logo
GE2025: What the main political parties' manifestos say about addressing the rising cost of living

GE2025: What the main political parties' manifestos say about addressing the rising cost of living

CNA24-04-2025

SINGAPORE: The rising cost of living is shaping up to be one of the defining issues of the 2025 General Election – and political parties are offering a range of policy ideas in response.
As election campaigning ramps up, CNA takes a look at key proposals to ease Singaporeans' burden, offered by the five parties contesting the most seats that have also released their manifestos. The People's Alliance for Reform, which is contesting the joint-fourth-highest number of seats, has not released its manifesto. PEOPLE'S ACTION PARTY Households to receive CDC vouchers, cash payouts and utilities rebates.
Schemes to support lower-income families and the elderly, such as ComCare and Silver Support, will be reinforced, lower-income families will be supported individually through ComLink+ and higher childcare subsidies for children from disadvantaged families, along with regular pre-school attendance.
Lower preschool fees for parents and expanded parental leave with enhanced support for larger families. WORKERS' PARTY Alternative revenue channels to the Goods and Services Tax (GST), such as a net wealth tax on the assets of the country's top 1 per cent wealth holders, and a minimum corporate tax rate of 15 per cent.
Essential items, like basic food items, to be exempt from GST to ease the effects of inflation for low-income and middle-income groups.
A statutory and universal national minimum wage of S$1,600 (US$1,200) for full-time work and prorated for part-time work.
Lift the cap on MediSave use for those above 60, so that they can use MediSave to pay for all medical expenses not already covered by other schemes at government polyclinics, public specialist outpatient clinics and Community Health Assist Scheme clinics. RED DOT UNITED An 'unconditional cash transfer' should be distributed as a 'citizen's dividend' to provide financial stability for Singaporeans.
Shifting from GDP-focused policies to a 'well-being economy' that prioritises fair wages, job security with a 'citizens first' approach and sustainable growth for all.
Access to MediFund support for all Singaporeans, capping out-of-pocket expenses and introducing fairer subsidies.
Expand MediShield Life's coverage and redesign MediSave to be a supplementary fund rather than a primary way of paying for medical costs. PROGRESS SINGAPORE PARTY Reduce the GST from 9 per cent back to 7 per cent and exempt essential items like rice, water and milk formula from the tax.
Set up guidelines on rent increases for commercial properties and phase out socially conscious enterprise hawker centres.
Set hawker stall rentals at S$500 or 3 per cent of gross revenue, instead of the highest bid by tender. Phase out the social enterprise model for hawker centres that appears to have higher costs.
Cover basic MediShield Life and CareShield Life premiums and centralise drug procurement to lower costs. New mothers should receive a cash gift to offset confinement expenses. SINGAPORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY Reduce GST from the current 9 per cent and eliminate it for essentials like food and medicine. The party previously asked for the GST to be lowered to '7 per cent or even 5 per cent'.
Reduce rental costs.
Address 'indirect taxes' like water and utilities that 'add to the burden' of small- and medium-sized enterprises and are often passed on to consumers.
GE2025 People's Action Party Workers' Party

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?
Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: What about a safety net for local students wanting a place in university?

I was heartened to learn that our Government is extending support to the 151 Singaporean students at Harvard (S'porean undergrads at Harvard can continue studies in universities here, June 6). I am sure the Government will similarly extend support to Singaporean students at other elite US universities if the situation deteriorates there. I sympathise with the Singaporeans studying at Harvard, but I wonder if the message is that our local universities do in fact have the capacity to take in more local students. Or is it that our local universities will reduce the number of places available to local students, to accommodate the returning US students? Many local students do not have the financial resources to seek an overseas education, and universities at home are their only option. But due to limited capacity, not every eligible applicant is accepted. So, I was surprised to learn that local universities are able to accommodate the affected Singapore students at Harvard. Wouldn't this be at the expense of eligible local applicants? Finally, these Ivy League students no doubt have the ability and resources to study in the US. They took the decision to study abroad willingly. In the face of adversity, is our Government expected to offer a safety net back home? What about a safety net for local students? Roy Tan Choon Kang More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store