Al Qaida terrorists tried to poison UK water supply, says ex-security minister
It follows the publication of comprehensive military plans to safeguard the UK in the face of threats from Vladimir Putin's Russia and China.
Sir Keir Starmer said the strategic defence review (SDR), published earlier this week, would create a 'battle-ready, armour-clad' nation.
The move comes against the backdrop of ongoing concerns about the vulnerability of critical national infrastructure to attack.
Pressed in Parliament over whether there had ever been an attempt or a plan uncovered to contaminate the UK's water supply, environment minister Baroness Hayman of Ullock said: 'My understanding is that there has not been such an incident, but that does not mean that we should be complacent.
'We know that our water and energy infrastructure are both potentially vulnerable to hostile attacks.'
But moving to correct his frontbench colleague, Lord West, who served as Home Office minister for security and counter-terrorism from 2007 to 2010, said: 'In 2008 there was an attempt by eight al Qaida operatives to poison north London water supplies.
'I am pleased to say that our agencies worked brilliantly to stop it happening.'
The former Navy chief, who sits on Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee, added: 'As a result, in the Home Office we put in hand a whole series of work on police response times, indicators of where the outflows from reservoirs went and new barriers.
'Where has all that work gone? These things somehow seem to disappear. There should be some reports, and hopefully someone did something about it.'
Responding, Lady Hayman said: 'That is extremely interesting and very helpful of my noble friend. I will certainly look into it, because it is an important point.'
Earlier, the minister told peers: 'The Government's first duty is to protect our national security and keep our country safe.
'Defra (the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) recognises that the drinking water supply is a potential target for hostile actors.
'It works with water companies and partners across Government to understand and monitor threats to water supply and to consider responses as appropriate to protect the security of our water system.'
But Labour peer Lord Harris of Haringey, who is chairman of the National Preparedness Commission, said: 'I wonder whether her department is being a tad complacent in talking simply about monitoring the threat rather than looking at what practical arrangements can be made.
'For example, how do we deal with a drone which is flown over a reservoir and deposits something in there?
'The panic effects of that being known to have happened and not necessarily knowing what the substance is would be enormous.'
Lady Hayman said: 'Tackling the diverse range of state threats – not just drones but many other threats – requires a cross-government and cross-society response.
'We need to draw on the skills, the resources and the remits of different departments and operational partners.
'In Defra, we work closely to look at the threats and the appropriate levels of response, specifically drawing on expert advice from the National Protective Security Authority, the National Cyber Security Centre and the Home Office, as well as carrying out threat assessment with policing partners.'
Former Metropolitan Police chief Lord Hogan-Howe, who led the UK's largest force from 2011 to 2017, said: 'For about 15 years, I have been worried about the water supply – the large and small reservoirs, the pipes that connect them and, of course, the water treatment plants.
'I worry that there is sometimes confusion between the Home Office, Defra and others about who is looking after security.'
The independent crossbencher added: 'It needs to be higher in the priorities than it presently appears.'
In reply, the minister said: 'I can assure him that we discuss these matters with the Home Office.
'One thing that we have been trying hard to do in Defra and other departments since we came into government is to work better across Government.'
The Home Office has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
If stopping the boats were simple, it would have happened by now
Given the unusually fine weather – coupled with the world's many conflicts, and regions of endemic poverty – it should not come as a great surprise that yet another small boats record has been broken. New Home Office figures show that, since Labour came to power after the general election, more than 50,000 migrants have arrived in the UK via the English Channel. A few weeks ago, the numbers of refugees and economic migrants arriving via the English Channel reached a record rate for the time of year – 25,000 by the end of July, and, thus, the fastest flow since 2018, when such movements were first monitored. The new headline figure is different, and even more 'political'. At this rate, 2025 will set a new record for a calendar year. The political reaction has been predictable. Labour says it is 'unacceptable', while the Tories accuse the government of having 'surrendered our borders'. A little over a year ago, it was the Conservative government admitting the flows were unacceptable, and the Labour opposition laying the charge that the Sunak government had surrendered our borders. Meanwhile, Nigel Farage and Reform UK continue to pretend that solving this complex and intractable problem is simply a matter of willpower and a willingness to break international law and start a naval conflict with France. To borrow a recently fashionable phrase, the Reformists are the least serious people in British politics since… well, they persuaded the nation that Brexit was a good idea. Of course, in some ways, taking the Guinness Book of Records approach to the immigration statistics is playing the old immigration numbers game in an even more unhelpful way. The numbers may be large by recent trends, but they are rarely placed in context. Even a figure of 50,000-plus would, for example, only represent about 4 to 5 per cent of the total of gross, entirely lawful immigration into the UK on work and study visas. Not all will be able to make a successful claim for asylum. If any commit a criminal offence, they are liable to be deported – and much more rapidly under the latest proposals from the home secretary, Yvette Cooper. Contrary to some lurid and confused headlines, asylum seekers are neither responsible for most sexual offences in Britain, nor the same as those predators of Pakistani heritage who inflicted their appalling crimes on young girls for most of the last two decades. They were not responsible for the Southport murders; and they are mostly quite anxious to go to work, even if it is illegal for them to do so. The economic case for migration also stands. Despite an uptick in unemployment, there is a labour shortage in many parts of the UK, and it is almost as bad as it has ever been since Brexit in agriculture and the hospitality, health, social care and leisure sectors. A policy of 'net zero' migration, as advocated by Reform UK, would cause chaos in care homes, on farms and elsewhere, and inflict grievous damage to the economy. Those who want to reduce regular, lawful, documented and visa-based migration, such as Mr Farage, need to come up with some better ideas about how the demographically challenged and ageing British nation can undergo the renaissance they so cynically promise. Ministers have a duty to take on the myths and legends of irregular migration. But they are also under an obligation to 'stop the boats', something all parties actually agree about: this trade in human misery is dangerous and, indeed, unacceptable. Politically, Labour may have given the impression before the last general election, analogous to the way it approached economic policy, that fixing the problem of irregular migration would be easier than it has turned out to be. That is not to decry its efforts. Sir Keir Starmer was perfectly sincere in his belief, based on past experience as director of public prosecutions, that the criminal gangs engaged in human trafficking are susceptible to the same methods as gangs involved in terrorism and drug peddling. He was also right to rebuild cooperation with European neighbours, as with the 'one in, one out' deal with France and changes in German law to make obtaining and running the boats more difficult. Yvette Cooper seems fully aware of the need to stop using so-called 'migrant hotels', and to clear the huge backlog of cases left behind by the Sunak administration – people supposedly destined for Rwanda who were never going to get there because the Rwanda scheme was so small. Without condoning the ugly violence and vicious Islamophobia that disfigures too many local demonstrations, it is plain that the public is impatient with the lack of tangible progress. It is unfortunately not yet clear that Labour is making the requisite moves to 'smash the gangs' and 'turn the page and restore order to the asylum system so that it operates swiftly, firmly, and fairly'. The best thing that Sir Keir and Ms Cooper can do in these circumstances is to level with the electorate and explain why this intractable challenge will have to take time, and that they will do whatever is necessary to get the numbers radically lower. If stopping the boats were as easy as some claim, it would have happened by now. Nonetheless, the government needs to provide more evidence of progress, if only to counter the propaganda and misinformation so widespread on social media. In short, the public would like to hear about record-low numbers of small boat arrivals.
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Is Keir Starmer falling into a small boats trap?
As a milestone is reached of 50,000 migrants crossing the Channel since he became prime minister, Keir Starmer finds himself in a familiar place - seemingly unable to either stop the boats, or escape talking about them. Home Office data shows 50,271 people made the journey since the election last July, after 474 migrants arrived on Monday. This is around 13,000 higher than the comparable period the previous year. Starmer has tweeted more than 10 times about this issue in the past week alone, more than any other. On Monday he wrote on X: "If you come to this country illegally, you will face detention and return. If you come to this country and commit a crime, we will deport you as soon as possible." It could be a tweet by a politician of any party on the right - and many voters (and Labour MPs) will say it's right that the prime minister is taking this issue seriously. Illegal - or irregular - migration is a relatively small proportion of total migration. Net migration was down at 431,000 in 2024 which the OCED say is comparable to other high-income countries. But it is of course highly visible and politically charged. Nigel Farage's Reform party have had a busy few months campaigning on it, and the prime minister has been toughening up his language in response. Shortly after the local elections in May in which Reform won hundreds of seats and took control of councils, Starmer made his speech in which he warned: "In a diverse nation like ours, without fair immigration rules, we risk becoming an island of strangers." It outraged some in his own party, and he later said he regretted that language. But it was part of a speech which made clear that he wanted action - vowing to end "years of uncontrolled migration" in a way "that will finally take back control of our borders and close the book on a squalid chapter for our politics." It's a long way from his early months as Labour leader in 2020 when he said: "We welcome migrants, we don't scapegoat them." Migration did not feature as one of his five missions for "change" at the general election. The strategy by Starmer and his minister is to talk up forthcoming new measures - a crackdown on social media adverts by traffickers, returns of people without a right to be in the UK which are indeed higher than under the Conservatives, and last week, a "one in, one out" deal with France to send people back across the channel. The government say some people have been detained, although it is not known when these returns will happen. Ministers are also still pointing the finger at the previous Conservative government - which found stopping the boats easy to say and hard to achieve. Baroness Jacqui Smith, a former home secretary, said this morning: "I don't think it was our fault that it was enabled to take root. We've taken our responsibility to work internationally, to change the law, to improve the way in which the asylum system works, to take through legislation to strengthen the powers that are available. "The last government did none of those things and focused on gimmicks. And it's because of that, that the crime behind this got embedded in the way which it did. And that won't be solved overnight." But for a prime minister who appears to have come to this issue reluctantly, talking about it a lot - and suggesting he'll be judged on whether he can tackle it - risks raising expectations. Joe Twyman, of the pollsters Deltapoll said: "You cannot simply out-Farage Nigel Farage when it comes to the subject of immigration. In a sense, Labour is falling into precisely the same trap that the Conservatives fell into. They're giving significant prominence to a subject where they don't have much control". Starmer has avoided mentioning firm numbers on how many migrants his crackdown may stop, but as previous prime ministers have found with the difficult issue of controlling migration, if you ask to be judged on delivery, voters will do so.
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Mexico Congress to consider official for deputy finance minister
MEXICO CITY, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has nominated Maria del Carmen Bonilla to serve as deputy finance minister, a congressional committee agenda seen by Reuters on Tuesday showed. The committee will consider Bonilla's nomination in a Wednesday hearing, accoring to the agenda. Bonilla currently leads the finance ministry's public credit and international affairs unit.
