Election storylines converge on trade-dependent Saint John riding
Social Sharing
In a storage yard a few minutes from the Saint John port, larger shipping containers are being lifted and moved around like Lego bricks.
Large forklift-like machines roar back and forth, small but essential players in the supply chain we hear so much about — the essential moving of goods from producers to consumers.
This is the service that Riptide Intermodal and Logistics provides to its clients, major international shippers who use the port.
Riptide loads, unloads and stores cargo, including some in containers bound for, or coming from, the U.S.
And it's why owner April Logue has been watching the discussion of U.S. tariffs closely.
"There is going to be a cost that will trickle down to all of the supply chain partners," Logue said.
"We're looking at ways that we can support our customers with supply chain changes to routing, looking at different modes, means of transportation, ways that we can mitigate the cost and still continue to provide efficiency to our customers."
WATCH | 'The ebbs and the flows': Trade war resonates in Saint John:
Trade war hits N.B. election battleground
22 minutes ago
Duration 4:09
Saint John-Kennebecasis is ground zero in Canada's tariff election.
Companies like Riptide represent one reason many of the narratives in the current federal election campaign converge on the riding of Saint John-Kennebecasis.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has ranked Saint John the most tariff-vulnerable city in Canada because of its huge economic dependence on exports.
Irving Oil's refinery sends 80 per cent of its products to the United States. Forestry giant J.D. Irving Ltd. also relies on American buyers.
Beyond the big players, the fates of countless smaller companies also hinge on what the Trump administration does next.
Saint John has always been an outward-looking, entrepreneurial city, embracing trading ties with the United States.
In the years before 1867, a political debate over rail links — to Upper Canada, or to New England — created controversy among city merchants and briefly jeopardized the plan for Confederation.
Now the American-driven commercial focus is openly questioned.
"Trade diversification is key. You've heard all political parties talk about that," said Craig Estabrooks, the CEO of the port, which has more than tripled its container traffic since 2017.
"Make sure that we continue that momentum — that's what we're hearing from people."
Beyond the trade issue, the fate of the riding's Liberal incumbent, and the choice of his Conservative opponent, are also intertwined with the larger election story.
Three-term MP Wayne Long is unabashed about being the first Liberal MP to call for an increasingly unpopular Justin Trudeau to resign as Liberal leader in June 2024.
"It started with me, and then there was a group of eight, and then there was a group of 20, and then there was a group of 28," Long said.
Long says Trudeau's January resignation and the subsequent improvement in Liberal popularity has validated his early call.
"For those that say, 'You weren't loyal to the prime minister,' I'd say, 'Well, you know what? I was loyal to the Liberal Party.' Look at where we are now."
According to Long, new prime minister Mark Carney's steady, serious approach to the trade threat is winning over voters in the riding, which has been redrawn to add Quispamsis and exclude the west side of Saint John.
Riptide's Logue lives in Quispamsis and won't say how she is leaning in the election, but she knows what she is looking for.
"We need a government that's going to work with the industry, work with the manufacturers and the importers and exporters and look at these free trade agreements [and ] opportunities into new markets," she said.
She believes the pivot to more trade elsewhere can turn the tariff crisis into an opportunity.
"Anybody that is a logistics provider, anybody that works in the industry knows that there's a lot of up and downs," she said.
"You have to be ready to move with the ebbs and flows. … This is kind of our world, and what we do, and how we're always making changes and adapting and evolving."
CBC News had arranged an interview with Long's chief opponent, Conservative candidate Melissa Young, for this story.
But Young's campaign team cancelled the interview on short notice the day after Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre made a campaign stop in Saint John.
Young has worked for trade unions and governments in both New Brunswick and Ontario in areas including skills training and apprenticeships, making her a good fit with Poilievre's appeal to blue-collar workers.
"She has been working across Canada to recruit our youth into boots, not suits," Poilievre said in Saint John last week.
Young was appointed the candidate on the day of the election call, March 23, despite two other contestants who were hoping to win the nomination.
"I don't know what the issue was," said Lisa Keenan, a Saint John lawyer who was once president of the provincial Progressive Conservative Party and chair of the Saint John Port Authority. "Obviously, I wasn't the candidate, I don't think, that they were looking for."
Keenan is clearly disappointed with a top-down, leader-driven candidate selection process.
"I am a Conservative. I remain a Conservative, but grassroots participation as well as empowerment to people at local levels is extremely important," she said. "It speaks volumes to where you're going as a party."
Asked whether she would vote for Young, Keenan said, "I think that's between myself and the ballot box, but as I said, I am a Conservative and I wish the party well."
Four other candidates are now in the race in Saint John-Kennebecasis: Armand Cormier for the NDP, David MacFarquhar for the Greens, William Edgett for the People's Party of Canada, and Austin Venedam for the Libertarian Party of Canada.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
22 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts
CALGARY — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is pitching the idea of a 'port-to-port corridor' that would connect energy and other goods to Canada's northern Pacific and Arctic coasts. Moe made his remarks Monday alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith at an event focused on both provinces' ambitions to double oil and gas production. 'I know we are not going to be entirely reliant on the U.S for that marketplace,' Moe said. 'We are going to have access to the world.' Moe, who leads the right-of-centre Saskatchewan Party government, said he likes what he's been hearing out of the Liberal federal government about making Canada an 'energy superpower' and the strongest economy in the G7. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. He admits that means going against his political stripe to some degree. 'Far be it for me to be accused of being chair of the Liberal booster club the last decade or so, but there are some comments from this Prime Minister that I think we can truly get behind,' Moe told the event hosted by energy services industry advocacy group Enserva. Prime Minister Mark Carney's government has introduced legislation that would fast track certain infrastructure projects deemed in the 'national interest' as U.S. President Donald Trump upends what until recently has been a reliable cross-border trading relationship. Carney has heard pitches from the premiers about what projects they think should be chosen, but has not said which have made the cut. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wants a bitumen pipeline to be the 'anchor tenant' of a corridor to the Port of Prince Rupert, B.C., enabling exports to Asia above and beyond what the operating Trans Mountain pipeline can ship from the Vancouver area. She has said that project should be built in tandem with another one she'd like to see considered in the national interest: the Pathways proposal to capture and sequester carbon emissions from Alberta's biggest oilsands producers. Smith and Moe also voiced support for a pipeline to the Port of Churchill, Man., which would enable exports to Europe via Hudson Bay. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has been keen on the idea, too. 'One thing the prime minister seems to want is a project and a proponent,' Smith said. 'So we are working to get a proponent or a consortium to put a project on the table, and then we're going to test out this two year timeline that he has.' Smith said Carney has asked conservative premiers to reach out to people they know in the federal Conservatives to help the Liberals' project approval bill pass in the minority Parliament. Despite being encouraged by the new tone in Ottawa, Smith and Moe said they both want the repeal of numerous federal environmental policies that they say have stymied resource investment. 'Policies do matter and we need a significant policy shift and we need it very quickly,' Moe said. The event coincided with the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., where leaders from the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and Italy, as well as the European Union, are meeting. The confab of world leaders puts Alberta on the map at a time when the approach to energy security is being 'recalibrated,' Smith said. 'I know that, especially with the world turmoil, the energy security needs of our international partners has never been more important. And I think this really does drive a focus about how Alberta can be the solution.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Montreal Gazette
33 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: What not to say at U.S. border
Letters To The Editor Pete Hoekstra, the American ambassador to Canada, has said Canadians facing device searches and detainment is 'not a pattern.' I've been told of two situations that might make Canadians uneasy about going to the U.S. A couple I know driving from Toronto to Buffalo were asked by the U.S. border officer 'what they thought of our new president.' When they replied they 'did not think very positively about him,' they were pulled aside and their entry was eventually denied. And the same person who related the above story told me he was asked the same question at the airport when he was preparing to fly to the U.S. on business. When he gave the same honest reply, he was pulled aside and his device was searched. If you are crossing into the U.S. and are asked what you think about the U.S. president, maybe just say you think he is wonderful. Graham Wright, Westmount By this measure, Trump is a success Re: ' Anand weighs in on Israeli strike ' (NP Montreal, June 14) Charlie Kirk, described as the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, is quoted as saying: 'No issue currently divides the (U.S.) right as much as foreign policy.' This could be partly because it is difficult for some to ascertain what Trump's foreign policy is. Kirk also refers to 'our insanely successful presidency' — which is, in a way, a rather unfortunate description of the situation. John Hall, Montreal Warm reception among 'Mainers' Re: ' Support, love and gratitude from Plattsburgh ' (Opinion, June 13) I recently spent two weeks in my happy place, Old Orchard Beach, Me. On Flag Day — June 14 — I drove by a crowd of people near the ocean who were holding up placards protesting against many of Donald Trump's latest policies. As I passed them, I heard a big cheer go up. I can only surmise that my Quebec licence plate elicited such a response. Mainers are among my favourite people in the world. It pained me to see the empty stores and restaurants, and the dearth of people on the beach. Seems like such a sad consequence of hastily enacted, mean-spirited policies against Canadians. Debbie Astroff, Dorval Voters must not sit out midterms Re: ' Sorry, but I am tired of apologies ' (Letters, May 21) I absolutely agree with the letter writer that U.S. voters need to return control of Congress to the Democrats next year, which is more plausible in the House of Representatives than it is in the Senate. But there is an important distinction to be made: Trump won a plurality of the vote, but not quite a majority, over Kamala Harris. More significantly, voter turnout was around 64 or 65 per cent (depending on the source), with Trump winning just 32 per cent or so of all potential votes and Harris around 31 per cent. As is often the case, those who stayed home helped determine the election. The couch potatoes had better show up in the November 2026 midterms to save whatever semblance of democracy remains south of the border. Stan Shatenstein, Montreal Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.


Global News
36 minutes ago
- Global News
Liberal fast-track of major projects bill ‘new low,' opposition MPs say
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said Monday that Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to ram his government's major projects bill through the House of Commons this week represents a 'new low' in contempt for Parliament. May told a press conference she hasn't seen anything like it since the Conservative government under Stephen Harper pushed a major omnibus bill through more than a decade ago. May said she was 'shocked' by Harper's decision to bring in and fast track C-38 in 2012, a bill that was 400 pages long and 'destroyed 70 environmental laws.' 'This is worse,' she added. 'It appears to me — and it remains to be seen — that Mr. Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering (Conservative Leader) Pierre Poilievre's policies with a more friendly face.' Story continues below advertisement May spoke outside the House of Commons foyer Monday morning alongside First Nations leaders, NDP MP Gord Johns and lawyers from environmental groups — all of whom raised concerns about the legislation and the pace at which it's sprinting through the Commons. Grand Chief Linda Debassigé of the Anishinabek Nation said First Nations have 'not been consulted on this bill appropriately or adequately.' 'This bill presents serious concerns that, in our view, creates a path forward for any government to create legislation that undermines the rights and interests of our First Nations people,' she said. Soon after the press conference, the Liberals passed a closure motion with the support of the Conservatives to speed through study and debate of Bill C-5 by week's end. 4:58 Carney looking to pass legislation 'before summer' to remove trade barriers in Canada Government House leader Steven MacKinnon defended the government's haste Monday, arguing it has public buy-in since the bill delivers on major Liberal campaign promises from the recent election. Story continues below advertisement 'We just had the ultimate democratic test, and you know what we heard?' he said during debate in the House. 'Get this country moving. We need a response to the threats coming from down south.' The bill is now set for an unusually fast two-day study by the House transport committee Tuesday and Wednesday. The government expects to pass the bill through the Commons by end of Friday, which is also the last day the House is supposed to sit before the summer. Sen. Paul Prosper said he will try to slow down the part of the bill dealing with major projects in the Senate with an amendment. If the Senate amends the bill it would have to go back to the House of Commons for another approval. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The legislation would give the federal cabinet the ability to set aside various statutes to push forward approvals for a small number of major industrial products, such as mines, pipelines and ports, if the government deems them to be in the national interest. It aims to speed up the approval process for major projects so that cabinet can render a decision in two years at the most. It also aims to break down internal barriers to trade. Critics warn the proposed law would allow Ottawa to flout its constitutional duty to consult with First Nations under Section 35 of the Constitution. Story continues below advertisement 4:30 Carney, Canadian premiers united on 'nation-building' projects, but do not list them NDP MP Leah Gazan warned Monday that these fast-tracked projects will only wind up in the courts over the government's failure to properly consult with Indigenous peoples. 'The federal government is absolutely bulldozing over democratic principles in favour of corporate interests and it's going to have bad consequences,' she said. 'This is abhorrent. This is unprecedented. We need to ensure governments have proper oversights, not provide ministers in cabinet with unlimited powers to make decisions in violations of constitutional obligations.' Some constitutional experts told The Canadian Press the legislation's most far-reaching provisions — ones that would allow the executive branch to skirt laws to push forward big projects — are likely to survive a court challenge. Paul Daly, chair in administrative law and governance at the University of Ottawa, said while the provisions giving the executive more power are controversial, they're likely constitutional. Story continues below advertisement 'It is unlikely that a court would invalidate this as violating the Constitution,' he said. Sections 21 to 23 of the bill allow the executive branch to bypass existing rules and processes in 13 laws — including the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, the Indian Act and the Impact Assessment Law — through a regulatory process that does not need to be approved by Parliament. These sections are what's known in the legal community as 'Henry VIII clauses' — a reference to a King who preferred to govern by decree rather than through Parliament.' 3:02 Carney calls for energy partnerships to make Canada a global superpower Courts have not found these to be constitutionally invalid, Daly said, adding there are guardrails in the bill and Charter rights will continue to apply to the legislation. 'It's similar in character to the carbon tax legislation from a few years ago, where the Supreme Court said the Henry VIII clause was constitutionally valid. And I suspect that a court, if this statute were challenged, would come to the same conclusion,' Daly said. Story continues below advertisement Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said sections 22 and 23 are 'very worrisome' because they could allow the federal cabinet to exempt a pipeline or some other project from the Species at Risk Act. She said the bill overall gives the federal government too much leeway on the Crown's duty to consult with Indigenous peoples on decisions that affect them. 'If I were Canada's lawyers, I would have advised them strenuously against this bill,' she told The Canadian Press. 'That consultation has to be meaningful and I worry that, especially under the timelines that this government wants to make these decisions, that this bill is basically circumventing the government's constitutionally required duty to consult.' 2:11 The FSIN says First Nations were left out of the federal-provincial meeting Liberal MP Jaime Battiste insisted the legislation should not be so controversial and blamed the public outcry on bad communication and a lack of understanding of the bill's contents. Story continues below advertisement 'This legislation not only takes the step of saying that the duty to consult on these future projects is there … but there actually has to be meaningful equity and participation,' he told The Canadian Press on Monday. 'That has the opportunity for some lucky First Nations to have billions of dollars' worth of equity as part of these major projects and I'd love to see that and some clean energy in the Atlantic.' Carney said in June that it takes too long to push major new projects through 'arduous' approval processes and that in 'recent decades, it has become too difficult to build new projects in this country.' The federal Conservatives have claimed the bill does not go far enough and want to see the Impact Assessment Act repealed, the bill that currently lays out the federal review process required for major national projects. — With files from Nick Murray