State pensioners could get extra £4,050 in payments through these two schemes
State pensioners have been encouraged to check if they are eligible for two schemes that could provide an extra £4,000 a year in payments.
Payment rates rose 4.1% last month in line with the triple lock, raising the full new state pension from £221.20 a week to £230.25 a week.
But an expert has warned the rise may not be enough to cover rising living costs. Rebecca Lamb, external relations manager at Money Wellness, said: 'While the 4.1% increase in state pension payments is welcome, it's unlikely to keep pace with the continued rise in living costs, especially for essentials like energy, food, and rent.
'For many pensioners, particularly those already struggling with debt or a tight budget, this uplift won't go far enough on its own.'
She pointed pensioners to two ways they could boost their income. Ms Lamb said: 'To make the most of the increase, it's worth checking whether you're eligible for extra support.
'Pension Credit can boost your income, and schemes like the Warm Home Discount can help cut your energy bills.'
The average Pension Credit claim is worth over £3,900 a year, while the Warm Home Discount takes £150 off your electricity bill so with these two benefits, you could effectively boost your income by £4,050.
Pension Credits top up the income of those of state pension age on a low income, up to £227.10 a week for single claimants and £346.60 a week for couples.
But you could get more than this as there are extra amounts depending on your situation, such as if you care for someone or if you have savings.
Claiming the benefit also opens up access to other Government help, including the Winter Fuel Payment, worth £200 or £300 last winter, and a free TV licence for claimants aged 75 and over.
Claimants may also be eligible for a council tax reduction, for housing benefit and for help towards NHS costs.
The Warm Home Discount is a one-off discount where your electricity supplier applies the discount to your bill, if they are signed up to the scheme.
Those on the Guarantee Credit part of Pension Credit – the weekly top-up element – will qualify as well some other people on a low income.
Ms Lamb also encouraged pensioners that this time of year is a good time to do a review of their budget. She said: 'Start with the essentials and look for small ways to reduce spending.
'Even small savings can add up over time. And if you're worried about debt or bills, don't wait. There are free, confidential services that can help you regain control and feel more financially secure.'
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
27 minutes ago
- News24
Trump-Musk feud: ‘Alphas' clash triggers Russian mockery and EU invite
Brendan Smialowski/AFP US President Donald Trump has no plans to speak to billionaire Elon Musk and may even ditch his red Tesla car, the White House said on Friday after a stunning public divorce fraught with risk for both men. Trump's camp insisted that he wanted to move on from the row with the South African-born Musk, with officials telling AFP that the tech tycoon had requested a call but that the president was not interested. The Republican instead intended to focus on getting the US Congress to pass his 'big, beautiful' spending bill - Musk's harsh criticisms of which had triggered the meltdown on Thursday. Fallout from the blow up between the world's richest person and its most powerful could be significant, as Trump risks political damage and Musk faces the loss of huge US government contracts. Trump phoned reporters at several US broadcast networks to insist that he was looking past the row. He called Musk 'the man who has lost his mind' in a call to ABC and told CBS he was 'totally' focused on the presidency. The White House meanwhile squashed earlier reports that they would talk. 'The president does not intend to speak to Musk today,' a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity. A second official said it was 'true' that Musk had requested a call. 'Alphas having a go at each other' Musk's father, Errol weighed in on the spat in an interview with Al Arabiya, saying, 'it seems a bit silly to me'. Labelling money that is being given to the Democrats to vote for the bill as 'schemes', Errol said Musk is concerned and feels it is 'not the right thing to do', although he hasn't spoken to Musk since the fallout. The spat is 'just a bump in the road,' according to Errol, who says he messaged his son and told him to 'make sure this fizzles out. Now.' When people have been through a great deal of stress, as they've been... you can expect this kind of thing. Eventually, people reach a point where they lash out. I think there's a bit of tiredness here. Errol Musk He believes the president will prevail, because the Americans are '100% behind Trump'. The reasoning behind Musk bringing up the Epstein files, according to Errol, is because people lash out. 'That's a silly mistake. Let the innocent person cast the first stone.' In Errol's opinion, 'it's just elephant bulls or alphas, having a go at each other'. The feud between Trump and Musk provoked chatter, mockery and amusement among the ruling class in Moscow, where one senior official joked about hosting peace talks and another said Musk should bring his businesses to Russia. 'Elon, don't be upset!' nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, who once ran Russia's space programme, wrote on Musk's X social media site. 'If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity.' Elon @elonmusk, don't be upset! You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us - a "Bars-Sarmat" fighter. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity. — ROGOZIN (@Rogozin) June 6, 2025 Dmitry Medvedev, a senior security official and former president, posted: 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys!' We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment. Don't fight, guys😱! — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 6, 2025 The public feud between the US president and the world's richest man was an easy target for Russian politicians who have a history of gloating over perceived turmoil in Washington. Musk 'very welcome' in Europe Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the European Commission quipped on Friday that Musk is 'very welcome' in Europe. At the commission's daily briefing, spokesperson Paula Pinho was asked whether Musk had reached out to the European Union (EU) with a view to relocating his businesses, or setting up new ones. 'He's very welcome,' she replied with a smile. The commission's spokesperson for tech matters, Thomas Regnier, followed up by stressing - straight-faced - that 'everyone is very welcome indeed to start and to scale in the EU'. 'That is precisely the objective of Choose Europe,' he said, referencing an EU initiative in favour of start-ups and expanding businesses. READ | Chainsaw politics: How Elon Musk shot up in Trump orbit before flaming out of DOGE Musk has been a frequent critic of the 27-nation EU - attacking its digital laws as censorship and berating its leaders, while cheering on the ascendant far-right in Germany and elsewhere. The tycoon's row with Trump saw the president threaten to strip him of government contracts estimated at $18 billion - with Musk vowing in response to end a critical US spaceship programme. Explaining the rift, Trump said Musk had gone 'crazy' about a plan to end electric vehicle subsidies in the new US spending bill - as the bust-up sent shares in Musk's Tesla car company plunging. Continuing with its mockery on Friday, Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia's most powerful state media executives, mocked it as an example of 'modern US political culture' - 'Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse.' Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has in the past tried to interest Musk in cooperating with Russia on flights to Mars, asked on X: 'Why can't we all just get along?' He then asked Grok, X's AI chatbot, how Musk and Trump could reconcile. Why can't we all just get along? — Kirill A. Dmitriev (@kadmitriev) June 5, 2025 Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, when asked about the clash, said it was an internal matter for the US, though he was confident that Trump would handle it. 'Presidents handle a huge number of different things at the same time, some more and some less important,' Peskov said. Others saw clear benefit for Russia from the feud distracting Washington. 'We can just be glad that they won't have time for us,' said Konstantin Malofeyev, a hardline nationalist tycoon, who said it was now 'the best time to strike back' against Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump is considering offloading a Tesla he said he bought earlier this year to show support for Musk, a White House official said on Friday. The red electric vehicle, which retails for around $80 000, was still in a parking lot on the White House grounds on Friday, an AFP reporter said. 'He's thinking about it, yes,' a senior White House official told AFP when asked if the Republican would sell or give away the Tesla. Tesla stocks had tanked more than 14% on Thursday amid the row, losing some $100 billion of the company's market value, but leapt back in early trading on Friday. Brendan Smialowski/AFP Trump, who does not drive as a president, said he was buying the Tesla in March to boost support for his mega-donor, whose brand - and bottom line - has been hit hard by public outrage over his role in slashing US government jobs. At a choreographed publicity stunt that turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla showroom, Trump praised the EV as a 'great product' and lashed out on social media at 'Radical Left' attacks against the world's richest person and his company.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Tesla Shares Caught in the Middle of Musk-Trump Bromance Breakup
When President Donald Trump won the election in November, investors viewed Tesla Inc. as one of the biggest winners. That bet now seems to be on shaky ground after investors watched the once formidable alliance dissolve in real time. Simmering tensions over Trump's signature tax-and-spending bill erupted into a public war of words on Thursday, with Trump mulling an end government contracts and subsidies for Tesla and Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Musk said he would decommission a SpaceX aircraft used by the US, only to walk back his threat later in the day.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who owns the news? It must not be a group of foreign powers
Who owns the news? Much of the Left has been obsessed with the issue for over a century. They have long railed against press barons and their supposed bias. So it is perhaps surprising that this Labour Government is taking such a lackadaisical approach to foreign states having substantial holdings in British newspapers. The last Conservative government back in December 2023 intervened to put on hold and scrutinise the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a company backed by Sheikh Mansour, the deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates. Columnists, including Charles Moore, The Telegraph's former editor, rightly argued that even if there was no actual interference in the newspaper's editorial line, there would be the perception that the paper would no longer be independent. This would fatally undermine the newspaper's standing by throwing away its reputation for fearless reporting, whatever the reality of the situation. The then government listened and last year, in the Digital, Media and Competitions Act, introduced a new regulatory regime to restrict foreign state ownership of newspapers and news magazines. But this Act only set out the broad principle, not the details of how it would be implemented. A total ban would come with its own problems. There would be little risk of editorial interference if, say, the sovereign wealth fund of Norway was a passive investor owning 3pc or 4pc in a UK-listed media company. During the consultations, it was proposed that a 5pc limit may be appropriate to allow for such holdings. Last month the new Government announced that the threshold would not be 5pc, but actually 15pc. I and many of my colleagues in the House of Lords have serious misgivings about this much higher limit, but it is one we can live with. However, there is another aspect of the draft regulations which is unacceptable. The 15pc threshold is not cumulative, it applies to each individual holding. This means that there would be nothing to stop multiple states each owning 15pc of a newspaper. It has been reported that after The Telegraph's proposed takeover by RedBird Capital, Sheikh Mansour intends to retain up to a 15pc stake in the newspaper. With the current proposals there would be nothing to stop, say, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Bahrain from each taking 15pc holdings. A cumulative 60pc of a British newspaper owned by foreign states is a very different proposition. The guarantees against foreign control would have evaporated. Has this potential scenario arisen as a result of an oversight by Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary? Alongside 50 of my fellow peers, I have written to Ms Nandy asking for clarification. Signatories include former chancellor Lord Lamont, former trade secretary Lord Lilley, long-time chairman of the 1922 committee Lord Brady, ex-director of public prosecutions Lord Macdonald and the current chairman of Ipso, the independent press regulator, Lord Faulks. Our fears could be easily assuaged by simply amending the proposed regulations to ensure that 15pc is a cap on total foreign ownership. If the move is deliberate, it raises serious questions about this Government's commitment to a free press. The statutory instrument implementing the Government's regulations has now been laid and will shortly come before both Houses of Parliament. If the proposals reach the Lords in their current form, I and many of my colleagues will not be able to support the measure. The Telegraph's ownership has been left in limbo for two years so far. It is time for the new regulatory framework to be put in place that will allow its smooth transfer to new owners. But this must be done in a way that entrenches the traditional freedoms of our press. The issues are much wider than the future of just one newspaper. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
