logo
Takeaways from AP's report on creationist beliefs 100 years after the Scopes trial

Takeaways from AP's report on creationist beliefs 100 years after the Scopes trial

Yahoo20-05-2025
WILLIAMSTOWN, Ky. (AP) — Some people thought the 1925 Scopes monkey trial marked a cultural defeat for biblical fundamentalism.
But a century after what was dubbed the Trial of the Century, the issue is far from settled. Many American adults still embrace creationism — a belief in the literal truth of the Genesis account of the origins of the Earth and humanity.
To be sure, Tennessee public schoolteacher John Scopes was convicted in 1925 for violating a state law against teaching human evolution. But it appeared to be a pyrrhic victory for creationists.
That's because the star of the prosecution team — populist politician William Jennings Bryan — faltered when he took the stand as an expert witness. He struggled to defend the Bible's miraculous and mysterious stories.
But creationist belief is resilient. Polls generally show that somewhere between 1 in 6 and 1 in 3 Americans hold beliefs consistent with young-Earth creationism, depending on how the question is asked.
That belief is most evident in a region of northern Kentucky that hosts a Creation Museum and a gargantuan replica of the biblical Noah's Ark. They draw a combined 1.5 million visits per year.
This trend alarms science educators, who say the evidence for evolution is overwhelming and see creationism as part of an anti-science movement affecting responses to serious problems like climate change.
An ark in Kentucky
Ken Ham began speaking in support of creationism 50 years ago — halfway between the Scopes trial and today — as a young schoolteacher in Australia. He's expanded that work by founding Answers in Genesis, a vast enterprise that includes books, videos and homeschool curricula.
The organization opened the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, near Cincinnati, in 2007. Visitors are greeted with a diorama depicting children and dinosaurs interacting peacefully in the Garden of Eden — life-forms that scientists say are actually separated by tens of millions of years. The museum features an array of exhibits, some of them added in recent years, that argue for a literal interpretation of the biblical creation narrative.
Most dramatically, Answers in Genesis opened the Ark Encounter theme park in nearby Williamstown, Kentucky, in 2016. Its main attraction is the massive ark replica — 'the biggest freestanding timber frame structure in the world,' says Ham. It's 510 feet (155 meters) long, or one and a half football fields in length; 85 feet (26 meters) wide and 51 feet (16 meters) high.
Like the museum, the park includes numerous exhibits arguing for the plausibility of the ark — that Noah, his wife, his three sons and their wives had the skill and means to sustain thousands of animals in their care. The park also includes theme-park attractions such as a zoo, zip lines and virtual-reality theater. Similar theaters are planned for tourist hubs Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, and Branson, Missouri.
'The main message of both attractions is basically this: The history in the Bible is true," Ham says. "That's why the message of the Gospel based on that history is true.'
Creationist beliefs
Core beliefs of Christian creationism include:
— God created the heavens and the Earth by fiat in six literal days, with humans as the crown of creation.
— The Earth is just a few thousand years old.
— Humans sinned, and that brought death and suffering into the world (and, ultimately, the necessity of salvation through Jesus Christ).
— God drowned almost all people and breathing animals in a global flood because of human wickedness. God spared Noah and his family, instructing him to build a large ark and bring aboard pairs of each animal kind to preserve them from extinction.
— The flood explains geological phenomena such as the Grand Canyon.
Science educators' concerns
According to the vast, long-standing scientific consensus, the above biological and geological claims are absurd and completely lacking in evidence.
The consensus is that the Earth is billions of years old; that humans and other life forms evolved from earlier forms over millions of years; and that mountains, canyons and other geological features are due to millions of years of tectonic upheaval and erosion. A 2014 Pew Research Center poll found 98% of American scientists accept evolution.
'Evolution and the directly related concept of deep time are essential parts of science curricula," says the Geological Society of America.
Evolution is 'one of the most securely established of scientific facts,' says the National Academy of Sciences. The academy urges that public schools stick to the scientific consensus and that creationism is not a viable alternative. Creationists, it said, 'reverse the scientific process' by beginning with an inflexible conclusion, rather than building evidence toward a conclusion.
Courts of law — and public opinion
Creation and evolution may not be front-burner issues today, but the Scopes trial set a template for other culture-war battles over school books and gender policies. William Jennings Bryan's words from his era would sound familiar at a modern school board meeting: 'Teachers in public schools must teach what the taxpayers desire taught.'
The Scopes case involved the 1925 conviction of schoolteacher John Scopes in Dayton, Tennessee, for violating a state law against teaching in public schools 'any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.'
Tennessee repealed that law in 1967, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1968 that a similar Arkansas law was an unconstitutional promotion of religion. The high court in 1987 overturned a Louisiana law requiring creationism to be taught alongside evolution. A 2005 federal court ruling similarly forbade the Dover Area School District in Pennsylvania from presenting 'intelligent design,' as an alternative to evolution, saying it, too, was a religious teaching. Though distinct from young-Earth creationism, intelligent design argues that nature shows evidence of a designer.
A 2023-2024 Pew Research Center survey found that 17% of U.S. adults agreed that humans have existed in their present form since 'the beginning of time.'
A 2024 Gallup survey found that 37% agreed that 'God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years or so.'
The differences may be due to the phrasing of the question and the circumstances of the survey.
Both surveys found that majorities of Americans believe humans evolved, and of that group, more believe God had a role in evolution than that it happened without divine intervention.
Catholics and many Protestants and other religious groups accept all or parts of evolutionary theory.
But many conservative evangelical denominations, schools and other institutions promote young-Earth creationist beliefs.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mainland Europe To See First Total Eclipse Of The Sun Since 1999
Mainland Europe To See First Total Eclipse Of The Sun Since 1999

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

Mainland Europe To See First Total Eclipse Of The Sun Since 1999

It's exactly one year until the next total solar eclipse. On Aug. 12, 2026, a short totality will be seen from a narrow path stretching from northern Russia through Greenland, Iceland and Spain. It will be the first total solar eclipse to touch mainland Spain since Aug. 11, 1999. Skiers and hikers take in the view from the Appalachian Trail at the summit of Saddleback Mountain during the total solar eclipse, Monday, April 8, 2024, near Rangeley, Maine. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty) Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The maximum totality for the total solar eclipse on Aug. 12, 2026, will be 2 minutes 18 seconds off the coast of western Iceland. During totality, the moon will perfectly block the sun, causing a brief 360-degree twilight, dropping temperatures and the chance to see the sun's corona with the naked eye. The path of totality will be, on average, 182 miles (293 kilometers) wide and 5,133 miles (8,260 kilometers) long, beginning as an eclipsed sunrise in northern Siberia, Russia and ending as an eclipsed sunset in Spain's Balearic Islands in the Mediterranean Sea. It will be the first total solar eclipse since April 8, 2024, when a long totality was seen from a path through Mexico, the U.S. and Canada. The 2026 event will be the first in a series of three total solar eclipses in less than two years that cover both hemispheres. On Aug. 2, 2027, a total solar eclipse lasting up to 6 minutes 20 seconds — the longest remaining totality this century — will occur in North Africa, while on Jul. 22, 2028, up to 5 minutes 10 seconds of totality will occur in Australia and New Zealand. The path of totality covers Greenland, Iceland and Spain on August 12, 2026. Michael Zeiler/ In eastern Greenland, over a dozen expedition-style cruise ships will take eclipse chasers into the Scoresby Sund/Kangertittivaq. Here, totality will last around 2 minutes during mid-afternoon. Western Iceland, including the capital Reykjavik, the Reykjanes Peninsula and the Snæfellsnes Peninsula, is in the path of totality. Totality will last up to 2 minutes and 13 seconds. In Spain, the path of totality moves from Galicia in the northwest, across Castilla y León, La Rioja and Aragón, to the east coast north of Valencia, just missing Madrid and Barcelona. Totality in Spain will last up to 1 minute and 49 seconds. By chance, this total solar eclipse occurs not only on the same day as the peak night for the annual Perseid meteor shower, but also during a period when the Northern Lights season begins. While the latter will be restricted to those in Greenland and Iceland, the Perseid meteor shower will be observable from anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere. How Often Does A Total Solar Eclipse Happen? You'll often hear that a total solar eclipse occurs 'once every 18 months' somewhere on Earth, but that's an average. At present, they occur 14 times every 18 years, though for a total solar eclipse to occur in a specific location on Earth is extremely rare. It's about once in 366 years according to NASA, based on the paths of the 11,898 total solar eclipses from 2,000 B.C. to A.D. 3,000 A.D. Further Reading Forbes To See The Next Total Solar Eclipse, Book Now — Here's Why By Jamie Carter Forbes 18 Places To See The Next Total Solar Eclipse In 2026 By Jamie Carter Forbes NASA Just Snapped A Rare Solar Eclipse From Space — See The Photos By Jamie Carter

Scientists search for DNA of an endangered salamander in Mexico City's canals
Scientists search for DNA of an endangered salamander in Mexico City's canals

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Scientists search for DNA of an endangered salamander in Mexico City's canals

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Sixty years ago, residents of a canal-crossed borough in Mexico City could pluck axolotls — the large salamander reminiscent of a tiny dragon — out of the water with their hands because they were so plentiful. Now it's almost impossible to find them in the wild. That's why scientists from Mexico's National Autonomous University are filtering Xochimilco's murky waters for traces of the endangered creature's DNA. 'We all shed DNA along our path across the world and that can be captured by filtering air or water,' said biologist Luis Zambrano, from the university's ecological restoration lab. As they try to monitor the axolotls' dwindling numbers, scientists increasingly rely on this technique as their nets come back empty during periodic surveys of the population, which is only found in Xochimilco. They sample water taken from the canals and filter it for environmental DNA, or the genetic particles left by animals and plants that have contact with the water. That's then compared to the profiles contained in a genetic library put together some years ago by British scientists, said Esther Quintero of Conservation International in Mexico, which has collaborated with Zambrano since 2023. Scientists collected water from 53 locations in Xochimilco: 10 inside refuges where water is filtered and the water is cleaner and 43 outside those areas. They found axolotl DNA inside the protected areas and in one site outside them. Referring to the one unprotected area, Zambrano said 'it's very little,' but a sign that there is the possibility of resilience, even with continuing environmental degradation and pollution of the canals. So far, the researchers have only searched a third of Xochimilco with the environmental DNA technique and the manual work with nets, but they plan to continue the work and hopefully present an updated census early next year. The trend, however, is not good. From an estimated 6,000 axolotls per square kilometer in 1998, there were only 36 per square kilometer in the last census, in 2014. Zambrano highlights that his team's work has shown that conservation works and that the effort to protect the species is also improving water quality, increasing the number of pollinizers in the area and means that Mexico City makes better use of Xochimilco's water, among other benefits. But policymakers can do more, he said, such as prohibiting the opening of dance clubs, spas and soccer fields on Xochimilco's traditional man-made islands, known as chinampas. Instead, the government should incentivize the islands' traditional agricultural production, ensuring that farmers can actually make a living at it. If its habitat is fixed, the axolotl can take care of the rest. 'The axolotl reproduces a lot because it lays a lot of eggs … it can easily recover and we know how,' Zambrano said.

Who's Afraid of Peak Mineral?
Who's Afraid of Peak Mineral?

Atlantic

time19 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Who's Afraid of Peak Mineral?

In 1956, the American geologist M. King Hubbert made a startling prediction: In a matter of decades, the supply of fuel on which so much of modern society depended would dwindle. Dubbed the 'peak oil' theory, the concept held sway for decades as U.S. production of crude topped out in 1970, then declined. By 2009, however, the numbers started to turn, thanks to offshore drilling and new fracking technology, until U.S. crude oil output surpassed not just the country's 1970 peak but that of every other crude-pumping nation throughout all of history. Now, as the emissions spewed by burning all that crude help roast the planet, a new anxiety has started to grip energy policy: the possibility of peak mineral. The technologies the world is banking on to wean us off fossil fuels all depend on minerals, in various quantities: the so-called white gold of lithium and the bluish metal cobalt needed for batteries; the brittle metalloid tellurium used in solar cells and microchips; the tin for the soldering that forms a grid of cells on a panel; the soft, silvery cadmium and indium that formulate special kinds of thin-film photovoltaic equipment. Because renewables now make up the fastest-growing source of power generation worldwide, investors have been trying to bolster supplies of these minerals. A new study published Thursday in Nature Climate Change tried to look more comprehensively than any previous effort at the world's mineral future, considering 557 energy-transition scenarios that might keep the world from warming beyond 2 degrees Celsius, the target set as the maximum amount of allowable warming by the Paris climate accords. The researchers, a team of Chinese scientists led by the Beijing Institute of Technology, found that, even given moderate emission-reduction, the world would face shortages of up to 12 minerals by 2100 in every energy-transition scenario. In some regions of the world, such as the Middle East, twice as many minerals could be in shortfall. But clean-energy technologies are advancing rapidly enough that trying to imagine the industry's needs 75 years from now is a very theoretical exercise. Just as fears of peak oil were eventually mooted by technology, fears of peak mineral very well could be too. It's true that the world cannot currently meet humanity's growing need for energy while phasing out fossil fuels. As Ashley Zumwalt-Forbes, a petroleum engineer who previously worked as the Department of Energy's deputy director for batteries and critical materials, put it to me bluntly: 'We need more mines.' Known mineral reserves are limited, but the financial gymnastics necessary to open a mine are also a major barrier to increasing supply. These projects take decades to go from conception to operational; investors want to mine minerals that are cheap enough to be widely available (and therefore used in mass-market products), but expensive enough to make the new venture profitable. If the price of a mineral remains too high, though, the market for it won't grow fast enough to make new mines worthwhile. That's what made the Trump administration's decision last month to buy a big stake in MP Materials, the only active rare-earths mining company in the United States, so notable. It's the first time since World War I, when the federal government nationalized the railroad system, that Washington has directly intervened in the private sector. The U.S. was certainly motivated by competition with China, which has gobbled up the world's market share for mining and processing minerals needed for batteries and microchips, and recently slapped trade restrictions on exports of key metals. But because the Department of Defense now sets the price at which it will buy MP Materials' minerals and is its largest shareholder, MP Materials is also insulated from the ups and downs of commodity trading. In this still-early stage of the world's clean-energy boom, though, mineral needs are shifting quickly and opening up opportunities for substitutes. Silver demand grew over the past two decades thanks to solar cells, which today make up nearly 14 percent of global usage of the precious metal. While demand is growing as more panels are produced, improvements in the technology have slashed silver usage per unit by more than half in the past 15 years, Seaver Wang, the director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute think tank in California, told me. Substitutes such as copper that has been electroplated are becoming more common. Alloys used in the control rods in nuclear reactors—such as indium and cadmium—are already substitutable too, he said: Boron-carbide rods are at no risk of shortages, and even available 'off the product catalog at Westinghouse.' (Wang served as a peer reviewer on the Nature Climate Change study.) Companies have rolled out alternatives to lithium too—most notably batteries that use the far more abundant sodium. And because cobalt, a key ingredient in batteries, is primarily extracted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where labor practices are difficult to trace and often include child workers and slaves, manufacturers have in recent years commercialized new chemistries that completely forgo that metal. Five years ago, the energy consultancy BloombergNEF forecast demand for cobalt to hit 300,000 metric tons a year by 2030, according to Kwasi Ampofo, the consultancy's head of metals and mining. 'Now it's 100,000,' he told me. 'Battery companies realized they don't need cobalt in large quantities anymore. They got smarter on the material composition of these technologies.' The speed of innovation occurring now only points to how hard it is to predict 'mineral requirements for global-warming scenarios out to 2100,' Cameron Perks, a director at the London-based battery-materials consultancy Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, told me. The Nature Climate Change study forecasts, for instance, that Africa will be a major source of lithium. 'While I don't claim to know what will happen in 75 years, I know this is not going to be true anytime soon,' Perks said. The study's authors recognize these limitations. 'These findings underscore the complex and interconnected nature of mineral demands in low-carbon transitions,' they wrote in an email. 'While shifting technologies may relieve certain resource pressures, they can intensify others.' One of the study's clear limits is that the researchers based their calculations on high future growth rates for thin-film solar panels, which depend heavily on indium, cadmium, tellurium, and tin. As a result, those minerals most frequently came up short in the findings. But thin-film panels are also outdated technology. They have the advantage of generating more power in the dawn or late evening than crystalline silicon panels, which also require more steps to manufacture. Still, silicon panels have benefited from the scale of the solar-panel industry in China, and require less complicated chemistry; they have dominated the market since the early 2000s. In the email, the researchers acknowledged that thin-film solar panels losing market share might ease some shortages, but noted that that shift increases demand for other metals, particularly tin. Their goal, they wrote, was to 'encourage systemic thinking in designing sustainable energy transitions.' Substitution is just part of that equation. Oil supplies went up in part because natural gas became a viable alternative once technology to super-chill the fuel into its liquid form became an option. Unconventional drilling technology entered the mix after oil prices surged to record highs in the 2000s, making new and more expensive up-front projects economically viable. If new types of traditional nuclear reactors take off in the 2030s, that could radically alter the world's forecasted mineral needs. If nuclear fusion finally becomes a reality, that could upend all the projections. Artificial intelligence could achieve breakthroughs in material science; mining asteroids may become a source of minerals. If the old adage proves true that change is the only certainty in an more unpredictable future, that bodes well for adaptation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store