logo
‘Perverse' benefits system is unsustainable, warns Liz Kendall

‘Perverse' benefits system is unsustainable, warns Liz Kendall

Telegrapha day ago

Liz Kendall has said 'perverse incentives' in the benefits system must be tackled as she resists pressure from Labour rebels to water down her welfare reforms.
The Work and Pensions Secretary said the Government needed to take 'urgent action' to get people into work and warned that the rise in claims for personal independence payment (Pip) was 'not sustainable'.
In a letter to Debbie Abrahams, the chairman of the Commons work and pensions select committee, Ms Kendall said: 'Reforms are needed now to make the system sustainable, while supporting those people with the greatest needs.
'Our plan to rebalance the rates in Universal Credit will remove perverse incentives that trap people in benefit dependency.'
The comments come as Ms Kendall's plans to cut personal independence payment (Pip) and the health element of universal credit face mounting criticism from Labour MPs.
Last month the MPs' committee urged Ms Kendall to delay the implementation of her reforms, citing concerns about 'the impact of the proposed cuts in universal credit health support on employment, poverty and health outcomes'. Backbenchers have also been calling for the proposals to be dropped.
Dismissing their concerns, Ms Kendall wrote: 'We urgently need welfare reform to give people a better future – to stop people from falling into inactivity, restore trust and fairness in the system.'
As it stands, those who are permanently signed off work because of sickness and claim universal credit health top up receive more than twice as much as those on the basic level of universal credit. Those signed off sick do not need to look for work, while those on basic universal credit do.
Ms Kendall and others argue that this encourages people to claim sickness benefits and puts them off trying to find work.
A report from the Resolution Foundation found that 'changes to the benefits system over the last decade have strengthened the incentive to claim incapacity and disability benefits'.
The changes to the welfare system include stricter eligibility for claiming Pip and reducing payments for new claimants of the health element of Universal Credit. They are forecast to save £5bn by 2030.
The Work and Pensions Secretary said the reforms were necessary as the current rise in Pip cases was outpacing the increase in disability prevalence.
Even after changes to disability benefits, the number of people on Pip is still forecast to grow by 750,000 by the end of the parliament, according to government estimates.
The cost of Pip is poised to rise from £15bn before the pandemic to £37bn in real terms by the end of the decade, while the overall cost of sickness and disability benefits is expected to climb to £100bn.
Pip is the main non-means-tested benefit for those with health conditions or disabilities, with payments of up to £9,500 a year to help people with living costs and getting around.
'With Pip caseload and costs forecast to continue rising, reforms are needed now to make the system sustainable, while supporting those people with the greatest needs,' said Ms Kendall.
Under plans announced in March, the Government will tighten the eligibility criteria for people to claim Pip.
A separate but linked concern are worries about the high level of unemployed young people.
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics show that 923,000 people aged between 18 and 24 were not in employment, education or training (Neet) in between January and March 2025. There are concerns that many will find themselves stuck on benefits without help.
Alison McGovern, the employment minister, told the work and pensions committee on Wednesday: 'The situation for young people – well, it's a big worry for me at the moment.'
Ms McGovern added that the high number of Neets meant there were 'nearly one million young people effectively on the scrapheap. They need a start, they need a chance for a career'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all
Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all

The National

time24 minutes ago

  • The National

Starmer's approach to global trade is clearly not ‘pragmatic' at all

The UK Government estimates that annual economic output will be a stunning 0.1% higher by 2040 than it would have been without the India trade deal. In contrast, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) noted in Spring 2023 that Brexit's impact in the long run reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with what we would have had we remained in the EU. The amount gained by the 'landmark' India deal is therefore one-fortieth of the amount lost due to Brexit. READ MORE: UK-India post-Brexit free trade deal agreed after years of negotiation Prime Minister Starmer has described the Indian trade deal as a 'pragmatic' approach to global trade. Such an approach would, however, involve the UK Government restoring frictionless trade with the UK's largest trading partner, the European Union. If the UK Government were looking to deliver a 'pragmatic' approach on the economic front, Sir Keir would be looking to get the UK back into the European single market as soon as possible. This would be far more productive than trying to deliver trade deals with far-off countries and deliver immensely higher economic benefits than the paltry 0.1% generated by the India trade deal. Alex Orr Edinburgh THE world must be having laugh at Starmer as they did with Boris Johnson. Starmer considered he had done well to claim first prize with his Trump deal, being the first in the world to do so. Then along came Joseph Stiglitz, an American Nobel-prize-winning economist, on Laura Kuenssberg's Sunday show stating that Trump's method for changing his business bargaining tariffs is to choose the weakest first, then move on to the other countries, which is indeed what he did with the UK. READ MORE: Scottish care sector chief compares Keir Starmer to Enoch Powell in damning comments Stiglitz was a breath of fresh air in his interview, even stating that Scotland did things differently to Westminster especially where student fees are concerned. Starmer behaved like a school boy bringing an apple for his teacher when he presented Trump with an invitation for tea with King Charles. 'What a pushover', Trump must have thought, 'this guy is gonna be no trouble.' And so it was with Starmer claiming a success story with his 10% tariff in exchange for the 1.8% tariff on UK goods to America. Even more than before Brexit when we were part of the EU market. Alan Magnus-Bennett Fife STARMER'S Trump appeasement and grovelling is reaching the point where we're all reaching for the sick bag. Put aside the smarm-fest that was the 'royal' invitation. Put aside the bizarre trade deal, with oligarch-pal and yacht-botherer Peter Mandelson first lapping it up at Trump's left shoulder before looking like a puppet with cut strings when a real reporter (Scottish) pointed out it was all smoke and mirrors. Put aside all the UK's debasement. READ MORE: Police and fire brigade attend fire at Keir Starmer's house I ask again, when is enough going to be enough? Presidential adviser Stephen Miller, creep of creeps, has just announced a possible end to habeas corpus – the foundation stone of the most basic democracies. This follows the deportation of US citizens by ICE and Trump's befuddlement over whether or not he has to 'follow the constitution'. I just wait to see who Westminster will send along to represent Britain (England) at Trump's birthday military parade. Yes – the military parade for the draft dodger who has mocked veterans and banned transgender people from serving in the US military. Might I nominate Tony Blair as the perfect envoy to watch real heroes march by as slimeballs look down from a gold balcony? Amanda Baker Edinburgh I KNOW that modern journalists are generally illiterate about anything to do with religion these days but I would have thought that a journalist for The National would know a little more about the Scottish Catholic Church than shown in your article of May 9 on the election of Pope Leo XIV. The journalist quotes 'international development charity Cafod' about the Pope, obviously oblivious to the fact that this is the aid and development agency of the Catholic Church in England and Wales. Scotland's equivalent, Sciaf (Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund) is ignored, as is any source from the Scottish Catholic Church. READ MORE: Richard Murphy: Pope Leo can yield power stronger than political force The Vatican is the only state in the world which recognises Scotland as a separate entity from the rest of the UK. The then Pope Leo XXIII restored the Scottish hierarchy in 1878 and the current Scottish Bishops' Conference was born. The current pontiff has taken the name of Leo because he wants to acknowledge Leo XXIII's first modern Catholic Social Teaching encyclical, Reurum Novarum, which protected the rights of workers at the height of the industrial revolution – a sign that he will follow in the footsteps of Pope Francis. By the way, Sciaf, which transforms the lives of the poor, not making them comfortable in their poverty, is at the top of the recipients of funds for projects from the Scottish Government's overseas development fund (which would be much bigger had we been independent, of course). Please note for the future! Dr Duncan MacLaren KCSG Glasgow Former Director of SCIAF and former Secretary General of the Vatican-based Caritas Internationalis I HAD to laugh about the RBS bank notes article in last Monday's National. For the last two years, the ATM inside the Falkirk branch of the RBS only appears to dispense English bank notes (seven out of seven visits). All part of the anglicisation of Scotland, after the Tories changed the name of the parent company from RBS to the NatWest (National Westminster) Group in 2020? A Wilson Stirlingshire

Ministers on resignation 'watch-list' over welfare reforms
Ministers on resignation 'watch-list' over welfare reforms

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Ministers on resignation 'watch-list' over welfare reforms

A watch-list for potential ministerial resignations over Labour's welfare reforms is in place, Harriet Harman says. Speaking to Sky News political editor Beth Rigby on the Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harman reckons there could be resignations over the matter. While this week's spending review was taking up most of the headlines, the government told their MPs that controversial reforms to disability benefits would go ahead. The measures - headed up by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall - have proved mightily unpopular in Labour circles. More than 100 MPs from government benches are thought to have concerns about the plans to cut nearly £5bn from the welfare bill by restricting personal independence payments (PIP) and the health top-up to Universal Credit. Spiralling welfare costs, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, have been singled out as an area where the government could save money. Sir Keir Starmer has said he wants more people returning to the "dignity" of work. Asked by Beth if resignations could be on the cards, Baroness Harman said: "There might be. But I don't think, not cabinet." She added: "There is people on a watch list at the moment, but not cabinet ministers." A report released by a House of Lords committee earlier this year revealed that around 3.7 million people of working age get health-related benefits, 1.2 million more than before the pandemic. It also found that the government spends more (£65bn as of January) on incapacity and disability benefits than on defence. It added that if 400,000 people out of the workforce were able to find employment, it would save the government around £10bn through tax income and lower spending on benefits.

Should anyone go to prison for an abortion?
Should anyone go to prison for an abortion?

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Should anyone go to prison for an abortion?

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈 A landmark bill is due to be voted on in the House of Commons next week that could decriminalise abortion for women in England and Wales. Currently, any woman who has had an abortion after 24 weeks - without two doctors signing it off - could be jailed under a Victorian law. So why has it taken until 2025 for this vote? And who are the women whose stories have led to a potential change in the law? Beth, Ruth and Harriet speak to Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour MP proposing an amendment on the Crime and Policing Bill. Also, are we going to see tax rises in the autumn budget after this week's spending review? And is the Labour Party in turmoil over welfare cuts?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store