logo
Why the Pacific tsunami was smaller than expected — a geologist explains

Why the Pacific tsunami was smaller than expected — a geologist explains

The earthquake near the east coast of the Kamchatka peninsula in Russia on July 30 2025 generated tsunami waves that have reached Hawaii and coastal areas of the US mainland. The earthquake's magnitude of 8.8 is significant, potentially making it one of the largest quakes ever recorded.
Countries around much of the Pacific, including in east Asia, North and South America, issued alerts and in some cases evacuation orders in anticipation of potentially devastating waves. Waves of up to four metres hit coastal towns in Kamchatka near where the earthquake struck, apparently causing severe damage in some areas.
But in other places waves have been smaller than expected, including in Japan, which is much closer to Kamchatka than most of the Pacific rim. Many warnings have now been downgraded or lifted with relatively little damage. It seems that for the size of the earthquake, the tsunami has been rather smaller than might have been the case. To understand why, we can look to geology.
The earthquake was associated with the Pacific tectonic plate, one of several major pieces of the Earth's crust. This pushes north-west against the part of the North American plate that extends west into Russia, and is forced downwards beneath the Kamchatka peninsula in a process called subduction.
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) says the average rate of convergence — a measure of plate movement — is around 80mm per year. This is one of the highest rates of relative movement at a plate boundary.
But this movement tends to take place as an occasional sudden movement of several metres. In any earthquake of this type and size, the displacement may occur over a contact area between the two tectonic plates of slightly less than 400km by 150km, according to the USGS.
The Earth's crust is made of rock that is very hard and brittle at the small scale and near the surface. But over very large areas and depths, it can deform with slightly elastic behaviour. As the subducting slab — the Pacific plate — pushes forward and descends, the depth of the ocean floor may suddenly change.
A map of tsunami warnings on Wednesday stretching from the west to east of the Pacific Ocean.
Nearer to the coastline, the crust of the overlying plate may be pushed upward as the other pushed underneath, or — as was the case off Sumatra in 2004 — the outer edge of the overlying plate may be dragged down somewhat before springing back a few metres.
It is these near-instantaneous movements of the seabed that generate tsunami waves by displacing huge volumes of ocean water. For example, if the seabed rose just one metre across an area of 200 by 100km where the water is 1km deep, then the volume of water displaced would fill Wembley stadium to the roof 17.5 million times.
A one-metre rise like this will then propagate away from the area of the uplift in all directions, interacting with normal wind-generated ocean waves, tides and the shape of the sea floor to produce a series of tsunami waves. In the open ocean, the tsunami wave would not be noticed by boats and ships, which is why a cruise ship in Hawaii was quickly moved out to sea.
Waves sculpted by the seabed
The tsunami waves travel across the deep ocean at up to 440 miles per hour, so they may be expected to reach any Pacific Ocean coastline within 24 hours. However, some of their energy will dissipate as they cross the ocean, so they will usually be less hazardous at the furthest coastlines away from the earthquake.
The hazard arises from how the waves are modified as the seabed rises towards a shoreline. They will slow and, as a result, grow in height, creating a surge of water towards and then beyond the normal coastline.
The Kamchatka earthquake was slightly deeper in the Earth's crust (20.7km) than the Sumatran earthquake of 2004 and the Japanese earthquake of 2011. This will have resulted in somewhat less vertical displacement of the seabed, with the movement of that seabed being slightly less instantaneous. This is why we've seen tsunami warnings lifted some time before any tsunami waves would have arrived there.
Alan Dykes, Associate Professor in Engineering Geology, Kingston University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US algal bloom expert suggests modified clay as mitigation measure for SA outbreak
US algal bloom expert suggests modified clay as mitigation measure for SA outbreak

ABC News

time13 hours ago

  • ABC News

US algal bloom expert suggests modified clay as mitigation measure for SA outbreak

A US scientist invited to South Australia for his algal bloom expertise has advised the state government that modified clay could be an effective small scale mitigation measure — but warned there is no way to predict when the bloom will disappear. Algal bloom expert Don Anderson — a senior scientist at Massachusetts-based research organisation The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — addressed a meeting of the state government's algal bloom taskforce on Thursday. The size of the toxic bloom off SA's coast — responsible for widespread marine deaths and economic disruption in the fishing and aquaculture industries — is now estimated to be about 4,500 square kilometres. Speaking at a press conference after the meeting, Dr Anderson said South Australia's Karenia mikimotoi bloom was "significant … but I would not call it exceptional". He said he presented the taskforce with "three or four" bloom examples from around the world, but "could have chosen 40 … of this species or group of species causing trouble". "There are many, many outbreaks, so this is a big one — it's not the biggest," he said. Asked how long it would take for South Australia's bloom to disperse, Dr Anderson said: "It's an obvious question, and even the best experts in the world unfortunately can't answer that." Dr Anderson said he presented the taskforce with examples of toxic blooms that occurred off the coasts of Russia and Alaska, which disappeared within a couple of months and nine months, respectively. "Nobody really can explain exactly why they disappeared, the one in Alaska is interesting because it made it through their winter, severe winter," he said. "When it disappeared, [it] was the beginning of the springtime in April … when you think the days are longer, the waters warming up, it should be doing well. "The spectrum of durations is months, six months, eight months, potentially longer." Dr Anderson, who was invited by the state government to Adelaide, said he presented the meeting with several measures to address the bloom. The "most applicable" to South Australia, he said, would be a modified clay that can bind to the algal cells in surface waters. This solution forces the algal cells to the bottom of the water, where they stop growing or die. But Dr Anderson warned that clay can only be a small-scale solution given the amount needed to tackle the toxic algae. "You don't want to try to cover 100 or 500 square kilometres with this material — no-one could expect that would be a prudent action," he said. "What makes sense is to try [it] on a small scale, experimental scale, 2,000 square metres, learn how it works in this organism, learn what capabilities you need, what logistics you need, and then go from there." The state government on Thursday released the latest water testing results and satellite imagery tracking the bloom's movements. The imagery, according to a government summary, shows high chlorophyll-a levels around the Gulf St Vincent coastline — from north of Edithburgh on Yorke Peninsula to the southern tip of Fleurieu Peninsula — as well as the Spencer Gulf's western and eastern coastlines. Chlorophyll-a does not necessarily indicate the presence of a harmful algal bloom, but does indicate algae concentrations. Decreased levels of the pigment were detected across the metropolitan coastline and the Upper and Central Gulf St Vincent. The bloom is maintaining "a strong presence" in the Gulf St Vincent and tracking around in a clockwise direction, according to South Australian Research and Development Institute executive director Mike Steer. "There's also still evidence of the Karenia species on the western side of Spencer Gulf up to Lucky Bay," he said. But the bloom does not appear to be moving towards the northern Spencer Gulf, Professor Steer added. The area is home to the unique Australian giant cuttlefish, which the state government wants to protect from the bloom. Meanwhile, weekly water testing results showed Karenia algae cell counts increased at 16 sites, decreased at 14 and remained steady 35. Asked how long the bloom would last, Professor Steer said: "International experts can't even tell us." "The only way that we can keep on top of this is to understand the role of the oceanography, the role of the environment on the distribution and abundance of Karenia," he said. "And there's a fair bit of work to do there before we make any bold predictions."

'Completely captivating': Researchers explore Fiji's deep sea for the first time to collect data for ocean protection
'Completely captivating': Researchers explore Fiji's deep sea for the first time to collect data for ocean protection

ABC News

time18 hours ago

  • ABC News

'Completely captivating': Researchers explore Fiji's deep sea for the first time to collect data for ocean protection

We make phone calls all over the world here at Nesia Daily, but we never thought we'd make a call to the deep sea! A team of scientists and filmmakers from National Geographic has launched a groundbreaking expedition in Fiji, exploring previously unstudied deep-sea zones and identifying key biodiversity hotspots, some at depths of 6,000 metres below the surface. This mission by Pristine Seas is part of a five-year Global Expedition project to support communities and governments in the Pacific in their efforts to protect the ocean. After eight months of preparation, the ABC's reporter in Fiji, Lice Movono, joined the crew as the first iTaukei woman and first Pacific journalist to dive in a submersible in Fijian waters. Lice Movono is an ABC journalist in Fiji and the first iTaukei woman to take part in a mission exploring the deep-sea. Speaking to us aboard the Argo research vessel, Lice described the life-changing experience of "basically living in a National Geographic documentary" and being "completely captivated by the reality of what's under the ocean". "Traditionally, I am a protector of the ocean, and now, [being] on this expedition, I'm able to see the ocean through science, and I can intertwine that with my spiritual connection to the ocean." The research collected on this expedition aims to advance knowledge of Fiji's marine ecosystems, strengthen ocean conservation, and support Fiji's goal of sustainably managing 100 per cent of its waters and fully protecting 30 per cent of its ocean by 2030.

Queensland's cyclone-proof buildings survive earthquakes, but tremors can bring insurance challenges
Queensland's cyclone-proof buildings survive earthquakes, but tremors can bring insurance challenges

ABC News

time3 days ago

  • ABC News

Queensland's cyclone-proof buildings survive earthquakes, but tremors can bring insurance challenges

The latest earthquake to hit Queensland might not have done any serious damage, but tremors can still cause headaches for home owners. Windows shook across south-east Queensland on Saturday morning as a magnitude-5.6 earthquake struck inland from the Sunshine Coast. Geoscience Australia said the epicentre was about 80 kilometres west of Noosa and 250 kilometres north of Brisbane. It was the largest onshore earthquake in Queensland in half a century, and the biggest to hit the state at all since a 5.8-magnitude earthquake off the coast of Bowen in 2016. Magnitude scales are used to describe the impact of earthquakes. Here's what those scales are and the potential impact or damage each has: Queensland sits toward the bottom of Australian states in terms of earthquake activity. University of Queensland seismologist Dion Weatherley said Australia gets one or two magnitude-5 quakes per year on average, with one every five to 10 years in Queensland. He said the fault responsible for earthquakes felt in Queensland — the line where tectonic plates meet — could potentially generate up to a magnitude-7 quake. The scale of geological time measurement and the relative youth of geosciences means experts are unsure when such an earthquake could hit. "[Magnitude-7s] have a return period of around 25,000 years by estimated standards, so unfortunately we can't say with any certainty," Dr Weatherley said. He said there are no signs earthquake activity is getting more severe. "There's no indication that there's been any major changes in the tectonic plate motions in the past 10 years, 100 years, or even a million years that would suggest that earthquakes should be occurring at a higher rate," he said. Despite the state's relative lack of earthquake experience, Dr Weatherley said Queensland's infrastructure is by nature well-suited to tremors. "We don't design our buildings for earthquakes, but the reality is that engineers are not overly concerned about the structural integrity of our bridges and overpasses and our critical buildings and infrastructure, particularly when it comes to coastal areas further north," he said. Geoscience Australia said it hasn't detected aftershocks from the weekend's earthquake, but it has prompted the organisation to install new "seismic rapid deployment kits" near the Sunshine Coast. When in place, the sensors will measure any potential future aftershocks and give geologists more information about seismic activity in Queensland. Director of extreme weather response at the Insurance Council of Australia, Liam Walter, said earthquake damage wasn't a major priority in Australian insurance. "Earthquake is not a common loss type for Australia," Mr Walter said. "There's not the sort of catastrophic building demolitions that we see in other places, but it is an event that causes damage from time to time." Most domestic private home insurance covers damage to a property by earthquake, Mr Walter said, but this does not mean claims will be approved. Some residents in Muswellbrook in the Upper Hunter in New South Wales struggled to have their claims paid out after a series of earthquakes up to magnitude-4.7 shook the region last year. Insurance companies pointed to "pre-existing" damage as the reason for declining claims. Mr Walter said after an earthquake, people will often do an inventory of their home while in a "hypervigilant" state. "What we tend to find is … people will notice all sorts of cracks and movement and things around the house that they might not have noticed before," he said. "So it's actually quite a sensible thing to do to take regular inventory of your home, the building and your contents, if for no other reason than to make sure you have the right cover. "If you've got a record there … maybe you've taken some photos along the way as well, that could be super helpful when it comes to claim time to demonstrate the condition."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store