Downtown businesses in Vancouver, Victoria want changes to supportive housing, citing public safety concerns
Social Sharing
Alan Goodall has owned the Aura nightclub in Vancouver's entertainment district for 16 years, and he says the situation for his business has never been worse.
"Just in the last month alone, my ceiling has caved in in three different locations, three times," Goodall said of his club, located on the ground floor of the former Howard Johnson hotel on Granville Street.
The B.C. government purchased the hotel for supportive housing in 2020, and since then Vancouver fire crews have been called to the site 906 times, including for a fire on Wednesday.
Vancouver police also say they've been called to the housing site thousands of times since it was converted.
Downtown business problems aren't just affecting Granville Street. Business leaders and others in Vancouver and Victoria say the mounting number of public safety concerns in the downtowns and lack of action from the province is promoting them to rethink their operations.
"Just last month, I was closed for 16 days. I had 50 staff members out of work, people who lived paycheque-to-paycheque were given 24 hours notice and they didn't know how they were gonna pay their rent," Goodall said.
'Downtown businesses cannot wait'
Two people were injured in this week's fire, and all the residents were displaced overnight in what Vancouver Fire Rescue Services called an accidental blaze caused by a locking butane torch. The devices are commonly used to smoke drugs in crystal or powdered form.
Fire services information officer Matthew Trudeau described a challenging scene inside the facility.
"Hoarding conditions, challenges with water supply inside the building and people refusing to leave made fire suppression and search operations tough for crews," he said in a statement.
The Downtown Victoria Business Association said in its annual report released Wednesday that 48 per cent of the businesses surveyed said they are either unsure or would not renew their leases if it was due soon because of the "current conditions" in the neighbourhood.
"Our call is simple: all levels of government must act now," chief executive Jeff Bray said in a statement.
"No more studies. No waiting on perfect solutions, " he said. "The data is clear: downtown businesses cannot wait three to five more years."
Laura Ballance with the Hospitality Vancouver Association said the business situation is equally dire on Granville Street, and many businesses are blaming the crime and street disorder on the "failed experiment" of placing supportive housing in the area.
Ballance said the group has engaged with B.C. Housing for years but the conversations have not created any movement on the situation.
Vancouver's fire service said of the more than 900 calls for service at the former hotel, 375 were medical incidents, 43 were fires and 12 were rescue or hazard events.
Police said they had 65 calls to the hotel in 2019 before it became supportive housing. Two years later police were asked to attend 971 times, and have gone on to average more than two calls a day.
Moving supportive housing
Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim said he could "feel the frustration and the sadness and the anger of our local businesses" because of what they have to deal with.
He said he has spoken with provincial Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon after the fire and Kahlon committed to moving supportive housing out of the entertainment district, although there was no specific timeline.
In a statement, Kahlon said the province "will support the city's plan to revitalize the Granville entertainment district."
"Seeing another fire is frustrating for businesses, and having people lose access to housing is heartbreaking," Kahlon said.
He said supportive housing "works."
"We're seeing success in the City of Vancouver's reports that indicate a drop in violence and street crime in the Downtown Eastside with fewer people sheltering in encampments and parks."
Sim said the move of supportive housing away from Granville street "can't wait."
"Why don't you ask Alan [Goodall] how urgent this is?" Sim said at a news conference Thursday, gesturing to the nightclub owner also in attendance.
"So, speed is of the essence, "Sim said. "If there's no movement, we'll have more press conferences like this, and they won't necessarily be initiated by the City of Vancouver."
Goodall said he wouldn't wish what happened to his business on anyone.
"As a result of the fire that happened yesterday, they're right now tearing out my ceiling again — a ceiling that I kind of consider my own little Sistine Chapel. I spent 200 hours, me personally, putting that ceiling up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Liberals see a need for speed on major projects bill. Critics warn that's risky
Social Sharing Liberals are attempting to bulldoze their mega projects bill through Parliament, according to critics who say the legislation interferes with Indigenous rights, environmental protection and democracy itself. The government's One Canadian Economy Act is generating controversy inside and outside the House of Commons, with some arguing it confers king-like powers to rush projects deemed in the national interest to completion. The Liberals say the bill is intended to fast-track major projects as Canada faces the urgency of a disruptive Donald Trump presidency. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadian jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk and, quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," said Tim Hodgson, the natural resources and energy minister, at a news conference Thursday. "We need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War II." What's in the bill? The One Canadian Economy Act, or Bill C-5, will create a list of major nation-building projects. After a designated project is added to the list, the government will publish a document outlining all the conditions that builders must follow. A single designated minister — likely Dominic LeBlanc in this government — would be responsible for listing the projects and issuing the conditions document. "For far too long major projects, whether energy transmission lines, critical mineral developments, pipelines or clean technology projects, have been stalled by assessments, challenges and overlapping and duplicative regulations," said Leblanc on Friday during a procedural debate in the House Friday. What gets on the list? The prime minister has provided examples of projects that could be included on the list based on recommendations from Canada's premiers. Ports, mines, renewable energy and oil and gas pipelines could make the list, he said. The legislation offers the following criteria: Strengthening Canada's autonomy, resilience and security. Providing economic or other benefits to Canada. Having a high likelihood of successful execution. Advancing the interests of Indigenous Peoples. Contributing to clean growth and to meeting Canada's climate objectives. The legislation gives the government broad discretion to apply all or none of these criteria, which worries Conservatives who still seem generally supportive of the bill. "These concepts are broad enough that any interpretation or any argument could be made about each factor either way for each project," said Shannon Stubbs, the Conservative critic for energy and natural resources, during debate on the bill on Friday. 'Leap before you look' assessments Some academics are concerned about what happens if the bill's broad powers to speed up projects aren't used carefully. "That could be good for the economy if it is used wisely," said University of Ottawa law and economics professor Stewart Elgie. "But it could be bad for the environment if it is used poorly." For major infrastructure and development projects on the list, such as hydroelectric dams, ports and large-scale mines, the bill removes the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada's authority to limit them. But it does place limits on the minister's ability to fast-track cross-border pipelines and nuclear reactors. It states the minister cannot issue the approval document until both the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Canada Energy Regulator are "satisfied that issuing the document will not compromise the health or safety of persons." However, the bill suggests the power of all federal regulators and departments is constrained, as it states that every opinion and decision formed about a project once listed must be "in favour of permitting the project to be carried out in whole or in part." This creates what some academics are calling a "leap before you look" approach that turns the federal environmental review's informed decision-making "on its head." Henry VIII clauses Those same researchers also note that a legislative tool — Henry VIII clauses, named after the autocratic King Henry VIII of England — are tucked into the bill. WATCH | PM Mark Carney says 'more will be done' on energy: Carney says 'more will be done' on energy, but conversation isn't all about pipelines 17 days ago Duration 3:52 Asked by CBC's Power & Politics host David Cochrane about the separatist sentiment in Alberta, Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is 'committed' to working with Canadians across the country. Proposed legislation grants the Carney government, or future governments, the authority to exempt pipelines, mines or other listed projects from any law or government regulation. Near the very end of the 18-page bill, it states that cabinet can exempt national-interest projects from not only environmental laws but also acts of Parliament. "The combined effect of Sections 21, 22 and 23 gives cabinet an unconstrained ability to make regulations that not only alter the application of other federal regulations … but also to alter the operation of virtually all laws duly passed by Parliament, including outright exemption," as noted in a post co-authored by University of Calgary law professors David Wright and Martin Olszynski. What about Indigenous rights? The proposed law commits to consulting with provincial and territorial governments, as well as Indigenous Peoples, before a project is listed and a conditions document is issued or altered. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty on Thursday told reporters that the bill does not "do away with impact assessments" and there are "multiple points" where First Nations and other groups can bring forward their concerns. "The prime minister has been clear: these projects will be selected if the communities wish to participate," she said. Nevertheless, a national Indigenous group has raised concerns about a lack of consultation on the bill itself and what that could mean for the prospect of ongoing consultation. "Unfortunately, the government provided First Nations only seven days to respond to an outline of the bill and did not provide the full text (a consultative draft) in advance," the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, said in a statement. Likely Conservative backing Conservatives have signalled that they are open to backing the bill, proposing some changes during the House of Commons debate. Stubbs said the party would like to see it go further and faster while calling for a repeal of regulations like the Trudeau-era law that banned the oil tankers from ports or marine installations along British Columbia's north coast. "Canadians deserve a government that backs them. Not a government that blocks them," Stubbs said. However, with C-5's broad powers to sidestep existing laws for approved projects, the tanker ban could be overriden without repealing anything. The Bloc Québécois has said the bill, in theory, could exempt a company building a major project from a range of laws, including the Labour Code, Criminal Code and language laws. The party is calling for more scrutiny of the bill. "How could we go forward with such a huge bill, with huge consequences for Quebec and Canada, without at least doing what we have been elected to do — and that means studying effectively this bill in committee," Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet said. Concerns over bad-faith use The Liberals intend to send the bill to committee for two days of study before hoping to get it passed on Friday. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May takes issue with what she calls an "abbreviated bulldozer time frame." At least one Liberal is calling for changes to the bill, which is supposed to terminate in five years. Vancouver MP Patrick Weiler wants the government to shorten the bill's five-year sunset clause, which he noted would go beyond Trump's term and "at least one more federal election." "We need to consider how this legislation could be used in bad faith by a future government," he said.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Bike Share Toronto says it's a victim of its own success. It's looking to NYC for help
In the latest part of our series 'Toronto Explained,' CBC's Chris Glover breaks down flaws within Bike Share Toronto's program amid high demand — and how New York City's popular bike sharing program might pave the way for solutions.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Airbnb says thousands of B.C. reservations at risk, blames 'rushed' rental rules
Short-term vacation rental platform Airbnb said Friday that "thousands" of reservations in British Columbia are at risk of cancellation, accusing the province of rushing out regulations as it cracked down on the industry. Alex Howell, Airbnb's Canadian policy lead, said in an interview with The Canadian Press that the new rules, which require short-term rental hosts to confirm their listings are legal, have already led to some bookings being cancelled. The government has said platforms such as Airbnb can't post B.C. listings without confirming they are registered with the province. Howell said many hosts whose properties qualify can't register due to glitches and other problems with the new system. "Typically, we would have worked with a government for six months to do live testing, to make sure that things are working the way they should," Howell said. "And unfortunately in this situation, B.C. really just rushed into launching the system that hadn't been fully tested, and that's what's brought us to this situation." The province said Friday that dozens of other short-term rental platforms serving B.C. have managed to support their hosts in registering with the government. But Howell said that property owners have reported that typos and formatting errors have prevented them from registering with the province, despite meeting all the legal criteria for hosting short-term rentals. "The government's short-term rental system simply isn't ready," Howell said in a statement to CBC News. "We warned that rushing this rollout would lead to serious consequences, and now British Columbians are paying the price." Summer is tourist season The province had said that short-term rentals are being restricted to principal residences, a secondary suite or a structure such as a laneway house on the property, and the policy is meant to open up more units in B.C.'s rental housing market. Howell said the timing of B.C.'s latest rules on short-term rentals is especially impactful, just ahead of the busy summer tourist season. "Thousands of reservations across the province are now at risk," she said. "These are registered, compliant hosts that are failing validation protocols through no fault of their own. "And this impacts … thousands of reservations across the province, at least 50 per cent of which are domestic travellers who are following their own government's advice to support local and travel within Canada this year." Howell said instead of waiting until the June 23 deadline — when bookings on unregistered B.C. properties would be cancelled — Airbnb is proactively contacting affected hosts and guests to offer penalty-free cancellations. Airbnb can 'find solutions' In a statement, B.C. Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon said the province is confident that "Airbnb will find solutions to their challenges with getting listings verified ahead of the June 23 deadline." "We hope that Airbnb will choose to support their hosts in verifying their listings, instead of cancelling their bookings," Kahlon said. "This is new ground for B.C., and we are working through ServiceBC, our short-term rental branch, and the platforms themselves to help hosts comply with the requirements." The ministry also noted that there are 65 short-term rental platforms operating in B.C., and other platforms have been successful in supporting their hosts to get registered. In a separate statement, the Opposition B.C. Conservatives criticized the NDP's short-term rental policies, with Prince George-Valemount MLA Rosalyn Bird saying the regulations run counter to the province's efforts to promote local travel. "How do you promote staycations while sabotaging the short-term rental market that makes them possible in small towns?" Bird said in the statement. "The Premier [David Eby] says 'travel within B.C.', and then his government kneecaps our ability to welcome those travellers."
