Edinburgh cab drivers given one-year reprieve from needing to sell off old vehicles
Councillors voted on Monday to approve a waiver to the city's hire vehicle age and emissions policy, meaning cabs older than a decade are still allowed to travel on city streets.
Under the city's hire car regulations, as of 2021, any petrol cabs or private hires need to be 10 years old or less, and either comply with Euro 6 emissions standards or be Euro 5 and retrofitted to meet council requirements.
However, every year since 2020, the council has approved a four year extension to this time period, meaning the maximum age of a cab or private hire car on city streets is 14 years.
Every six months after a vehicle passes ten years old, it needs to go through an inspection to make sure it is still in compliance with the city's regulations.
A report by officers to councillors said that some members of the taxi trade had found difficulty in finding vehicles that meet the city's current age and emissions standards.
SNP councillor Norman Work asked council officer Andrew Mitchell: 'Was there any sort of timescale for this? There have been these extensions. Was there any idea how long it would go on for?'
Mr Mitchell said: 'The initial target was 2021. The pandemic intervened, and the committee quite rightly gave an adjustment to the timeline.
'So the final timeline for Euro 6 then became 2023. The vast majority of the fleet has been compliant for quite some time.
'A smaller number [of drivers] have struggled, either for financial reasons or various other reasons.'
Regulatory Committee convener, Liberal Democrat councillor Neil Ross, asked: 'Over two thirds [of vehicles over ten years old] have failed their first presentation for testing.
'I know there have been efforts made to encourage compliance with these older vehicles, but I'm wondering if there's anything else that could be done to incentivise better presentations?'
He said: 'You're in the territory of, if you repeatedly fail, then you bring the operators to committee.
'It's not something we've done except in fairly extreme examples. But if you're testing them twice a year, and they're still turning up for their annual tests and failing, I struggle to see [what can be done].'
Another council officer, Catherine Scanlin, added: 'What we're finding on testing is that it's wear and tear of the rest of the vehicle. And with the best will in the world, it's very very difficult, and very expensive in the main, to keep on top of that.
'So when they're coming for tests, even when the vehicles are prepped, they can't forsee some of the issues.
'Historically, older vehicles were passed down the line to new people coming into the trade. That's not possible with these vehicles.
'Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that vehicle is fit for public service. It is a challenge, and it's difficult. Even the best maintained vehicles – it's a challenge for them as well.'
The report also said that a report would come to the committee in the near future updating on the council's progress towards a 100% wheelchair accessible taxi fleet.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
5 minutes ago
- STV News
Survey to determine if Edinburgh has too many private hire drivers
A survey to determine whether there are too many private hire cars in Edinburgh has been approved by Edinburgh councillors. It comes after a group of taxi drivers in the capital handed over a petition to city councillors last month, asking for a review to be carried out. The drivers had also asked for a pause to be placed on issuing new private hire licences while the survey was carried out. But at Friday's meeting of the Regulatory Committee, councillors did not back a Green group amendment that would have called for that. According to council regulatory services head Andrew Mitchell, tendering for a survey would take about 12 weeks, and data collection would take place in the first half of 2026. In a deputation to the committee, city taxi driver Keith Auld told councillors: 'We believe every passenger deserves a professional journey. But we are undergoing unsustainable pressure. 'This is not healthy competition, it is over-saturation. And it is already having real consequences. We need fair, sustainable and regulated competition.' Mr Auld and other city black cab drivers say that private hire drivers, many of whom carry out work for apps like Uber and Bolt, end up undercutting their trade. According to them, this comes down to the lower cost to buy and run a hire car, with the vehicles allowed for use as taxis being very expensive and requiring public hire insurance. In addition, fares for black cabs are set by the council, while Uber, Bolt and other private hire providers have no minimum charge. They also argued in their petition that due to the low incomes drivers get from those rideshare services, many of them work for dangerously long hours. Officers said that 2,982 private hire cars were presently operating in the capital, while 1,090 taxis were also running. Mr Auld said that three new private hire cars were being added in the city every day, and that the number would reach 4,000 'in no time'. After the survey is returned to councillors next year, they may consider putting a cap on the number of private hire cars allowed in the city. In the meeting, councillors were supportive of the idea of a survey, but the committee stopped short of supporting the temporary freeze on licence grants. Green councillor Susan Rae put forward an amendment that would have called for this, but Mr Mitchell said that if the committee voted for it, the law could be broken. He said: 'There is no legal power to issue a moratorium. There would be no basis in law to refuse to consider an application on the basis of overprovision [without evidence]. 'In my view, an immediate moratorium is not something that would be competent.' Liberal Democrat councillor and committee convener Neil Ross endorsed his group's motion, which called for a survey to be conducted. He said: 'It would be helpful if we had a workshop for committee members to discuss other issues and elements of concern around the current numbers of private hire vehicles. 'I would be grateful if that were factored in. I'm proposing that we proceed with the consultation and overprovision survey. 'I'm also proposing that officers are alert to concerns raised by all members of the trade who have issues around long working hours. 'I think this is a sensible way forward, it follows the guidance that we have been given by the Scottish Government, it is a legally robust way of approaching the question.' Labour councillor Margaret Graham put forward an amendment for the city's administration, which asked that any survey look at the number of private hire cars parked in city streets. Conservative councillor Joanna Mowat said: 'I'm probably alone in this committee in having very great nervousness about interfering in the market. 'There is an element with any cap that is introduced with numbers, the danger of creating protected markets. 'I'm uncomfortable with that, from a political point of view, my natural mean is to be uncomfortable with protecting markets. 'I do think the terms of the petition that has been brought here today, about the public safety element, is something that means we should probably consider this. 'I don't for one minute think this is going to produce the information that everyone else seems to think this is going to produce. 'But we're not going to know that unless we carry out an overprovision survey.' The Labour group added the Green amendment to their addendum, and the Liberal Democrat group added a portion of the administration addendum to their amendment. Both positions were tied, and as convener, Cllr Ross made a tiebreaking vote that saw the Liberal Democrat position win out. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Scotland's deficit grows by £5.1bn, Gers figures show
Scotland's deficit increases by £5.1bn from previous year UK deficit less than half the rate of Scotland Scottish Government says increase linked to fall in North Sea revenue SNP accused of 'reckless financial vandalism' by Scottish Labour Finance sec insists 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK' Scotland's finance secretary has insisted the country's finances are 'sustainable' as figures showed spending levels were more than £26 billion higher than the amount raised in revenues. The latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) figures reported 'overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.5 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.7% of the country's GDP. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland. The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.' Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion. Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24. 'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted. Scottish secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border. He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels. Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. 'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Scottish finance secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'. Robison said: 'Gers allocates Scotland a population share of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. For example, UK defence expenditure is listed as £5.1 billion, but only £2.1 billion was actually spent with industry in Scotland in 2023-24. 'Being taken out of the EU, against the will of the people of Scotland, has also hit Scotland's revenues by £2.3 billion, and the higher cost of UK Government debt adds £500 million to the deficit. 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.' Responding to the figures, Scottish Labour finance spokesperson Michael Marra asscused the SNP government of 'reckless financial vandalism'. 'The SNP has already blown a hole in Scotland's finances and its full fiscal autonomy plans would make a bad picture worse', he added 'Scotland is benefiting disproportionately from Labour's game-changing investment in public services, but this money is being squandered by an incompetent SNP government. 'The SNP cannot be trusted with public money – but Labour is investing in Scotland's future and a Scottish Labour government will spend this money properly.' Scottish Conservative shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy MSP said: 'The SNP Government's own figures highlight the huge, and rising, Union dividend that Scots enjoy thanks to being in a strong United Kingdom. 'Every single person in the country is almost £2,600 better off because we are part of the UK. 'If we lost that – as we would if the SNP achieved their goal of Scottish independence – it would have a catastrophic impact on the nation's finances. 'Things are bad enough already, because the SNP government continue to squander their positive financial settlement through mismanagement and waste. But losing the UK funding model would mean even more eye-watering tax hikes and public spending cuts for hard-working Scots. 'The GERS figures also underline the importance of North Sea oil and gas to Scotland's fiscal security, and the economic lunacy of the Labour Government's block on new drilling. 'Astonishingly, Keir Starmer's reckless policy is backed by the SNP, Liberal Democrats and the Greens. Only the Scottish Conservatives are standing up for this crucial sector of the Scottish economy and the North East communities it supports.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Scots benefitting from 'economic strength' of UK as public spending remains higher north of the Border
The annual GERs report warned overall public finances in Scotland are "weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue". Scotland continues to enjoy higher spending on public services than other parts of the UK, an annual assesment of the nation's finances has found. The Government Expenditure and Revenue (GERS) figures for 2024-25 show Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head of additional spending compared to the UK average. But it also warned "overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. The report is published by economists at the Scottish Government every August and is meant to enhance public understanding of fiscal issues north of the Border. The figures are regularly seized upon by both pro-UK and pro-independence supporters to justify their respective stances on the constitution. Last year, £91.4 billion in tax receipts was raised in Scotland through devolved and reserved taxation - compared to £117.6 billion in public spending. That works out to eight per cent of UK revenue and nine per cent of spending. The figures also reveal the country's notional deficit, or net fiscal balance, grew to around £26.5 billion, or 11.7 per cent of GDP, more than double the UK deficit of 5.1 per cent of GDP. This is an increase of £5.1 billion on the previous year. Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, said the figures proved the SNP's desire for full fiscal autonomy - which would hand Holyrood full powers of taxation - would cause "turbo-charged austerity". "These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK," he said. "By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. It also means that Devolved Governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions. "That means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas. People in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes. "These figures also underline that the Scottish Government's policy of full fiscal autonomy would mean turbo-charged austerity and economic chaos for Scotland. That's why the UK Government will stand up for the pooling and sharing resources across the UK as part of our Plan for Change - to grow the economy and put more money in working people's pockets." Shona Robison, the SNP Finance Secretary, said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East." However, the veteran Nationalist added: "Being taken out of the EU, against the will of the people of Scotland, has also hit Scotland's revenues by £2.3 billion and the higher cost of UK Government debt adds £500 million to the deficit. 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security."
