logo
DA challenges new employment equity targets in court, drawing ire from unions

DA challenges new employment equity targets in court, drawing ire from unions

Daily Maverick01-05-2025

The DA is again at odds with the government — of which it is a member — this time over the new employment equity targets set by the Department of Labour and Employment.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) is preparing for a fresh legal battle with the Government of National Unity (GNU), of which it is a member, over the new employment equity targets set by the Employment Equity Amendment Act.
DA MP Michael Bagraim's announcement of the planned legal proceedings comes two weeks after the Department of Employment and Labour (DEL) gazetted two sets of employment equity regulations. The party's decision to go to court has been heavily criticised by workers' unions.
The new regulations introduce five-year numerical targets for the top four occupational levels (junior, middle, senior and top management) across 18 sectors, ranging from finance to manufacturing.
The DEL's 2024 employment equity report found that despite comprising just 7.3% of the population, white workers held 62.1% of all top management positions.
In a statement released on Tuesday, Bagraim said the DA had launched a constitutional challenge to section 15A of the amended Act, claiming that it introduced rigid race quotas in the workplace, which would 'destroy jobs, undermine the economy and violate the constitutional rights of all South Africans'.
Bagraim, the DA's spokesperson on employment and labour, added that section15A was an abuse of state power in that the powers it gives Employment and Labour Minister Nomakhosazana Meth were 'vague, unchecked and dangerously broad'.
Daily Maverick previously reported that Nadeem Mahomed, director of employment at the law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, said the designated group the Act referred to included black people (Africans, coloured people and Indians), women and persons with disabilities, provided they are South African citizens by birth or descent.
However, Bagraim claimed that the final quotas would make it 'virtually impossible' for coloured people in the Western Cape and Indian workers in KwaZulu-Natal to find or keep employment.
The DA also claims:
Section 15A violates section 9 of the Constitution by enabling discrimination based on race.
The minister's discretion under Section 15A lacks clear legal standards, contravening the Dawood principle of administrative law.
The implementation of demographic targets disproportionately prejudices coloured and Indian communities in certain provinces, particularly the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal.
Exemptions for small businesses and the government's settlement in the Solidarity case suggest an acknowledgement of the potential economic harm of the quotas.
Read the DA's founding affidavit here.
'This case is not about resisting redress. It is about protecting people's rights under the Constitution, the rule of law, and the livelihoods of South Africans.
'The DA believes that real redress does not mean implementing policies that bring more division. We believe that true transformation can only be achieved by focusing on inclusive economic growth that creates opportunity for all,' said Bagraim.
In response to questions sent by Daily Maverick, DEL chief communications officer Teboho Thejane said: 'Let's let the legal process unfold. Citizens have the constitutional right to address issues in the way they see appropriate. The department follows relevant processes when it comes to legislative framework within its scope.'
Several workers' unions had stronger words about the DA's legal challenge.
'Spurious attack'
On Tuesday, the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) released a strongly worded statement expressing its 'dismay' at the DA's 'spurious attack on employment equity.
'It is alarming that the DA court papers are premised upon fake news about the Act and its regulations. Nowhere in either does it provide for any worker, of any colour or gender, to lose their job. None. Any statement claiming they do should be taken as seriously as the flat-earth hysteria on social media.
'Employment equity and transformation remains an extremely emotive matter for all workers and should be handled with the necessary care and sensitivity and not used to score likes on social media,' said Cosatu parliamentary coordinator Matthew Parks.
Parks said the amendments to the Act sought to strike a fair balance between easing administrative burdens on SMMEs reflecting SA's demographic diversity and pushing employers to do better to ensure all employees had a 'fair chance to fulfil their full potential'.
'The regulations provide ample time, eg, five years, and modest targets, well below population demographics, for employers to work towards. As with all laws, exemptions are provided for employers who have tried, but, for a variety of reasons, cannot achieve their targets,' said Parks.
He added that the union was confident that the case would be dismissed as 'legal adventurism'.
General Industries Workers Union of South Africa (Giwusa) said the union strongly condemned the DA's litigation.
'Ultimately, it reflects the commitment within the DA to roll back the progress made with respect to transformation, and it also reveals the character of the DA. The fact that the DA is not concerned with the dominance of white people in the top echelons of the corporate ladder in many sectors of the industry of this country says a lot,' said Giwusa's Mametlwe Sebei.
Sebei said that employment equity had been instrumental in ensuring that all levels in organisations were reflective of SA's diverse demography. However, he noted that there was resistance, particularly in the private sector, where operational and top management were predominantly white.
'That is the reason that it is absolute hogwash for the DA to keep insisting that economic growth and the opening of education opportunities, all of which are important, on and by themselves would address this issue. If that were so, we would not have had the lack of representation and exclusion of black people from the management of industry and public service,' added Sebei.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament to get to work on amending Constitution following high court order barring John Hlophe from serving on JSC
Parliament to get to work on amending Constitution following high court order barring John Hlophe from serving on JSC

Eyewitness News

time3 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Parliament to get to work on amending Constitution following high court order barring John Hlophe from serving on JSC

CAPE TOWN - Following last week's high court ruling that a judge impeached for gross misconduct can't serve on the Judicial Service Commission, Parliament is set to get to work on amending the Constitution during this administration. Besides a submission made to the Constitutional Review Committee by the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (CASAC), the DA says a bill to this effect is already in the pipeline. ALSO READ: The party's justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach, said it's important to tighten the law to prevent impeached individuals from making a return in other spheres of government. The National Assembly speaker is yet to announce the next steps in filling the vacancy on the judicial service commission. The seat belongs to the MK party, which plans to appeal a ruling preventing its parliamentary leader, John Hlophe from serving on the body. CASAC wants Parliament's Constitutional Review Committee to consider amending sections 177 and 194 to specify that any person removed from judicial office or a Chapter 9 institution may not hold any other public office. Breytenbach, co-chair of the committee, said a Private Member's Bill has already been prepared and is with Parliament's legal drafters. "I think it's very important that Parliament is populated with MPs who are ethical, honest, reliable and have integrity, so the sooner we can prevent bad eggs like John Hlophe and Busisiwe Mkhwebane coming to Parliament, the better." The Western Cape High Court said in a judgment last week that the National Assembly had not acted rationally nor constitutionally when it rubberstamped the MK Party's nomination for the JSC.

Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'
Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Gayton McKenzie: 'If I were President, I would scrap BEE and start an empowerment bank'

Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie proposes bold reforms, criticizes Black millionaires for lacking community investment, and blames illegal immigration for unemployment, urging South Africans to embrace 'unpopular decisions' for collective growth. Image: File Patriotic Alliance (PA) leader and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, says if he were made president, he would completely scrap the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) policy. He was speaking at the Black Business Council Summit on Friday. Instead, he proposes replacing it with a single empowerment bank, funded by a mandatory contribution of 1% of turnover from all white-owned businesses and previously empowered individuals. 'You can't build wealth without collateral,' McKenzie said. He believes the new bank would provide loans where 'your blackness will be your collateral. Your black skin.' According to him, this model avoids the counterproductive practice of forced partnerships, such as the 26% equity expectations under current BEE frameworks. 'Instead of telling white people, come make me a 26% partner, I will not do that. That's not business. That's counterproductive.' McKenzie highlighted that the new bank would enforce accountability, mentorship, and evidence of impact before extending further loans. On the current implementation of BEE, he is critical of how it's benefited a small elite rather than addressing broad economic disparities. 'BEE has not failed. We have failed BEE, and I'm including myself in all the Black millionaires today.' 'It is the same people doing deal after deal, and that is the truth. We can't run away from it.' He said black business leaders have become complicit, often choosing repeated partnerships over building independent ventures, even after attaining significant wealth. 'You do a deal, you're no longer poor; you are now a dollar millionaire, yet you still insist on becoming a partner in a business that a white man has built. That's a conversation we don't want to hear.' McKenzie drew a contrast with the Jewish community, suggesting that Black millionaires should show similar communal responsibility, especially in addressing the country's staggering Black unemployment. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading 'We have so many black millionaires, but we have the highest unemployment rate. We just get more, we get more, but you're not even giving back to where you stay.' On illegal immigration, he blames the national budget deficit and service delivery failures on unaccounted foreign nationals. ''The ANC is getting an F, but they don't deserve an F. The ANC should be getting a D. But the reason why they don't deserve, don't know why they're getting an F, because they budget for South Africans. ''Mabahambe, and you will see jobs will appear.' 'Two million of them have jobs, waiters, whatever. So when we chase them away, immediately we have two million jobs for locals.' He says South Africa is budgeting for people not counted in the census, which causes direct economic strain. Ultimately, McKenzie argued that real empowerment comes not from forced partnerships, but from building institutions and taking 'unpopular decisions' that directly benefit the broader Black population. 'Let us get rich, all of us, but let's take the unpopular decisions. Mabahambe.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel IOL Politics

Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa
Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa

IOL News

time5 hours ago

  • IOL News

Education or Entrapment? How Student Debt Sustains Systemic Youth Oppression in a Democratic South Africa

Awam Mavimbela is a registered social worker, former Walter Sisulu University Lecturer, PhD candidate with University of the Free State, and a published author Image: Supplied Apartheid-era education policies, rooted in oppression and segregation, have necessitated post-apartheid efforts to redress historical injustices by broadening access to the university system. Education remains a critical instrument for addressing inequality and alleviating poverty. However, despite gains in access, post-apartheid South African youth are now confronted by a new barrier, student debt. Even within this debt crisis, the enduring deliberate inequalities of apartheid are evident. Institutions historically serving white students tend to have significantly lower levels of student debt compared to universities predominantly attended by African, Coloured, and Indian students. For instance, as of 2021, student debt at Tshwane University of Technology amounted to R4.4 billion; Cape Peninsula University of Technology stood at R1.13 billion; Central University of Technology at R1.78 billion; and the University of KwaZulu-Natal and the University of the Witwatersrand at R1.7 billion and R1.062 billion, respectively. In stark contrast, Stellenbosch University's student debt was only R16.3 million; Rhodes University, R15.3 million; and the University of Cape Town (UCT), the lowest, at R14.1 million. The consequences of student debt are severe. They include withholding of academic certificates, exclusion from further studies, and blocked registration for subsequent academic years. These frustrations contributed to the #FeesMustFall protests of 2015/2016, when students, particularly from marginalised communities, reached a breaking point. While student demographics are not always disaggregated by race within institutions, without doubt African, Coloured, and Indian students bear the brunt of student debt an inference supported by national socio-economic disparities released by StatsSA yearly. Thus, student debt emerges as a modern mechanism of continued systemic oppression in South Africa, reinforcing historical patterns of exclusion and undermining constitutional promises. Section 29(1)(b) of the South African Constitution obliges the state to make higher education "progressively available and accessible." This means there should be funding (NSFAS) reform as the current leads to student debts. The existing debt crisis contradicts this mandate, challenging the myth that access to education is purely merit-based. Instead, structural inequalities ensure that student debt perpetuates intergenerational poverty as per apartheid policies. During apartheid, racial exclusion from education was legally enforced through instruments such as the Bantu Education Act of 1953, the Indian Education Act, and the Coloured Persons Education Act. Today, universities—ostensibly democratic institutions—function as more subtle vehicles of exclusion through financial mechanisms, particularly student debt. The discourse around student experiences is increasingly colour-blind, overlooking the racialised nature of economic and educational policy legacies. Within a neoliberal framework, student debt is framed as a personal burden rather than a manifestation of systemic socio-economic oppression. This neo-liberal individualistic perspective erases the structural dimensions of debt, which enforces racial and class stratification. As such, debt is not merely a technical or financial issue, it is youth symbolic violence (continuation of oppression). For Black graduates, many of whom are financially responsible for extended families, student debt is a source of mental illnesses like, trauma, stress, and delayed economic participation. Historic debts contribute to the intergenerational mental health burdens—depression, anxiety, social isolation, and trauma—among previously oppressed populations. Furthermore, the student debt crisis reveals how universities have become corporatised entities, dependent on student fees for financial viability. Students are no longer just recipients of education; they are financiers sustaining the neoliberal university model. This article contends that student debt is a consequence of apartheid-era oppression and calls for solutions beyond the current frameworks, such as debt cancellation, free education, or universal basic income. Without reimagining education funding, existing approaches risk entrenching the status quo of racial inequality, thereby serving elite interests. Student debt also undermines initiatives like the 1997 White Paper for Social Welfare, which identified education as a vehicle for redressing historical imbalances (poverty). The fragmented social welfare systems experienced by Africans, Coloureds, and Indians cannot be remedied without addressing the racialised nature of educational debt.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store