The Republican Budget Bill Rips College Away From the Working Class
The budget bill that House Republicans passed early Thursday funds tax cuts for the rich by kneecapping Medicaid, slashing food stamps, and gutting green-energy investments—while also adding trillions to the deficit. But Republicans aren't content simply to take away health care and nutrition assistance from millions of Americans while accelerating climate change. The bill will also disproportionately hurt low-income students by making it harder for them to borrow and repay their loans and by tightening the rules for Pell Grants recipients. In doing so, it takes an axe to one of the few reliable ladders for working-class people seeking higher education.
While there is some appetite for changes to the student loan program—total student debt is $1.6 trillion and growing, and more than five million borrowers are in default—they are not the ones that the Republican Congress has made. And no one was crying out for cuts to the Pell Grant program, a straightforward grant given to the lowest-income college students that don't have to be repaid. But these provisions in the bill are consistent with Republicans' broader attacks on higher education itself, which they consider to be corrupted by elitism and wokeism. Increasing the burden of student loans and tightening restrictions on Pell Grants, though, will only make it harder for working students to attend college. So much for the GOP's reverence for meritocracy.
The changes to the Pell Grant program increase the number of credit hours that are required to qualify as a full-time student, from 12 to 15, and cut off aid entirely for students attending less than half time. For most college programs, that effectively requires one additional class per semester to get the maximum loan, around five classes total, and amounts to an almost $1,500 cut for students taking 12 credit hours who can't add to their courseload. It would also entirely cut off an estimated 20 percent of students currently receiving aid. 'It is a full-out assault on the ability of students—especially low-income students—to access and afford higher education,' Jon Fansmith, senior vice president for government relations and national engagement at the American Council on Education, told Inside Higher Ed last week. And it will only save the government an estimated $67 billion through the next decade, in a bill that the Congressional Budget Office estimates will add $3.1 trillion to the deficit over that time period.
Advocates have said that the requirements are likely to hit the hardest for students who need to work or take care of a child while in college. 'It just completely ignores the reality that the majority of these students are not able to take five courses because they're also juggling the realities of life … working multiple part time jobs just to get by,' said Aissa Canchola Banez, the policy director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, a nonprofit that wants to eliminate student debt.
The 50-year-old Pell Grant program was designed to enable the poorest students to attend school by providing them with tuition assistance they didn't have to pay back. Today, most recipients come from families making less than $60,000 a year. Overall, the value of the amount provided has diminished over the years because the small increases lawmakers have made haven't kept up with inflation, not to mention the much-faster rising costs of college. It once covered almost three-fourths of tuition, and now only covers a little over a quarter.
As Pell Grants have decreased in value, students in need have relied more on student loans, both those provided by the government and by private lenders. Student debt has more than doubled in this century, as more students have gone to college and college costs have soared. Defaults rose over that time period as well. Borrowers have already been struggling to pay back those loans, especially those who borrowed but didn't finish to receive degrees, and the programs meant to help those in over their head weren't working as designed. Former President Joe Biden forgave a record number of student loans, largely by removing administrative barriers to forgiveness under existing laws. But Biden's biggest effort was blocked by the Supreme Court.
Advocates have rallied around free college tuition at state universities and community colleges and increased aid like Pell Grants to help tackle the student loan crisis and the college affordability crisis. But the fight over student loans has helped make higher education funding more generally a target for the right. Republicans used the student loan crisis as a justification for these cuts. 'Our current student loan system is broken and has left students holding over $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt, with taxpayers estimated to lose hundreds of billions of dollars on loans disbursed over the next decade,' GOP Rep. Tim Walberg of Michigan said in a statement after the House Education and Workforce Committee passed the education cuts, adding that the bill 'would save taxpayers over $350 billion' and 'bring much-needed reform' of student loans.
It's part and parcel with Republicans' wholesale assault on higher education. The Trump administration has gone directly after many elite colleges and universities over their DEI policies and students' pro-Palestinian protests. This bill will extend the fight to the state and community colleges that educate the vast majority of students in the U.S., particularly those from low-income and working-class families. Other efforts to cut government spending on higher education will also impede these institutions' ability to step in and provide help to the students who need it who can no longer count on Pell Grants to help cover their costs.
Tying colleges and universities to the culture wars has helped stoke anti-elitism among the right. Republican voters are worried about the values colleges and universities teach and think these institutions hold too much sway over American culture, moving it too far left. This is especially true of older voters who presumably see their grandchildren in college and don't know what to make of the generational gaps they see in political thinking. It's led them to question not only what universities are teaching, but whether they hold value for society at all.
There are criticisms of higher education that are more than fair. The cost of college has gotten too far out of reach for many Americans, and for those who must borrow and struggle to earn a degree, their eventual earnings are often offset by unmanageable debt. The rise in student debt has also led many policymakers to question whether too many professional fields require unnecessary credentials. The push for high school students to go to college has been accompanied by a decline in apprenticeship programs and other alternative pathways into careers that provide high-earning opportunities in blue-collar work.
As the daughter of the plumber, I'm sympathetic to arguments that not everyone needs to go to college for a good, well-paying career. But that message seems most aimed at low-income students in poor communities, those who might benefit most from college and can afford it the least. Earlier in my career, I held a second job as a private tutor for SAT prep on Connecticut's Gold Coast, and those parents and students were all scrambling to get into the best colleges possible, never once doubting the value or their ability to afford it. I never once heard someone suggest they forgo college for a blue-collar career.
Abandoning the idea that education can be an engine for social mobility would change the shape of the United States. And it's become clear that funding for colleges has now simply become a wedge in the ongoing culture wars and battle for voters, as college graduates of all classes have migrated to the Democratic Party and non-college graduates are wooed by the MAGA Republicans' faux populism. Needless to say, the cuts in the GOP bill were authored by congressmembers who not only attended college, but in many cases went to Ivy League schools and hold advanced degrees.
The bill still has to pass the Senate, where the Republican majority is also slim, and GOP senators including Rand Paul of Kentucky and Josh Hawley of Missouri have objected to some provisions. Whatever happens in the upper chamber, the Republican Party has shown us that it plans to use the worries of the working-class to dismantle any government attempt to help them, even in the smallest ways.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ex-NFL kicker calls out Simone Biles over personal attack on Riley Gaines
Jay Feely, a former NFL kicker who is running for Congress in Arizona, made his stance on men in women's sports known as he weighed in on the Simone Biles-Riley Gaines feud on Saturday. Feely wrote on X in response to Biles' personal attack on Gaines, "men don't belong in women's sports!" "@Simone_Biles argument is the antithesis of title 9 and equal opportunity it's provided for women. It puts girls in dangerous, compromising situations so a man pretending to be a woman can feel better about themselves," Feely wrote. Feely added his support for Gaines in the post. "Simone doesn't win any medal if she competes against men," he wrote. "Serena Williams doesn't win any tournaments if she competes against men. They are the best ever to do it. Why should we compromise with our high school and college girls and take away their opportunities." Biles went after Gaines as the OutKick podcast host reacted to a transgender pitcher competing in the Minnesota state softball championship. "@Riley_Gaines_ You're truly sick, all of this campaigning because you lost a race. Straight up sore loser," Biles wrote on X. "You should be uplifting the trans community and perhaps finding a way to make sports inclusive OR creating a new avenue where trans feel safe in sports. Maybe a transgender category IN ALL sports!! "But instead… You bully them… One things for sure is no one in sports is safe with you around!!!!!" Gaines responded to Biles' attack. "This is so disappointing. My take is the least controversial take on the planet," Gaines wrote in response to Biles' post. "Simone Biles being a male-apologist at the expense of young girls' dreams? Didn't have that on my bingo card. "Maybe she could compete in pommel horse and rings in 2028." Feely revealed he was stepping into the Arizona congressional race in April in an interview with Fox News Digital. He entered the Republican primary for Arizona's 5th Congressional District to replace Rep. Andy Biggs, who's running to be the Grand Canyon State's next governor. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Epoch Times
39 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Speaker Johnson Downplays Musk's Influence, Suggests Republicans Will Pass Budget Bill
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on June 8 downplayed tech billionaire Elon Musk's critical comments and said that House Republicans will pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act backed by President Donald Trump. Last week, Musk and Trump got into a heated back and forth after the Tesla CEO repeatedly bashed the spending bill on social media. Trump suggested that it was because of its cuts to electric vehicle mandates, and at one point floated cutting federal money to Musk's companies. Meanwhile, Musk took credit for Trump and the GOP winning the 2024 election and threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Massachusetts celebrates LGBTQ pride amid national conservative backlash
'It's really important for us to come together and to both celebrate and also stand firm in our commitment to our community members,' Binney said. Advertisement As Pride Month continues throughout June, the annual celebrations have developed a sense of political urgency. In Washington, D.C., thousands gathered under grey skies Sunday morning at the Lincoln Memorial for a Pride rally and protest march. During President Trump's 2024 campaign, he called on Congress to pass a bill declaring there are 'only two genders,' and in January he signed executive orders opposing hormonal and surgical intervention for transgender minors and Advertisement 'This is not just a party,' Ashley Smith, board president of Capital Pride Alliance. 'This is a rally for our lives.' At the Cambridge Pride event, Robert Ressler, a 36-year-old youth and family policy researcher from Cambridge, said Pride serves a number of valuable functions for the queer community: a sense of togetherness, an opportunity for resistance and a feeling of normalcy during difficult times. 'It does feel, unfortunately, that it seems people against the queer community are especially powerful right now,' Ressler said. 'But I'm optimistic that won't be forever.' At Quincy Pride, drag queen and drag show host LaKia Mondale floated onstage to a news sound byte announcing President Donald Trump's January executive order recognizing only two sexes. Abruptly, the audio switched to the opening strains of Gloria Gaynor's 'I Am What I Am' and Mondale began her routine, shimmying her hips back and forth and shedding her cape when the beat dropped to reveal a rainbow-striped unitard. Earlier in the show, Mondale had said 'We're not going to get into politics today, let's leave that to D.C.' But before leaving the stage after the closing performance, she made sure to plug the Transgender Emergency Fund of Massachusetts, a nonprofit supporting low-income and unhoused transgender people for which Mondale serves as a board member. Despite Mondale alluding to the growing threats to the transgender community under Trump several times throughout her performance, the mood at Quincy was festive, with hundreds of colorfully clad visitors of all ages gathering on Pageant Field. Rainbow balloons abounded, pride goers nodded along to upbeat music, and rows of vendors hawking pride-themed merchandise and food. Excited children flocked to the field's inflatable bounce houses, clutching balloon animals and miniature pride flags. Advertisement For Cat Giacalone, 26, the event was both a celebration and a protest. She said that the recent increase in anti-LGBT legislation has made her feel like Pride is more important — and more courageous — than ever. 'This year, it's all about protest, it's about being here and letting people know that we're not going away,' she said. 'It's terrifying. I know I'm safe in Massachusetts, but I'm afraid for my friends in other places.' Erika Barresi, 29, came to Quincy Pride to have fun and 'be with people from my community,' but she also felt the weight of what pride means in light of the new administration. 'I'm afraid of us losing trans rights, marriage equality, equality in general,' she confessed. 'That makes celebrating Pride this year even more important. In this community, anyone can be who they want.' This story includes material from the Associated Press. Dan Glaun can be reached at