South Koreans vote for president in hope of restoring stability after martial law crisis
[SEOUL] South Koreans were voting for a new president on Tuesday to cap six months of turmoil triggered by a shock martial law briefly imposed by former leader Yoon Suk Yeol that marred the country's reputation as a vibrant, if at times chaotic, democracy.
The new leader will face the challenge of rallying a society deeply scarred by the attempt at military rule and an export-heavy economy reeling from unpredictable protectionist moves by the United States, a major trading partner and a security ally.
Turnout is expected to be high with polls open between 6 am (2100 GMT Monday) until 8 pm following early voting when more than a third of the 44.39 million eligible voters cast their ballots.
As of 11 am, 8.1 million people, or just over 18 per cent of the electorate, had voted at 14,295 polling stations around the country, according to the National Election Commission.
Leading candidates ended three weeks of official campaigning late on Monday, crisscrossing the country before converging on Seoul for final rallies, as they vowed to put months of turmoil behind them and breathe new life into an ailing economy.
Both liberal frontrunner Lee Jae Myung and his conservative rival Kim Moon Soo have pledged change for the country, saying a political system and economic model set up during its rise as a budding democracy and industrial power are no longer fit for purpose.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Their proposals for investment in innovation and technology often overlap, but Lee advocates more equity and help for mid-to-low-income families while Kim has campaigned on giving businesses more freedom from regulations and labour strife.
Overshadowing any social policy initiatives, however, is Yoon's botched attempt to impose martial law that has loomed large over the poll.
Lee has called the election 'judgment day' against Kim and his People Power Party accusing them of having condoned the martial law attempt by not fighting harder to thwart it and even trying to save Yoon's presidency.
Kim was Yoon's labour minister when the former president declared martial law on December 3.
The conservative Kim, on the other hand, has branded Lee a 'dictator' and his Democratic Party a 'monster,' warning if the former human rights lawyer becomes president, nothing will stop them from working together to amend laws simply because they do not like them.
'Polarised'
The frontrunner Kim and his rival Lee cast their ballots during early voting last week. Yoon and his wife voted at a school near their private residence on Tuesday, appearing relaxed but ignoring questions as they left the polling station.
Regular voters in Seoul urged the next leader to ease discord and restore stability and address urgent challenges from the fallout of the crisis that have touched their families personally.
'The economy has gotten so much worse since Dec 3, not just for me but I hear that from everybody,' Kim Kwang Ma, 81, said. 'And we as a people have become so polarised... and I wish we could come together so that Korea can develop again.'
Lee is favoured to win, according to polls released a week before the vote, leading Kim by 14 percentage points with 49 per cent public support in a Gallup Korea survey, although Kim had narrowed an even wider gap at the start of the campaign on May 12.
Exit polls conducted by three television networks will be released at the close of the polls at 8 pm. Ballots will be sorted and counted by machine first, then triple-checked by election officials by hand to verify accuracy.
It was not clear when the result would emerge. In 2022, Lee conceded to Yoon at around 3 am the day after the vote in the closest presidential race in the country's history, which was decided by a margin of less than 1 percentage point.
The National Election Commission is scheduled to certify the result on Wednesday and the winner's inauguration is expected within hours. There will be no presidential transition as the office has remained vacant since Yoon was impeached by parliament and then removed by the Constitutional Court on April 4. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Putin says deadly bridge attack shows Ukraine's leaders do not want peace
Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the government via video link at the Novo-Ogaryovo state residence outside Moscow, Russia June 4, 2025. Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool via REUTERS MOSCOW - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that he did not think Ukraine's leaders wanted peace after accusing them of ordering a deadly bomb attack in Russia that killed seven and injured 115 more just a day before talks in Turkey. A highway bridge over a railway line in the Bryansk region of western Russia was blown up at 10:33 pm (1933 GMT) on Saturday night just as a passenger train carrying 388 passengers to Moscow was passing underneath, Russian investigators said. Russia's top state investigator said Ukraine was responsible for planting the three bombs in the Bryansk bridge attack, five bombs in the attack against a bridge in neighbouring Kursk and another bomb attack against a bridge in Bryansk on Sunday. In some of his most hawkish remarks in recent months on the outlook for peace, Putin said the attacks had been directed against civilians and accused the Kyiv leadership of being a "terrorist organisation" supported by powers who were becoming "terrorist accomplices". "The current Kyiv regime does not need peace at all," Putin said at a meeting with senior officials. "What is there to talk about? How can we negotiate with those who rely on terror?" Ukraine has not commented on the bridge attacks. It denies it targets civilians, as does Russia, though civilians have been killed by both sides. Kyiv has similarly accused Moscow of not seriously wanting peace, citing as evidence Russian resistance to an immediate ceasefire. Russia says certain conditions must first be met. In the remarks released by the Kremlin, Putin did not mention the high-profile Ukrainian operation - which unfolded on Sunday - to attack strategic bomber aircraft at Russian air bases. The attacks on bridges and the nuclear-capable bombers came just before Russia and Ukraine met for direct peace talks in Istanbul where Moscow set out what the United States has called "maximalist" aims. Putin suggested a ceasefire would simply be used by Ukraine and its Western backers to rearm. Russia's negotiator at the talks said Ukraine had passed him a list of 339 children Kyiv says have been abducted by Moscow. WAR HEATING UP Before Putin spoke, other Russian officials said that military options were "on the table" for its response to Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russia and accused the West of being involved in them. "We urge London and Washington to react in such a way as to stop further escalation," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted by Interfax news agency as saying. Ryabkov oversees relations with the U.S. and arms control. British and U.S. officials have said they had no prior knowledge of the weekend attacks on Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers. U.S. President Donald Trump's Ukraine envoy said the risk of escalation from the war was "going way up" after the attacks on the nuclear-capable bombers. A week earlier, Trump rebuked Putin over a fierce aerial attack on Ukraine. At the Putin meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov suggested that Russia should not give in to the clearly provocative attacks by Ukraine and should use both negotiations and other means to achieve its aims in the military operation. Putin appeared to agree with Lavrov but in later remarks said he would be speaking to security officials about the situation. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
From triumph to Trump: S. Korea President Lee Jae-myung starts term with full plate
South Korean new President Lee Jae-myung (centre) and his wife Kim Hye-kyung after attending the Presidential Inauguration at the National Assembly in Seoul, on June 4. PHOTO: EPA-EFE – Freshly minted South Korea President Lee Jae-myung has hit the ground running, just hours after winning the snap election of June 3. And among the many urgent matters awaiting him is to get the attention of his American counterpart Donald Trump. Officials from Washington and Seoul are hurrying to set up a congratulatory phone call between Mr Trump and Mr Lee to happen as early as June 5, which would, hopefully, serve as a precursor to a face-to-face meeting in the near future. Local media reported that the two possible windows for a Trump-Lee meeting could be at the Group of Seven Summit in Canada from June 15-17, and the Nato summit set for June 24-25 in the Netherlands, both of which South Korea has been invited to attend. Mr Lee's first day in office on June 4 coincides with Washington's deadline for trading partners to submit their 'best proposals' to the table, ahead of the July 9 expiry of the 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs. The doubling of steel and aluminium tariffs from 25 per cent to 50 per cent by the United States also took effect from June 4, and South Korea was among the countries hit. Speaking on a radio show on the eve of the election, Mr Lee had expressed confidence that he and his team would be able to reach 'compromise and adjustment in a way that benefits both sides' with the US , even putting aside his dignity when speaking to Mr Trump, if need be . 'If that is the way powerful countries operate, we must overcome it. If it's necessary, I'll even crawl under (Mr Trump's) legs. What's the big deal?' he quipped. Mr Lee, a former human rights lawyer, was sworn into office at 9am (10am in Singapore) on June 4, barely five hours after the final vote tally gave him a 49.42 per cent mandate. His closest rival, former labour minister Kim Moon-soo, garnered 41.15 per cent. The snap election Mr Lee, 61, won was widely seen as a referendum of his disgraced predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's failed self-coup of Dec 3, 2024. Yoon was subsequently stripped of his powers by the country's Constitutional Court and is now undergoing trial on insurrection charges. Mr Lee inherits a burning portfolio following six months of political chaos left by Yoon's short-lived martial law debacle. The new President has acknowledged that beyond the uphill task of healing a fractured and wounded nation, a key priority for him would be to regain the trust of its biggest ally, the US, and to iron out urgent trade issues. Data released on June 1 by the South Korean government have shown that the country's economy has started to slow down following Mr Trump's announcement of various tariffs since April 2 . South Korean exports fell 1.3 per cent from a year earlier, with steel exports, in particular, falling by 12.4 per cent. South Korea was the fourth-largest exporter of steel to the US last year. Amid the uncertainties, the Bank of Korea on May 29 slashed the country's economic growth forecast for 2025 to 0.8 per cent, from its previous estimate of 1.5 per cent. The previous administration had begun talks with its Washington counterpart in seeking a full exemption from or reduction in the proposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on South Korea, in addition to reduction in sectoral tariffs on steel, automobile and other imports. The previous government had repeatedly stressed the final push had to be done by the new administration from June 4. Dr Victor Cha, who is Korea chair at the Washington-based think-tank Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), says the first contact between the two presidents is important, given how it has been 'six months where the Trump administration has been moving 100 miles per hour while South Korea's been stuck in neutral without a government'. Speaking at a CSIS podcast on June 3 to dissect the election results, Dr Cha added that any major decisions on tariff negotiations are likely to be made by Mr Trump himself, which further necessitates a summit meeting between the two presidents. Professor Leif-Eric Easley at Ewha Womans University shared a similar assessment, suggesting that Mr Lee and Mr Trump could bond over their 'political survivor' backgrounds, and move the South Korea-US alliance 'beyond threats of tariff hikes and troop reductions to urgently refocus on military deterrence, economic security and coordinated diplomacy'. A recent Wall Street Journal report on May 22 about the US plans to reduce its military presence in South Korea had sparked fears about what it means for Washington's security commitments in the troubled Korean peninsula. There had also been concerns that South Korea, under Mr Lee's liberal-leaning stewardship, might worsen matters if it pivots towards China at the expense of the South Korea-US alliance and the US-Japan-South Korea trilateral partnership. Mr Lee had been perceived as 'pro-China' for his previous xie-xie gaffe where he had suggested in March 2024 that South Korea remain a neutral party in the cross-strait tensions between China and Taiwan. In the run-up to the country's general election in 2024, in an attempt to disparage then President Yoon's tightening alliance with the US and Japan, which had invited criticism from China, Mr Lee had said that Seoul could avoid antagonising Beijing further, especially over Taiwan Strait tensions, by simply saying xie xie, or 'thanks' in Mandarin, to China and Taiwan. But the new President has repeatedly sought to dispel such a notion. In his inaugural address on June 4, Mr Lee emphasised that he would seek a 'pragmatic' approach to diplomacy, and 'turn the crisis of global economic and security shifts into opportunities to maximise national interests'. He also pledged to strengthen the US-South Korea alliance, bolster the US-South Korea-Japan trilateral partnership, while improving relations with both China and North Korea, which he described as being in the 'worst state' because of the last administration. Mr Lee has since appointed Mr Wi Sung-lac, a former diplomat well-versed in Russia and North Korea affairs, as his national security adviser. Mr Wi, who is behind Mr Lee's 'pragmatic diplomacy' approach, spoke to foreign media at a briefing on May 28, where he gave the assurance that the South Korea-US alliance remains the 'cornerstone' of the President's diplomacy vision. 'Mr Lee aims to restore the trust for the alliance, which has been damaged by the unlawful martial law incident, and to deepen the ROK-US relations into a future-oriented strategic alliance,' he said, referring to the Republic of Korea, the official name of South Kore a. Pointing out that the advancement of North Korea's nuclear and missile capabilities is something that cannot be neglected, Mr Wi said Mr Lee's government will also seek to 'strategically engage' China and Russia to cooperate on the stability of the Korean peninsula. Dr Lee Seong-Hyon, a senior fellow at the Washington-based George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations, told The Straits Times that the new Lee administration's foreign policy directions bear watching. 'Today's North Korea differs from past iterations, as does China,' said Dr Lee. 'South Korea's domestic turmoil over the past six months may have created an inward focus that underestimates these seismic geopolitical shifts, so simply reverting to old foreign policy paradigms may prove inadequate when major powers are redrawing their grand strategies.' Wendy Teo is The Straits Times' South Korea correspondent, based in Seoul. She covers issues concerning the two Koreas. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
Continuity or reset? Japan, China seek clues to S. Korea President Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung speaking during a media conference at the Presidential Office in Seoul on June 4. PHOTO: REUTERS – South Korea's East Asian neighbours Japan and China on June 4 quickly congratulated President Lee Jae-myung on his resounding election win, even as both countries are closely watching for clues to how the liberal leader will approach bilateral relations. This scrutiny stems from perceptions that South Korean diplomacy oscillates wildly depending on the ruling party of the day. Liberals are judged to be hostile towards Japan and friendly towards China and North Korea, while conservatives hold an opposite view. Ties between Tokyo and Seoul plunged into a deep freeze under the previous liberal President Moon Jae-in, only to thaw rapidly under Mr Lee's ousted predecessor, Yoon Suk Yeol, who is now facing insurrection charges for his martial law debacle. Mr Lee had previously described Japan as an 'enemy nation' and gone on a 24-day hunger strike to oppose Yoon's conciliatory policies, which he termed 'humiliating diplomacy'. He has also criticised Yoon for worsening ties with China by moving closer to the United States on positions such as Taiwan, which Beijing regards as part of its territory to be reunited with. But Mr Lee adopted a more centrist agenda on the campaign trail, saying that he wanted to repair fraying ties with China, while also insisting that he held a 'very favourable impression of the Japanese people'. His approach to this diplomatic tightrope will have ramifications from Washington to Tokyo, as the US corrals its Indo-Pacific allies for support in its big-power competition with China. Both Japan and South Korea are US security allies, while China is their largest trading partner. On June 4, Mr Lee said : 'I will strengthen cooperation between South Korea, the US and Japan, based on the solid South Korea-US alliance, and will approach relations with neighbouring countries from the perspective of national interest and practicality.' All eyes will be on Mr Lee's likely diplomatic debut on June 15 at the Group of Seven (G-7) summit in Canada, where South Korea has been invited as an obser ver. There, he could potentially meet bilaterally with US and Japan's leaders. Amid the diplomatic ambiguity, analysts in China were sanguine about Beijing-Seoul ties, while Japanese observers were more circumspect over Tokyo-Seoul relations. In a congratulatory message to Mr Lee, Chinese President Xi Jinping stressed that he attaches 'great importance' to China-South Korea relations. The two countries, he said, are close neighbours and partners that have overcome ideological and social differences in the 33 years since establishing diplomatic ties to develop stable and healthy relations. This partnership 'not only improved the well-being of the citizens in both countries, but also promoted regional peace and stability', Mr Xi added, according to state media reports. 'China is willing to work with South Korea to adhere to the original intention of the establishment of diplomatic ties and firmly follow the rules of good neighbourliness and friendship,' Mr Xi said, noting that this is to the benefit of both countries at a time of growing regional and international uncertainty. Over in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba delivered a similar message of working together as 'partners' and close neighbours to tackle global challenges, as the countries celebrate the 60th anniversary of bilateral ties in 2025. 'The importance of holding summit talks at an early date and engaging in 'shuttle diplomacy' won't change,' Mr Ishiba said, referring to the practice of the leaders regularly visiting each other's countries, while expressing his hopes to 'further invigorate bilateral exchanges' at all levels. Yet, Japanese officials are wary that Mr Lee's election would portend a dramatic shift in bilateral ties, given that he has said he would broach wartime issues over Japan's colonial rule of the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945, and the territorial dispute over the Dokdo/Takeshima islets. This is especially since 2025 marks the 80th year since Japan's wartime surrender, an anniversary year that could be weaponised to stoke tensions by raising historical grievances. Japan's position is that all wartime reparations have been 'completely and finally' settled under a 1965 agreement to normalise ties, with Tokyo paying US$500 million (worth about US$5 billion today, or S$6.4 billion) in grants and low-interest long-term loans to South Korea. But past South Korean administrations have repeatedly brought up historical issues, including comfort women and wartime labour, casting a pall over bilateral relations. 'Even if the administration takes a conciliatory stance towards Japan at the start, it could gradually evolve into a hardline stance towards Japan,' a Japanese Foreign Ministry official was quoted as telling the Mainichi newspaper. Another official was cautiously optimistic, saying it would be foolhardy to stoke anti-Japan sentiment at this time, given the positive public opinion. North Korea's military involvement in Russia's invasion of Ukraine also means that geopolitical calculations would have changed, the official was cited as saying. Kobe University's Professor Kan Kimura told The Straits Times that the way forward is unpredictable, given that invoking history would be a non-starter for Japan. 'Lee's language over history and territorial disputes is going to be provocative,' he said. 'The question is whether both countries can delink history with economic and security issues.' He saw it in Seoul's interests to maintain close ties with Tokyo, saying: 'Given that South Korean public opinion towards China is worsening, North Korea is refusing to engage in dialogue with South Korea, and the US is exerting pressure including through tariffs, objectively speaking, South Korea has almost no diplomatic options.' Analysts in China told ST that ties will likely thaw between Beijing and Seoul under Mr Lee, whom they expect will strike a better balance amid US-China competition. Associate Professor Zhang Guangxin at Zhejiang Gongshang University's East Asian Institute in Hangzhou noted that despite Yoon's pivot to the US that had chilled bilateral relations with China, trade between the two countries remains robust. Exports from South Korea to China grew 6.6 per cent in 2024 from a year ago, which underscores the robust trade relations, Prof Zhang noted. 'Mr Lee's clear victory over the People Power Party (which Yoon belonged to) shows the South Korean public's desire for economic stability,' he said. Prof Kim Chang Hyun of the China-Europe International Business School in Shanghai, meanwhile, said business elites in South Korea no longer see China as solely a big market for their products but 'an important partner to learn from', pointing to China's advances in green technology and artificial intelligence. The two experts said that public opinion in South Korea towards the US is likely deteriorating, given US President Donald Trump's demands that Seoul pay more for defence, and the threat of 'reciprocal tariffs' of 25 per cent. Students from South Korea – the third-largest source of foreign students to the US – are also facing heightened uncertainty over Mr Trump's immigration policies. 'There will be some rebalancing in public opinion in South Korea towards the US now,' Prof Kim said. Walter Sim is Japan correspondent at The Straits Times. Based in Tokyo, he writes about political, economic and socio-cultural issues. Aw Cheng Wei is The Straits Times' China correspondent, based in Chongqing. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
