Opinion - Bond auction shows Trump's economic house of cards may soon collapse
Spectacle often substitutes for substance, and nowhere is this more evident than in the latest tremors shaking Wall Street.
On May 21, a lackluster 20-year U.S. Treasury bond auction delivered what can only be described as a resounding vote of no confidence in Washington's economic stewardship. The numbers were as stark as they were symbolic: a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.46 and a yield of 5.047 percent — the highest in five years.
The markets responded as they usually do to bad news in the Capitol Hill core: stocks tumbled, bond yields soared and the dollar retreated. Now, with Moody's recent downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, concerns about fiscal instability have deepened, reinforcing investor skepticism about the sustainability of Washington's approach. One could almost hear the groan of a global economy growing weary of underwriting President Trump's illusions.
At the center of this financial unrest lies a paradox that has defined recent U.S. economic policy: the fantastical belief that one can cut taxes, ramp up spending, and somehow avoid the mathematical consequences. The latest offering from the House Republicans — an expansive tax-and-spend package aligned with Donald Trump's post-presidential ambitions — illustrates the delusion in full color.
Advertised as a tonic for economic rejuvenation, the bill is projected to add $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Not surprisingly, investors are beginning to ask whether Washington has any intention — let alone a plan — for reversing the fiscal tide. This concern has been magnified as the 30-year bond yield surged to 5.15 percent intraday on May 22 before settling at 5.05 percent, highlighting waning confidence in America's debt trajectory.
Yet this story is neither new nor uniquely American. Japan, that other industrial behemoth weighed down by demographic decay and decades of tepid growth, held its own 20-year bond auction just a day earlier. It recorded its weakest demand since 2012. The yield spiked to levels not seen since the turn of the millennium. In both Washington and Tokyo, the bond markets are holding up an unflattering mirror: fiscal indiscipline, once tolerable and even fashionable, is losing its market cachet.
To be clear, the stakes are global. For decades, U.S. Treasurys have represented the financial equivalent of terra firma — a bedrock in turbulent times. The dollar's status as the world's reserve currency has been undergirded not just by the size of the U.S. economy but by an assumption of stability, predictability and institutional maturity. All three are now in question.
The sputtering auction of long-term debt, a financial instrument once deemed near-sacred by global investors, signals something deeper: an erosion of faith not just in fiscal management, but in the very political coherence of the United States.
The temptation in elite financial circles, and increasingly among central bankers, is to reach once more for the palliative of quantitative easing — anesthetic for the markets, if not a cure for the underlying disease. The Federal Reserve may indeed expand its balance sheet in the coming months, but such measures are the fiscal equivalent of painkillers prescribed for organ failure.
They may mask the symptoms, but they leave the rot untouched. Worse, they risk reinforcing a cycle in which fiscal irresponsibility is not only tolerated but incentivized, on the assumption that the central bank will always ride to the rescue.
This moral hazard is not abstract. It undermines the very foundations of democratic accountability. What incentive remains for lawmakers to make unpopular decisions — on entitlement reform, tax equity or defense spending — if the consequences of inaction are indefinitely deferred? In this sense, the current drama on Wall Street is a symptom of a broader malaise: the decoupling of economic decision-making from political courage.
Yet the White House remains allergic to introspection. The instinct is to externalize, to locate the cause of internal disarray in foreign villains — China, Russia, Iran — while studiously ignoring the unsustainable structure at home. If the bond market signals anything, it is that the margin for error is narrowing. Investors are not ideologues. They do not traffic in patriotic bromides. They want to know whether the empire can pay its bills.
And they are not reassured.
This should worry more than just Wall Street. For better or worse, the global economy is still chained to the health of the American financial system. A destabilized dollar or an imploding Treasury market would not merely dent U.S. prestige; it could spark global contagion, the effects of which would be felt from Lagos to Lahore, from São Paulo to Seoul. The dominoes may fall more slowly than in 2008, but fall they will.
Japan's bond market woes further underscore this global fragility. Weak demand for its 20-year bond auction mirrors Washington's struggles, suggesting that investors are recalibrating their appetite for long-term debt in major economies. The simultaneous erosion of confidence in both U.S. and Japanese fiscal policies could foreshadow broader financial instability ahead.
What's needed is not another round of fiscal theatrics, but a sober reckoning. The United States must confront its own contradictions — between rhetoric and reality, between consumption and production, between global ambition and domestic decay. This means real decisions: revisiting the tax code to ensure the wealthy pay their share, reducing wasteful defense expenditures and investing in productive capacity rather than speculative finance. Above all, it means recognizing that empire is expensive — and often unaffordable.
As economist Herbert Stein once quipped with characteristic clarity, 'If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.' The current U.S. fiscal trajectory is not merely unsustainable; it is absurd. The only real question is whether the correction will be orderly — or catastrophic.
The alarm bells have sounded, not just in economic data but in the global perception of American reliability. It is late in the day, but not too late — yet. If the world's most powerful economy cannot demonstrate basic fiscal sanity, it may not be long before the privileges of empire begin to vanish, one auction at a time.
Imran Khalid is a physician and has a master's degree in international relations.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
No Pipeline, No Progress: Meeting The Demand For Advanced Degrees
As demand for master's and doctoral degrees surges, too few programs exist to support the students most often excluded—despite their potential. The United States stands at a crossroads. While innovation, competitiveness, and global leadership increasingly depend on highly educated workers, access to graduate education remains deeply unequal and underfunded. Over 60% of business and government leaders hold graduate degrees—with more than half in business and nearly a third in law. A 2020 report by Brint and colleagues found that 61% of top media figures and 78% of think tank and foundation leaders also held advanced degrees. In many leadership roles, graduate education is no longer a competitive advantage—it's a requirement. Demand is rising. A 2024 report from Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce projects that nearly 1 in 5 jobs will soon require an advanced degree. Among 'good jobs'—those offering middle-class wages of $43,000 or more—1 in 4 will demand graduate credentials. Yet access to graduate education remains deeply inequitable. Madeline Brighouse Glueck finds that parental education still shapes graduate enrollment, especially in high-investment, high-return programs like law, medicine, and PhDs. In medicine alone, over 75% of students come from the top two income quintiles. Even academically qualified first-generation and low-income students are often left behind. While families with financial and social capital can navigate elite admissions and cover soaring costs, others are shut out. The only federally funded graduate pipeline program is the McNair Scholars Program, which supports first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented undergraduates seeking PhDs. This program—and others like Upward Bound—are now at risk of being defunded. As the federal government grows increasingly hostile toward identity-based programs in higher education, the burden of promoting equitable access is falling to the private sector and nonprofit organizations. Yet only a handful of national nonprofits directly focus on this issue: These organizations are doing powerful work—but their combined reach can only serve a fraction of the students who deserve access. To meet the moment, coordinated investments are needed—not just in graduate preparation, but also in affordability, mentorship, and long-term support: Graduate education is not a luxury—it is a national imperative. If we want to lead in science, health, law, and business—and if we believe in opportunity—we must invest in the people who will lead those fields. Let's ensure that talent, not zip code or family background, determines who has a seat at the table. Change can't wait. The time to invest is now. —--------- Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today!
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wants the Fed to Cut Interest Rates by a Full Point. That Normally Takes a Recession
President Donald Trump demanded the Federal Reserve lower its benchmark interest rate by an entire percentage point. The Fed, which operates independently of White House control, has resisted Trump's call to lower interest rates. Lower rates could boost the economy but risk igniting inflation. The Fed typically adjusts its interest rate a quarter point at a time: the last time it cut a full point was in March 2020 when the pandemic Donald Trump renewed his calls on the Federal Reserve to lower its benchmark interest rate Friday, and this time, he had a specific (and huge) ask in mind. In a series of social media posts Friday morning, Trump pointed to the economy's recent track record of solid job growth and cooling inflation, and taunted Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for not having lowered interest rates sooner. Trump said the central bank should lower its influential fed funds rate by "a full point," saying it would be economic "Rocket Fuel!"The Fed adjusts its fed funds rate, which influences borrowing costs on all kinds of loans, to keep inflation down and employment high. Fed officials have kept their rate higher than usual so far this year in an effort to push inflation down to its goal of a 2% annual rate. Officials said they are waiting to see what happens in the economy because they are concerned Trump's tariffs could push up prices and set off a fresh round of Fed's cautious approach has angered Trump, who wants rate cuts and the economic growth they could promote. A full percentage point cut would be a major move by the Fed and would bring the fed funds rate to a range of 3.25% to 3.5%, its lowest since September 2022. The Fed typically moves rates a quarter-point at a time. The last time the Fed cut rates an entire percentage point was March 2020, when it was evident that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic would thrash the economy. Before that, the Fed cut an entire point in December 2008, during the Great Recession. The posts were the latest moves in Trump's pressure campaign to influence the Fed's decision-making about monetary policy. The central bank is designed to be insulated from politics, and Powell has said the Fed's decisions will be based only on economic considerations. Trump has repeatedly criticized Powell for not lowering interest rates, in contrast to the Fed's European counterpart. The European Central Bank has cut rates eight times since last June. The Fed cut rates three times over that time period, including a jumbo half-point cut in September, but has kept rates flat. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NEAR Protocol Surges 5% After Forming Bullish Support Pattern
Global markets are navigating heightened uncertainty following a public spat between U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. NEAR Protocol has demonstrated resilience amid this volatility, recovering from a sharp 5.2% decline to establish support at $2.42. The recent price action shows promising signs of accumulation, with increasing volume on the second test of support forming a potential double bottom pattern on short time frames. This technical structure, combined with the successful break above the $2.46-$2.47 resistance zone, suggests buyers are regaining control despite broader market turbulence. NEAR's recovery may indicate growing institutional confidence in blockchain infrastructure projects with real-world utility. NEAR-USD exhibited substantial volatility over a 24-hour period, with a range of 0.132 (5.2%) between the high of 2.547 and low of 2.415. The asset experienced a sharp decline during the 20:00 hour on June 4th, establishing a key support level at 2.423 with above-average volume of 2.69M. A potential double bottom pattern formed with increasing volume on the second test of support, suggesting accumulation at lower levels. Resistance established around 2.462-2.470, with the current recovery approaching this critical zone. In the last hour, NEAR-USD demonstrated significant bullish momentum, climbing from 2.433 to 2.455, representing a 0.9% gain. Price action formed a clear uptrend with notable volume spikes at 07:15 (206K) and 07:37 (120K), indicating strong buyer interest. A temporary peak of 2.462 was reached at 07:34 before a sharp pullback to 2.445, establishing a new support level. Recovery from this dip culminated in a final push to 2.458 at 07:54, followed by consolidation around 2.455. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy. Sign in to access your portfolio