US wants to launch more satellites from NZ
The US has been ken to diversify launches into clear southern hemisphere skies for several years. File photo.
Photo:
Joel Kowsky / NASA via Getty Images
The US military is holding talks with New Zealand about launching more satellites from this country.
The US Space Force is moving to deploy hundreds more satellites that will - among other things - support America's nuclear command-control-and-communications (NC3) system.
It is not known what types of satellite it might wish to launch from here, but the Pentagon has signalled for several years its interest in diversifying launches into clear southern hemisphere skies, and elsewhere outside the US.
Congress ordered a report two years ago on the benefits of using partner countries' spaceports for rapid launch in a war or other crisis. RNZ's efforts to get the report through the US embassy have failed.
There are now new talks, with US Space Force General Brigadier Kristin Panzenhagen at the forefront.
US Space Force General Brigadier Kristin Panzenhagen
Photo:
Supplied
"We are looking at international partnerships as potential ways to get our satellites to orbit," she said in an interview with the Mitchell Institute thinktank.
Talks were in their very early stages.
"So we've been talking to some of our allies and partners about their launch capability, whether it's existing capability - so for example, you know, Japan has existing capability, Rocket Lab is launching out of New Zealand, Ariane Space out of French Guyana."
The US wanted to "see what we may be able to do for enhancing each other's resiliency".
She said Sweden and Britain were also in the talks. The UK has no working spaceports, but is trying to build six of them.
The Pentagon has repeatedly told lawmakers - in pleas for more space funding - that it was in a race against China to achieve space superiority by 2027.
The US could end up helping design new spaceports offshore, so its launches would not face technical barriers, Panzenhagen added.
The 2023 report to Congress aimed to assess launch capability and "the shared costs and technology between the United States and allies, including if investments from the Pacific Deterrence Initiative and the European Deterrence Initiative could be considered for allied spaceports".
As the US pivots away from Europe and more towards the Indo-Pacific, it is
pouring billions more into the Pacific Deterrence Initiative
for the likes of missiles in Guam, drone experiments, and "military construction", documents showed.
Launches out of Mahia for the Pentagon and US space spy agency NRO have been mostly for experimental missions so far.
But the US relies on its two spaceports at home - at Cape Canaveral in Florida, and at Vandenberg base in California - for actual missions, including 'cannot fail' operations.
Retired Space Force colonel Charles Galbreath, now a senior fellow at the Mitchell institute, interviewed the general on Youtube last week, and spelled out why accelerating launches mattered so much.
"Launch, and the assured access to space that it represents, is foundational to space superiority and leveraging the unique benefits of the space domain.
"If you can't get to space, you can't control it," Galbreath said.
Space Force is not only diversifying, but speeding up. In its latest exercise, a launch that once took two years was down to just 10 weeks, Galbreath heard.
International diversification is being paired with bringing more companies on board, often smaller ones, rather than the usual massive 'primes' like Lockheed.
For instance, Rocket Lab US has just been elevated into a fast-lane of its National Security Space Launch (NSSL) programme.
New Zealand is also linked in
through its space research within the Five Eyes intelligence group, including a role in current tests of satellite comms to ships.
This comes under the umbrella of what US media calls the "Pentagon's global meta-network" - or CJADC2 - or combined joint all-domain command and control - essentially, a satellite-linked network for faster shooting.
The New Zealand Defence Force has recently been going to more US-led CJADC2 exercises or taking a bigger role, including in ones that
build "kill chains" and "kill webs"
.
The head of US nuclear forces Admiral Charles Richard underlined the link between JADC2 (now called CJADC2) when he spoke to Congress in 2022.
"A subset of what JADC2 is doing is for nuclear command and control," Richard said.
"The two systems have to be overlapped to a great extent so that we can have integration."
US Admiral Charles Richard
Photo:
AFP / DREW ANGERER
Both CJADC2 and nuclear command-control-and-comms expect to benefit from the launch of hundreds of satellites into low-orbit, to get away from reliance on a handful of large, hugely expensive and vulnerable large satellites in higher orbit, according to official US documents.
A big CJADC2-linked exercise in Australia in August - Talisman Sabre - aims to advance how 19 countries including New Zealand share communications through a single system, which occurred for the first time last year.
Defence and Space Minister Judith Collins talked up the commercial opportunities for New Zealand firms to help out the Pentagon last year.
But last week's
survey of the space industry that Collins released
- which covered its potential to double by 2030 to be worth $5 billion a year - barely mentioned defence.
Collins told RNZ: "I have not engaged directly with the Space Force on launching from New Zealand."
Company leaders in the defence industry praised her appearance at an industry event last Friday. "Judith Collins is a rock star," said one online. "Capable of doing the work publicly and behind closed doors," said another.
RNZ asked if it could attend the event to hear her speak, but was declined.
Launches are checked and approved by national security officials and National Security and Intelligence Minister Christopher Luxon.
But Luxon diverted RNZ's questions about NC3 to the Defence Ministry.
RNZ has approached Collins for comment.
The US Embassy said it had "nothing further to provide".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Chair refuses to apologise, rejects use of ‘kia ora' in council email
Environment Southland has eight catchment committees across the region. Photo: ODT/Supplied A chair of a southern council group is unrepentant about his behaviour at a recent meeting, which was dubbed "disrespectful" by a council leader. Mataura catchment liaison committee chair Hugh Gardyne has also rejected the use of 'kia ora' in an email reprimanding him for his actions. The committee Gardyne oversees is one of eight in the region that supports Environment Southland with local river work. In May, Gardyne gave a blunt presentation to councillors, alleging catchment management was in "a state of paralysis" under the watch of the council chief executive and that communication was ineffective with the general manager in charge. He was shut down at the end of his talk, when he mentioned an abatement notice later revealed to be one [ issued by Environment Southland against itself]. A letter from Environment Southland chair Nicol Horrell on 28 May warned Gardyne of his behaviour, saying parts of his presentation were factually incorrect and disrespectful. "My intention is both to correct your understanding of the facts, and to inform you that councillors will not tolerate any criticism levelled at staff in public meetings or disrespectful behaviour," Horrell wrote. He added it was incorrect to suggest catchment work was in a state of paralysis and accused Gardyne of not having all the facts. "I would be interested to know from where you are getting your information." The letter ended with a suggestion that Gardyne apologise to the chief executive and manager in question, but Gardyne has defended his actions, saying his criticism was about questioning professional ability. "It doesn't, in my opinion, deserve a response or an apology." Hugh Gardyne chairs the Mataura catchment liaison committee, which helps Environment Southland with river management. Photo: ODT/Supplied Gardyne said he would speak at council again in the future and the response from the general manager had been "great", following the presentation. Separately, he also took exception with the use of 'kia ora' in the email sent by Horrell, which delivered the reprimanding letter. Gardyne requested he instead be addressed with 'hello' or 'dear'. Horrell told Local Democracy Reporting using the te reo Māori greeting was commonplace and he didn't think its use would be Gardyne's biggest issue. "I would have thought that that's almost a wee bit racist." In a letter back to Horrell, Gardyne doubled down on perceived issues with river management and questioned whether the chair's concerns were shared by other members. Environment Southland oversees eight catchment liaison committees, which help the council develop annual maintenance programmes and budgets, as well as provide a local point of contact. Gardyne has been involved with the Mataura group since the early 1990s. Last month, the council said it was working to improve communication with its catchment committees. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sucrose doesn't stop long-term impacts on preterm baby development
By Mia Mclean of This story was originally published on The Conversation. Babies born before 32 weeks gestation who have procedures in hospital that cause pain, such as the routine heel prick, suffer long-term consequences. Photo: Neil Salter Infants born very preterm spend weeks or even months in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) while their immature brains are still developing. During this time, they receive up to 16 painful procedures every day . The most common is a routine heel prick used to collect a blood sample. Suctioning of the infant's airways is also common. While many of these procedures provide critical care, we know they are acutely painful . Even tearing tape off the skin can be painful. We also know, from decades of research, that preterm babies' exposure to daily painful invasive procedures is related to altered brain development , stress functioning and poorer cognitive and behavioural outcomes . The commonest strategy to manage acute pain in preterm babies is to give them sucrose, a sugar solution. But my recent research with Canadian colleagues shows this doesn't stop these long-term impacts. In New Zealand, there is no requirement to document all procedures or pain treatments. But as the findings from our Canadian study show, we urgently need research to improve long-term health outcomes for children born prematurely. We collected data on the number of procedures, clinical exposures and sucrose doses from three NICUs across Canada. One of these sites does not use sucrose for acute pain management. This meant we were able to compare outcomes for children who received sucrose during their NICU stay and those who did not, without having to randomly assign infants to different care as you would in a randomised controlled trial - the gold standard approach. Very early born babies can spend weeks and months in a Newborn Intensive Care Unit. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly At 18 months of age, when children born preterm are typically seen for a follow-up, parents report on their child's behaviour. Our findings replicate earlier research: very preterm babies who were exposed to painful procedures early in life showed more anxiety and depressive symptoms by toddlerhood. Our findings are similar regarding a child's cognition and language , backing results from other studies . We found no link between preterm babies' later behaviour and how much sucrose they were given to manage pain. Sucrose is thought to activate centres of the brain that modulate pain and lead to the release of endorphins , but the exact mechanism remains unclear. It has become the worldwide standard of care for acute neonatal pain, but it doesn't seem to be helping in the long term. About one in 13 babies are born preterm each year in Aotearoa New Zealand. Some 1-2% are very preterm, two to four months early. Māori and other ethnic minorities are at higher risk . Studies in New Zealand show children born very preterm have up to a three-fold risk of emotional disorders in preschool and by school age . This remains evident through adulthood. Sucrose may stop preterm babies from showing signs of pain , but physiological and neurological pain responses nevertheless happen. As is the case internationally, sucrose is used widely in New Zealand, but there is considerable variation in protocols of use across hospitals. No national guidelines for best practice exist. Infant pain should be assessed, but international data suggest this isn't always the case. What's more, pain isn't always managed . Routine assessment of pain and parent education videos are useful initiatives to encourage pain management. Minimising the number of procedures is recommended by international bodies . Advances in clinical care, including the use of less invasive ventilation support and the inclusion of parents in the daily care of their infant, have seen the number of procedures decrease . Pain management guidelines also help, but whether these changes improve outcomes in the long-term, we don't know yet. We do know there are other ways of treating neonatal pain and minimising long-term impacts. Placing a newborn on a parent's bare chest, skin-to-skin, effectively reduces short and long-term effects of neonatal pain. For times when whānau are not able to be in the NICU, we have limited evidence that other pain management strategies, such as expressed breast milk , are effective. Our recent research cements this: sucrose isn't helping as we thought. Understanding which pain management strategies should be used for short and long-term benefits of this vulnerable population could make a big difference in the lives of these babies. This requires additional research and a different approach, while considering what is culturally acceptable in Aotearoa New Zealand. If the strategies we are currently using aren't working, we need to think creatively about how to limit the impact of pain on children born prematurely.

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Leonie Freeman and Mike Willlams Part 1
Te Pāti Māori MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipa-Clarke was among those to perform a haka, at Parliament, after the first reading of the Treaty Principles Bill, on 14 November, 2024. Photo: RNZ/ Samuel Rillstone Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Leonie Freeman and Mike Williams. They discuss the fallout from Te Pāti Māori haka protest; Trump vs Musk: grab the popcorn, and the issues around political party affiliation in local politics.