
The view from India newsletter Backing the aggressor: Trump the warmonger
Israel's war on Iran began on June 13, 2025. A week later, it is as much the Unites States's war. President Donald Trump, who rose to power six months ago promising peace, is hardly a peacemaker. 'He has become a warmonger and a globalist aggressor,' as The Hindu's editorial today notes, in the wake of American B2 bombers dropping bunker-busting bombs at Fordow, Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear facility, while U.S. submarines fired Tomahawk missiles at the Natanz and Isfahan nuclear plants, even as Israel struggled to intercept Iranian ballistic missiles.
While the U.S.'s actions against Iran are not surprising, given its long-persisting hostilities with Iran and its much-criticised, yet unwavering support to Israel in the bombardment of Gaza, Mr. Trump's own reckless leadership adds yet another, dangerous layer of volatility to the world that is seeing enormous turbulence and destruction.
What is Israel's endgame in Iran? Our International Affairs Editor Stanly Johny addressed this question in our newsletter last week. Do read it for context. Also watch this, where he breaks down Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's objectives—from regime change and diplomatic pressure, to dragging the U.S. into direct conflict. The latter has now been achieved, and West Asia is in for more, deadly turbulence.
Also Watch | U.S. strikes Iran's key nuclear sites: What next? Stanly Johny answers key questions.
United Nations chief Antonio Guterres has warned against yet 'another cycle of destruction' and retaliation following the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, which he said marked a 'perilous turn' in the region. 'The people of the region cannot endure another cycle of destruction. And yet, we now risk descending into a rathole of retaliation after retaliation,' he added.
The consequences of Israel's provocation will be far-reaching, impacting not just the region but the entire world. Iran's Parliament, the Majlis, has reportedly approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz in response to the attacks by the U.S. on Iranian nuclear facilities, the country's state-owned media PressTV reported on Sunday (June 22, 2025), citing Esmaeil Kowsari, a member of the Majlis. According to the report, the final decision on the closure of the Strait of Hormuz lies with Iran's Supreme National Security Council. The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea, and is one of the world's most important oil trade routes, T.C.A. Sharad Raghavan reports.
Impact on India
In this comprehensive explainer, our Diplomatic Affairs Editor Suhasini Haidar explains India's stand on the escalation in West Asia, the impact of the war on Indian workers in Israel and Iran, efforts on the evacuation front and more. As the conflict escalated, the MEA and its embassies in Tehran and Tel Aviv put evacuation efforts, as part of what was named 'Operation Sindhu', on priority. Unlike the rest of West Asia, where nearly 10 million Indians reside, relatively fewer numbers live in Iran and Israel. There are about 10,000 students and professionals in Iran and about 25,000 workers, students and researchers in Israel, many of whom only moved recently to fill in for construction and caregiver jobs after Israel dismissed thousands of Palestinian workers in the wake of the October 7 terror attacks in 2023, she writes. In a special gesture, Iran opened its embattled airspace to allow flights carrying 1,000 Indians home.
Our colleague Kallol Bhattacherjee tracked updates from the Ministry of External Affairs on the evacuation of Indians. Hours after the U.S. struck three prominent nuclear sites in Iran, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with the President of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday, and called for 'immediate de-escalation'.
However, should India play a more proactive role? Suhasini Haidar tells us at what's at stake and what India's responses mean. Watch the latest episode of Worldview.
Gaza out of focus
Nearly 56,000 Palestinians have been confirmed killed between October 7, 2023 and June 22, 2025, an Al Jazeera graphic reminded us, as Israel's war on Iran displaces every other headline in the world. Although people's resistance to Israel's persisting killings in and bombardment of Gaza is growing significantly, especially in Europe, governments are still reluctant to call out Israel on what many rights groups have unambiguously deemed a genocide. Last week, India had abstained in a UN resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. Every other member of BRICS, SCO and SAARC and even all G-7 members minus the U.S. had voted in favour of the resolution critical of actions. In a break from older positions, New Delhi has made it clear that India will not criticise Israel.
When both, Israel's motivations as well as the mass killings and destruction in Gaza are amply evident, many prominent governments across the world are simply watching, privileging their myopic, strategic calculations over basic humanity. Morality does not inform realpolitik, but overlooking a catastrophe of this magnitude cannot serve even self-interest in the long term.
Top 5 stories this week:
1. It is still not too late for India's voice to be heard: New Delhi's silence on the devastation in Gaza and the hostilities against Iran is a disturbing departure from its moral and diplomatic traditions, contends Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson of the Congress Parliamentary Party
2. NPT | For the sake of peace, at the cost of war: While Iran has long proclaimed adherence to the NPT's basic tenets and benefited from them vis-à-vis civilian nuclear technology, its covert activities in violation of the treaty's safeguards have progressively undermined trust and led to an international crisis that is still unfolding, writes Vasudevan Mukunth
3. Blaise Metreweli | Licensed to spy: Ramya Kannan profiles the first woman chief of the MI6, said to be well-versed in technology, a prerequisite for espionage operations in an increasingly 'post-truth' world
4. Resetting the India-U.S. partnership in uncertain times: While the structural logic of the partnership remains robust, what is needed is a reset that is marked by clarity and mutual commitment, writes Amitabh Mattoo, Professor and Dean, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
5. Lessons from Operation Sindoor's global outreach: The intensive period of public diplomacy affirmed that India, when united, can project its voice with clarity and conviction on international platforms, writes Congress MP Shashi Tharoor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
US wants equity stake in Intel for cash grants approved under Biden
By Andrea Shalal and David Shepardson WASHINGTON -U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday the government wanted an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved during the administration of former President Joe Biden. Separately, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any U.S. investment in Intel would be aimed at helping the troubled chipmaker stabilize. Asked about reports that the U.S. was considering taking a 10% stake in Intel, Bessent told CNBC's "Squawk Box" program: "The stake would be a conversion of the grants and maybe increase the investment into Intel to help stabilize the company for chip production here in the U.S." Bessent gave no details about the size or timing of any U.S. stake in Intel, but said any investment would not be aimed at forcing U.S. companies to buy chips from Intel. Bessent's comments were the first official response from the Trump administration after Bloomberg News reported on Monday the U.S. government is in talks to take a 10% Intel stake in exchange for $7.9 billion in grants that were approved for the U.S. chip company during the Biden administration. "We should get an equity stake for our money," Lutnick told CNBC. "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away." Lutnick said the U.S. does not want control of the company. "It's not governance, we are just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity for the Trump administration for the American people." He suggested any stake would be "non-voting," meaning it would not enable the U.S. government to tell the company how to run its business. He made his comments a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2 billion into the chipmaker, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer,'" Lutnick said. Intel and TSMC, a Taiwan-based chipmaker, did not immediately comment. Intel has struggled financially and recorded an annual loss of $18.8 billion in 2024, its first such loss since 1986. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
US Targets Chinese Steel And Lithium for Forced-Labor Scrutiny
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration said it will step up scrutiny of imports of steel, copper, lithium and other materials from China to enforce a US ban on goods allegedly made with forced labor in the country's Xinjiang region. The announcement of new 'high-priority sectors' targeted under the four-year-old Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was included Tuesday in an annual update to the US government's enforcement efforts. It also dovetails with President Donald Trump's broader trade goals, as he seeks to lower the US trade deficit with China and pressures Beijing to curb shipments of fentanyl and precursor chemicals. 'America has a moral, economic, and national security duty to eradicate threats that endanger our nation's prosperity, including unfair trade practices that disadvantage the American people and stifle our economic growth,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. Still, the administration went ahead with the announcement at a time when Trump has sought to improve relations with his counterpart, Xi Jinping. The US president last week extended a pause on higher tariffs on goods from China for 90 days as he seeks an in-person meeting with the Chinese leader. Under the 2021 law, the US government assumes that anything made even partially in the Chinese manufacturing hub of Xinjiang is produced with forced labor and cannot be imported into the US. Companies may win exemptions if they can provide 'clear and convincing evidence' forced labor was not used. The measure is meant to help combat alleged repression of Uyghurs and other minorities in the province of Xinjiang. Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations that minorities are compelled to work against their will. Although the law applies to all goods, it originally singled out apparel, cotton and cotton products, tomatoes and silica-based products — including polysilicon — as high-priority sectors for enforcement. Under former President Joe Biden, the government expanded the products subject to extra scrutiny to include aluminum, polyvinyl chloride and seafood. The Trump administration's Tuesday announcement expands the list again to encompass red dates, caustic soda and lithium, as well as steel and copper. The US doesn't import significant tonnage of copper from China, according to data from Morgan Stanley. In 2024, the US imported about 470,000 tons of steel from China, equal to 0.5% of domestic consumption, according to the Commerce Department. --With assistance from Joe Deaux. More stories like this are available on


Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Katy Perry & Justin Trudeau's rumored romance fizzles after ‘intimate' dinner fallout
Katy Perry and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's rumored romance has reportedly cooled following an 'intimate' dinner in Montreal. Sources suggest the decline due to their busy schedules and Trudeau's unease with public attention. Perry is concentrating on her global tour, while Trudeau remains dedicated to his duties as Canada's Prime Minister, prioritizing work and family. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Montreal Dinner Sparks Speculation Personal Backgrounds Provide Context Public Scrutiny and Busy Schedules Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: Reports indicate that the rumored romance between pop superstar Katy Perry and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has fizzled, after what was cited as an 'intimate' dinner in Montreal. Sources suggest the connection cooled off due to their hectic schedules and Trudeau's discomfort with the media spotlight that comes with dating a globally recognized pop speculation began the previous month when Perry and Trudeau were seen sharing an intimate dinner in Montreal. The outing rapidly caught the attention of the public and the press , as the Canadian Prime Minister later attended Perry's sold-out 'Lifetimes' tour stop in Canada. The meetings further sparked widespread rumors about a budding according to the Daily Mail, communication between the pair has 'waned in the past two weeks,' signaling that the initial spark has dimmed. 'She's busy, he's busy,' an insider told the outlet, citing that the two previously texted 'nonstop' in July. 'They have a lot going on, and the newness is gone. But there's nothing negative about it. They just aren't in constant communication anymore. That could change, but for now, it is what it is. It has cooled off.'Trudeau and his wife, Sophie Grégoire, finalized their separation in 2023 ending 18 years of former couple has three children: sons Xavier, 17, and Hadrien, 11, and daughter Ella-Grace, the same time, Perry confirmed her split from actor Orlando Bloom in early July after nearly ten years together. Perry and Bloom share a 4-year-old daughter, Daisy. Both had recently undergone important personal transitions, which may have influenced to the brief nature of their suggest that Trudeau's discomfort with the media spotlight surrounding their rumored romance played a major role in the fallout. High-profile personalities often face intense public scrutiny, and dating a celebrity can intensify that pressure. Meanwhile, Perry's busy international tour schedule and global commitments left little room for pursuing a more serious relationship. Currently, both are prioritizing their respective commitments.A1. Katy Perry is an American pop singer, songwriter, and actress known for hits like Firework and Dark Horse.A2. Justin Trudeau is the Prime Minister of Canada, serving since 2015, and a prominent political leader in the country.