Court of Appeal rules in State's favour over rights of International Protection applicants
The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) used its legal power under the 2014 Act - under which it was established - to commence a judicial review in respect of International Protection applicants who were not offered accommodation when they made their asylum claim.
A year ago, the High Court ruled that the men had their right to human dignity breached by the State, through its failure to provide for their basic needs and it found that the Charter of Fundamental Rights under European law had been breached.
The State appealed the decision on a number of grounds, including the interpretation and/or the application of the 2014 Act by IHREC; the standard and the burden of proof that the High Court applied; and failure regarding relevant considerations, such as the additional needs payment made available which amounts to €113.80 per week.
In his judgement published this morning, Mr Justice Anthony M. Collins acknowledged the commission's "express statutory entitlement" to commence proceedings for the purpose of obtaining relief in respect of any matter concerning the human rights of any person or class of persons.
The court found that the evidence provided by IHREC from a small sample of homeless IP applicants was insufficient to prove that those conditions of extreme material poverty undermined the physical and mental health of the 2,800 IP applicants who were subject to the case, to the degree that it breached their right to human dignity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
6 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump says he would meet Putin even if Russian leader won't meet Zelensky
Donald Trump has said he would meet Vladimir Putin even if the Russian leader will not meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Mr Trump was asked by a reporter if the Russian leader would need to meet Mr Zelensky to secure a meeting with the US, and replied: 'No, he doesn't. No.' His comments followed Mr Putin's remarks earlier on Thursday that he hoped to meet the US president next week, possibly in the United Arab Emirates, but the White House was still working through the details of any potential meetings, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed Mr Putin's announcement came on the eve of a White House deadline for Moscow to show progress towards ending the three-year war in Ukraine or suffer additional economic sanctions. Asked on Thursday if his deadline for Friday would hold, Mr Trump said of Mr Putin: 'It's going to be up to him. We're going to see what he has to say. It's going to be up to him. Very disappointed.' He also touched on killings that have continued on both sides and added, 'I don't like long waits. I think it's a shame.' A White House official told the Associated Press on Thursday morning that a US-Russian summit would not happen if Mr Putin did not agree to meet Mr Zelensky, but the official later said it only made it less likely. Speaking of possible direct talks with Mr Zelensky, the Russian president said he has mentioned several times that he was not against it, adding: 'It's a possibility, but certain conditions need to be created.' The Kremlin has previously said Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky should meet only when an agreement negotiated by their delegations is close. Ukraine fears being sidelined by direct negotiations between Washington and Moscow, and Mr Zelensky said he had phone conversations with several European leaders on Thursday amid a flurry of diplomatic activity. European countries have pledged to back Ukraine for as long as it takes to defeat Russia's invasion. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, earlier brushed aside the possibility of Mr Zelensky joining the summit, something the White House said Mr Trump was ready to consider. Mr Putin has spurned Mr Zelensky's previous offers of a meeting to clinch a breakthrough. Asked who initiated the possible talks with the US president, Mr Putin said that did not matter and 'both sides expressed an interest'. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky (Gregorio Borgia/AP) A meeting would be the first US-Russia summit since 2021, when Joe Biden met Mr Putin in Geneva. It would be a significant milestone towards Mr Trump's effort to end the war, although there is no guarantee it would stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. Months of US-led efforts have yielded no progress on stopping Russia's invasion of its neighbour. The war has killed tens of thousands of troops on both sides and more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. Western officials have repeatedly accused Mr Putin of stalling in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. He has previously offered no concessions and said he will accept a settlement only on his terms. Mr Zelensky said European countries must also be involved in finding a solution to the war on their own continent. 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same bold approach from the Russian side. It is time to end the war,' he added. A ceasefire and long-term security guarantees are priorities in potential negotiation with Russia, he said on social media. He noted that Russian strikes on civilians have not eased despite Mr Trump publicly urging Mr Putin to relent. A Russian attack on Wednesday in the central Dnipro region killed four people and wounded eight others, he said. A new Gallup poll published on Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a peace settlement. In the survey, conducted in early July, about seven in 10 Ukrainians said their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible.
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Clonskeagh Imam Sheikh Hussein Halawa fails in High Court bid
Imam Sheikh Hussein Halawa, who has, among others, been locked out of the Islamic Cultural Centre in Clonskeagh, Dublin, since April, has been refused a High Court order requiring the Islamic Cultural Foundation of Ireland to restore him to aspects of his position and duties that do not require the chained-up mosque to be reopened. Ms Justice Leonie Reynolds instead made directions regarding the exchange of written evidence in the proceedings and put the matter back to mid-September. She also directed that the foundation address the health and safety concerns that had given rise to the closure of the mosque. Judge Reynolds told Mr Halawa's legal team he had seriously delayed in bringing the proceedings since the closure in April. Mediation talks had terminated on Wednesday and his application was being brought without proper notice to the foundation. The court also held that the request allowing Mr Halawa, who is 69 and approaching retirement, to perform duties outside the mosque had not been made through correspondence and the foundation had not had an opportunity to set out the reasons for the closure because it had not been served with papers backing up his application. READ MORE Barrister Niall O'Huiginn, for the Islamic Cultural Foundation, told Judge Reynolds that Mr Halawa's application was not an appropriate one to have been brought to court. He said he had not been involved in the mediation that had failed to deliver a successful outcome. He said there had been no evidence of urgency to have brought such an application during the legal vacation and Mr Halawa was continuing to be paid even though the mosque had been closed due to unfortunate circumstances. Cliona Kimber SC, for Mr Halawa, said her client was unable to minister to his parishioners and his reputation was being very publicly damaged. He had been left sitting at home without invitation to public ceremonies that included the President of Ireland, the Taoiseach and Government Ministers. Judge Reynolds said there was no reason why the parties could not decide to return to mediation to resolve the issues and she was concerned there may be an ongoing garda investigation. Mr O'Huiginn said certain incidents had certainly been reported to the gardaí. She said she was not disposed to granting interim injunctions to Mr Halawa and there were other avenues available to him such as defamation proceedings. She would afford the foundation to put in a replying affidavit to that of the plaintiff and a number of weeks and days for a further exchange of documents.
RTÉ News
12 hours ago
- RTÉ News
FG election spend nearly twice that of FF and SF
Fine Gael spent almost twice as much as both Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil during last year's local, European and general elections, new figures show. Party accounts filed with the Standards In Public Office commission (SIPO) confirm that Tánaiste Simon Harris's party was the biggest spender during all three of the election campaigns in 2024. According to the official figures, Fine Gael spent a combined €3.22m on elections last year. This compares to Sinn Féin's €1.7m and Fianna Fáil's €1.69m. Of these amounts, the general election campaign is where most of the money was spent, with Fine Gael spending just over €2m during November's race compared to Fianna Fáil's €950,000 and Sinn Féin's €644,000. During this campaign, Fine Gael won 38 seats (up three), Fianna Fáil won 48 (up ten) and Sinn Féin won 39 (up two). The second highest expenditure was for the European parliament elections in June 2024, with Fine Gael and Sinn Féin both spending around €600,000 compared to Fianna Fáil's €320,000. During this campaign, Fine Gael won four seats (down one), Fianna Fáil won four (up two) and Sinn Féin won two (up one). The third election last year, June's local elections, also saw Fine Gael spend €512,000, Fianna Fáil €289,000 and Sinn Féin €77,000. During this campaign, Fine Gael won 245 seats (down 10), Fianna Fáil won 248 (down 31) and Sinn Féin won 102 (up 21). According to the accounts filed with SIPO, Sinn Féin remains the richest of the three biggest parties based on income, cash balances and financial reserves. As a comparative example, by the end of last year, Sinn Féin had €4.6m in cash in its accounts, compared to Fianna Fáil which had €470,000 at that time. While not all finances of a party are focused on campaign spending, a significant proportion is usually assigned for this eventuality. It is widely expected that a presidential election campaign will cost a party around €500,000.
