
x
Last year America ran a budget deficit of 7 per cent of GDP. It may soon be even bigger. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now working its way through Congress, permanently extends tax cuts introduced in 2017, offers more to hospitality workers and old folk, and boosts payments to poor children. The proposed legislation amounts to trillions of dollars of extra borrowing over the next decade.
Mr Trump's showmanship attracts attention — but America is not alone. Governments across the rich world are increasingly profligate. This year France will run a deficit worth 6 per cent of GDP; Britain's will be only a little smaller.
The German government will borrow the equivalent of 3 per cent of GDP. Canada's budget balance is also moving into the red.
Jean-Baptiste Colbert, a bureaucrat under Louis XIV, remarked that the essence of tax policy involved 'plucking as many feathers from the goose with the least hissing'. Today's governments do not pluck the goose. Like producers of foie gras, they stuff it.
Governments have long run deficits. France, the land of foie gras, has not seen a surplus since 1974. And a government can simultaneously borrow money and become less indebted, if the economy grows faster than debt accumulates.
What is happening today, however, is unprecedented. Deficit levels would not be unusual if the economy were in recession. In fact, rich-world GDP is growing decently. The unemployment rate is near an all-time low. Corporations' profit growth is healthy.
Meanwhile, borrowing costs have jumped. The average rich-world government, weighted by GDP, now borrows for ten years at a 3.7 per cent annual interest rate, up from 1 per cent during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In these circumstances, many textbooks would advise, at the very least, cutting your deficit. Today's governments prefer to double down. Many are promising to raise defence spending. Although that may be unavoidable, the same is not true of other decisions. In Japan political parties are offering fiscal sweeteners, ranging from cash handouts to consumption-tax cuts, ahead of an election to the upper house of parliament.
The British government recently undid cash-saving measures it had imposed only a few months before, restoring payments to old people to help with energy bills. South Korea is cutting inheritance tax. Australia is cutting income tax.
Even once-prudent countries are getting in on the act. The German government is planning to borrow €800 billion ($143b) to invest in defence and infrastructure.
'By German standards, this truly is 'whatever it takes' fiscal policy,' say analysts at Deutsche Bank. Switzerland, which before the pandemic ran a large budget surplus, now has a small one.
Next year the country will introduce a 13th month of state-pension payments. The silver-haireds enjoying a late lunch on the banks of the Rhine do not appear to be on the breadline. These days, though, everyone gets a handout.
Why are governments so spendthrift? During the pandemic politicians developed a habit of bailing out businesses and households. High inflation then spurred demands for payments to alleviate a cost-of-living crisis
Today many incumbents hope to ward off populists by throwing around money. When a politician suggests a cut, 24-hour news and social media ensure that everyone hears a sob story. Fiscal responsibility is more toxic than ever before.
Until recently, it was painless for governments to run loose fiscal policy. In 2021-23 nominal GDP was growing reasonably fast, inflation was high and interest rates were low. Under these conditions, the average rich-world government could run sizeable primary deficits (ie, before interest payments) and still cut their debt load.
Some countries, such as Japan, could reduce their debt-to-GDP ratio even if they ran a primary deficit of 12 per cent of GDP. As such, two-thirds of rich-world governments are less indebted today than five years ago. Japan's debt-to-GDP ratio has fallen by 24 percentage points. Greece's has fallen by 68 points.
Today growth and inflation are down, and interest rates are up. We calculate that, for the average rich country to cut its debt, it must now balance its primary budget. For some, the fiscal arithmetic has radically altered. Italy's debt-reducing primary balance has swung from a deficit of 3.1 per cent of GDP in 2023 to a surplus of 1.3 per cent of GDP.
The Italians are shrinking their budget deficit, but not by enough. With many other governments making even less progress, and a trade war promising a growth slowdown, rich-world public debt is likely to start rising.
This is bad timing. Demographers have known for decades that the mid-2020s would be the point at which baby-boomers would begin to retire in droves, prompting demand for health care and pensions to surge. In 2015 Britain's Office for Budget Responsibility, a watchdog, suggested that even under benign conditions, now was the point at which the government would struggle to avoid accumulating debt.
A demographic crunch and free-spending fiscal policies are therefore about to interact in unpleasant ways. No one can predict if or when investors will lose patience, forcing interest rates much higher. Yet there must be a limit to the debt binge.
As any lover of foie gras knows, overfeeding even the greediest goose can cause its liver to explode.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Israel-Gaza war will only end with ‘complete dismantlement' of Hamas
Executive Council of Australian Jewry Co-CEO Alex Ryvchin discusses United States President Donald Trump's belief that an Israel-Gaza ceasefire could happen within the next week. 'We hope this war does end, but I think it will take the complete dismantlement of Hamas to a point where they see no way out,' Mr Rvychin told Sky News host James Macpherson. 'Either accept surrender or exile for their leadership, I think that's the only way we get to a conclusion here.'


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
EDITORIAL: Penny Wong the wrong person to win American's favour
Australian steel and aluminium exports to the US face punishing 50 per cent tariffs. From July 9 every single other item sent to our third largest trading partner will be subject to levies of 10 per cent. AUKUS, once touted as the 'once-in-a-generation' opportunity to foster international co-operation and boost peace and stability in the Pacific, is at risk with the Americans undertaking a 30-day review of the submarine deal — seemingly in retaliation for Australia's military budget intransigence. And US President Donald Trump has made it clear where Australia stands in his list of priorities, standing Anthony Albanese up and making no effort to schedule a make-up session. Australia's relationship with its No.1 security ally is at its lowest ebb in memory. And into this fray we are sending . . . Penny Wong. The Foreign Minister is off to Washington to meet with her counterparts in the Quad strategic partnership, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The fact that it is Ms Wong, whose procrastination in backing the US's recent strike action against Iran and repeated conflation of Israel with Hamas's terrorist leadership has won her few friends in the Republican administration, who is being deployed at this critical juncture is deeply worrying. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is seemingly no closer to securing a long awaited meeting with Mr Trump. The earliest opportunity for a sit-down is believed to be in September, when Mr Albanese is scheduled to travel to the US to address the United Nations. That would make it 10 months since Mr Trump's election, and eight since his inauguration, that the Prime Minister and the President have gone with just a handful of phone calls between them. All the while tensions continue to simmer — over AUKUS, over tariffs and over whether Australia is pulling its weight in our military alliance. It's a worrisome situation and one Mr Albanese appears content to play out, unwilling to risk further damage to his ego after Mr Trump blew him off having left the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the conflict in the Middle East. Mr Albanese says Australia is continuing to lobby for an exemption to Mr Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, with diplomats working behind the scenes on making the nation's case. No doubt that's true. But it's clear that those efforts have so far entirely failed to secure any traction. This is not a problem that will be resolved through diplomats — particularly if those diplomats are Kevin Rudd, who Mr Trump has a public, personal dislike for. Nor is it likely that Ms Wong will secure any meaningful wins. Australia's best chance of repairing our relationship with our most important ally comes will come at the highest level. That means Mr Albanese needs to get to DC sooner rather than later to meet with Mr Trump. And when he does so, he needs to be armed with arguments stronger than those already tried and failed.

Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
City of Melbourne raids Covid cash to pay for bike lanes
Don't miss out on the headlines from News. Followed categories will be added to My News. The City of Melbourne is still raiding a Covid-era economic recovery fund to bankroll its bike lane rollout into next year. The council's annual budget for cycling infrastructure is set at $3.5m, including a $539,000 parcel from the Melbourne City Recovery Fund (MCRF). The fund, announced by then premier Daniel Andrews almost five years ago, was a $100m pot – jointly funded by the state and Town Hall – to encourage people to return to the CBD over the 2020-21 summer. Remnants from the fund are now being directed into the council's 2025-26 cycling budget, amid claims the scheme was being used as a slush fund for the city's capital works. It comes as Lord Mayor Nick Reece on Monday night caved to pressure from the cycling lobby and tipped a separate $4.5m over the next three years into building new bike lanes. Mr Reece had been facing pressure from the cycling lobby, with the lord mayor saying he'd heard them 'loud and clear'. On the issue of the recovery fund, it was previously reported $825,000 had been diverted for road projects, including creating speed limits in East Melbourne and North Melbourne. Another $10m was pulled from the scheme for 40km of bike lanes, prompting criticism from Small Business Australia head Bill Lang over the fund's intentions. The recovery fund's aim was to kickstart economic activity, provide Covid-safe dining and improve CBD streetscapes, including wider footpaths, bollards and planter boxes to promote outdoor dining. But the money will now be spent on suburban bike lanes and other traffic infrastructure. A 2km section of Queensberry St, Carlton, has been identified as a priority project. The bike lane funding was queried by Greens councillor Olivia Ball at a recent council meeting. 'I thought MCRF ended in 2023,' Dr Ball said. Council infrastructure manager Rick Kwasek confirmed the money was being used in the budget, although it was not listed as a separate line item. 'There are components of the MCRF funding which remain, which is the $539,000,' he said. 'And that will support the cycling budget.' A City of Melbourne spokesman said a key purpose of the recovery fund was to invest in new infrastructure. 'We've made it safer, more enjoyable and more convenient to walk, ride and visit the city,' the spokesman said. 'This includes the Exhibition St upgrades, where we've transformed the theatre district with wide bluestone footpaths, greenery and protected bike lanes.' The council received 1466 submissions over its cycling infrastructure spending. More than $200,000 had also been pulled from footpath expenditure for cycle infrastructure.