logo
Solar farm proposal for Selby green belt land rejected

Solar farm proposal for Selby green belt land rejected

BBC News13-03-2025

Plans to erect a solar farm which would have covered an area equivalent to 80 football pitches on green belt land have been rejected by local councillors.The 49.95MW scheme, proposed for an 156-acre (63-hectare) site at Hillam, near Selby, was recommended for approval by planning officers at North Yorkshire Council.The solar farm would have provided enough green energy to supply 17,000 homes and displace 107,500 tonnes of CO2 a year, according to the proposal.However, councillors voted to reject the plans due to the loss of "good quality" arable land and the fact the scheme fell within green belt.
Setting out their reasons for refusing the plans, councillor Angus Thompson said: "Whilst I fully accept that climate change is a special circumstance, this is good quality agricultural land."I can assure you I'm a retired farmer - I know all about sheep, I know all about arable land - and grade two is good quality arable land and it's in a green belt."
Councillor John McCartney said several other solar farms had already been approved for the Selby district, and further appropriation of land to generate solar power was "unacceptable". "The accumulation should say we shouldn't put any more in the Selby district," he stated."I get the point about the grid connections, but there's got to be fairness as well - and just raping the entire south Selby by putting solar panels on it is unacceptable."The meeting heard an application for a solar farm near Malton had recently been given the go-ahead by the secretary of state, after initially being refused by the council, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Councillors were warned that while the council would stand by the decision to refuse the application, the decision could still be overturned on appeal.Nearby residents, community leaders and the CPRE, formerly the Campaign for the Protection of England, had all objected to the proposal, with CPRE North and East Yorkshire claiming the development, on Austfield Lane, would not conform to local or national planning policies.Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Martin Rees emails 'unlikely' to be reviewed in inquiry
Martin Rees emails 'unlikely' to be reviewed in inquiry

BBC News

time15 hours ago

  • BBC News

Martin Rees emails 'unlikely' to be reviewed in inquiry

Emails sent and received by Marvin Rees are "unlikely" to be reviewed in an upcoming inquiry into the Barton House former mayor's emails appear to have been deleted when he left office, so the inquiry into the evacuation may leave several questions Rees was attending a conference in Kigali, Rwanda, when the council tower block was evacuated after fears the building could suddenly 400 residents were ordered to leave their homes with no warning in November 2023, when Bristol City Council decided the block, in Barton Hill, was too risky for them to stay in. The building was declared safe in February on the housing policy committee were asked whether these emails would be available to the inquiry, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.A written answer to a public question said: "The planned review will be carried out by an independent consultant. "The consultants will work with residents and stakeholders to co-design the scope of the review. "This is not an inquiry into the working activities of the mayor of Bristol, as such individual's emails are unlikely to form part of this review."The answer added that the review's findings would be shared with residents and published more the Green Party won the local elections more than a year ago, they promised a review into the evacuation. The evacuation happened more than 18 months ago, but it is still unclear when the inquiry will actually committee was urged to set up an investigation that "doesn't just sweep things under the rug" by democracy activist Dan the meeting, he said the inquiry should be into any mistakes the council made that "led to people being traumatised because of the incompetence of the people involved". "What the hell was going on that day? Did anyone in the mayor's office try to prevent the evacuation from happening?"

200m steel fence blocking beauty spot view to be removed after public outcry
200m steel fence blocking beauty spot view to be removed after public outcry

Wales Online

time2 days ago

  • Wales Online

200m steel fence blocking beauty spot view to be removed after public outcry

200m steel fence blocking beauty spot view to be removed after public outcry The 2.1m-tall steel fence appeared suddenly and without warning across the face of Gilwern mountain in the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park and close to the boundary of the Unesco Blaenavon World Heritage site in April The fence that has been out across the Pwll Du Road on Gilwern Mountain, north Monmouthshire (Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service ) A massive fence erected without consultation across a mountain and overlooking a scenic spot is set to be dismantled following public outrage. Residents were angered when the 6ft steel barrier was unexpectedly installed across the face of Gilwern mountain in the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park and near the boundary of the Unesco Blaenavon World Heritage site in April. Locals dubbed the 200m long galvanised steel structure with sharp spikes the Great Wall of Clydach and demanded its removal sparking a planning dispute. ‌ Monmouthshire County Council, which argued it had to intervene to prevent people from accessing Pwll Du Road that runs across the face of the mountain and has been closed to traffic due to safety concerns for the past five years, has now agreed to take the gate down. ‌ The council has announced it will instead use stock fencing and the posts at either end of the road, supporting the fence, will be reduced in height. It will also be painted to blend in with the surrounding countryside. Farmer Wayne Elliot has been battling Monmouthshire council over the road, that is now fenced off, since 2020 (Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service ) Independent county councillor for Llanelly Hill Simon Howarth said during a recent assembly at Clydach village hall council authorities announced a plan to tender the dismantling of an unpopular fence for approximately £20,000 – a figure that has unsettled many residents. Article continues below The councillor said: "The fence is coming down. They did say they are going out to tender and the cost is around £20,000, which hasn't gone down very well. We shouldn't have got here." Following the uproar over the original £40,000 expense to erect the barrier it will now be replaced by a less obtrusive 1.5m-high stock fence while the current posts and concealed gates that bar vehicle access will remain in place. Cllr Howarth expressed frustrations about the financial impact, saying: "Overall we are where we should have started but around £50,000 to £70,000 worse off." ‌ The 2.1m-tall steel fence overlooks the village of Clydach in the Bannau Brycheiniog National Park (Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service ) The councillor said he was also pleased the council has said it will allow access to the back side of the fence, between it and the mountainside, for cyclists and pedestrians though some points still have to be made safe. He also said the council will hold talks with farmers and commoners over access for moving stock from the Keeper's Pond end of the mountain road, which he welcomed. Article continues below A council spokesman said: "Following a positive meeting the local community and the council agreed with the proposal to reduce the height of the back line of the palisade fencing, replacing it with stock proof fencing and painting the reveals and pillars with a suitable colour to blend in with the landscape." Earlier safety measures, such as installing gates and boulders, had been ineffective since they were frequently damaged or removed. As a result of a 2023 rockfall incident the council commissioned another report, which proposed banning pedestrians in addition to vehicles from using the road. That report also suggested potential alternatives including the creation of new footpaths above and below the current road and realigning the road farther into the mountain. However the council has said these alternatives would require a multi-million-pound outlay.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store