Police investigate sudden death of woman in Belfast
are investigating the sudden death of a woman in
Belfast
on Tuesday morning.
Cordons remain in place at the front and back of the house in the Shore Road area in the north of the city, as forensic officers carry out detailed examinations.
It is understood one man has been arrested after being detained at the scene.
Neighbours were alerted when police vehicles arrived at the house facing Loughside Park at around 1am on Tuesday.
READ MORE
North Belfast DUP MLA, Philip Brett, said there was 'massive shock and sadness' in the community following the incident.
'I have spoken with the police and they will be releasing a statement later today,' he said.
'My thoughts and prayers are with all those impacted.'
A spokeswoman for the Police Service of Northern Ireland confirmed an update in the investigation will be provided today.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
27 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Kneecap trial spotlights challenges for Irish speakers in British and Irish courts
When the case of Kneecap 's Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh was before Westminster Magistrates Court earlier this summer, Ó hAnnaidh's legal team indicated that he might require an Irish-language interpreter for his trial. That trial, if it proceeds to hearing later this year, would be the most high-profile case involving testimony given through Irish in recent history. It is also likely to highlight at least some of the difficulties faced by Irish speakers in courtrooms both in the UK and Ireland. Perhaps the most basic difficulty is securing a right to use Irish at all. Had Ó hAnnaidh been prosecuted in Northern Ireland prior to February, 2024, a 1737 Act of Parliament would have prohibited the use of Irish in court. Even now, following the introduction of the Identity and Language (Northern Ireland) Act, there are no procedures in place to protect a right to use Irish in Northern Irish courtrooms. It will be for Northern Ireland 's Justice Minister, Naomi Long, to introduce the guidelines which will give effect to the new Act there. At present, the primary concern is how any procedures would define necessity. Will a person need to demonstrate a certain level of fluency, or that they will suffer a particular degree of prejudice in order to prove it is 'necessary' for them to use Irish during a hearing? Beyond the six counties, the position in Ireland is, on paper, more favourable, with statutory and constitutional protections of the right to speak Irish in court. Yet, even here, the practical challenges and negative impacts of speaking Irish can often deter parties from using it. The most basic obstacle facing Irish speakers across all the UK and Ireland was mentioned by the judge during Ó hAnnaidh's last appearance in court – it can often be difficult to locate an interpreter. In the UK, there is, at least, a National Register of Public Service Interpreters. The register determines who is qualified to interpret court proceedings. It requires interpreters to prove they have an approved qualification, while they must undertake training to act in courtroom settings. READ MORE Yet even with that infrastructure in place, an interpreter was still proving hard to find when Ó hAnnaidh was last in court. No such register is maintained in Ireland and there is no central registration or regulation of interpreters, let alone those sufficiently qualified to act in courtroom settings. As a result, although there is a constitutional and statutory right to speak Irish in court in Ireland, it may be harder to locate a qualified interpreter in Ireland than in the UK – where no such right exists. Even where an interpreter is located, judges and lawyers who are not familiar with interpretation may fail to grasp the potential for crossed wires and bias that result from linguistic differences and the process of interpretation itself. An Irish speaker will not, for example, be able to give the same monosyllabic yes or no answer that an English-speaking witness would. The potential impression of being evasive, vague or contradictory where small differences in language and meaning have tangible legal outcomes is real. In cases where interpreters lack specific courtroom experience, and legal proceedings lack guidelines for how to deal with interpreters, those risks can be realised all too easily. In Australia and the US, researchers have established that linguistic differences and small changes introduced by interpreters, such as hesitating words like 'ah' or 'um', can cause witnesses to appear untrustworthy or evasive. Negative perceptions of those who choose to speak a minority language, including Irish, can also have very real impacts on the choice to use a language in court. The choice to use a language, including Irish, is often seen as political - aligning the speaker (whether rightly or wrongly) with a particular ideology or political group. In such cases, the choice to speak (or refuse to speak) a particular language can be read as a rejection of institutions which operate through another tongue, or as an effort to shame non-speakers. Hardly the note to strike when appealing to a judge or a jury. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter Minority language speakers can be perceived as difficult; seeking to gain an advantage by inconveniencing the other parties in a trial. Similarly, they can be considered untrustworthy - using the delay interpretation requires to more carefully consider their answers, or to deliberately misunderstand a question to buy time. In Ireland, these perceptions are often based on the assumption that there is no such thing as a person who is more comfortable speaking Irish than English. Yet while English may be dominant in terms of the number of daily users, there are still those who – in the face of the formalities and consequences of the legal process – would rather have the security of the language they know best when they must answer questions on which their liberty or livelihood depend. It is likely Ó hAnnaidh will have to contend with at least some of these negative tropes if his hearing proceeds using an Irish interpreter. In being tried in the UK he will, at least, have the benefit of a system in which interpretation is regulated. On this side of the Irish sea, the case is an opportunity to reflect on why negative tropes concerning Irish speakers persist - inside and outside our justice system. It also presents an opportunity to give practical effect to the official status of Irish in courtrooms across the island. Furthermore, it presents an opening to recognise that the issues impacting Irish speakers are ones which reach through our society – and our justice systems - more broadly. Poor standards of interpretation, as well as the legal profession's lack of training on how to conduct a hearing in which interpreters are involved, are barriers to accessing justice and securing a fair trial. They profoundly impact all our minority language communities – including those navigating the international protection system. Irish speakers, Irish citizens, Irish residents and those seeking to make a life here all deserve a justice system in which the language they speak does not determine the reach of their voice, or the reception of their testimony. Dr Róisín Á Costello is an Assistant Professor at the School of Law, Trinity College Dublin and a practicing barrister.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
New forensic evidence identifies 1970s IRA bombers
Several prime suspects responsible for the Guildford pub attacks, and other IRA bombings and shootings in Britain between 1974-1976, have been identified, according to legacy investigators in Belfast . Suspects for these attacks, now in their 70s and 80s, have been linked to the incidents by forensic evidence subjected to new scientific testing ordered by the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) in Belfast. However, the Irish Government faces pressure to offer greater co-operation with legacy investigations into killings that took place during the Troubles. Investigators have made progress in an investigation into the no-warning pub bombings in Guildford Surrey. The bombings occurred five days before the British October 1974 general election. READ MORE The Horse and Groom bomb, believed to been left by a man and women posing as a courting couple, killed four soldiers from the nearby barracks and a civilian. The victims were aged between 17 and 21. The ICRIR investigation focuses on a February 1974 M62 motorway coach bombing, in which the IRA placed 25 pounds of high explosive inside the luggage locker of a coach carrying off-duty soldiers and their families. The bomb detonated just after midnight as the bus travelled to a British military base, killing nine soldiers and three civilians and injuring 38. It resulted in wrongful conviction and jailing of Judith Ward, who served 17 years before her conviction was quashed. At the heart of the investigation by the ICRIR are the construction methods used to make the IRA bombs for the 1970s campaign in Britain. 'Due to very significant advances in forensic science since these atrocities half a century ago, we have developed some highly significant leads,' said the organisation's deputy commissioner Keith Surtees. There is 'the real prospect of finally bringing' IRA members who were involved in some 70 bombings and shootings to justice, the former Metropolitan Police commander told The Irish Times. [ Forensic advances bring chance of new prosecutions for 1970s IRA bombings Opens in new window ] The ICRIR also wants the Irish Government to strengthen co-operation with its work. Investigators involved in Operation Kenova were unhappy with the help offered previously. Separate An Garda Síochána and judicial liaison mechanisms to expedite requests for evidence and information that is held by the Garda, military intelligence in Dublin or other quarters is now sought. 'If you want to fully investigate cases like Narrow Water, a joint framework with the Irish Government is needed,' one official closely involved in the situation told The Irish Times, speaking on condition of anonymity. Surtees was the chief investigator for Operation Kenova, which established the British agent code-named Stakeknife's involvement in 13 murders and 15 abductions of suspected fellow agents and informers. Up to now, legacy investigations have largely, but not entirely, centred on prosecutions against British soldiers for alleged actions during the Troubles, so the new chapter in the ICRIR's work will be keenly noted in many quarters. Following requests from family members, the ICRIR is also investigating the August 1979 ambush that killed 18 British army soldiers in Warrenpoint, when the IRA detonated explosives from the southern side of the Border. The Warrenpoint killings on northern side of Carlingford Lough, caused by two large roadside bombs at Narrow Water Castle at the Co Down beauty spot, constituted the deadliest attack on the British army during the Troubles. Both bombs were deliberately set off half an hour apart by radio control by IRA men 200 yards across the lough on its southern bank. A British tourist was also killed on the shore in Co Louth by army gunfire. The attack happened five hours after Lord Louis Mountbatten, uncle to the late Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, was assassinated by an IRA bomb in his fishing boat in Mullaghmore, Co Sligo. Two family members and a 15-year-old boy also died.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Drugs worth more than €8m seized following investigation by Garda and Polish police
More than €8 million worth of drugs were seized in Ireland as part of a joint investigation by the Garda and Polish police. The joint investigation team was established in January 2022 to target a network of transnational Polish criminal organisations with leadership, transport and distribution cells based in Ireland, Poland and Spain. 'These organisations were identified to be co-ordinating the importation of cannabis at a significant scale in to Ireland as well as other European jurisdictions,' a statement from An Garda Síochána said. Over €8 million worth of drugs were seized following an investigation by Gardaí and Polish police. Photograph: An Garda Síochána Over €800,000 in cash was seized during the investigation. Photograph: An Garda Síochána Some 340kg of cannabis herb, 155kg of cannabis resin and 26kg of amphetamine were seized. Photograph: An Garda Síochána During these investigations, more than €8 million of controlled drugs were seized in Ireland, with assistance from Revenue's customs service. READ MORE Some 340kg of cannabis herb, 155kg of cannabis resin and 26kg of amphetamines were seized. More than €800,000 in cash was also seized. Thirteen Polish nationals based in Ireland were arrested. 'Evidence provided by Ireland was shared with prosecutors in Poland and, as part of the joint investigation team, a number of the prosecution cases in Ireland were transferred to Poland for prosecution as part of larger organised crime prosecutions in the Polish jurisdiction,' a Garda statement noted. In total, more than 800kg of controlled drugs, seven firearms and several hundred rounds of ammunition were seized across a number of European jurisdictions. Charges have been filed against 170 individuals in Poland by the district prosecutor's office in Gliwice. Assets worth more than €11 million were seized by Polish investigators across Europe as being the proceeds of crime. Detective Superintendent Dave Gallagher of the Garda National Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau said: 'This investigation again shows the international dimensions of transnational organised crime and demonstrates fully the benefits of our ongoing collaboration with law enforcement in other jurisdictions. 'Such investigations co-ordinated via Europol and Eurojust continue to disrupt, prosecute and dismantle transnational criminal organisations impacting on communities in Ireland and across Europe.'
