Marathi Sahitya Mahamandal to join protest against language imposition
Joshi, however, clarified that the rally is not affiliated with any political party.
'The Mahamandal has no political interest. Our sole objective is to protect the Marathi language and ensure it continues to thrive with pride. We are not against any language, but we oppose the imposition of any language,' he said.
He also pointed out that although the education minister had earlier announced a pause on implementing the language policy, the State government later issued an official notice reaffirming its April 16 decision. Joshi noted that this was done without consulting education experts, language advocacy organisations, or the state's own language advisory committee.
'This disregard for expert opinion and scientific research on language learning highlights the government's insensitivity towards Marathi-speaking citizens,' he said.
He further stressed that introducing a third language at the primary level adds a cognitive burden on children, who already struggle with Marathi and English. 'At such a young age, students perceive any non-native language as foreign, and it hinders learning. Child psychology supports this view,' he explained.
'Even though Marathi and English are mandatory up to Class 10, many students in Class 8 still struggle with reading in their second language,' Joshi said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
20 minutes ago
- Hans India
US tariffs don't deter India's growth story: S&P
New Delhi: Trump tariffs will not have any impact on India's growth, as it is not a trade-oriented economy, and its sovereign ratings outlook will continue to remain positive, S&P Global Ratings Director YeeFarn Phua said on Wednesday. In May last year, S&P had upgraded the outlook on India's sovereign rating of 'BBB-' to positive, citing robust economic growth. On August 6, US President Donald Trump announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on all Indian imports, on top of an existing 25 per cent duty, taking the total to 50 per cent from August 27. The White House said the measure responds to India's continued purchase of Russian oil. Replying to a query on whether the tariff imposition poses downside risks to the positive outlook on India, YeeFarn said: 'I don't think the tariffs imposed on India will have an impact in terms of economic growth, largely because India is not a very trade-oriented economy. And if you look at India's exposure to the US in terms of exports to GDP, it is just about 2 per cent'.
New Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Amid 'vote chori' row, BJP claims Sonia Gandhi listed as voter before becoming citizen
NEW DELHI: The BJP on Wednesday launched a counterattack on the Congress, questioning its alleged attempt at 'vote-chori' by reportedly seeking inclusion of Sonia Gandhi's name in the electoral roll years before she was granted Indian citizenship. In response to the Congress's criticism of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) system and its allegations of electoral malpractice, BJP IT Cell chief Amit Malviya took to 'X' (formerly Twitter), saying, 'Sonia Gandhi's tryst with India's voters' list is riddled with glaring violations of electoral law.' He wrote, 'This perhaps explains Rahul Gandhi's fondness for regularising ineligible and illegal voters, and his opposition to the SIR. Her name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship. At the time, the Gandhi family lived at 1, Safdarjung Road, the official residence of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. Until then, the voters registered at that address were Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, and Maneka Gandhi.' Tagging a copy of the requisition slip for adding Sonia Gandhi's name, Malviya claimed, 'In 1980, the electoral rolls of the New Delhi parliamentary constituency were revised with January 1, 1980, as the qualifying date. During this revision, Sonia Gandhi's name was added, appearing at serial number 388 in polling station 145'. He alleged in the post, 'This entry was a clear violation of the law, which requires a person to be an Indian citizen to be registered as a voter. Following an outcry in 1982, her name was deleted from the list — only to reappear in 1983. But even her reinstatement raised serious questions. In the fresh revision of the electoral rolls that year, Sonia Gandhi was listed at serial number 236 in polling. Thakur's vote theft charge Ex-Union Minister Anurag Thakur alleged voter registration irregularities in Rae Bareli, Wayanad, Diamond Harbour, and Kannauj. He accused Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, and Akhilesh Yadav of winning through 'vote theft.'
NDTV
20 minutes ago
- NDTV
Chauri Chaura Incident Of 1922: When Freedom Protest Turned Violent
Four years after the end of the First World War, wherein Indian soldiers fought alongside the British, the struggle for the country's freedom was well underway. The political class, led by Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru and umpteen others from the Indian National Congress, knew one thing: the people of India deserved complete freedom from the Raj. While many remember the heroic marches and peaceful protests, some events revealed the raw anger and frustration of a people oppressed for decades. Among them was the Chauri Chaura incident, when a non-violent protest turned violent. In 1922, in a market town in the United Provinces - now Uttar Pradesh - an angry mob set a police station on fire. Though school history textbooks dedicated barely a paragraph to Chauri Chaura, the name has stayed with generations. The Chauri Chaura Incident 1922 On 4 February 1922, in Chauri Chaura, Gorakhpur district, police opened fire on a large group of protesters participating in the non-cooperation movement. In retaliation, the demonstrators attacked and set fire to the police station, killing all its occupants. The violence killed three civilians and 22 policemen. Nineteen demonstrators were sentenced to death, while 14 were handed down life imprisonment by the British colonial authorities. The Background From 1920 onwards, Indians, under Mahatma Gandhi's leadership, were engaged in a nationwide non-cooperation movement. Using Satyagraha, a philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, the Indian National Congress organised protests to challenge oppressive colonial laws, such as the Rowlatt Act, with the ultimate goal of attaining Swaraj (home rule). The Incident Two days before the incident, on 2 February 1922, volunteers led by retired British Indian Army soldier Bhagwan Ahir protested against high food prices and liquor sales at Gauri Bazaar. Local police, led by Daroga Gupteshwar Singh, beat back the demonstrators, and several leaders were arrested and locked up in the Chauri Chaura police station. On 4 February, some 2,000-2,500 protesters assembled and marched toward the market lane to picket the liquor shop. Armed police were dispatched to control the situation, while protesters shouted anti-British slogans. Attempting to disperse the crowd, Gupteshwar Singh ordered his 15 officers to fire warning shots into the air, but this only enraged the protesters, who began throwing stones. As the situation spiralled, sub-inspector Prithvi Pal ordered the police to fire directly at the advancing crowd, killing three civilians and wounding several others. Overwhelmed and heavily outnumbered, the police retreated to the station. In rage, the protesters set the chowki ablaze, killing all officers, including Gupteshwar Singh, trapped inside. Most victims were burned alive, while some were killed at the entrance and thrown into the fire. Reports vary, but 22 or 23 policemen were reported dead. Aftermath In response, the British declared martial law, conducted raids, and arrested. Shocked by the violence, Mahatma Gandhi went on a five-day fast to atone, realising he had rushed the protest without stressing non-violence. He felt the people were not ready for independence and needed more preparation. Mahatma Gandhi was later arrested and sentenced to six years in prison, but he was released in February 1924 because of ill health.
