
Teenagers' Summer Jobs Under Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Each summer, millions of teens shift from the classroom to the checkout counter. But with widespread economic uncertainty, increasingly essential extracurricular commitments and the rise of automation, the opportunities for America's youth to gain experience—and earn a little cash along the way—may be quietly vanishing.
A report last week from Challenger, Gray & Christmas (CGC) revealed the extent of these threats. The outplacement firm estimates that teens will gain around one million jobs across May, June and July this year, a stark drop from its forecast of 1.3 million last year and a slight decline from the 1.1 million that were eventually added. If their prediction is correct, this would mark the lowest number added since 2010 (960,000).
"Many teens need these jobs and employment opportunities to stay in school, help with school expenses and help their families," said sociologist and labor market expert Yasemin Besen-Cassino. "Limited opportunities could mean more hardship for teens from lower-socio-economic status backgrounds."
Senior Vice President of CGC Andrew Challenger summarized the threats: "This summer, we may not see the opportunities manifest. With the current socio-political climate, we may see fewer tourists; with the expected impact of tariffs, we may see higher prices and lower consumer demand. Those who traditionally hire in the summer may hold off this year."
Besen-Cassino told Newsweek about these broad-based economic concerns: "It's not surprising to see fewer businesses hiring teens in the upcoming summer."
"This is just the demand size of the equation," she said. "With economic uncertainly, challenging job prospects, and mass layoffs, many teens are apprehensive about their future job prospects."
These impacts have already begun to drip into the data. Some 5.5 million workers aged 16 to 19 were employed in April, the lowest total for the month in three years, according to CGC, citing the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Meanwhile, the April unemployment rate for teens is at its highest since 2020, during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
A "help wanted" sign is seen at an office in Elgin, Illinois, on March 19, 2022.
A "help wanted" sign is seen at an office in Elgin, Illinois, on March 19, 2022.
Nam Y. Huh/AP Photo
Eric Edmonds, Economics Chair at Dartmouth College, believes the core issue is a "mismatch" between the types of jobs employers are offering and the wages at which these are offered, and those that "align with the preferences of teen workers."
"Thus, there is a shortage of attractive teen jobs at wages they find acceptable and simultaneously a shortage of workers at wages employers prefer to pay," he told Newsweek.
Besen-Cassino said similarly that, while "many teenagers are seeking employment, but they are reluctant to seek the typical teen jobs in the retail and service sector."
Both highlighted the alternatives on offer for teens, which have grown in appeal as longer-term anxieties about post-school or college career prospects heighten. These include classes, internships and other credentialing opportunities that will give them a stronger edge when they seek to enter the job market.
"A few decades ago, they might feel summer jobs prepared them for their future jobs," Besen-Cassino told Newsweek. "But many teens are using summer time to better prepare themselves for future jobs by applying for internships or applying for jobs that help them develop marketable skills."
Youth unemployment has remained relatively stable since descending from its COVID-era highs, currently at 9.6 percent per the Bureau of Labor Statistics, up from 9.3 percent last May.
However, beyond competing interests and a resultant reduction to spend summer working retail or hospitality, a larger threat to teen employment, across all seasons, looms on the horizon: Automation.
"It's not just the economic uncertainty that may make teen jobs unavailable," Andrew Challenger said. "Employers are using new technologies and automation for things the teen worker would have otherwise done."
Edmonds told Newsweek that a "substantial increase in motivated teen workers" would reduce the move toward automation, which he said was incentivized by "chronic labor shortages" in low-wage jobs such as agriculture and the service industry.
"Teen employment in the United States enjoyed its heyday in the 1980s and 1990s with teens staffing many retail and service sector jobs," Besen-Cassino told Newsweek. "However, in the past few decades we have witnessed the decline of the malls. Malls going away, the rise of automation and AI in many retail and service sector result in fewer need for these jobs."
She added that these trends are fueling anxiety not only among teenagers but also among their parents, whose own jobs may be similarly at risk.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
14 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Why Brands Are Still Betting on the US
Serena Uziyel isn't giving up on the US. Over the last year, the Istanbul-based luxury shoe brand has opened two stores in Florida and one in New York in what is now its second-largest market after Turkey. The brand hopes to open more stores in Florida, as well as new markets like California and Texas. Those plans were made before the Trump administration unleashed its tariffs, and when the US economy was on more solid footing. But the brand has no intention of changing course now. 'We know how to deal with it, so we are not going to change our plans,' said chief executive Nadir Celik. It helps that the brand has experience navigating economic turbulence and high inflation in Turkey, he added. Countless brands are making their own assessment of whether trying for a slice of the world's biggest fashion market is still worth the investment. All signs point to a weak economy with consumer confidence plummeting as the costs for essential goods like eggs go up. Retail sales on discretionary items fell in April. Trump's trade policy is also in flux, with the Supreme Court potentially weighing in on whether he can impose tariffs on dozens of countries on top of a 10 percent global levy that went into effect in April. Investing in America could be a costly mistake in a worst case scenario, where Trump imposes prohibitive tariffs, the economy enters a deep recession, or both. But missing out if the turbulence is milder than expected has its own costs. Brands operating in the US are moving quickly to protect themselves, such as by reconfiguring their supply chains to minimise potential tariffs, or operating on parallel tracks, growing their US presence while speeding up expansion elsewhere. For many, the choice to stay is clear – the market is simply too big to ignore. 'America as an economy is too important to be canceled,' said the Switzerland-based designer Philipp Plein. 'People have money to spend; people will keep on spending money.' A Resilient Market Philipp Plein International Group is going ahead with a number of US store openings for its Plein Sport activewear brand, as it looks to at least double sales for that business to $40 million, Plein said. The line is made in China, where Trump has slapped 30 percent duties on all products, but he's betting that the tariff uproar won't be as detrimental as many fear. He's even more confident in the American consumer. He noted the country's economy bounced back quickly after Covid compared to other leading economies like China, which has struggled to recover from the pandemic. Brands are also banking on customer loyalty to get them through a potential rough patch. When it comes to customers, 'once we get, them we keep them,' said Peta Heinsen, co-founder and director of the Australian womenswear brand Matteau. Heinsen said the label aims to have more than half its sales come from the US, up from 35 percent today. If US customers replicate a 70 percent global repeat purchase rate, they'll get there, tariffs or no tariffs, Heinsen said. The more that happens in the US, 'we can see huge potential without having to do too much more than we're already doing,' she said. Supply Chain Alignment Where brands are changing course, it's often behind the scenes. Ever-changing tariffs have underscored the need for brands to have a global supply chain — particularly one that isn't wholly dependent on China. The more suppliers and factories in its network, the more flexible a brand can be in relocating production when the cost of doing business increases. Diversified supply chains will help in most tariff scenarios, experts say. Several brand founders cited Portugal, Turkey and India as countries with relatively low manufacturing costs that were likely to dodge the highest tariffs. In February, Matteau moved production of its swimwear line from China to Portugal, sidestepping the roller coaster ride in April and May that saw tariffs on Chinese imports set as high as 145 percent before temporarily settling at their current level. (Whether the brand's bet pays off in the long run remains to be seen; in late May, Trump threatened a 50 percent tariff on goods from the European Union). After moving into 1,700 Target stores, supplement maker Imaraïs Beauty is in talks to move production of its gummy supplements from Canada to the US so it can keep its big new retail customer consistently supplied without having to pay tariffs. 'As a brand, and a brand owner, you're putting out fires nonstop,' said co-founder and chief executive Aaron Hefter. 'This is a forest fire.' With a trade war still brewing and consumer sentiment in flux, brands have to move forward with their growth plans while minimising any threats to their business, said Anshuman Jaiswal, chief business officer at software firm OnePint, which helps global businesses manage inventory. 'The only thing that you can control is, 'Can I have more risk cushion in my business plan?'' Jaiswal said.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
How tourists alerted this fund manager to sell Moncler before its stock plunge
In February, while luxury brand Moncler was still basking in the glow of a stellar 20% share price surge from January, fund manager Giles Parkinson made a contrarian move: he sold out. His decision, driven by subtle signals in tourist spending data, ultimately proved to be the right one. By the end of March, Moncler's shares had plummeted over 14%, and its subsequent first-quarter results in April confirmed a growth slowdown. MONC-IT YTD line "We sold out of Montcler," said Parkinson, head of equity at asset manager Trinity Bridge. "The reason, the proximate cause for that, in isolation, was a more cautious assessment of the future growth of the luxury industry than we had before." Parkinson's caution wasn't borne out of analyst reports, hushed industry whispers, or traditional financial modeling, but from what he called a "good short-term guide to luxury industry writ large": the spending patterns of international tourists. Tourism spending data as a proxy Parkinson, who manages about £5 billion ($6.7 billion) in assets across several funds, said his decision to close his Moncler position partly stemmed from data provided by Global Blue, a firm which helps tourists and retailers with tax refunds. Typically, tourists can claim a refund on the sales tax or value added tax component of their total bill, which is often significantly large when making high-end luxury goods purchases. "More than 50% of luxury goods purchases are made by people travelling," said Luca Solca, head of luxury goods equities research at Bernstein. "This was the situation pre Covid-19, and we are now back to it." Global Blue's data for Europe, which is a significant destination for luxury goods shoppers, indicated a year-on-year growth of +9% for February, a 10-percentage-point deceleration from the 19% recorded in January. "We found, on a month-to-month basis, that's quite a good proxy for almost the trading health of the overall luxury industry," Parkinson said. "There wasn't anything notable affecting the comparative period or calendar effects or travel disruption," Parkinson noted. This clean signal, free from obvious distorting factors, amplified its significance. Even Japan, another destination for luxury goods shoppers from China, "also showed a deceleration in February," albeit with some Chinese New Year timing nuances. The numbers, though, were unambiguous for Parkinson, telling a story which he expected the companies in the luxury goods sector to echo in a few weeks. The data-driven conclusion the Trinity Bridge fund manager had arrived at was also contrary to the market sentiment at the time, which was expecting a long rebound in the luxury sector after a trough at the end of 2024. "Our assessment was that investors were looking for acceleration. [Fourth quarter] 2024 being the bottom for luxury was maybe going to be mis-founded," Parkinson added. The divergence between his data-led view and market hopes was key to his decision to divest Moncler. Global Blue's weak February European shopper data released on March 5 did indeed work as a catalyst. Moncler's stock, which had traded buoyantly, reversed and gradually ended March with a painful 14.4% decline. Moncler confirms the trend Moncler's first quarter 2025 report on April 16, while not disastrous, painted a clear picture of a company navigating choppier waters. The group's global sales rose by 1% to 829 million euros ($936.4 million). Crucially, the flagship brand Moncler saw sales rise only 2% and its crucial Europe, Middle East, and Africa region fell by 1%. The softening trend in tourist spending lingered. Global Blue's March 2025 data, released on April 9th, showed European tax-free sales growth decelerating further to +7% year-on-year. Parkinson is also not alone in using alternative and publicly available data to make trading decisions, and its impact may not be limited to the luxury sector stocks. Deutsche Bank and RBC Capital Markets analysts have also cited the use of tax-free shopping data in their assessments. "While this is not a direct read on cross-border transactions, we view it as a strong proxy for certain key European and Asian markets," said Daniel Perlin, analyst at RBC who rates fintech companies such as Visa , Mastercard , PayPal and Shift4 . Bernstein's Solca said that while Global Blue is the "absolute leader" in the tax-free shopping data, he cautioned that investors should use it as only one factor in making investment decisions. "They are one piece of a bigger mosaic, I would think," Solca added.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Squeezed by inflation, city budget keeps spending steady but trims ambition
Jun. 2—The Albuquerque City Council last month approved a $1.5 billion budget for the next fiscal year, largely accepting Mayor Tim Keller's proposals and continuing his priorities on housing, homelessness and policing. The 6-2 vote followed months of meetings and was one of the final steps to fund the local government for the next 12 months, starting in July. But the budget documents outlined concern about the future and the mayor's introduction letter cites "significant uncertainty, attempting to keep up with rising inflation, economic disruptions, and bracing for federal cuts." "I wish we'd had more to work with," said Councilor Renée Grout, who led the council's budget-building efforts. "I'm hopeful that this year, our revenues will pick up and that we'll have some extra funds, and we'll be able to do a mid-year clean-up and get a better raise for everybody." Revenue — where all the money comes from Albuquerque's economic outlook significantly affects the city's budget. That's because the collection of gross receipt taxes, or GRT, makes up about 40% of the city's total resources and about 70% of the general fund, which finances many of the city's core functions. The budget notes that uncertainty caused by the Trump administration's tariff policies, alongside the possibility of escalating wars in Europe and the Middle East, could affect future revenue, particularly as those things impact the price of oil and global supply chains. It also states that Albuquerque is still feeling the economic aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, the budget said that retail and wholesale trade, an industry that has historically comprised about 25% of the city's GRT, has struggled to grow under pressure from inflation, lingering from the pandemic and reaggravated by the Trump administration's economic policies. This budget also allocates $4.6 million of the historic opioid settlement money to nonprofits, part of a council-approved plan to distribute money to nonprofits that help people recover from addiction. That money comes from a settlement between local governments and pharmaceutical companies, and follows a joint plan established by the city and Bernalillo County. Higher raises for city workers stall One of the final budget flashpoints revolved around pay increases for employees. The mayor's proposed budget called for a 2% increase for all city workers. The council added another 0.5% increase. That raise does not apply to firefighters since their contract was renegotiated last year. Some of the money being used to fund the increases comes from about $1 million in savings after the city was released from the Court Appointed Settlement Agreement and the decade-long oversight of the city's police department. The settlement was reached after a Department of Justice found a pattern of excessive use of force within the police department. But for some on the council, 2.5% wasn't enough. Councilor Klarissa Peña pushed for the council's 0.5% increase to be 1%. "I think 1% across the board is important to our employees and the services that they provide," Peña said. "They're the ones that keep the parks clean, and they're the ones that keep all the other services going." But that money would have to come from somewhere, and some on the council felt it was shaving away at council priorities. Peña's plan called for cuts to after-school programs, employee early retirement and some vacant positions. Ultimately, Peña's efforts failed on a 4-4 tie vote, leading the councilor to vote against the budget. The top-funded departments The approved Albuquerque Police Department budget of about $274 million, about a 2% increase, took the largest portion of the general fund budget. Despite that, police funding was a point of contention. In one of the most high-profile moments of the process, APD Chief Harold Medina verbally sparred with Councilor Louie Sanchez during a presentation on May 8. Sanchez, a former police officer who is running for mayor, said that APD and Keller's administration were inflated. Sanchez reiterated that concern May 19. "We have an over-bloated administration as it is," Sanchez said. "I think if the administration would actually realize and make some cuts where cuts need to be made, I think that these people (city staff) could be funded." Sanchez ultimately voted for the budget, but another councilor who raised concerns about police funding did not. Councilor Dan Lewis criticized the administration for eliminating police officer positions, despite Medina saying he could not fill them this year. APD can have up to 1,100 officers, but the upcoming budget will only pay for 1,000. APD currently has around 900 officers and aims to reach 1,000 by the end of this year, Medina said. "This budget cuts police officers," Lewis said, "and has no vision for hiring any more police officers." The mayor's office defended the move by reiterating Medina's point about staffing. Kevin Sourisseau, the city's chief finance officer, also said the council has told the administration they don't like seeing money for vacant jobs sit around undisbursed. Other top-funded departments and initiatives include Albuquerque Fire Rescue, which was budgeted for $128.6 million. General obligation bond debt service, which pays back bonds for capital projects, was budgeted for $97.4 million. The Municipal Development Department, which oversees public works projects, was budgeted for $50.6 million