A retired woman living month-to-month on disability says one of her biggest financial regrets was being too generous
Anita Clemons Swanagan was forced into early retirement at 55 after developing a brain tumor and having several strokes. The medical bills piled up for the expenses that her health insurance would not cover.
At one point, she had over $100,000 in medical debt. She said she'd paid most of it off, but doing so drained most of her savings.
"Right now, I live totally on what I receive from disability," Swanagan said at the time of her interview with Business Insider in late 2024, adding, "I wouldn't consider myself financially stable."
Are you an older American comfortable sharing your retirement outlook with a reporter? Please fill out this quick form. We are especially interested in hearing from people 80 and older.
Swanagan said that one of her financial regrets is giving too much money to friends in need when she was younger and not saving more for herself.
"It's OK to care about people," she said, adding, "However, you have to look at what it is costing you mentally and financially. You only have so many years to prepare for retirement."
Swanagan is one of many in the US whose retirement was derailed by a medical crisis. Dozens of people between 48 and 96 who have emailed reporters or responded to surveys about their biggest life regrets told BI their stories about not factoring medical expenses into retirement planning or prioritizing routine medical appointments.
She regrets not asking for more money
After getting divorced, Swanagan raised her three children on a single salary as a solo parent, but never took government assistance before retirement. She believed being financially self-resilient set the right example for her children to become productive members of society.
However, that meant she constantly worked long hours and juggled multiple jobs to support her family. She spent 15 years as a correctional officer in Texas, Kansas, Washington, and Illinois. She also worked in hospitals, worked side gigs on farms, and provided in-home care for Alzheimer's patients.
Looking back, she regrets some of her decisions. "There were times I worked for less than I was worth," she said, adding, "I never demanded more money or moved on to where I was appreciated. My salary hovered around $50,000."
She wishes she'd saved more for the future
Despite tight finances, Swanagan said she always helped coworkers and friends who were going through hard times. It was "never more than a couple hundred dollars," she said, "but it adds up."
She said helping people is important, but your future self is someone worth helping, too. If she could go back in time, she said she would tell her younger self not to be so generous because the future is unknown.
"There's no such thing as a perfect retirement plan," she said. "Circumstances change, and you can never be fully prepared."
Later in life, Swanagan was diagnosed with a rare, aggressive hormonal disorder called acromegaly, which she said caused her brain tumor and was a contributing factor to her diabetes and high blood pressure. It also caused some of her bones, including those in her jaw, to expand, which led her to lose all of her teeth and her joints to ache constantly.
"There's nothing they can really do about it to take the pain away, so I'm always in some degree of pain, stiffness. I have trouble walking," she said.
Unable to work, Swanagan lives on inherited farmland in Illinois that has been in her family since 1856. At the time of her interview with BI, she was staying in her SUV, which she converted into a camper while she waited for the tiny home she ordered to arrive.
"I have people around me that are family that are willing to pitch in and help me put my home together," she said.
This story was adapted from Anita Clemons Swanagan's interview for Business Insider's series "Life Lessons." Learn more about Swanagan's story and others' in the video below:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Motor Trend
7 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
Opinion: Congress Must Stop the Proposed Public Land Sell-Off
Congress must stop the proposed sell-off of public land owned by the Bureau of Land Management included in the "One Big Beautiful" budget reconciliation bill. Its passage into law would be harmful to MotorTrend readers and car enthusiasts nationwide. MotorTrend opposes a bill mandating the sale of federal lands, impacting off-road trails and car enthusiasts. It criticizes the bill for risking public land privatization and denying access to car enthusiasts and urges public and industry action to halt the sell-off. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next MotorTrend rarely takes a position on proposed or enacted legislation. However, because this ill-advised land sale would be harmful to our readers, the car enthusiast community at large, the American auto industry, and MotorTrend 's editorial operations, we must voice our unequivocal opposition. Land available for sale under the provisions of this bill, as written at the time of publication, covers innumerable miles of off-road trails and maintained roads in the western United States encompassing popular and famous sites, including most of the Moab trail network. If this land were sold, it would cut off automotive enthusiasts from the best off-roading our nation has to offer. Rock crawlers are far from the only car enthusiasts who would be affected. Anyone who uses their car, truck, or SUV to overland, camp, hike, hunt, fish, boat, swim, climb, photograph, paint, observe wildlife, or any other outdoor activity on federal land would be cut off by land sales. Should the land be developed as the bill suggests (but does not require), boundary wilderness would be affected by the new neighborhoods built in formerly wild areas in ways that could discourage or restrict access to anyone hoping to drive out to a remote lake, river, mountain, forest, or desert. MotorTrend would likewise be hurt by public land sales. Our reviews of trucks and SUVs often rely on access to trails on public lands in order to bring you full and complete evaluations of their off-road capabilities. Our photography and videos also often rely on access to public lands for off-road and other stories. The Title V Energy And Resources rider, Subtitle C-Lands, Section 50301, titled 'Mandatory Disposal of Bureau of Land Management Land for Housing,' would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to sell a minimum of 0.25 percent and maximum of 0.5 percent of all land owned by BLM, not including protected lands such as National Parks and Monuments, within five years. This equals a maximum of 2.1 million acres across 11 named western states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Montana, which is considered a western state and is approximately 30 percent federal land, was exempted from the legislation in a deal between Montana Republican Senator Steve Daines and rider author Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee in return for supporting the rest of the bill. A total of 210 million acres of federal lands in the above states would be eligible for sale. An earlier version of the bill mandated the sale of up to 3.3 million acres of land, including land managed by the National Forest Service. Senator Lee stripped that from the proposed legislation after significant bipartisan backlash and an unfavorable ruling from the Senate Parliamentarian judging it unacceptable in a reconciliation bill. Now, Senator Lee is trying again with a watered down bill that still threatens some of America's greatest off-road trails. The revised wording now limits sales to land within 5 miles of a "population center boundary," which is not defined in the text. Nearly all of Moab's trail network, as an example, exists on or crosses BLM land within 5 miles of the city of Moab. While the bill purports to restrict the sold land for housing development, it does not require it. As written, the bill requires prospective buyers to describe how the land could be used for housing and/or infrastructure to support housing, but the bill does not actually require any housing be built and has no enforcement mechanism to compel construction or resale. A buyer could therefore submit their proposal with no intention of actually building, and the government would have little recourse once the sale is complete. It would be a backdoor way for individuals to purchase formerly public land for their own private use, so long as they continued to insist development is being planned. Proving otherwise to show breach of contract would be difficult at best and up to the chronically underfunded BLM to enforce. Were the buyer to go through with development plans, it could potentially mean a suburb built on what is currently the top the famous Hell's Revenge trail, or the top of Poison Spider. The bill also does not require the input or consent of the affected state and local governments or local citizens. The bill only requires the head of BLM 'consult' with governors, local governments, and local indigenous tribes and give 'priority' to lands nominated by those governments but does not require them to abide by those consultations. The ultimate decision as to which lands to sell rests with the head of BLM alone. Similarly, the department head is allowed, but not required, to give first right of refusal to those local governments. In practice, the department heads can sell whatever land they want to whomever they want if vague and limited rules are met. This leaves your public lands at the whim of an unelected department head and the willingness of your state and local officials to advocate effectively on your behalf. The bill requires BLM to relinquish all title, rights, and interests to the land sold, so it will almost certainly remain private forever. Once it's gone, it's gone. While the purpose of this measure is purportedly expanding housing stock, the remote location of most of the eligible land makes this reasoning hollow. As the bill requires 85 percent of the money generated by the sale of these lands go to the U.S. Treasury's general fund, it appears the real purpose of this sale is to offset the cost of tax cuts for primarily wealthy individuals found elsewhere in the bill. Because the measure requires the land to be sold or auctioned for market value or greater, it will likely end up in the hands of the same wealthy individuals whose tax cuts are being funded by its sale. For these reasons, we urge you to contact your senators and representatives and demand they stop the public land sell-off in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." Call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121, ask for the office of your state's senators or representative, and tell the staff member who answers you oppose the sale of public land and want it stripped from the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." If you're unable to call, send an email. You can also contact your senators and representatives at their local offices by phone or email. You can find your representative by clicking here and find your senator by clicking here. We further call on automakers and the aftermarket industry to publicly denounce the sale of public land. Car brands like Ford, Jeep, Rivian, and Subaru have built their brands in part or fully on outdoor recreation, and we ask them to stand up for the public lands they eagerly promote in their marketing and advertising. Similarly, we call on the aftermarket industry and its primary advocacy organization, SEMA, to likewise stand up for the public lands their customers recreate on with all the suspension, powertrain, recovery, and camping equipment they produce.
CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately"
Fed Chair testifies that tariffs could drive up inflation, which is why rates were held steady President Trump says he's "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately," after Canada announced a digital services tax on large foreign and domestic technology companies. Posting on Truth Social Friday afternoon, the president said the U.S. will let Canada know what their tariff rate will be in the next week. The trade talks blowup comes only a week after the president met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the Group of Seven economic summit in Alberta. "We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country," the president wrote. They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately." The post came shortly after Mr. Trump told reporters in a press conference at the White House that he will soon be sending letters to countries with whom trade talks aren't going well, and tell them what their tariff rate is. Canada is one of the United States' biggest trading partners. The U.S. has imposed tariffs on most imports from Canada, and Canada has hit back with tariffs on U.S. exports to Canada.
Business Insider
11 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why 99.5% of big projects fail
Dan Gardner is the coauthor of "How Big Things Get Done," a book that explores why so many billion-dollar projects, from nuclear power plants to Olympic Games, go wrong and how some manage to succeed. Drawing on data from over 16,000 megaprojects, Gardner and his coauthor Bent Flyvbjerg reveal the startling truth: Only 0.5% of big projects are delivered on time, on budget, and with the promised results. Business Insider interviewed Dan Gardner to learn about some of the world's most high-profile projects, like the Sydney Opera House, which soared 1,400% over budget, and the troubled California High-Speed Rail, which is expected to cost over $100 billion and hasn't moved any passengers yet. He also spotlights the rare successes, like the Empire State Building and the Hoover Dam, to show what's possible when projects are built on smart planning, strong leadership, and modular thinking.
