logo
In wake of Minnesota lawmaker shootings, experts say political violence has been on the rise in U.S.

In wake of Minnesota lawmaker shootings, experts say political violence has been on the rise in U.S.

CBS News17-06-2025
Political violence has been on the rise in U.S., experts say in wake of Minnesota shootings
Political violence has been on the rise in U.S., experts say in wake of Minnesota shootings
Political violence has been on the rise in U.S., experts say in wake of Minnesota shootings
Police said the shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses this past weekend appears to be politically motivated.
The suspect in the shootings, Vance Boelter, 57, was charged Monday with two counts of second-degree murder in the shooting that killed Minnesota state Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and two counts of second-degree attempted murder in the shooting that killed Minnesota Sen. John Hoffman and his wife separately in an overnight rampage Friday into Saturday.
Boelter is also facing six charges in federal court, including stalking and murder. He was taken into custody on Sunday night near his Sibley County, Minnesota, home following a manhunt that lasted over 36 hours.
"It's a chilling attack on our democracy on our way of life," said Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Joe Thompson. "It's only the most recent example of political extremism in this county and a trend that's been increasing in recent years."
In the wake of the shootings, U.S. Capitol police said politically based threat investigations are up 400%. An Illinois lawmaker said she hopes the horrific tragedy will lead to increased safety measures for public officials and first responders.
Shortly after police arrested Boelter in a field near his home in Minnesota, a search of his car turned up weapons, detailed plans for the attack, and the names of hundreds of Democratic lawmakers written in various locations.
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker was in Minnesota on Friday for an event. He said his name was not found in Boelter's list, but some Illinois politicians' names were.
"They recovered devices and other papers that had 600 names, more than 600 names," Pritzker said. "There are Illinois folks, like Iowa and others, but very few — and again, no one, the FBI specifically said to me that these people are not targets."
Investigators called the murder of Hortman and her husband a political assassination.
"It's only the most recent example of political extremism in this county — and a trend that's been increasing in recent years," said acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson.
There have been several high-profile political attacks in America in just the last five years the U.S. Capitol was attacked on Jan. 6, 2021.
On Oct. 28, 2022, Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, was beaten by an intruder at the couple's San Francisco mansion.
On July 13 of last year, President Trump — then campaigning for a new term — survived an assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania.
On May 21 of this year, two Israeli Embassy workers were shot and killed outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., and on June 1, a peaceful march in support of Israeli hostages was firebombed in Boulder, Colorado.
Dan Byman-Director warfare, irregular threats and Terrorism Project at the Center for Strategic International studies
"There has been a significant increase in the number of Americans really seeing the other political side as an enemy," said Dan Byman, director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats and Terrorism Project at the Center for Strategic International studies. "Words like 'treason' show up. Calls supporting violence have increased. Polling indicates that significant numbers of Americans believe violence is justified if their particular cause is not fulfilled."
Such inflammatory language can easily lead to violence, Byman explained.
"Individual followers often taking it in their own direction, where they'll grab a little from one ideologue, a bit more from another ideologue, and then throw in their own pet grievances," he said, "and as a result, you have lots of angry individuals."
Illinois state Rep. Nicole La Ha (R-Lemont) emphasized the severity of the threat.
"I think it's really important that we, as elected officials, understand that our words carry a lot of weight," she said. "It definitely wasn't something on my mind that I need to be looking over my back."
La Ha has previously introduced legislation modeled after the Judicial Privacy Act to better protect the private information of politicians and first responders.
"Which includes our home addresses, our home phone numbers — and it allows us to ask government bodies to protect those things and to keep them private," La Ha said. "You know, it's unfortunate that sometimes we don't act until it's too late."
Pritzker did not reveal the names of the politicians who were listed on the evidence found in Boelter's home and car. But he made it clear that it was not a hit list.
If convicted, Boelter could receive the death penalty.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal agent fires weapon during immigration stop in Southern California, officials say
Federal agent fires weapon during immigration stop in Southern California, officials say

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal agent fires weapon during immigration stop in Southern California, officials say

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal agent fired at a moving vehicle in Southern California after the driver refused to roll down his window during an immigration stop and sped off, the Department of Homeland Security said. A DHS statement said the driver struck two U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents as he drove away Saturday, prompting one agent to fire his weapon 'in self-defense.' No one was hit by the bullets. The department provided no other details about how or where the vehicle struck the agents and whether they were injured. DHS said the agents were conducting a 'targeted enforcement operation' but provided no details about why they were targeting the unidentified man. The incident occurred just before 9 a.m. in San Bernardino County, east of Los Angeles. Javier Hernandez, executive director of the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice, spoke to the man's family and provided their account of the incident, a portion of which was captured on video by the driver's son and son-in-law who were in the vehicle. Hernandez did not disclose the 43-year-old driver's name, and DHS did not identify him. Hernandez said the man is from Mexico, has been in the U.S. for 23 years and does not have legal status. The 18-year-old son and 23-year-old son-in-law are U.S. citizens, Hernandez said. On the videos, the uniformed officers are wearing masks and have 'police' written on vests. At least one is wearing a hat labeled CBP, for Customs and Border Protection. They approach the vehicle and tell the driver to roll down his window. The driver refuses and one of the others in the vehicle says, 'What do you want?" The agents then smash windows on both sides. The driver immediately drove away, and three shots can be heard in the video. The video doesn't show either officer being struck by the vehicle. The driver called the San Bernardino Police Department and reported that masked men had pulled him over, broke his car window and shot at him, the police department said in a statement. Police officers went to the family's home and spoke with the driver. They left without taking him into custody because California law prohibits local police agencies from assisting federal officials with immigration enforcement, the department said. Federal agents later arrived at the man's home, but the family did not allow them to enter because they didn't have a warrant, Hernandez said. DHS did not respond to questions about whether they had a warrant and were still seeking the man's arrest. A crowd gathered outside the family's home in response to the presence of federal agents. The San Bernardino police returned to assist with crowd control, the department said. The man and his family declined an interview request from The Associated Press. DHS criticized the police department for not arresting the man. 'This reckless decision came despite the subject's outright refusal to comply and his wounding of two federal officers,' DHS said in a statement. 'It is yet another tragic example of California's pro-sanctuary policies that shield criminals instead of protecting communities.' There is no clear definition of sanctuary jurisdictions, but the term is generally applied to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration has spread across Southern California, where local officials say federal actions are spreading fear in immigrant communities. Raids in the Los Angeles region spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guard and Marines in the city for nearly two months. After an appeals court upheld a temporary order by a district court judge banning indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests, the administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift the restrictions in an emergency petition.

Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting
Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Minnesota election official weighs in on Trump's vow to end mail-in voting

The Brief President Donald Trump said he plans to issue an executive order to ban mail-in ballots and voting machines before the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has claimed there was fraud in the 2020 presidential election, election officials say there has been no evidence of this. Experts said only Congress could change federal election law. (FOX 9) - President Donald Trump vowed Monday to lead what he calls "a movement" to eliminate mail-in voting. Trump said he is working with attorneys on drafting an executive order towards his goal ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Election law experts and Minnesota election officials point to the U.S. Constitution and say a president is not given the authority to change election law. The backstory Trump posted a similar message earlier on Monday on social media and said his reason for this pledge is a matter of election integrity. "We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt," said Trump. How can this be achieved? Fact check An election law expert said only Congress can change how federal elections are run. "States basically operate both the state and federal, but the U.S. government under the Constitution has some authority to be able to regulate the time, place, and manner of federal elections," said David Schultz, political science professor at Hamline University and law professor at University of St. Thomas. "Could Congress pass a law that basically bans mail-in voting for federal elections. The answer is yes. But notice what I said, is that Congress would have to a law to be able to do that. The president can't issue an executive order. Could Congress pass a law that prevents states from using mail-in ballots in their own elections, the answer is no." Local perspective Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon addressed some of Trump's remarks in a statement sent to FOX 9. "The U.S. Constitution gives states full control of the time, place, and manner of elections – subject only to action by Congress. A President has no power to grab election authority from states. "America's elections are run largely by local communities. This choice is intentional to ensure that towns, cities, and counties have full control over who represents them. The people who do the work of administering elections are our neighbors and friends, each of whom takes an oath to follow the law, prevent fraud, and conduct their work in a fair and impartial manner. These local election administrators register voters, create ballots, count ballots, and so much more. Once their work is complete on election night, they report the results to our office. Our office never touches a ballot during an election." Simon also responded to Trump's mention of voter fraud. "Every election cycle, everywhere, Minnesota included, you're going to have a very few bad apples who do the wrong thing and engage in some sort of misconduct, but man it is a microscopic level. We know that because we get all the reports, by law, from all of the prosecutors," said Simon. Simon addressed Trump's statement about the prevalence of mail-in voting. "Just about the only country in the world that uses it," said Trump. "There are dozens of countries around the world from Japan, Australia, New Zealand, most of Western Europe that use and have the option of mail in balloting," said Simon. Secretary Simon also responded to Trump's concerns about voting machines. Simon said electronic tabulating equipment gets certified by both state and federal authorities and is more accurate than hand counting. Plus, in Minnesota, paper ballots are used to check the accuracy of machine results, and paper ballots are kept for two years after every election. What they're saying Donna Bergstrom, Deputy Chair of the Republican Party of Minnesota sent FOX 9 this statement. "President Trump is right to shine a spotlight on the flaws and vulnerabilities of mail-in voting. Election integrity is the foundation of our representative democracy, and Minnesotans deserve to know that their vote is secure and accurately counted. Even Democrats like Amy Klobuchar and Angie Craig have admitted Minnesota's mail system is unreliable—you can't even depend on getting your electric bill on time, so why would we turn the integrity of our elections over to that same broken system? "At the same time, we recognize that in a few remote areas of Minnesota, mail-in ballots are the only option because of the distance from polling places, and as a retired United States Marine, I know that our military members deserve access to voting and sometimes this is their only option. But those are specialized exceptions." The Source Minnesota Secretary of State, Political Science and Law professor, President Donald Trump, Republican Party of Minnesota, FOX News, and the Associated Press.

Menendez brothers to be evaluated by parole board for release after 30 years in prison
Menendez brothers to be evaluated by parole board for release after 30 years in prison

Washington Post

time20 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Menendez brothers to be evaluated by parole board for release after 30 years in prison

LOS ANGELES — The Menendez brothers are set to make their cases for parole starting Thursday, marking the closest they've been to winning freedom from prison since their convictions almost 30 years ago for murdering their parents. Erik and Lyle Menendez were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison for fatally shooting their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion in 1989 . They were 18 and 21 at the time. While defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance. The brothers became eligible for parole after a Los Angeles judge in May reduced their sentences from life in prison without the possibility of parole to 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole under California law because they were under the ages of 26 when they committed their crimes. A panel or two or three parole hearing officers from a board of commissioners appointed by the governor will evaluate the brothers individually. Erik Menendez will have his hearing Thursday morning, followed by Lyle Menendez on Friday, over videoconference from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego. The board will assess whether the brothers pose an 'unreasonable risk of danger to society' if released, considering factors like criminal history, motivation for the crime and signs of remorse, behavior while in prison and plans for the future, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Even if the board grants their parole, it could still be months before the brothers walk free — if at all. If the board grants each brother's parole, the chief legal counsel has 120 days to review the case. Then Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has 30 days to affirm or deny the parole. Only then, if Newsom affirms the parole, would the Menendez brothers be able to leave prison. Newsom had previously ordered the state parole board to conduct a risk assessment of the brothers in response to a clemency request. At the time, he emphasized that the key question was whether the brothers posed an 'unreasonable risk to public safety.' He noted at a May news conference that he has both approved and rejected decisions by the parole board before and that he was the 'ultimate arbiter.' The brothers' lawyer, Mark Geragos, sought release last month for Erik Menendez after he was hospitalized for a 'serious medical condition.' He has since returned to prison. The case has captured the attention of true crime enthusiasts for decades and spawned documentaries, television specials and dramatizations. The Netflix drama ' Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story ' and the documentary 'The Menendez Brothers,' both released in 2024, have been credited for bringing new attention to the brothers. In the last year, weigh-in from celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and a greater recognition of the brothers as victims of sexual abuse has helped amass a legion of supporters who have called for their release. Some have flown to Los Angeles over the past few months, holding rallies and attending court hearings as the brothers' attorneys pushed for their resentencing. The previous LA County district attorney, George Gascón, first opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences. Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for fellow people in prison, his office said in a petition. The judge's decision to ultimately resentence the brothers followed months of pushback from current prosecutors, who argued the brothers hadn't taken adequate responsibility for their crimes. The Menendez brothers still have a pending habeas corpus petition filed in May 2023 seeking a review of their convictions based on new evidence supporting their claims of sexual abuse by their father. Last month, a different judge ordered Los Angeles prosecutors to explain why their case shouldn't be reexamined. The state corrections department has selected one media representative to view the proceedings virtually and share notes with the rest of the press at set intervals.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store