Macron says 'worst scenario' if Iran quits nuclear non-proliferation treaty
French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were "genuinely effective" but the "worst-case scenario" would be if Tehran now exits the global non-proliferation treaty.
"The worst would be that the consequence of this is Iran's exit from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and therefore, ultimately, a drift and a collective weakening," Macron told journalists after an EU summit in Brussels.
Macron said that in a bid to maintain the treaty -- that is meant to limit the spread of nuclear weapons -- he would speak in the coming days to the five members of the United Nations Security Council.
Those talks already kicked off with a call with President Donald Trump on Thursday in which Macron said he informed his US counterparts of contacts Paris had with Tehran in "the last few days and hours".
"Our hope is that there will be a real convergence of views," Macron said, adding that the aim was "that there should be no resumption" of nuclear buildup by Iran.
Iran ratified the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) in 1970, committing it to declare its nuclear material to the International Atomic Energy Agency.
But it has recently begun preparing the grounds for a possible withdrawal from the treaty, accusing the agency of acting as a partner in 'Israel's war of aggression'.
American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles.
Trump himself has called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and repeatedly said they "obliterated" the nuclear sites.
But US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by months -- coverage sharply criticised by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
5 hours ago
- Roya News
Six US citizens arrested in South Korea for attempting to send rice, Bibles to North Korea
South Korean authorities arrested six American nationals early Friday for trying to send plastic bottles filled with rice, one-dollar bills, and Bibles into North Korea from the country's western coast, police confirmed. The group, all US citizens between their 20s and 50s, was intercepted while launching the bottles from Ganghwa Island, located just northwest of Seoul and one of the South's closest points to North Korea. 'We have arrested and are questioning six American nationals... on suspicion of violating the Framework Act on the Management of Disasters and Safety,' the lead investigator from Ganghwa Police Station in Incheon told Agence France-Presse (AFP). The Americans reportedly did not speak Korean, so police provided interpreters during the ongoing interrogation process. Ganghwa Island, sitting just 10km from North Korean waters, has long been used by activist groups and NGOs to float items like rice, USB drives containing South Korean dramas and K-pop, and religious materials toward the North. But the South Korean government designated the area a danger zone last November, warning that such acts could be seen as provocative by Pyongyang. The arrests come amid recent efforts by South Korea's new president, Lee Jae Myung, to dial down tensions with the North. Since taking office earlier this month, Lee has ended the use of loudspeaker broadcasts along the border, propaganda tactics that were reignited last year during a heated exchange between the two Koreas. In response to anti-North leaflets and media sent by balloon from the South, Pyongyang had launched thousands of trash-filled balloons into the South and broadcast eerie sounds across the border. Following Lee's decision to cease broadcasts, North Korea stopped its own psychological operations the next day, suggesting a fragile but active attempt to reduce hostilities. While the arrested Americans' motives have not been formally disclosed, similar past incidents have involved Christian groups attempting to send humanitarian and religious materials into the North, where both are strictly forbidden. It remains unclear what legal consequences the six may face, but South Korean law has grown stricter in recent years concerning unauthorized cross-border activism, especially those deemed a risk to public safety or national security.
Roya News
5 hours ago
- Roya News
US greenlights $30M for controversial Gaza aid group
The US State Department announced Thursday it will provide USD 30 million in funding to a newly established food distribution network in Gaza. The initiative, known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), has been promoted by 'Israel' and is largely operated by American contractors, but has drawn sharp criticism from humanitarian groups and the UN. At a press briefing, State Department spokesman Thomas Pigott praised the group, calling it 'absolutely incredible and should be commended and supported.' He urged other countries to contribute financially to the foundation, despite objections raised by numerous aid organizations over its methods and the violence reported around its distribution points. The GHF began distributing food in southern Gaza late last month, establishing only a limited number of sites. Most are located near 'Israeli' military positions, a fact that aid groups say creates dangerous conditions for civilians seeking food and undermines humanitarian neutrality. Pigott declined to say whether the US funding had already been disbursed or if the foundation would expand to serve more of Gaza's population. However, he emphasized that the new system aligned with 'President Trump's call to deliver aid in a way where it can't be looted by Hamas,' and described the foundation's model as one of 'creative solutions.' Violence has been a constant near these distribution sites, with hundreds reportedly killed in the past month as desperate civilians have crowded around aid convoys. Witnesses say Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) have opened fire near the centers, though the IOF claims it only fired warning shots when soldiers felt threatened. The Gaza health ministry has attributed many deaths to these incidents. The GHF has denied responsibility, suggesting that some reports were misattributed or fueled by 'Hamas propaganda.' It has also accused Hamas of threatening aid workers and spreading misinformation. Meanwhile, international human rights groups remain skeptical. In a joint statement released Tuesday, 15 organizations criticized the foundation's 'militarized model' and close cooperation with 'Israeli' authorities, saying it violates the humanitarian principles of impartiality, neutrality, and independence. Despite these concerns, John Acree, the foundation's interim executive director, welcomed the US pledge. 'Americans deeply care about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and want to see real action,' he said. 'Now is the time for unity and collaboration.' However, many say the new initiative falls far short of meeting the enormous humanitarian need in Gaza. Nearly two million Palestinians live in the enclave, where 'Israel's' blockade, imposed after the aggression began in October 2023, drastically reduced the flow of food and medicine. From March to May, aid was almost entirely cut off. While 'Israel' insists Hamas has looted aid, the UN disputes that it happens systematically and argues that the real issue is the obstruction of supply lines. The UN warned Thursday that most families in Gaza are surviving on a single meager meal a day, with adults regularly skipping food so children and the elderly can eat. Even as other organizations resume work, including World Central Kitchen (WCK), which restarted operations after a May suspension, the UN says aid access is still woefully inadequate.
Roya News
11 hours ago
- Roya News
Macron says 'worst scenario' if Iran quits nuclear non-proliferation treaty
French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities were "genuinely effective" but the "worst-case scenario" would be if Tehran now exits the global non-proliferation treaty. "The worst would be that the consequence of this is Iran's exit from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and therefore, ultimately, a drift and a collective weakening," Macron told journalists after an EU summit in Brussels. Macron said that in a bid to maintain the treaty -- that is meant to limit the spread of nuclear weapons -- he would speak in the coming days to the five members of the United Nations Security Council. Those talks already kicked off with a call with President Donald Trump on Thursday in which Macron said he informed his US counterparts of contacts Paris had with Tehran in "the last few days and hours". "Our hope is that there will be a real convergence of views," Macron said, adding that the aim was "that there should be no resumption" of nuclear buildup by Iran. Iran ratified the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) in 1970, committing it to declare its nuclear material to the International Atomic Energy Agency. But it has recently begun preparing the grounds for a possible withdrawal from the treaty, accusing the agency of acting as a partner in 'Israel's war of aggression'. American B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs last weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third site with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Trump himself has called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and repeatedly said they "obliterated" the nuclear sites. But US media revealed a preliminary American intelligence assessment earlier this week that said the strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by months -- coverage sharply criticised by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others.
