Is the universe gently twirling? Scientists say the universe could be completing one rotation in nearly 500 billion years
The universe is a place of mind-bending mysteries and vast, ancient expanse that is still not fully understood. Our cosmos never ceases to surprise us, be it the Big Bang, black holes, dark matter, or the accelerating expansion of space. There have been decades of research and advanced technologies like the James Webb Space Telescope, which have been constantly researching this, but still, the astronomers have some fundamental questions about the universe's structure and behaviour remaining in their bag.
Now, a new study from the
University of Hawai'i Institute for Astronomy
has probably brought us one step closer to resolving some unknown mysteries about the universe.
A Universe that spins?
In a study published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, astrophysicist István Szapudi and his team suggest that the universe could be slowly rotating, completing one full revolution roughly every
500 billion years
. That is very slow and too subtle for current instruments to directly detect, but it could be enough to change the way space behaves on a cosmic scale.
The idea comes from a simple observation that everything in the universe spins. Planets, stars, galaxies, and even black holes all rotate.
So why not the universe itself?
'To paraphrase the Greek philosopher Heraclitus of Ephesus, who famously said, 'Panta Rhei', which means that everything moves, we thought that perhaps Panta Kykloutai – everything turns,' said Szapudi, lead author of the study, as quoted by the University of Hawai'i news release.
What is the Hubble Tension?
The Hubble tension is a long-standing difference between two different ways of measuring the universe's expansion rate. One method is through using nearby supernovae and galaxies, which gives a higher value than another method that looks at cosmic microwave background radiation from the early universe. These conflicting numbers have confused scientists and led some to suggest that entirely new physics may be needed.
But Szapudi's team created a mathematical model that includes a small amount of cosmic rotation, without breaking any known laws of physics. 'Much to our surprise, we found that our model with rotation resolves the paradox without contradicting current astronomical measurements,' Szapudi said.
What is practical about the model?
What makes this model particularly suitable is that it doesn't require new theories or particles. It fits within standard physics by also offering a novel explanation for a decades-old cosmic puzzle.
"It is compatible with other models that assume rotation. Therefore, perhaps, everything really does turn. Or, Panta Kykloutai!' Szapudi added.
If this rotating universe theory holds up under further studies, it could be quite a progress in how we understand the cosmos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Hint of ‘life' beyond Earth? Study reveals ‘surprising' biological activity on a distant planet
In the age of scientific evolution, technological advancements, and space exploration, we have often pondered over this one question for years – is there any planet beyond Earth that could sustain what we know as 'life'? Any planet that might be habitable for living beings in the future? In April 2025, the scientific community was abuzz with a groundbreaking announcement: astronomers had detected dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in the atmosphere of exoplanet K2-18b, located 124 light-years from Earth. DMS is a compound produced solely by biological processes on Earth, primarily by marine phytoplankton. This discovery was hailed as the strongest evidence yet of potential extraterrestrial life beyond our solar system. However, just weeks later, scientists are urging caution and emphasizing that the initial excitement may have been premature. Why? While the detection of DMS is intriguing, it does not definitively prove the existence of life on K2-18b. The compound could also be produced by unknown non-biological processes, and further observations are needed to confirm its origin. As per Dr. Luis Welbanks, a postdoctoral research scholar at Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration, 'It was exciting, but it immediately raised several red flags because that claim of a potential biosignature would be historic, but also the significance or the strength of the statistical evidence seemed to be too high for the data.' What is K2-18b? K2-18b, classified as a "Hycean" world, is a super-Earth exoplanet, meaning it's larger and more massive than Earth, that orbits a red dwarf star called K2-18. It's located about 124 light-years away from Earth in the constellation Leo. The planet is in its star's habitable zone, meaning it could potentially have liquid water on its surface, according to NASA. The exoplanet has a hydrogen-rich atmosphere and a subsurface ocean. This environment could potentially support microbial life. In addition to DMS, the James Webb Space Telescope has detected methane and carbon dioxide in the planet's atmosphere, further suggesting conditions that might be conducive to life. However, despite these promising signs and excitement surrounding the same, scientists remain cautious. The detection of DMS alone is not sufficient to confirm the presence of life. As Professor Nikku Madhusudhan, of the University of Cambridge and the lead author of the April study , noted, "We have to question ourselves both on whether the signal is real and what it means." The initial excitement surrounding the discovery of DMS on K2-18b underscores the growing interest in the search for extraterrestrial life. However, it also highlights the complexities and challenges of interpreting data from distant exoplanets. Nikku Madhusudhan and his colleagues have conducted additional research that they say reinforces their previous finding about the planet. And it's likely that additional observations and research from multiple groups of scientists are on the horizon. The succession of research papers revolving around K2-18b offers a glimpse of the scientific process unfolding in real time. It's a window into the complexities and nuances of how researchers search for evidence of life beyond Earth — and shows why the burden of proof is so high and difficult to reach. However, the search for life beyond Earth continues. 'Are we really alone in this vast universe?' As scientists continue to analyze the data and conduct further observations, the prospective answers to that very question remain open. Analysis finds evidence for many exoplanets made of water and rock around small stars
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Astronomers Uncover Most Powerful Explosion Since The Big Bang
Astronomers from the University of Hawai'i's Institute for Astronomy have identified a new class of cosmic explosions, termed "extreme nuclear transients" (ENTs), marking the most energetic events observed since the Big Bang. These phenomena occur when massive stars, at least three times the mass of our Sun, are torn apart by supermassive black holes at the centres of distant galaxies. The resulting explosions release energy equivalent to what 100 Suns would emit over their entire lifespans, making them visible across vast cosmic distances. This discovery offers new insights into the dynamic interactions between stars and black holes in the universe. The team's findings were detailed today in the journal Science Advances. "We've observed stars getting ripped apart as tidal disruption events for over a decade, but these ENTs are different beasts, reaching brightnesses nearly ten times more than what we typically see," said Jason Hinkle, in a statement, who led the study as the final piece of his doctoral research at IfA. "Not only are ENTs far brighter than normal tidal disruption events, but they remain luminous for years, far surpassing the energy output of even the brightest known supernova explosions." The immense luminosities and energies of these ENTs are truly unprecedented. The most energetic ENT studied, named Gaia18cdj, emitted an astonishing 25 times more energy than the most energetic supernovae known. While typical supernovae emit as much energy in just one year as the sun does in its 10 billion-year lifetime, ENTs radiate the energy of 100 suns over a single year. As per a news release by W M Keck Observatory, ENTs were first uncovered when Hinkle began a systematic search of public transient surveys for long-lived flares emanating from the centres of galaxies. He identified two unusual flares in data from the European Space Agency's Gaia mission that brightened over a timescale much longer than known transients and without characteristics common to known transients. "Gaia doesn't tell you what a transient is, just that something changed in brightness," said Hinkle. "But when I saw these smooth, long-lived flares from the centres of distant galaxies, I knew we were looking at something unusual."
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Fall of Solahkhambi pillars: Conservation efforts by state raise eyebrows of experts
Bhopal: The pillars of 'Solahkhambi', a Paramar era creation with a startling visual resemblance to the Greek Acropolis, were built in the 10th-11th century. They stood tall, facing the vagaries of nature for thousands of years, but are now grounded. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They are set to be erected soon under a 'conservation' effort by the state archaeology department. This effort has raised eyebrows, leading to concerns from conservation enthusiasts and experts. A short drive from the state capital, Bhopal, the Solahkhambi site is situated in Bihar Kotra village of Rajgarh district, around 3 kilometres from Chidikoh Bird Sanctuary. Although the name suggests 16 pillars, the structure had 14 pillars mounted on a platform, which stood for thousands of years until last week when they were 'opened' or brought down. The site is a protected area under the state archaeology department. The state archaeology department has given the work for the conservation of the site to the Indian National Trust for Conservation of Art and Heritage (INTACH), a non-government body working for the conservation of heritage. Under the conservation efforts, INTACH has 'opened' the pillars, brought them down, and will be erecting them again after strengthening the pillars. Officials from the directorate of archaeology say that the move was undertaken after all necessary evaluations and procedures were followed. "Proper evaluation was done. Efforts were made to see whether anything could be done externally to ensure the safety of the heritage site. But its base was not strong, and the pillars were slanting. The best option was to re-install the pillars. The same structures will be installed again, with no changes made. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Some repairs, using the same materials, will be done if required. All procedures have been followed," Assistant Engineer, Directorate of Archaeology, Santosh Namdeo, told TOI. Sources from the department said that during the conservation efforts undertaken around a decade ago, some weight was put on the roof of the structure, which also added to the deterioration of its base. "A detailed and long evaluation process was adopted before starting the conservation efforts. Its platform or the base on which it stands has been weakened. It was a months-long process of evaluation. Thereafter, a detailed report was submitted to the govt. It was then evaluated by the govt before giving a go-ahead. It was only after due approvals that the pillars were opened up. The pillars will be re-installed after conservation," Conservation Architect from INTACH, Raghav Sharma, told TOI. Convener of the INTACH Bhopal chapter, MM Upadhyay, said, "We always ensure that there are no changes in the structures during conservation. Every minute detail is taken care of." Meanwhile, the move has raised eyebrows among conservation enthusiasts. "The first principle of conservation is that there should be minimum intervention. And the second important principle is whatever work you do should be reversible, like if any prop is installed to support the structure, it is removable. Thus, minimum intervention and reversible intervention are two very important aspects of conservation. And the third most important thing is the structure should be evaluated for movement. If a pillar was bent, it should have been seen whether it still has movement or has stabilised. It should have been observed for a year or so before taking such measures. It is only under extreme conditions that moves like this could be undertaken; otherwise, interventions should be minimal," Conservation Architect and former member of the National Monument Authority, Meera Ishwar Das, told TOI. Bhopal: The pillars of 'Solahkhambi', a Paramar era creation with a startling visual resemblance to the Greek Acropolis, were built in the 10th-11th century. They stood tall, facing the vagaries of nature for thousands of years, but are now grounded. They are set to be erected soon under a 'conservation' effort by the state archaeology department. This effort has raised eyebrows, leading to concerns from conservation enthusiasts and experts. A short drive from the state capital, Bhopal, the Solahkhambi site is situated in Bihar Kotra village of Rajgarh district, around 3 kilometres from Chidikoh Bird Sanctuary. Although the name suggests 16 pillars, the structure had 14 pillars mounted on a platform, which stood for thousands of years until last week when they were 'opened' or brought down. The site is a protected area under the state archaeology department. The state archaeology department has given the work for the conservation of the site to the Indian National Trust for Conservation of Art and Heritage (INTACH), a non-government body working for the conservation of heritage. Under the conservation efforts, INTACH has 'opened' the pillars, brought them down, and will be erecting them again after strengthening the pillars. Officials from the directorate of archaeology say that the move was undertaken after all necessary evaluations and procedures were followed. "Proper evaluation was done. Efforts were made to see whether anything could be done externally to ensure the safety of the heritage site. But its base was not strong, and the pillars were slanting. The best option was to re-install the pillars. The same structures will be installed again, with no changes made. Some repairs, using the same materials, will be done if required. All procedures have been followed," Assistant Engineer, Directorate of Archaeology, Santosh Namdeo, told TOI. Sources from the department said that during the conservation efforts undertaken around a decade ago, some weight was put on the roof of the structure, which also added to the deterioration of its base. "A detailed and long evaluation process was adopted before starting the conservation efforts. Its platform or the base on which it stands has been weakened. It was a months-long process of evaluation. Thereafter, a detailed report was submitted to the govt. It was then evaluated by the govt before giving a go-ahead. It was only after due approvals that the pillars were opened up. The pillars will be re-installed after conservation," Conservation Architect from INTACH, Raghav Sharma, told TOI. Convener of the INTACH Bhopal chapter, MM Upadhyay, said, "We always ensure that there are no changes in the structures during conservation. Every minute detail is taken care of." Meanwhile, the move has raised eyebrows among conservation enthusiasts. "The first principle of conservation is that there should be minimum intervention. And the second important principle is whatever work you do should be reversible, like if any prop is installed to support the structure, it is removable. Thus, minimum intervention and reversible intervention are two very important aspects of conservation. And the third most important thing is the structure should be evaluated for movement. If a pillar was bent, it should have been seen whether it still has movement or has stabilised. It should have been observed for a year or so before taking such measures. It is only under extreme conditions that moves like this could be undertaken; otherwise, interventions should be minimal," Conservation Architect and former member of the National Monument Authority, Meera Ishwar Das, told TOI.
