‘Return to the dark days': Protests take aim at Zelensky for first time in the war
'It is a very sad moment because for me it means we are going back in time when we had this same discussion,' said Mustafa Nayyem, a former member of parliament who took part in the earlier protests. 'It is very sad and very dangerous.'
Amelina said her husband had called her from the front, upset by news of the parliamentary vote, and told her that many other soldiers were also unhappy.
Activists and analysts see the legislation as part of a broader crackdown on independent news media, voices critical of the government and government oversight groups, both public and private, threatening hard-won progress towards democracy.
One of Ukraine's most prominent anti-corruption activists, and a frequent critic of the Zelensky administration, Vitaliy Shabunin, was accused in a court proceeding last week of evading military service and fraud.
He has denied the accusation, which his many domestic and international defenders call baseless, even farcical. If convicted, he could face a decade in prison.
There was a widespread view in Ukraine that Zelensky and his administration had grown cloistered, losing touch with the people.
'It's impossible to tolerate what's been happening these past weeks and months – the attacks on civic activists, the attacks on the anti-corruption system,' said Iryna Nemyrovych, 36, the director of the Ukrainian Health Centre, an independent research group.
'We've seen all of this before.'
Dmytro Koziatynskyi, a veteran of the Russo-Ukrainian war, was one of many influential figures calling for protests.
'Time is not on our side,' he said in a message shared widely online.
'We must take to the streets tonight and urge Zelensky to prevent a return to the dark days of Yanukovych. See you this evening!'
The demonstrators were largely young and peaceful, and there was little police presence, with only few security personnel at the barricades outside the presidential complex of offices.
There were also protests in Lviv and other cities as public anger swelled and word spread of the gatherings.
One demonstrator in Kyiv, Sashko Adamliuk, 25, said Ukraine was fighting for more than land.
'Our democracy is under attack,' he said. Like many of those gathered, he feared the government was systematically stifling dissent.
Oleksandr Teren, 29, a veteran who lost both his legs in combat, said the actions of the government were an affront to all those who had sacrificed so much in the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
37 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's guru talkfest won't make you richer - he's chosen the wrong people
Why isn't there a seat for the CSIRO, which has given us life-changing and productivity-enhancing inventions as Wi-Fi, solar hot water, gene shears, polymer banknotes and permanent-crease clothing? Where is the expert in AI or cancer therapy or environmental trends or agricultural science? Scott Farquhar, co-founder and former chief executive of Atlassian, will be there as the lone voice of the technological future. He'll be sitting next to three former or current state treasurers who will tell us all about the fiscal problems they face. If you were to list the most important developments that have made the world more productive, would tax reform even get a look in? (Perhaps the creation of income tax to help Britain fight Napoleon might get a mention.) The telephone, the internal combustion engine and the lightbulb are three of the most transformative pieces of technology in humanity's development. The phone allowed us to communicate quickly. The internal combustion engine enabled us to move goods and people really quickly. And the lightbulb – the creation of cheap light – meant we could work when we wanted to. Loading These three pivotal productivity enhancements weren't driven by tax reform. They were driven by ingenuity, by the circumstances faced by their creators, by the need to improve the lives of everyone. What's also important – and more than a little disheartening – is that all three came into being between 1876 and 1879. Three inventions that underpin today's society are approaching their 150th birthdays. That's why there is so much interest in AI at present. This is an invention that could utterly change our lives. As US Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook noted in a speech last week, AI is a general-purpose technology (a transformative invention like the steam engine and electricity). 'AI is poised to alter the contours of the global economy. AI is transforming the economy, including by accelerating how quickly we generate ideas and making workers more efficient,' she noted. It's ideas that make the world, the economy and productivity go round. That's not to say tax doesn't matter. If you impose huge imposts on businesses or individuals, then you distort the economy in a way that is unlikely to be productive. If you don't raise revenue, then say goodbye to roads, hospitals, a judicial system and defence networks. Governments often build incentives into the tax system for a major policy aim. That's the whole reason, for instance, that superannuation is taxed lightly and why excises on cigarettes and alcohol are so high. Loading The idea put up by the Labor-aligned McKell Institute this week, to increase the capital gains tax concession on new apartment builds (and reduce it for investors who simply buy an existing detached house), is another example of how the tax system can help. However, it's aimed at acting as an incentive for investors to build more homes – not to build those homes more productively. Apart from, perhaps, some incentives directly aimed at research and development, inventions and productivity-enhancing breakthroughs are rarely driven by the tax system. Terrible events and diseases drive change (Alexander Fleming's penicillin discovery was transformed into a useable medicine by Howard Florey and German-born Ernst Chain, but it was only World War II that made it cheap and mass-produced lifesaver). Penicillin has saved an estimated 500 million lives. In terms of productivity improvement, this single medicine has done more than any tax concession to improve our lives and our economy. Yet when you look around the cabinet table next month, don't expect to see anyone carrying out health-related research. We can hope that some of the specialists who get to sit in on certain parts of the roundtable might pique the interest of those who will ultimately have a say over what policies get supported. But I wouldn't bet on it. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
The Age
37 minutes ago
- The Age
Albanese's guru talkfest won't make you richer - he's chosen the wrong people
Why isn't there a seat for the CSIRO, which has given us life-changing and productivity-enhancing inventions as Wi-Fi, solar hot water, gene shears, polymer banknotes and permanent-crease clothing? Where is the expert in AI or cancer therapy or environmental trends or agricultural science? Scott Farquhar, co-founder and former chief executive of Atlassian, will be there as the lone voice of the technological future. He'll be sitting next to three former or current state treasurers who will tell us all about the fiscal problems they face. If you were to list the most important developments that have made the world more productive, would tax reform even get a look in? (Perhaps the creation of income tax to help Britain fight Napoleon might get a mention.) The telephone, the internal combustion engine and the lightbulb are three of the most transformative pieces of technology in humanity's development. The phone allowed us to communicate quickly. The internal combustion engine enabled us to move goods and people really quickly. And the lightbulb – the creation of cheap light – meant we could work when we wanted to. Loading These three pivotal productivity enhancements weren't driven by tax reform. They were driven by ingenuity, by the circumstances faced by their creators, by the need to improve the lives of everyone. What's also important – and more than a little disheartening – is that all three came into being between 1876 and 1879. Three inventions that underpin today's society are approaching their 150th birthdays. That's why there is so much interest in AI at present. This is an invention that could utterly change our lives. As US Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook noted in a speech last week, AI is a general-purpose technology (a transformative invention like the steam engine and electricity). 'AI is poised to alter the contours of the global economy. AI is transforming the economy, including by accelerating how quickly we generate ideas and making workers more efficient,' she noted. It's ideas that make the world, the economy and productivity go round. That's not to say tax doesn't matter. If you impose huge imposts on businesses or individuals, then you distort the economy in a way that is unlikely to be productive. If you don't raise revenue, then say goodbye to roads, hospitals, a judicial system and defence networks. Governments often build incentives into the tax system for a major policy aim. That's the whole reason, for instance, that superannuation is taxed lightly and why excises on cigarettes and alcohol are so high. Loading The idea put up by the Labor-aligned McKell Institute this week, to increase the capital gains tax concession on new apartment builds (and reduce it for investors who simply buy an existing detached house), is another example of how the tax system can help. However, it's aimed at acting as an incentive for investors to build more homes – not to build those homes more productively. Apart from, perhaps, some incentives directly aimed at research and development, inventions and productivity-enhancing breakthroughs are rarely driven by the tax system. Terrible events and diseases drive change (Alexander Fleming's penicillin discovery was transformed into a useable medicine by Howard Florey and German-born Ernst Chain, but it was only World War II that made it cheap and mass-produced lifesaver). Penicillin has saved an estimated 500 million lives. In terms of productivity improvement, this single medicine has done more than any tax concession to improve our lives and our economy. Yet when you look around the cabinet table next month, don't expect to see anyone carrying out health-related research. We can hope that some of the specialists who get to sit in on certain parts of the roundtable might pique the interest of those who will ultimately have a say over what policies get supported. But I wouldn't bet on it. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Calls for consumption tax to be off the roundtable menu
A push to raise the GST as part of the government's economic roundtable is being met with resistance, with the community services sector warning it would increase the burden on low-income earners. A number of prominent economists have advocated raising or broadening the 10 per cent GST to fund cuts to less-efficient levies such as income taxes. Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie objects to the proposal on the grounds it would increase inequality. "We need a fairer and more effective tax system that secures the revenue we need to fund essential services and safety nets while encouraging more productive investment to create jobs and lift living standards," she said. "This can be done with reforms that lift productivity and overall revenue without increasing the burden for people on low and modest incomes." While Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said increasing the tax on consumption does not fit with his agenda, Labor is pledging to overhaul Australia's tax system as part of an economic roundtable in August. The summit is aimed at kick-starting the nation's stalled productivity growth and living standards. Shifting from income to consumption tax would ease the burden on younger working Australians but it would also widen wealth inequality, deepen poverty and deliver only modest economic efficiency gains, a report produced by the council found. Broadly speaking, personal income tax is more progressive than the GST because people pay a higher rate the more they earn, whereas low-income earners tend to pay a higher proportion of their money on consumption taxes than people on higher incomes who save more. Instead, the government should take steps that reduce inequality while lifting productivity and revenue, report author Peter Davidson found. To that aim, they could tighten loopholes for family and corporate trusts, limit negative gearing, reduce tax concessions on superannuation and halve the 50 per cent discount on the capital gains tax. Changing the capital gains tax discount has been backed in by the Greens and Labor-aligned think tank the McKell Institute, which argued it could be tweaked to encourage new housing supply and make it easier for Australians to own their own home. Prospective homebuyers hoping for lower mortgage rates could get a clearer indication of the Reserve Bank's next move on Thursday when governor Michele Bullock speaks for the first time since a surprise surge in unemployment last week. Ms Bullock will talk about the RBA's dual mandate of maintaining low inflation and unemployment in a speech to the Anika Foundation in Sydney.
