What Marine Corps aviation has in store over the next five years
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Over the next five years Marine aviators should see more F-35s, an upgraded MV-22 Osprey fleet, a larger fleet of cargo aircraft and data-enabled predictive aircraft maintenance.
That's the vision Deputy Commandant for Aviation Lt. Gen. Bradford Gering shared Tuesday at the Navy League's annual Sea-Air-Space Exposition.
'So, what does modernization look like in the Marine Corps? It's an all-fifth-gen tactical air force of F-35s augmented by collaborative combat aircraft,' Gering said. 'It's a full fleet of CH-53K helicopters for the heavy lift mission.'
Gering added that the MV-22 program will have finished its platform midlife upgrades over the remainder of the next five-year budget cycle.
AI, advanced tech central to new Marine Corps aviation plan
Also involved in the Corps' aviation wing will be its drone fleet of MQ-9 Reapers, which are flying today. Those will eventually see major payload and sensor upgrades, Gering said.
On the larger side of the aviation equation, the Corps expects to complete purchasing of the 95 total KC-130J cargo planes it needs for its transport fleet.
Two training squadrons and nine operational squadrons are now flying the F-35 Lightning II jet, a fifth-generation fighter. Over the next five years the Corps will build another seven active duty squadrons, which will be supplemented by two Reserve squadrons.
At the end of the F-35 transition there will be 18 active squadrons, a dozen flying the F-35B and six flying the F-35C. The two Reserve squadrons will fly the C variant, which is built for aircraft carrier takeoff and landing. The B variant can conduct vertical takeoff and landing.
Gering said the Corps also wants to be able to maintain and close kill webs and all enemy air assets through an airborne command and control and an 'aviation ground support structure that is scalable and can conduct expeditionary operations and work in a distributed aviation environment.'
In its aviation plan, released in January, the Corps provided more details on its airborne assets.
The Marines shifted their F-35 plans to buy more carrier-based F-35Cs and fewer short takeoff and vertical landing F-35Bs. The total number of Joint Strike Fighters the service plans to buy remains 420.
The Corps will eventually fly 280 F-35Bs and 140 F-35Cs, more than doubling the number of F-35Cs included in the 2022 plan, which called for 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
How to Take Incredible Underwater Photos Like a Pro Photographer
When you're diving, the water around you filters light — but not evenly. As you descend, red wavelengths disappear first, followed by orange and yellow. Soon, all you have left are greens and blues. Most recreational dives are shallow enough that you'll still be able to capture some oranges and yellows, but after 15 feet or so you have very little red. And that's the best-case scenario, on a sunny day when the water is clear; murky water, cold water, and overcast days all create unique lighting challenges. The result is that your images right out of the camera will typically be far less vibrant than the inspo you've likely seen on social media. If you've been dazzled by underwater photos with vibrant oranges and reds, what you've seen is either the results of a very shallow dive or the product of the photographer's bringing their own lights underwater. Avoid: Color filters Color filters that you mount in front of your camera's lens can serve as a bridge between bringing your own lights and getting enough from the sun. Typically these lights are red, orange, or magenta for underwater use, but they don't add red, orange, or magenta light — instead, they reduce green and blue light. The camera tries to compensate by letting in more light so that there's more red, orange, or magenta than there otherwise would have been. However, I'm not a fan of using these lights, for several reasons. First, doing so darkens the overall image and forces the camera to compensate by increasing the ISO sensitivity, shutter speed, and/or the aperture setting to let in more light; that process tends to reduce overall image quality. In addition, these filters work only at some depths and lighting conditions. So, although filters can help, editing is a better, more flexible fix for beginners. Use: Editing software Virtually all underwater photos you see online have been edited. Generally, they have been brightened, and the colors have been adjusted to make them look a little more natural. Editing is entirely optional, of course, and many of my favorite underwater photos that I've taken haven't been messed with much, if at all. But when you're 50 feet under the sea, the world is blue and green. Editing the images you capture to add reds, oranges, and yellows may make them less 'realistic,' but the result is often more pleasing and interesting to a viewer. Ultimately, there's no right or wrong answer as to how much editing is too much. If you're handy at photo editing, you can use Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, or Premiere Pro — or any of the many free photo and video alternatives. These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter These four versions of the same image demonstrate how underwater photos can look with different color adjustments. The first is direct from the DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro. The second was edited in the DJI app. The third is the result from AquaColorFix, and the last is my own edit in Photoshop. The first photo is the most 'true to life' in that it's what you actually see when you're underwater. It isn't the most interesting photo, however. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter In addition, the apps created by action cam manufacturers — such as DJI's Mimo app (iOS, Android via APK only), Insta360's desktop and mobile app (iOS, Android), and GoPro's Quik app (iOS, Android) — have filters to improve the colors of underwater footage from their various cameras. CapCut, our pick for the best third-party video editing app, doesn't have a specific filter for underwater footage but does include the tools you need to fix the colors yourself. But if you don't want to mess with adjustment sliders yourself, consider AquaColorFix (iOS, Android). This automated color-correction app is simple to use and does a great job. It also has traditional image adjustments, as a standard photo editor does. The free version works only with photos and adds watermarks, while the paid version removes the watermarks and also works with video. At this writing, it costs $25 as a one-time purchase, $10 per year, or $3 per month. AquaColorFix makes the colors more visually interesting with just a few taps. There's no singular 'right' way to do photo editing; more elaborate photo editing software, such as Photoshop, will let you do more but at a higher cost in both money and time. Geoffrey Morrison for NYT Wirecutter Another solid option is the Dive+ app (iOS, Android) which has additional social and location-guide features. The free version has a watermark and a limit to how many images and videos you can color-correct per day. The paid version costs $24 per year or $4 per month at this writing. Avoid: LED lights It's possible to add red and orange back into images by bringing your own lighting. You can find rigs that add small LED lights and strobes to everything from action cameras to more elaborate camera setups. But you don't need lights for good underwater photography, and for most people they would be more trouble than they're worth. They add cost and complexity, and even the smallest rigs are bulkier than just the camera itself. Yes, they can absolutely help you get some epic shots, but they're effective only within a short distance from the camera — roughly 3 to 10 feet, give or take a few feet depending on the situation. You shouldn't consider adding lights to your camera before you are extremely comfortable and experienced with both diving and underwater photography.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is Ford's Big Problem Rearing Its Ugly Head Again?
Ford recently issued two recalls that are not necessarily concerning. The company's higher warranty costs have hurt earnings in the past. Quality improvements will take time to filter through Ford's U.S. fleet. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › Let's take a moment to rewind back almost a year ago, when Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) reported second-quarter earnings for 2024. "It's a code-red situation at Ford after a disaster quarter," Daniel Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, said in comparison to healthy results at crosstown rival General Motors, according to The Detroit News. Part of Ford's "disaster" quarter was due to rising warranty costs, which cover vehicles leaving the factory with defects that later require repairing. In recent years, Ford has continuously found itself near the top in the volume of U.S. vehicles recalled, and it has weighed on the Detroit icon's bottom line. After a couple of recent recalls, is this problem rearing its ugly head again? Not so fast -- let's dig in. In late May, Ford issued a recall for 1,075,299 vehicles in the U.S. over an issue that could prevent the rearview camera from displaying images, which increases the risk of a crash, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). At first glance, this number is alarming, considering Ford's annual recall volume is generally around 4 million to 6 million total. But not all recalls are created equal, and that's the case here as well. Within months of being contacted by the NHTSA, Ford was able to reproduce the camera failure and fix the software through an over-the-air update, free of charge. That's the clear difference between hardware, which requires a consumer to bring the vehicle to a dealership for repairs, and software that can be fixed over the air. This isn't a recall that's going to cost Ford much, and it certainly won't noticeably weigh on earnings. The next example is a different story. Ford also recently announced that it will recall nearly 30,000 F-150 Lightning electric pickup trucks sold in the U.S.. The reason is a suspension nut loosening or missing entirely. The majority of affected vehicles, or 20,528, are from the 2024 model year, with the remaining from the 2025 model. This is where the hardware vs. software aspect comes into play. To fix the issue for affected vehicles, Ford and Lincoln dealers have to inspect the torque of the nut on the ball joint of the left and right upper control arms. If it passes inspection, the nut is replaced; if it fails inspection, the knuckle and nut will be replaced. This is not only a physical process, but far more expensive than a simple over-the-air blast to fix a million vehicles, essentially all at once. While this recall for hardware will cost Ford, the small volume of vehicles won't move the needle at all for the automaker's financials. For investors, what's important to realize is that while headlines about recalls can be very loud, not all of them are created equal, and these two in particular don't raise any red flags in terms of earnings being affected. Ford has made a focused effort on improving quality over the past few years, and most of the issues are on vehicles produced prior to 2021. Despite the company's focus on improving quality and reducing warranty expenses, management warned that it will take at least 18 months to see the benefits of new processes and lower warranty costs – my guess is perhaps even longer. Before you buy stock in Ford Motor Company, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Ford Motor Company wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Ford's Big Problem Rearing Its Ugly Head Again? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) a Strong ETF Right Now?
The F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) was launched on 01/10/2024, and is a smart beta exchange traded fund designed to offer broad exposure to the Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs category of the market. Products that are based on market cap weighted indexes, which are strategies designed to reflect a specific market segment or the market as a whole, have traditionally dominated the ETF industry. Market cap weighted indexes offer a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way of replicating market returns, and are a good option for investors who believe in market efficiency. But, there are some investors who would rather invest in smart beta funds; these funds track non-cap weighted strategies, and are a strong option for those who prefer choosing great stocks in order to beat the market. This kind of index follows this same mindset, as it attempts to pick stocks that have better chances of risk-return performance; non-cap weighted strategies base selection on certain fundamental characteristics, or a mix of such characteristics. Even though this space provides many choices to investors--think one of the simplest methodologies like equal-weighting and more complicated ones like fundamental and volatility/momentum based weighting--not all have been able to deliver first-rate results. Because the fund has amassed over $200.65 million, this makes it one of the average sized ETFs in the Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs. ZTRE is managed by F/M Investments. Before fees and expenses, ZTRE seeks to match the performance of the ICE 3-YEAR US TARGET MATURITY CORP INDEX. The ICE 3-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index comprises of selected investment-grade corporate bonds of both U.S. and non-U.S. issuers that are included in the ICE BofA US Corporate Index; have at least 2.5 years but less than 3.5 years remaining to maturity and have at least $300 million face value amount outstanding. Expense ratios are an important factor in the return of an ETF and in the long-term, cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins, other things remaining the same. Operating expenses on an annual basis are 0.15% for this ETF, which makes it on par with most peer products in the space. ZTRE's 12-month trailing dividend yield is 4.67%. It is important to delve into an ETF's holdings before investing despite the many upsides to these kinds of funds like diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk. And, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis. Looking at individual holdings, Cash & Other (Cash&Other) accounts for about 1.10% of total assets, followed by Ch Robinson Worldwide Inc 4.2% 04/15/2028 (12541WAA8) and Ul Solutions Inc 6.5% 10/20/2028 (903731AA5). Its top 10 holdings account for approximately 3.19% of ZTRE's total assets under management. Year-to-date, the F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF return is roughly 2.81% so far, and is up about 6.29% over the last 12 months (as of 06/06/2025). ZTRE has traded between $49.68 and $51.33 in this past 52-week period. The ETF has a beta of 0.05 and standard deviation of 2.44% for the trailing three-year period. With about 430 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk. F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider. IShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) tracks ICE BOFA 1-5 YEAR US CORPORATE INDEX and the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. IShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF has $21.07 billion in assets, iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF has $30.19 billion. IGSB has an expense ratio of 0.04% and LQD charges 0.14%. Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFs. To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE): ETF Research Reports iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD): ETF Research Reports iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
