Rangers takeover chief in Club 1872 summit as fan group break silence on key issues
Rangers chairman Andrew Cavenagh has held constructive talks with fan group Club 1872.
The shareholders grouping revealed they had been granted a sitdown with the American pharmaceutical tycoon who spearheaded the recent takeover at Ibrox.
Advertisement
Chief executive Patrick Stewart was also involved in the meeting which the group hope can help build bridges between them and the board.
READ MORE: Celtic handed 4 man MLS transfer dossier as next Alistair Johnston identified
READ MORE: Kwame Poku tipped for Rangers stardom as Peterborough chief reveals destiny and truth behind Celtic rumours
Club 1872 have been at loggerheads with the Ibrox hierarchy in recent years over a number of issues.
They went to war with Rangers chiefs over their decision to participate in the Sydney Super Cup in Australia against rivals Celtic.
The Ibrox club accused the of embarking on "propaganda war" but in the end they withdrew from the friendly Down Under over a wider supporter backlash.
Rangers fans stop the game while protesting the Old Firm friendly in Australia
Now, though, they appear to been keen to create a better relationship with the new owners.
Advertisement
Club 1872 have five per cent shareholding in the club and their ultimate aim is to have official representation at board level - but that is not on the table for the new regime.
But they could still have a part to play in the new era as talks get set to continue and a statement read: "Club 1872 is pleased to announce that we held a very positive meeting with new Rangers Chairman and lead consortium member, Andrew Cavenagh and chief executive, Patrick Stewart [on Monday].
"Since John Bennett became chairman in April 2023, Club 1872 has been meeting regularly with Rangers to find a way forward on a proposed funding model which would fit with the club's strategy and allow renewed investment directly to the club for shares as well as funding key heritage projects of significance to the Rangers support.
"At each stage of those discussions, progress was made but then delayed by the regularly fluctuating situation with the senior leadership of the club. We have met with three different chairmen and two different chief executives over that time.
Advertisement
"We sincerely apologise to contributors for our relative silence during this time but we were dealing with those regular changes to the senior decision makers at the club and were mindful of confidentiality considerations and sensitivities in that ever changing landscape - particularly in recent months with a live takeover in play.
A general View of Ibrox
"We welcome this early opportunity to speak to Andrew Cavenagh and outline our funding proposal, the significant funds we have available to invest and to gain an understanding of the priorities of the new owners.
"We also had the opportunity to discuss the upcoming EGM, the change in the company structure and the investment strategy of our new owners going forward.
Advertisement
"It is our intention to find a way in which Club 1872 can fit into that strategy that all parties are comfortable with and we were encouraged by our initial talks in that regard.
"We will now continue those discussions with a view to presenting a proposal to contributors for their consideration in due course. In the meantime we will shortly publish our poll for the upcoming EGM."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
12 minutes ago
- New York Times
Marketa Vondrousova beats Aryna Sabalenka to reach first final since Wimbledon 2023
Markéta Vondroušová is into her first final since she won Wimbledon in 2023. The Czech, who has been hampered by shoulder problems since her stunning victory at SW19, beat world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka 6-2, 6-4 in the German Open semifinals Saturday. Sabalenka, one of the favorites to lift the Wimbledon title this year, had saved four match points in a tiebreak to escape 2022 champion Elena Rybakina the previous day, one of them coming via a fortunate net cord. But Vondroušová was not so profligate. After both players saved break points in their opening service games, Vondroušová needed just one chance to break Sabalenka's serve at the next opportunity. She broke again to seal a clinical first set, and when the Belarusian — as she so often does — mounted a charge early in the second, Vondroušová broke her to love to restore parity immediately and snuff out the world No. 1's momentum. Advertisement At 4-4 in the second set, Vondroušová made her move at the most critical time. A stunning forehand winner with her knee to the ground earned a Sabalenka double fault, as she tried to overpress and earn back the advantage. Sabalenka got to 30-30, but Vondroušová changed from a chipped, slow return and slammed a first serve to her opponent's ankles to cough up a short ball and win a break point. Sabalenka saved that one, but missed a routine forehand into the net under pressure at 40-40, echoing how Rybakina had tightened against her with their match on the line the previous day. And then Vondroušová somehow stayed in a point from the shadows deep behind the baseline, lobbing and chipping strikes back into play until she managed to jam Sabalenka on a volley that she dumped into the net. Serving for the match, Vondroušová found herself down 0-40. But in the face of Sabalenka's much-improved defense, she kept playing attacking tennis and earned errors to get back to deuce. Two points later, she was back where she had dreamed of being for so long. Vondroušová's four consecutive victories in Berlin match the longest win streak she has compiled in the two years since her Grand Slam triumph. Last grass season, her Wimbledon title defense ended with a first-round defeat to Jessica Bouzas Maneiro of Spain, then the world No. 83. Vondroušová was world No. 6. The first unseeded woman to lift the Venus Rosewater Dish one year; the second defending women's champion to lose in the first round in the Open Era the next. Come last year's U.S. Open, she was undergoing surgery. At 25, Vondroušová thought her career was close to over. She couldn't swing a tennis racket after surgery on her shoulder. She would try to play. The pain would return. Another surgery wasn't an option. All the time spent on physical improvement wasn't translating into tennis. She missed six months of the 2024 season, returning in January 2025. Advertisement 'It's not fun,' Vondroušová told The Athletic at Roland Garros a few weeks ago. 'I had to be very patient.' In Paris, she won two Grand Slam matches for the first time in over a year, and now that tennis has moved from clay to grass, her command of the ball, skidding groundstrokes and confidence at the front of the court is back on full display. In a rematch of the 2023 Wimbledon final, she took out Ons Jabeur for the right to face Sabalenka, having beaten Madison Keys, another serious Wimbledon contender, in the opening round. Vondroušová will play either Liudmila Samsonova or Wang Xinyu in Sunday's final.
Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Ukraine Amasses $43 Billion for Defense Industry, Zelenskiy Says
By and Daryna Krasnolutska Save Ukraine has accumulated $43 billion for its defence industry so far this year between local funding and aid from allies, using it to ramp up the production and purchase of drones, artillery and other weaponry, said President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Kyiv has also launched a 'Build with Ukraine' program and announced new agreements to be signed this summer, including opening production lines in European countries.
Fast Company
27 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Autodesk CMO Dara Treseder on how brands are navigating attention and polarization at Cannes Lions
At the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, top agencies and brands vie for awards and hustle to close deals. As this year's event wraps up, Autodesk CMO Dara Treseder shares the insider buzz—from the continued rise of creator-led content to how brands navigate getting the right kind of attention in a polarized market. This is an abridged transcript of an interview from Rapid Response, hosted by Robert Safian, former editor-in-chief of Fast Company. From the team behind the Masters of Scale podcast, Rapid Response features candid conversations with today's top business leaders navigating real-time challenges. Subscribe to Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts to ensure you never miss an episode. What are you hearing people talk about here at the festival? A lot is going on. There's a recurring theme. I think . . . everyone is trying to figure out, How can I cut through without being cut out? How can I cut through without alienating a core part of my audience? Because we're living in such a polarized time, where there are very few things people can align on. And so there is really that, but we are also in an attention recession, where it's so difficult to get attention, and getting attention is not enough, because you have to convert that attention into intention, right? To get people to actually go into discovery, consideration, and ultimately purchase. So, it's not just getting the attention, but the attention in the way that's right for your brand. Exactly. Getting attention in a way that's right for your brand and drives action, drives engagement. And now, there's just so much that grabs people's attention, so grabbing attention isn't enough. It's actually converting the attention into intention, into buyer intent. Are there any rules about it, or is it that each brand has to do it in its own way? I think that there are some themes that we're seeing about how brands in general are doing this, across all industries, B2B, B2C, healthcare, technology, beauty, retail. We're seeing some recurring themes. And I think one of the big themes is leaning into creators and community, because people show up for people. They might not necessarily show up for brands in the same way as we've seen in the past. So a lot of brands are leaning into [that]. I mean, creators are all over the place. Creators and athletes. Because creators and athletes come with a more dedicated and a more engaged and a more, I'm going to use the word rabid, a little bit, fan base. Yes, real fans. Real fans, rather than just celebrities that you see. I mean, we've been talking for a few years about influencers and how that has sort of changed the marketplace. It sounds a little bit like we've broken through to a new layer with that? We've certainly broken through to a new layer. And in fact, they don't want to be called influencers. They want to be called creators. Because they're saying, 'Hey, I'm not here to just influence. I'm here to co-create with you to drive a certain outcome.' So we're seeing that happen more now. And does that change the relationship that a brand like yours has with a traditional advertising firm? Are you going to creators in a different way? It definitely changes, because creators have, I think, a lot more say and a lot more power, and they're taking a bigger space at the table. So, gone are the days, I think, where it's just you find a creator, you tell them exactly what you want to do. If you're actually trying to drive real results and you want their fans to show up, they're taking an audience-first approach. So first of all, you've got to find that creator that aligns with your values. So you have to know they agree with you or they're simpatico in that way before they start. There's got to be trust. . . . And the trust goes both ways. You have got to trust that they are aligned to your brand values, they are aligned to your customer base, because remember, you want to cut through, you want to break through, but you are not trying to cut out a big portion of your customer base. So you need to make sure that you have that trust that yes, they are aligned to your brand values, they're aligned to your purpose, they're aligned to the outcomes, but then you also have to trust them to give them the space to do what they do. Because it can't come across as an ad. It has to come across as something more organic, something that they would truly want to do on their own, because that's when their audience shows up, and that's what determines the result. Are you, in your conversations with your peers, with other CMOs, are you hearing them privately acknowledge like, 'Oh, we didn't do that quite right? We alienated a group we didn't want to.' One hundred percent, especially in today's world. . . . As we're having these private CMO roundtables, we're all sharing, here's what went wrong, here's what went right, here's what I learned. And a lot of it is just, the margin for error is a lot slimmer than it ever was. There is a very thin line between cutting through and cutting out. It's like walking on high heels on a teeny-tiny thread. There is no margin for error. And so . . . a lot of CMOs are thinking about, How do I do this and how do I do this well?. . . And I think one of the things that's really important is making sure that you have a broad pull at the table as these decisions are being made, and that you are also able to pivot and adjust very quickly. Yes. The idea that to break through, you have to say something sharp, but you're also saying that the risk is higher than ever, but you have to take that risk. There's no way out of this bind. There's no way out. Let me tell you. We've got to give CMOs and marketers, all marketers at all levels, we've got to give [them] a break. It is a tough world out there. And so, yes, you have to opine with a spine, but you got to be careful what you opine on. So you need to pick the thing that truly makes sense for your brand and business. You cannot opine on everything. If you speak about everything, you're speaking about nothing. And if you end up speaking about things that you have not earned the right to speak about, you don't have the credibility to speak about, you could end up in some real hot water that you don't want to be on. Not the good kind of bath, the scalding kind of bath. So there really is that thoughtfulness that has to go into it.
