I exiled myself from Richard (I am not a crook)Nixons America during the Viet Nam war. My first job in Australia was as a reporter for ABC Televisions current affairs show, This Day Tonight. Like all journalists, we used typewriters. (A machine with a keyboard similar to a computer, but connected mechanically to keys which printed directly on the paper without a separate printer.)
Information was gathered either through interviews or by library research using books or articles. Now, we have a rapidly expanding technology. Generative AI is just a glorified Google, isnt it?
The biggest casualty in Trump's tariff trade war is the American economy and the nation's consumers.
Anyway, Trump World has totally embraced the MFABT philosophy along withanother concept, introduced bySteve Bannon: Flood the zone with shit.
In U.S. football, flooding the zone refers to an offensive strategy where a team concentrates its pass receivers on one side of the field, forcing the defence to overcommit to that side and potentially creating weaknesses elsewhere.
Steve Bannonsflood the zone refers to his tactic of overwhelming the media and opposition with an avalanche of information, misinformation, and/or action in other words, shit. Combine this with MFABT and you have Trump World.
There is a glaring omission in MFABT thinking: empathy. Nowhere is there any concern for the impact of their glittering, profitable technology on humans.
Martha Stout wrote inThe Sociopath Next Door:
Well, for starters, how about being President of the United States, or maybe a tech oligarch or why not the richest man in the world?
MFABT is now affecting everyone on Earth and even the Earth itself. Climate change is a perfect example. Trump has cancelled renewable energy programs and lifted restrictions on oil and gas drilling.
The tariff chaos is also classic MFABT, which encourages market disruption through challenging the status quo and destroying established commercial and governmental institutions.
Upon his re-election to the White House, Donald Trump's Administration has seen America decline through political, economic and social chaos.
One of the best examples of the impact of MFABT is the DOGE inducedcripplingof the U.S. Social Security System. The DOGE kids moved fast and broke it to the point where people are going hungry. But, of course, that isnt a problem in MFABT thinking.
Actually, DOGE is emerging as something more than MFABT, horrific as that is. Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, isnt stupid. He may have no moral compass, but he knows how to make money a lot of money. How about a scheme to get a whole bunch of sensitive information about Musk's competitors camouflaged as a drive for government efficiency?
According to aNational Labor Relations Boardwhistleblower, this is exactly what happened.
Of course, Trumps disastrous actions dont go unnoticed in the rest of the world, including Australia.
The New York Timescited Trumps tariff war as a key factor in the way Aussies had voted in the 2025 Federal Election:
And outgoing Opposition LeaderPeter Duttons downfall mirrors Conservative LeaderPierre Poilievres defeat in Canadas election on 28 April. In January, Canadas incumbent centre-left Liberals were heading for defeat to the Conservatives. But then, Trump caused a national uproar with his aggressive tariffs and his call for Canada to become the 51st U.S. state.Mark Carneyromped in.
Things are so bad in the U.S. that I wondered about the possibility of a military coup. TheU.S. Constitutionactually provides for such an action.
I tried the old-fashioned technique of asking a human, in this case, a friend who is a retired high-ranking Australian military officer.
Trump's pause on tariffs has led to a global game of political chess and could steer the world into a lose-lose stalemate.
Here are his views:
Sadly, it looks like the cavalry wont be riding over the horizon any time soon to save us from the ongoing U.S. trainwreck. Meanwhile, the insanity continues.
John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser,calledworking in the Trump White House like living inside a pinball machine.
Nothing escapes the all-seeing attention of the White House, which recently sent out anofficial statementannouncing cuts to Public Radio:
The White House made many complaints of left-wing bias, including Public Radios showSesame Street, when Big Bird and friends partnered with CNN for a town hall. They offended Trump by presenting children with a one-sided narrative to address racism amid the Black Lives Matter riots.
Nothing and no one in America is safe if Trump considers Sesame Street dangerous.
The systematic destruction of American democracy is relentless and determined. The future is bleak. Trump and his MFABT team have already broken so much stuff that there isnt enough Super Glue in all the world to mend it.
DrNorm Sandersis a former commercial pilot, flightinstructor, university professor, Tasmanian State MP and Federal Senator.
Related Articles
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
JONAH GOLDBERG: Trump shows that loyalty is all that matters to him
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. Photo by Evan Vucci / AP Photo Last week, the Court of International Trade delivered a blow to Donald Trump's global trade war. It found that the worldwide tariffs Trump unveiled on 'Liberation Day' as well his earlier tariffs pretextually aimed at stopping fentanyl coming in from Mexico and Canada (as if) were beyond his authority. The three-judge panel was surely right about the Liberation Day tariffs and probably right about the fentanyl tariffs, but there's a better case that, while bad policy, the fentanyl tariffs were not unlawful. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Please forgive a lengthy excerpt of Trump's response on Truth Social, but it speaks volumes: 'How is it possible for (the CIT judges) to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be? I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. … In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own 'thing.' I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten!' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Let's begin with the fact that Trump cannot conceive of a good explanation for an inconvenient court ruling other than Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's irrelevant that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law the administration invoked to impose the relevant tariffs, does not even mention the word 'tariff' or that Congress never envisioned the IEEPA as a tool for launching a trade war with every nation in the world, the 'Penguin Islands' included. Also disregard the fact that the decision was unanimous and only one of the three judges was appointed by Trump (the other two were Reagan and Obama appointees). (The decision has been paused by an appeals court.) Trump is the foremost practitioner of what I call Critical Trump Theory — anything bad for Trump is unfair, illegitimate and proof that sinister forces are rigging the system against him. No wonder then that Trump thinks Leonard Leo, formerly a guiding light at the Federalist Society, the premier conservative legal organization, is a 'sleazebag' and 'bad person.' Note: Leo is neither of those things. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Trump's broadsides at Leo and the Federalist Society are portentous. Because Congress is AWOL, refusing to take the lead on trade (and many other things) as the Constitution envisions, it's fallen to the courts to restrain Trump's multifront efforts to exceed his authority. That's why the White House is cynically denouncing 'unelected' and 'rogue' judges on an almost daily basis and why Trump's political henchman, Stephen Miller, is incessantly ranting about a 'judicial coup.' The supreme, and sometimes seemingly sole, qualification for appointments to the Trump administration has been servile loyalty to Trump. But that ethos is not reserved for the executive branch. Law firms, elite universities and media outlets are being forced to kneel before the president. Why should judges be any different? This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Trump has a history of suggesting 'my judges' — i.e., his appointees — should be loyal to him. That's why he recently nominated Emil Bove, his former personal criminal lawyer turned political enforcer at the Department of Justice, for a federal judgeship. The significance of Trump's attack on the Federalist Society and Leo, for conservatives, cannot be exaggerated. The legal movement spearheaded by the Federalist Society has been the most successful domestic conservative project of the last century. Scholarly, civic-minded and principled, the Federalist Society spent decades developing ideas and arguments for re-centering the Constitution in American law. But now Trump has issued a fatwa that it, too, must bend the knee and its principles to the needs of one man. The law be damned, ruling against Trump is ingratitude in his mind. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Speaking of ingratitude, the irony is that the Federalist Society deserves a lot of credit — or blame — for Trump being elected in the first place. In 2016, the death of Antonin Scalia left a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Many conservatives did not trust Trump to replace him. To reassure them, Trump agreed to pick from a list of potential replacements crafted by the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society. That decision arguably convinced many reluctant conservatives to vote for him. In the decade since, the Heritage Foundation has dutifully reinvented itself in Trump's image. The Federalist Society stayed loyal to its principles, and that's why the Federalist Society is in Trump's crosshairs. Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast RECOMMENDED VIDEO Sports Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Columnists World


Winnipeg Free Press
6 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup, concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the tournament. The United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize pool. The Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. But there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear slow. At the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans, either. Wary travelers, visa woes Trump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this year. The U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Association President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months — already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues. 'They (the task force) recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible,' Freeman said. 'But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas. 'We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president,' said Rubio. But the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World Cup. The proclamation included an exemption for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' It did not mention fans. Fan fears There are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup matches. Danny Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, 'We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to (Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem.' That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning. Navarro put the onus on FIFA. 'They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?' Navarro said. 'There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about.' If you build it, will they come? It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup is. Ticket sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45. FIFA created an incentive program that says fans who buy two or more tickets to the Club World Cup 'may' be guaranteed the right to purchase one ticket to the World Cup next summer. Navarro said economic uncertainty and fears of inflation may make fans hesitant to spend their money on the Club World Cup — when the more desirable World Cup is looming. In some host cities, there's little sign the Club World Cup is happening. A light rail station in Seattle had a lone sign advertising the event. The Seattle Sounders are among the teams playing in the tournament. Hans Hobson, executive director of the Tennessee State Soccer Association, suggested part of the problem is that, unlike the national teams that play in the World Cup, some of the club teams playing in Nashville are just not known to U.S. fans. 'It's not leagues that they watch. If it was the Premier League or the Bundesliga or something like that, then they'd go, 'Oh, I know players there. Let's go check it out,' Hobson said. There were tickets available to LAFC's match against Esperance Sportive de Tunisie in Nashville on June 20 for $24.45. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has traveled to several host cities to gin up enthusiasm. He has promised 'the world will be welcomed.' But some say the United States isn't exactly rolling out the red carpet for visitors in the current climate. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. 'I could see trepidation for anyone looking to travel to the U.S. at this current political climate,' said Canadian national team coach Jesse Marsch. 'So it's a sad thing, I think, that we have to talk about visiting the U.S. in this way but I think everybody has to make decisions that are best for them and that fit best with what's going on in their life and their lifestyle.' ___ AP Sports Writer Teresa Walker contributed to this report ___ AP soccer:


Globe and Mail
7 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Vice President JD Vance Just Delivered Incredible News to Bitcoin Investors
On May 28, Vice President JD Vance gave the keynote speech at the Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) 2025 conference in Las Vegas. He offered a broad overview of what's coming next for crypto, as well as a few insights into how the White House is thinking about Bitcoin right now. Last year, President Donald Trump attended this same event, outlining the major pro-Bitcoin policies of his 2024 campaign platform. So now that top political leaders are openly embracing crypto, what should Bitcoin investors expect? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Pro-Bitcoin policies of the Trump administration A major focus of Vance's speech was a reiteration of the pro-crypto regulatory approach of the Trump administration. In just five months, the White House has already taken a number of big steps -- including a major shakeup at the Securities and Exchange Commission to make it more crypto-friendly, and the creation of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. All of this is good news for Bitcoin investors, of course. It opens the door to more innovation, economic growth, and wealth for everyday Americans. As Vance pointed out in his keynote, millions of Americans now own Bitcoin. So any moves that can help Bitcoin grow and prosper will help everyday Americans as they save for the future. And there's more good news on the way. Next up, says Vance, is new legislation for dollar-pegged stablecoins, as well as a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto that will help to establish the official rules of the road for Bitcoin. Once that's in place, the mainstream adoption of crypto can really start. Institutions will no longer have an excuse not to get involved with Bitcoin. Bitcoin as a long-term strategic asset Vance also emphasized that the White House is thinking about Bitcoin as a long-term strategic asset. That was the stated purpose of creating the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve back in March. The next major step, says Vance, is new legislation that will codify the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in law. Otherwise, the next administration could just as easily reverse the existing executive order with a new executive order of its own. There's a key reason the White House is thinking about Bitcoin as a "strategically important asset" these days. And that's because Bitcoin represents the sort of American values -- innovation, entrepreneurship, freedom, and lack of censorship -- that are anathema to countries such as China. In fact, as Vance pointed out, the U.S. should look to use Bitcoin as a source of competitive advantage against China. All of that should give hope to current Bitcoin investors. There's simply too much invested in Bitcoin for the U.S. government to back off now. The government is going all-in on Bitcoin. As a result, crypto has moved from the fringe to the mainstream. Potential conflicts of interest? All of that sounds great, of course. It's great to hear that the government is embracing Bitcoin. It's fantastic to hear that Bitcoin could become the answer to some of the economic and strategic problems currently facing the Trump administration. However, it has become impossible to ignore the potential conflicts of interest that may exist. Vance, by his own admission, holds close to $500,000 worth of Bitcoin. Just days before the conference, Donald Trump's media company announced that it was planning to buy $2.5 billion worth of Bitcoin. And Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. (both of whom showed up at the Bitcoin 2025 conference) are engaged in Bitcoin ventures of their own. Even if there is no wrongdoing involved, the optics aren't great. It's the reason many people now think that tighter safeguards should be imposed on politicians to prevent them from enacting certain policies or taking certain actions that could be used to enrich themselves. What's next for Bitcoin? The White House has given a strong signal of its support for Bitcoin. Crypto investors no longer need to worry about regulatory overreach, or about government policies specifically designed to limit innovation in the crypto sector. All of that is incredible news for Bitcoin. Suddenly, all the sky-high price forecasts for Bitcoin no longer seem so unattainable. As long as you are willing to buy and hold for the long haul, investing in Bitcoin right now might be the best way to turbo-charge the performance of your entire portfolio for years to come. Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025