logo
Renewable cleanup rules making Alberta less competitive for investment: report

Renewable cleanup rules making Alberta less competitive for investment: report

CTV News3 days ago

Power transmission lines and wind turbines as seen with the Rocky Mountains in the background near Pincher Creek, Alta., Thursday, June 6, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh
CALGARY — A report says new cleanup rules for renewable energy sites are hurting the competitiveness of Alberta's industry.
Business Renewables Centre-Canada analyzed the reclamation security requirements for renewables in 27 jurisdictions and found Alberta's are now the most costly.
Under a code of practice for solar and wind projects published last week, the Alberta government says operators must provide an estimate for the cost of dismantling turbines and panels, removing underground concrete infrastructure, hauling waste away, replanting vegetation and other items.
A 30-per-cent security is required upfront, rising to 60 per cent after 15 years to ensure there is enough money for proper cleanup at the sites' end of life.
BRC-Canada says Alberta's upfront security requirement is unusually high and the rules don't take into account the salvage value of the concrete and metals that could be sold to recoup cleanup expenses.
The Alberta government issued the new rules in February 2024, just as a seven-month moratorium on new renewable project approvals expired, but it had yet to lay out the details around how they'd be implemented.
Jorden Dye, BRC-Canada's director, said many renewable projects are being built by multinational companies that can move their capital around easily.
'And it'll just be really disappointing if we see Alberta lose out and lose our ground as the biggest developer of renewable energy in the last few years in Canada because we've continued to place onerous rules on the industry,' he said.
In addition to the reclamation security requirements, the province has placed buffer zones around wind turbines so as not to impede 'pristine viewpoints' and is taking an 'agriculture first' approach to deciding what can be built on farmland. The province is also working through consultations on the structure of its energy market as well as transmission regulations.
'If you take one by itself, it's OK — we might be able to live with it, or we can work around it,' said Dye.
'It's kind of getting to the totality of the decisions that's really driving some of the concerns.'
The BRC-Canada study noted some jurisdictions — such Illinois and Tennessee — require a 100-per-cent reclamation security, but only 10 per cent of that must be paid upfront.
'Renewable energy projects are really sensitive to the upfront capital cost,' Dye said. 'Having that as an operating annual cost is a lot different to whether a project will go forward than if it's an upfront cost.'
Three-quarters of the jurisdictions the group compared accounted for the salvage value of materials once projects are dismantled. While that amount may not reflect the real-world value of the metal and concrete decades into the future, it does go a long way toward offsetting the reclamation costs, Dye said.
Dye said wind and solar projects generally have a lifespan of 20 to 50 years, but components are often refurbished along the way. And when they're done operating, there is decades' worth of real-world data to make pursuing another development easier.
While an oil or gas well will eventually become depleted, 'the sun and the wind will still be there in those exact spots,' Dye said.
The cost of cleaning up old oil and gas wells has been a major issue in the oil and gas sector. The Alberta Energy Regulator estimates that as of June 2024, there were $36 billion in environmental liabilities.
In announcing the renewables policy in February 2024, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said the province was looking for a different and better way to approach solar and wind cleanup than what had been done for oil and gas.
'It is critical that we do not repeat errors of the past, and that we have reclamation rules and costs accounted for at the beginning of any development,' she said. The reclamation bond or security can be paid to the Alberta government, or be negotiated between the renewable developer and a landowner.
Janetta McKenzie, oil and gas program director at the Pembina Institute think-tank, said the rules for wind and solar are fundamentally different than 'generous and flexible' ones for oil and gas.
In that sector, companies are required to pay about one per cent of cleanup costs in upfront securities, with no firm timelines, she said.
The industry-funded Orphan Well Association looks after closure costs when an energy company has gone bankrupt or otherwise cannot meet its obligations. But that organization 'is also buttressed by some interest-free loans from the provincial and federal government and is pretty persistently underfunded,' McKenzie said.
'This is a province that wants to unleash its energy sector, but there is an energy sector that's waiting for a stable regulatory environment and then one that is being given a lot of options to not reclaim and not clean up itself in a timely manner.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025.
Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada's 'worst boss' defies nuclear regulator, threatens to sue
Canada's 'worst boss' defies nuclear regulator, threatens to sue

CBC

time15 minutes ago

  • CBC

Canada's 'worst boss' defies nuclear regulator, threatens to sue

A licensed nuclear facility in Kanata is ignoring orders from the federal regulator, with the owner claiming in all-caps rants that he will sue the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). A deadline passed this week for Best Theratronics Ltd. (BTL) to provide the CNSC with a written update on its progress toward restoring a lapsed financial guarantee. After receiving no response from the company, the CNSC told CBC in an email that it will now "determine the next steps." BTL owner Krishnan Suthanthiran did not respond by publication time when asked about the deadline elapsing, but has previously accused CNSC of wrongdoing. "We are not in violation of CNSC RULES , it is CNSC THAT IS IN VIOLATION OF THEIR OWN RULES," Suthanthiran wrote to CBC in an email last month, claiming he was filing a lawsuit against the CNSC. "THIS AND MY BUSINESS EXPERIENCE IN CANADA WILL BE A GLOBAL MOVIE - DOCU DRAMA - under the generic title , " NO GOOD DEED GOES UNPUNISHED ", the septuagenarian continued, using idiosyncratic capitalization and punctuation. With Suthanthiran's conflict with the CNSC stretching back to last November, critics say the case highlights issues with the regulator's cosy relationship with the industry it oversees and raises questions about whether taxpayer money could be at stake if the dispute is not revolved. 'Canada's worst boss' BTL is a manufacturer of cancer treatment machines with a Class 1B nuclear substance processing facility operating licence. Formerly part of Crown corporation Atomic Energy Canada Ltd., it was privatized in the 1990s and then sold to the Indian-born Suthanthiran in 2007. The licence permits it to handle nuclear isotopes involved in the production of cobalt-60 external beam radiation therapy units and cesium-137 self-contained blood irradiators. As part of its licence, BTL is required to maintain a $1.8-million financial guarantee, to cover any costs associated with cleanup or decommissioning, should the company default on its obligations. Last year, as BTL was involved in a protracted labour dispute in which striking workers labelled Suthanthiran "Canada's worst boss," the CNSC was made aware this guarantee had lapsed. At the same time, the regulator was growing concerned about security at the then empty facility. In November, the CNSC issued two orders against BTL, one relating to restoring the financial guarantee and another related to security at the facility while the workers were on strike. In February, the CNSC amended the financial guarantee order, giving BTL until June 9 to provide a written update. "Providing extensions and long timelines for compliance is a hallmark of a regulator that is being too deferential and accommodating of industry," said Theresa McClenaghan, executive director of the Canadian Environmental Law Association. This accommodative approach toward a recalcitrant licensee was also seen in communications CNSC sent to BTL advising the company that it may be in breach of the financial guarantee order. "Some of the activities that Best Theratronics Ltd. has indicated have occurred ... may not be allowed under section 1 of the amended order," it wrote in a May 15 email seen by CBC. "As such, we request that you cease these activities." In a response seen by CBC, Suthanthiran replied to the regulator: "I HAVE BEEN BUSY IN RAISING LOAN FUNDS TO KEEP BTL OPERATIONAL , ( but not other companies ) . BUT WHY ARE YOU CHARGING LINCE FEES QUARTERLY WHEN YOU ARE DENYING THE CANCER PATIENTS GLOBALLY FROM GETTING THEIR TREATMENT . "CNSC TREAMENT OF BTL IS NOT A REGULATORY PRUDENCE BUT CRIMINAL . "BEST WISHES , HAVE A GRSAT FRIDAY ." 'The captive regulator problem' Part of CNSC's difficulty in dealing Suthanthiran is that its regulatory framework does not envisage dealing with bad faith actors, according to McClenaghan. Instead, its light-touch regulatory philosophy relies on licensed operators to uphold standards. "Licensees are directly responsible for managing regulated activities in a manner that protects health, safety, security and the environment," the CNSC writes on its website. "I can't think of a time in Canada where you just had somebody completely not complying" with orders, said McClenaghan. "In my view, the CNSC is not sufficiently independent." Among the next steps the CNSC may consider, it has the power to revoke Suthanthiran's licence. "The CNSC uses a graduated approach to enforcement to encourage and compel compliance and deter future non-compliances," a CNSC spokesperson told CBC in an email. "Enforcement actions can range from simply informing the licensee, to issuing an order or an administrative monetary penalty, to revocation of a licence and prosecution in the most extreme of cases." Green Party Leader Elizabeth May believes Suthanthiran's licence should be revoked. "Why is he still operating in Canada when he's out of compliance with many orders that the company has been issued?" she asked. Under investigation in Belgium In 2012, another company owned by Suthanthiran, Best Medical Belgium, was placed into administration after Belgian authorities accused Suthanthiran of illegally draining funds from the company and walking away. The Walloon regional government said the total cost of that cleanup operation eventually reached €128 million, now worth about $200 million Cdn. A criminal investigation into Suthanthiran in Belgium is ongoing, the Belgian prosecutor has told CBC. Given Suthanthiran's history, it is problematic that the CNSC has not moved more swiftly, according to May. "It's basically the captive regulator problem," she said, suggesting the CNSC may be too close to the industry it oversees. BTL is in the riding of Liberal MP Jenna Sudds, who said she takes matters of regulatory compliance seriously. "Ignoring directives from our national regulatory body raises serious concerns about the commitment to safety standards that protect both employees and our community," Sudds wrote in an emailed statement, adding that she will "monitor this situation closely."

N.S. shakes up requirements for metal mines in bid to speed up approvals
N.S. shakes up requirements for metal mines in bid to speed up approvals

CBC

time35 minutes ago

  • CBC

N.S. shakes up requirements for metal mines in bid to speed up approvals

Nova Scotia Environment Minister Tim Halman says he's acting on years of requests from the mining industry to change the regulatory requirements for some major projects. The changes are the latest move in the Houston government's plan to ramp up resource development. "We are embracing the fact that strong environmental protection, economic opportunity and regulatory clarity are not competing priorities. They must work together, and in Nova Scotia they will," Halman said at a news conference Friday. Halman's department is removing 15 requirements from the application for industrial approvals, which a project needs before it can start operating. The changes apply only to metal mining projects, while all other major projects will still have to meet the pre-existing requirements for industrial applications. 15 requirements pushed down the road The 15 requirements that were dropped include noise and air emissions monitoring plans, the submission of reclamation securities and signed authorization from landowners, among other items. The requirements are not being completely discarded but are being pushed further down the road. The requirements will be conditions of industrial approval, with deadlines coming at various stages of construction and operation of the mine. Officials from Halman's department called it a "phased" approach and said it will help speed things up. "When a company receives industrial approval, it may be many months or years before they begin construction," said Janet MacKinnon, executive director of sustainability and applied science. "So we wouldn't necessarily need that information until they were ready at that phase of their project to start building or start constructing or start operating." 'Quicker is better' Metal mining projects have to undergo a Class I environmental assessment, which takes 50 days, before moving on to industrial approval, which takes 60 days. Those timelines are set in legislation. The period in between receipt of environmental approval and the submission of an application for industrial approval is highly variable, said Paul Keats, and that's the area the province is aiming to address. Keats, director of the regional integration, compliance and operations unit at the Environment Department, said the months or years that can go by in between the two stages is dictated in part by the applicant's ability to meet all the requirements for industrial applications. He said a group of 10 staff has been assigned to work exclusively on industrial approvals for metal mining projects. "We are going to be here to help clients understand the requirements and help them get through a successful approval quicker," he said. He couldn't say exactly how much time he expects the new process to shave off. "Quicker is better," said Keats. MacKinnon said Mi'kmaw leaders were "made aware" of the changes to the industrial approval process and will continue to be consulted on a project-by-project basis.

Downtown businesses in Vancouver, Victoria want changes to supportive housing, citing public safety concerns
Downtown businesses in Vancouver, Victoria want changes to supportive housing, citing public safety concerns

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Downtown businesses in Vancouver, Victoria want changes to supportive housing, citing public safety concerns

Social Sharing Alan Goodall has owned the Aura nightclub in Vancouver's entertainment district for 16 years, and he says the situation for his business has never been worse. "Just in the last month alone, my ceiling has caved in in three different locations, three times," Goodall said of his club, located on the ground floor of the former Howard Johnson hotel on Granville Street. The B.C. government purchased the hotel for supportive housing in 2020, and since then Vancouver fire crews have been called to the site 906 times, including for a fire on Wednesday. Vancouver police also say they've been called to the housing site thousands of times since it was converted. Downtown business problems aren't just affecting Granville Street. Business leaders and others in Vancouver and Victoria say the mounting number of public safety concerns in the downtowns and lack of action from the province is promoting them to rethink their operations. "Just last month, I was closed for 16 days. I had 50 staff members out of work, people who lived paycheque-to-paycheque were given 24 hours notice and they didn't know how they were gonna pay their rent," Goodall said. 'Downtown businesses cannot wait' Two people were injured in this week's fire, and all the residents were displaced overnight in what Vancouver Fire Rescue Services called an accidental blaze caused by a locking butane torch. The devices are commonly used to smoke drugs in crystal or powdered form. Fire services information officer Matthew Trudeau described a challenging scene inside the facility. "Hoarding conditions, challenges with water supply inside the building and people refusing to leave made fire suppression and search operations tough for crews," he said in a statement. The Downtown Victoria Business Association said in its annual report released Wednesday that 48 per cent of the businesses surveyed said they are either unsure or would not renew their leases if it was due soon because of the "current conditions" in the neighbourhood. "Our call is simple: all levels of government must act now," chief executive Jeff Bray said in a statement. "No more studies. No waiting on perfect solutions, " he said. "The data is clear: downtown businesses cannot wait three to five more years." Laura Ballance with the Hospitality Vancouver Association said the business situation is equally dire on Granville Street, and many businesses are blaming the crime and street disorder on the "failed experiment" of placing supportive housing in the area. Ballance said the group has engaged with B.C. Housing for years but the conversations have not created any movement on the situation. Vancouver's fire service said of the more than 900 calls for service at the former hotel, 375 were medical incidents, 43 were fires and 12 were rescue or hazard events. Police said they had 65 calls to the hotel in 2019 before it became supportive housing. Two years later police were asked to attend 971 times, and have gone on to average more than two calls a day. Moving supportive housing Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim said he could "feel the frustration and the sadness and the anger of our local businesses" because of what they have to deal with. He said he has spoken with provincial Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon after the fire and Kahlon committed to moving supportive housing out of the entertainment district, although there was no specific timeline. In a statement, Kahlon said the province "will support the city's plan to revitalize the Granville entertainment district." "Seeing another fire is frustrating for businesses, and having people lose access to housing is heartbreaking," Kahlon said. He said supportive housing "works." "We're seeing success in the City of Vancouver's reports that indicate a drop in violence and street crime in the Downtown Eastside with fewer people sheltering in encampments and parks." Sim said the move of supportive housing away from Granville street "can't wait." "Why don't you ask Alan [Goodall] how urgent this is?" Sim said at a news conference Thursday, gesturing to the nightclub owner also in attendance. "So, speed is of the essence, "Sim said. "If there's no movement, we'll have more press conferences like this, and they won't necessarily be initiated by the City of Vancouver." Goodall said he wouldn't wish what happened to his business on anyone. "As a result of the fire that happened yesterday, they're right now tearing out my ceiling again — a ceiling that I kind of consider my own little Sistine Chapel. I spent 200 hours, me personally, putting that ceiling up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store