OpenAI's Sarah Friar: ‘Am I worried about deep fakes? Yes'
When
Sarah Friar
announced she was stepping back as chief executive of neighbourhood tech platform Nextdoor, she had a plan.
'I felt I had done all I could – inject big growth into the system. I'd taken Nextdoor public, I made sure the balance sheet was really robust, I'd done a lot of work on the product and kind of rebuilt the whole site from scratch,' she says. 'I wasn't feeling though that my growth trajectory was still like this. I felt like I was plateauing a little. And frankly, I was at a stage of life where, ironically, I thought maybe I wanted to retire and take a break.'
It didn't quite work out that way. Within a few weeks,
OpenAI
came calling via Larry Summers, tapping her to be the company's next chief financial officer. Friar was intrigued.
'All the delusions I had of this beautiful life I was going to lead? Bye. I'll go back to working really hard,' she says. 'But how could I say no? It was just an incredible moment for technology, and that's certainly lived up to that promise. I feel like I've gotten a front-row seat to incredible outcomes.'
READ MORE
That was in June 2024. Almost a year later, Friar is at the Dublin Tech Summit, discussing everything from
AI
safety to the future of the sector. The general consensus from those who have heard her speak is that she is the adult in the room, a voice of reason in an industry that has given people cause for concern.
'I felt I had a skill set that Open AI needed. It definitely was going to need to raise money, needed to be kind of respected in the markets with investors. It hadn't really had a business plan. Finance without strategy is really directionless, but strategy with no finance is totally toothless – no one can get anything done.
'I felt like I could bring that,' she says. 'Also it was a company that was growing at speed, and then culture is really important. So I felt like I could be that leader that isn't just going to stay in my lane.'
OpenAI lit a fire under the generative AI industry when it surprised the tech world with the public launch of
ChatGPT
. There were teething problems, particularly around hallucinations, where the technology would make up facts and supply inaccurate information to queries.
But Friar says many of those early issues have been resolved, or at least vastly improved. The introduction of reasoning models has also made the technology smarter, and ChatGPT now has memory so it can learn from its interactions with people.
Friar is a frequent user of AI herself, a habit that predates her time at OpenAI.
'I was definitely one of those people who was on the wait list the minute [ChatGPT] hit Silicon Valley, and everybody wanted it. First, all I did was create rhymes. For Nextdoor, I did my holiday speech to the company in rhyme, which I thought was so clever and I'm mortified,' she says. 'That's versus moving to real outcomes today: personalised education in school, drug discovery.'
She points to Moderna, which uses the technology for personalised doses for vaccines, college students using ChatGPT as an educational aid to learn about complex problems.
Finance without strategy is really directionless, but strategy with no finance is totally toothless – no one can get anything done
—
Sarah Friar
It also functions well as a wine sommelier, Friar says, particularly with the technology's ability to use your phone's camera. 'I take a photograph of the label, and you can say, tell me about this wine. What should it pair with? How should it taste like? Is it good to drink now?'
Since Friar joined, OpenAI has announced two funding rounds: the $6.6 billion (€5.8 billion) Series E funding round in October 2024, and the blockbuster $40 billion round in March, the largest private tech funding round to date. In total, the company has raised $57.9 billion across 11 funding rounds, with backers that include Microsoft and Softbank.
AI is widely considered a bit of a money pit, one that the companies involved are hoping will pay off. Innovation and ambition are expensive, not to mention the ongoing cost of serving up answers to queries and deeper research requests.
These days, ChatGPT offers a range of subscriptions for users who want to get more out of the system – unlimited use, building their own custom GPTs, enterprise-level access.
But the majority of OpenAI's users – 95 per cent, Friar says – are still on the free plan. OpenAI has no plans to try to force these users to pay. Instead, it will use the more expensive subscriptions to support that access. ChatGPT's plans range from $20 to $200 a month.
'We needed to build a business model that continues to support a lot of free use,' she explains. 'For all the rolling of eyes on the Twitterverse, for people who want to do a lot of coding, a lot of deep research, things that take a lot of tokens, they are delighted to kind of pay that amount of money.
'If you take my husband, he's an investor. He effectively thinks of Deep Research as like his analyst, and he's like $200 a month. I would not even get an analyst to work for me for a month for that. And so I think if you see the value, you get there.'
Although OpenAI does not specify revenue figures for its products individually, Friar says the $200 a month ChatGPT Pro hit one milestone sooner than the rest - reaching $100 million in annual recurring revenue in a short time.
The bulk of OpenAI's users are outside the US, necessitating its overseas expansion. This is where Ireland has benefited; OpenAI has made Ireland its European headquarters, a point of pride for Friar, who is originally from Co Down.
There are plans to grow the Irish office, she says, as OpenAI seeks to expands its European presence.
'We do have a very vibrant Dublin office that is starting to grow and it will get big over time because it can be an office ... where we can put research and apply it potentially over time,' she says. 'It's a really good place for what we call FDEs – forward deployed engineers – who tend to work alongside a customer to help bring their wildest AI dreams to some sort of fruition. So we are definitely investing in Dublin.'
However, the EU does not have the greatest reputation among companies that are trying to move fast and create a new industry, with regulations intended to put guardrails on technologies such as AI seen as a hindrance to the sector. Friar says that while OpenAI welcomes regulation, it is possible to overdo things.
'Particularly in a young technology where we're still all somewhat figuring out and it's moving at the speed of light,' she says, 'I think you can get into a way over-regulated environment and I think that's the place where the EU does need to be careful and mindful.'
As the technology has advanced, so have concerns about its use and the potential for bad actors to weaponise AI.
'Am I worried about
deep fakes
? Yes; that's a malicious actor moment. But also, if someone's going to stop it, I think it's technology on the other side. I think this goes back to being responsible with what we roll out,' says Friar. 'We don't say that we've got it all, we know everything, because that would not be very humble and also not very true. But this is where we have to go – work with regulators, work with governments, work with research institutes.
'And I think if you get enough of the right, the good people on one side, you'll continue to keep the technology safe but you're not going to be able to keep it in a box. It's just not a tenable outcome.'
OpenAI has made some big moves recently. The company has signed up Jony Ive, the former Apple designer, to create a device that will bring AI to people without relying on a smartphone. The device itself remains a mystery for now, but Friar seems enthusiastic about the partnership.
'Every tech era has had the thing, the substrate. The internet age, I don't know if it happens without the PC,' she says. 'When you got to the mobile phone era, the touch screen is what made the phone.
'In the world of AI, we are still, like, these devices force us to talk with our thumbs. How do we create a much more holistic view of a substrate to work on top of it? I don't think we've had that springboard moment where we're like, oh, there's all of this intelligence, now what could really happen?'
Ive, she says, has done really well in the last two big generation shifts in the tech industry. But it isn't just about him; there is a whole team behind his IO company with the expertise to take the ideas into reality.
[
Can Jony Ive replicate the Apple magic at OpenAI?
Opens in new window
]
The stakes are high on this one. Not only has the company spent $6.5 billion on buying IO, but it is also trying to succeed where others – most notably the
Humane AI Pin
– have crashed and burned. Sold off for parts to HP, Humane now lives on as a cautionary tale. But OpenAI seems confident that the partnership with Ive will pay off.
'What we've bought with IO is that holistic picture,' Friar says. 'Maybe we're not the folks who will win on the device, but we've certainly injected a lot of excitement into the ecosystem right now, and I think that's only good for, ultimately, where we're trying to go in the age of intelligence if the whole ecosystem is vibrant.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
29 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Airline passengers face longer delay times before compensation kicks in
EU countries have agreed to increase the amount of time passengers will have to wait before they can claim compensation for a delayed flight after 12 years of negotiations. Passengers will only be able to apply for compensation for short-haul flights if they are delayed for four hours or more, while for long-haul flights they will have to wait six hours, EU transport ministers said on Thursday. Currently, passengers can apply for compensation if any flight is more than three hours delayed. Ministers also agreed, as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights, to increase the amount of compensation marginally for those delayed on short-haul flights from €250 to €300, but cut it for long-haul flights from €600 to €500. READ MORE [ Holidaymakers face air traffic delays this summer Opens in new window ] [ Airline passengers got €1.2m in compensation during 2024 Opens in new window ] Other rights agreed included automating forms for compensation, restrictions to grounds for denying reimbursement and putting more responsibility on airlines to provide rerouting and accommodation when there are long delays, as well as strengthened rights for passengers with disabilities. The revision of the EU's air passenger rights was first proposed in 2013 by the European Commission, but it has taken 12 years for EU states to come to an agreement on the time frame for compensation. Airlines argued that mandating a longer delay threshold would give them a 'fighting chance to minimise delays and avoid flight cancellations', the industry body Airlines for Europe (A4E) said in a letter to the German minister for transport this week. A4E represents Europe's major airlines, including Lufthansa, Air France-KLM and Ryanair. It said that 70 per cent of flights that end up being cancelled could be saved at a five-hour threshold 'benefiting up to 10 million passengers per year'. 'Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity,' A4E said in a statement. The European Commission originally proposed extending the time to five hours for short-haul flights and nine for long-haul. Politicians, however, have veered away from delivering the politically unpalatable message that passengers will have to lose out. Germany was one of the strongest opponents of increasing the limits, along with Spain. In a statement on Thursday, German lawmakers from the European People's Party, Europe's largest political group, said that 'decreasing the rights to compensation for air passengers would be a step in the wrong direction. Reimbursement after a three-hour delay has been standard for many years and should remain so'. 'No politician wants to say more than four hours,' one senior EU diplomat said. The member states will have to negotiate with the European Parliament before the revisions become final law. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
State should ease ‘financial burden' for people facing heavy legal costs at public inquiries, report finds
The 'personal financial burden' of appearing before a Commission of Investigation should be eased by the State, the final report of the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) commission has said. The Commission of Investigation into the controversial sale of Project Eagle has called on the Government to change the 'strict' guidelines for covering the legal costs of those who appear before high-profile public inquiries. It said witnesses who 'diligently' give evidence, submissions and documents can end up in the 'very unfortunate situation' of having to personally pay high legal fees for their participation in the process. At the moment, the guidelines for legal costs under the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004 says witnesses can recoup some but not all of their legal fees. The current guidelines do not cover instruction fees, brief fees and legal fees incurred while making submissions. READ MORE In the case of the Nama commission, over two-thirds of the legal bills of the so-called 'bad bank' could not be recovered. It is understood that Nama's total legal costs reached €7.5 million, but it only received €2.4 million of that back from the commission. Thirty-six witnesses on behalf of Nama, including past and present employees, offered evidence and submissions over the seven years of the inquiry. All of these witnesses made claims for the payments of their costs. After assessing the claims for costs from Nama with the help of the State Claims Agency , the commission said it believed the current guidelines on legal costs would 'benefit significantly from review and updating'. 'Engaging with a Commission of Investigation can be an onerous task for private individuals, many of whom understandably seek legal advice and assistance in relation to their interaction with a Commission,' the commission stated in its final report to Taoiseach Micheál Martin . 'Witnesses who diligently provide detailed statements, attend to give evidence, provide documents and make submissions may find themselves in the very unfortunate situation of having to discharge significant fees personally due to the strict confines of the guidelines for payment of legal costs.' The commission, whose sole member is Susan Gilvarry, said Nama had tried to recoup 'substantial legal costs', but the commission wasn't able to consider or direct the recovery of any costs not set out in the current guidelines. It pointed out that the recovery of costs was less important in the case of Nama, where a state agency's costs are 'sought to be recovered from a Government department'. But it said that these 'discrete set of circumstances' would not apply in every case, so it recommended that the 'guidelines are revised and clarified to reflect the personal financial burden that witnesses or third parties may be subjected to by virtue of being requested to engage with a Commission of Investigation'. [ Department of Finance to wind down special bank shareholdings unit Opens in new window ] The Department of the Taoiseach did not respond to requests for comment. The report from the Nama commission said that its final costs, from the point it was established in June 2017 to April 2025, were €10.3 million. This included €4.6 million in legal fees, a salary cost of €1.75 million and administrative costs of €1.4 million. Since the late 1990s, the State has spent more than €600 million on tribunals of inquiry and commissions of investigation, including the €143 million Mahon/Flood Tribunal, the €85 million Commission to inquire into Child Abuse and the €83 million Moriarty Tribunal. In April, the billionaire businessman Denis O'Brien was awarded €5.8 million by the State Claims Agency for the legal costs he faced while a witness for the Moriarty Tribunal between 2001 and 2010.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Vodafone to shift headquarters to St Stephen's Green
Vodafone Ireland is to move its headquarters to the city centre next year, leaving the Sandyford location it has occupied for more than two decades. The company said it would relocate to 70 St Stephen's Green as the building's sole occupant from April next year. The lease on its Mountainview building in Central Park, Sandyford, was due to expire or renew in 2026. 'As we mark 25 years in Ireland, we are pleased to move to a new location where we will be much closer to our customers including many businesses and State bodies,' Vodafone Ireland's HR director Noelle Burke said. READ MORE 'Mountainview in Central Park and the Sandyford district has been a wonderful home to Vodafone Ireland for a long time, and we are pleased that we will continue to have a smaller presence there.' Vodafone announced the move to Mountainview in May 2002. More than 2,000 people work with Vodafone in Ireland, and almost half are currently based at its headquarters, with the company operating a hybrid policy that has staff in the office between eight and 10 days a month. The new location will also advance the company's net zero commitment by 2028, halving carbon emissions for its headquarters by facilitating a shift to public transport alongside a significantly more energy efficient building. 'Our climate goals are important to us, and this decision is aligned to our commitment to reducing carbon emissions,' Ms Burke said. 'This was a key driver in our decision-making process, to ensure we can provide a central location for our employees and customers, helping to reduce our impact on the environment.'