Mandamus order in Dutch model death allows for families to sue cops, govt: MP
The High Court yesterday ordered the government to pay RM1.1 million in damages to Smit's family after finding that authorities had failed to conduct a proper investigation into her 2017 death in Kuala Lumpur.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-badminton ace's court date with Supermax boss postponed
Stanley Thai (right) wants the High Court to bar the media and public from a defamation trial brought by former national badminton player Robert Lin against him. KUALA LUMPUR : Former national badminton player Robert Lin Woon Fui saw the trials of his defamation suits against Supermax founder Stanley Thai and another businessman, both scheduled to start today, delayed to 2027. Judicial commissioner Eddie Yeo rescheduled the trials for March 29, 30 and 31, 2027. Lin is suing Thai and Teh Chee Kien over statements they allegedly made three years ago, claiming their remarks were false, baseless and maliciously published. He says the statements have damaged his reputation. Last month, Thai and Teh each filed applications for protective orders over their respective cases. Both applications are fixed for hearing on Sept 19. Yeo also directed that Thai and Teh file affidavits by Aug 20, and for all parties to file their written submissions by Sept 10. Lin was represented by Tan Lee Kiat, while G Rajasingam appeared for Thai and Teh. Thai and Teh's protective order applications mirror one filed by Thai in another defamation suit brought against him by his estranged wife, Tan Bee Geok, also due to be heard by Yeo on the same date. Thai and Teh want the court to hold their respective trials behind closed doors and are asking for the media to be barred from covering the proceedings. They also want all court documents sealed and for court transcripts to remain confidential and available only to the parties and their lawyers, with transcribers made to sign non-disclosure agreements. Both men claim their respective trials touch on personal and familial matters which are private and not of public interest. Thai and Teh, both represented by Shearn Delamore & Co, also claim the trials may involve examining the private lives of the parties and their witnesses. They say the parties and their witnesses are of substantial social and commercial standing, and that one witness is about to get married and fearful of repercussions that a public trial may bring. Law firm Nazri Aziz Masura Mak & Tan is acting for Lin in both suits. Lin represented the country in the men's doubles event at the 2006 World Cup, where he was a silver medalist. He also won bronze medals for Malaysia at the 2006 Doha Asian Games and the 2007 SEA Games, held in Thailand. Thai and Tan jointly own Supermax Holdings Sdn Bhd, a substantial shareholder in Supermax Corporation Bhd, one of the world's leading producers of rubber gloves. They were married in 1987, but saw their relationship deteriorate amid allegations from both sides. In 2022, Tan sought a judicial separation. Thai filed for divorce in April last year. Those proceedings are ongoing in the family court.
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Man charged with trafficking 65kg of ganja
PASIR MAS: A man, wanted by the police four years ago in connection with the death of a seven-month pregnant woman, was charged in the Magistrate's Court here on Wednesday (Aug 6) with trafficking in 65 kilogrammes of cannabis into the country. Zulhakimy Aiman Suhairuddin, 24, along with two other individuals who have already been charged, were charged with trafficking the drug in a car in front of an unlicensed shophouse in Kampung Pak Jak, Alor Pasir, here at 2.50pm on March 22 this year. No plea was recorded after the charge was read out to Zulhakimy Aiman before Magistrate Syed Farid Syed Ali as the case falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court. The charge, under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, provides a sentence of hanging or life imprisonment, and if not sentenced to death, shall be subject to not less than 12 strokes of the cane, upon conviction. The prosecution was conducted by Deputy Public Prosecutors Muhammad Baihaqy Mohd Saidi and Syazalia Che Suhaimin, while the accused was unrepresented. The court set Sept 2 for mention of the case pending the chemical report. — Bernama
The Sun
15 hours ago
- The Sun
Court of Appeal rules EC's Covid-19 voter ban unlawful
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today ruled that the Election Commission's (EC) decision to bar a registered voter from casting his ballot in the 2022 Johor state election due to Covid-19 quarantine restrictions was unlawful. A three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Supang Lian, Datuk Wong Kian Kheong, and Datuk Ismail Brahim held that the EC had violated R.K. Tamileswaaran's constitutional right to vote under Article 119 of the Federal Constitution by preventing him from exercising his right to vote. 'The first respondent (EC) had committed an 'error of law' or an illegality in this case by denying the appellant's (Tamileswaaran's) right to vote in the election,' he said. In delivering the court's unanimous decision, Justice Wong said the High Court had erred in ruling that the EC's duty under Article 113 of the Federal Constitution to conduct elections was subject to the Covid-19 prevention SOP and the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 (PCDA). 'The SOP and PCDA cannot restrain the EC's duty to conduct elections,' he said. Justice Wong issued a certiorari order to quash the EC's decision, and granted several declarations sought by Tamileswaaran. The court allowed Tamileswaaaran's appeal to overturn the Dec 7, 2022, decision by the High Court in dismissing his judicial review. The court did not make any orders as to costs. While acknowledging that courts have the discretion to award monetary compensation for breach of the right to vote, Justice Wong said no constitutional compensation would be granted in this case. He said this was because the EC's decision was made based on the SOP in the interest of public health and safety, and its officers had acted in good faith in this case. In the judgment, Justice Wong held that the SOP and the PCDA regulations created by the Director-General of Health and the Minister of Health, respectively, are subsidiary legislation and not Federal law or an Act of Parliament. The court also dismissed arguments submitted by the EC and the government, represented by senior federal counsel Mohammad Al-Saifi Hashim and Fauziah Daud, that public policy considerations on public health and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic were sufficient grounds to dismiss the judicial review. ' A voter's right to vote is a constitutional right and not a statutory right,' added Justice Wong. In his judicial review application, R.K. Tamileswaaran claimed that he was on the sixth day of his Covid-19 quarantine and had tested negative on a self-administered test. He stated that he was barred from entering the polling station because his MySejahtera application displayed a high-risk status, and he had not obtained permission from the district health officer to vote. The court's decision was delivered via online proceedings. Tamileswaaran was represented by lawyers New Sin Yew and Nur Izni Syazwani Ahmad. - Bernama
