
Staff fearful of reprisals if they speak up amid hospital investigation, report finds
Asked to review University Hospitals Sussex, the report's authors said they 'repeatedly heard concerning examples of staff, often at a senior level, being ignored, dismissed and sometimes ridiculed when speaking up.'
The report by Niche Health and Social Care Consulting said this fear of reprisals from whistleblowing could be harming patient safety. It also highlighted complaints of misogyny and failures to deal with 'unwanted romantic advances'.
The review team noted a number of challenges facing the trust, including an investigation by Sussex police into possible corporate and individual manslaughter charges over allegations of medical negligence and cover-up in the general surgery and neurosurgery departments. Operation Bramber is focused on the deaths of more than 90 patients, and serious harm suffered by more than 100 others. It was sparked by the concerns of two consultant whislteblowers who lost their jobs at the trust after speaking up, first revealed in the Guardian in June 2023.
The report found staff feared their careers could be hindered if they raised concerns. One said they had been told not to share data that made the trust look bad. Another said when they did raise concerns they were 'gaslit' and targeted by management.
The report identified 'significant issues with psychological safety at every [staff] level' and noted that the fear of speaking up had worsened in the last year. It said staff identified as having the potential to disagree with management said they were deliberately ignored in meetings.
A staff survey conducted for the review received 376 responses of which more than 300 were negative or very negative on the issue of speaking up. The responses often cited a 'fear of reprisals'.
One said: 'There could be comeback which will affect your career in [a] negative manner.' Another said: 'I raised concerns. It put a target on my back. Management lied, gaslit me, would circumvent the issue, would dismiss my concerns.' A third said: 'I feel no one listens.'
Staff complained that the executive team discouraged bad news and different opinions. The review identified a 'predominance of direct and authoritative leadership styles'. It added: 'We heard repeatedly that 'there is a parent-child dynamic in this organisation'.'
It also found that 'incivility and poor behaviours appear to be pervasive' and there was a strong view that these were tolerated by leaders. The report did not give details of these behaviours. Last year the Guardian revealed that a consultant surgeon was promoted after allegedly assaulting resident doctors during surgery.
Six senior women at the trust complained to the reviewers of misogyny, which was felt to be prevalent among consultants. Female staff said they faced eye rolling and other signs of dismissiveness from male colleagues when they spoke at meetings. They also faced pejorative references to sexuality when they took the lead.
One woman claimed she 'experienced unwanted romantic advances and inappropriate comments, with no actions taken months after reporting this to various senior leaders.'
Earlier this month the trust chief executive, George Findlay, announced his departure.
Andy Heeps, the acting chief executive, said the trust accepted all the report's recommendations for improvement and its 'valuable insight into what we do well, where we are improving, and where there is clearly more to do'.
He said: 'The authors recognise the scale of the task in completing such a huge trust merger during the Covid pandemic, and highlight a number of key improvements such as our big reductions in waiting lists and key service quality improvements.
'But they also draw attention to some fundamental issues which we've not yet succeeded in tackling – and all of these things need to change, and change quickly.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Women can now claim almost £1,000 for 'gifting' their eggs and demand has never been greater. But for many the procedure is painful, has been linked to serious health conditions and leaves a lifetime of troubling questions
Leena Khan was a 21-year-old university student when she saw the Facebook advert seeking egg donors: giving would be a selfless act, the fertility clinic said. 'I've always gone out of my way to help people,' says Leena – and with £750 expenses offered, the money would help fund her studies. As far as ideas go, she says, 'it didn't seem crazy'. Within months of donating, however, Leena started suffering painful, heavy periods.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I forced my reluctant husband to take my placenta home and blend it into a smoothie - I was out of hospital the next day
When I saw DJ Calvin Harris ' picture of his partner and Radio 1 host Vick Hope 's placenta pills on Instagram it brought back so many memories. I was 32 and pregnant with my first baby when I heard about the concept of consuming your placenta after the birth. I was taking birth classes with a midwife who was very into the natural birth movement, and she told me about a theory that eating the placenta could prevent post-partum depression, ease bleeding after delivery and improve your iron levels. Although there is no scientific evidence that eating the placenta after childbirth is beneficial, many animals including cattle, goats, horses and dogs, do it as it's supposedly an amazing source of nutrition. I was intrigued by the idea and figured that anything that might make me feel better or make the early days of life with a newborn easier was worth a try. I already knew the placenta - a temporary body organ that develops during pregnancy - had lots of beneficial ingredients in it as I once got talked into buying a £400 moisturiser which contained sheep's placenta. The midwife leading my birth classes introduced me to a woman who lived nearby who was a doula and birth coach, and she also offered a placenta encapsulation service. For £150 she would take my placenta, dehydrate it and turn it into little vitamin-like pills and a tincture which I could add to water. I'd also heard of people taking their fresh placenta and putting it into smoothies to drink after the birth. Although I'd planned a natural home birth, my waters broke and there was meconium in them, and when I went to the hospital they told me I'd have to stay there and be induced. While we were waiting for the induction, my partner Andy and I went for a walk and I suddenly remembered my plans for my placenta. We popped into a Pound Shop and bought a cool bag to take the placenta home with us. The birth was chaotic and not at all how I'd imagined, but I remember Andy pointing to my placenta and saying to the doctor: 'We need to take that'. When he got home, he stuffed it in the fridge. The days after my birth were really hard and I felt terrible, so while I was still recovering on the ward, I asked Andy to go home and rip off a bit of my placenta and put it into a smoothie for me. I'd read that it was full of stem cells which can help a woman's body to replenish itself after birth. Andy was sceptical, but I felt so rotten I forced him to do it: 'You have to do it for me and the baby'. He later told me that he got the placenta out of a tupperware in the fridge and tried to cut it with a knife but it was too thick, so he just ripped some off with his hands. He put it in the Nutribullet with a load of frozen berries. I drank it in the hospital. It didn't really taste that different from a normal smoothie. I don't know if it was just a placebo effect or if it really helped, but not long afterwards, I stopped bleeding and was allowed to go home the next day. The early days of having my daughter Wren were a blur, but I did take the placenta pills - religiously at first and then less as time went on. I remember there were some moments where I had a bit of a wobble about whether to take them or not, as I'd had drugs to induce labour and did wonder if they'd gone into the placenta. I also had a lot of problems with breastfeeding and there are mixed reports about whether consuming the placenta increases or decreases your milk supply. My family weren't that surprised when they heard I was taking pills made of my placenta - they already think I'm quite hippy and woo woo. But I remember my mother-in-law was shocked and a bit mortified when we told her. I think in other cultures it's a normal practice and people have been doing it for decades. My French friend Alexia told me that her mother made granules of her placenta nearly 40 years ago. Alexia's mother gave them to her when she was a child and told her if she ever felt unwell, she could take them to get better. When I had my daughter Alba two years later, in 2018, I would have done it again, but she was born at 36 weeks so we weren't organised enough. She was born in the bath at home and I do remember looking at my placenta and marvelling at what my body had created. You've grown a baby and a whole new organ. I can see why in many cultures the placenta is treated as a sacred thing. The other day I was having a clear out and I found the little brown bottle of tincture which we'd had made all those years ago. It's supposed to be great for rebalancing hormones, so I've just started taking it again to help with perimenopausal symptoms. I have 10 drops in a glass of water every morning. It's too soon to really feel an effect, but it feels positive to try something. I hope it works for Vick and helps her recover from the birth. There's nothing to be squeamish about. I think anything that makes people feel good is worth the effort.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
‘Childhood verbal abuse can have similar mental health impact as physical abuse'
Verbal abuse of children could be as damaging to their mental health in adulthood as physical abuse, according to researchers. A study of more than 20,000 adults in England and Wales found that people exposed to verbal abuse in childhood were likely to feel disconnected, pessimistic, and emotionally unwell in later life. Adults who were physically abused as children had a 52% higher chance of experiencing low mental wellbeing, and this stood at around 64% for those who had been subjected to solely verbal abuse. While verbal abuse did show as having a marginally higher impact in this study, the researchers said the difference was not statistically significant and that further studies would be needed perhaps with a larger sample size to confirm the validity of the difference. Being exposed to both types of abuse compounded the risk even further, at 115% higher, the study led by Liverpool John Moores University found. Lead author, Professor Mark Bellis, who is director of research and innovation at the university, said: 'Our research shows that verbal abuse in childhood may inflict mental health scars as deep and enduring as those caused by physical abuse. Important progress has been made in reducing physical abuse, but verbal abuse is often overlooked.' The study, published in the BMJ Open, also suggested the prevalence of verbal abuse has risen in recent decades 'eroding the long-term mental health benefits we should see from reducing physical abuse'. The authors worked alongside Bangor University and Public Health Wales to pool data from seven relevant studies, involving 20,687 adults from England and Wales and looking at birth cohorts from the 1950s onwards. They found that the prevalence of child physical abuse halved from around 20% among those born between 1950 and 1979 to 10% among those born in 2000 or later. But when it came to verbal abuse, the prevalence rose from 12% among those born before 1950 to around 20% among those born in 2000 or later. The researchers said an estimated one in six children endure physical abuse, primarily from family members and caregivers, but one in three are subjected to verbal abuse. Jessica Bondy, founder of Words Matter, an organisation focused on ending childhood verbal abuse by adults said: 'This study confirms what survivors and professionals have long known: words can wound deeply and have a lasting impact on a child's mental health and development. We all get overloaded sometimes, but too many adults are turning to harsh words without realising the lasting damage they cause to children. 'Any gains made in reducing physical abuse risk being undone by rising rates of verbal abuse. We must act now to confront the lasting harm caused by cruel, critical or controlling language. We need to build children up – not knock them down. The mental health of the next generation and our shared future depend on it.'