Indigenous leaders say Trump's threats to make Canada a 51st state challenges inherent sovereignty
Indigenous leaders in Saskatchewan see the U.S. president's threats to make Canada a 51st state as uninformed about Treaty agreements and First Nations' inherent sovereignty.
Since before his inauguration, President Donald Trump has continuously made comments suggesting Canada is so dependent on its trade and security relationship with the U.S. that it ought to become a state.
Trump has even gone so far as to refer to the Canadian Prime Minister as "Governor Justin Trudeau." Trump's taunts have elicited fiery reactions from the Canadian leader.
Trudeau has repeatedly insisted that Trump's claims will never come to fruition.
Chief Tanya Aguilar-Antiman of Mosquito, Grizzly Bear's Head, Lean Man Assiniboine Nation finds Trump's claims "insulting."
"It's clearly evident that Trump is lacking knowledge of treaties," she told CBC.
Mosquito, Grizzly Bear's Head, Lean Man First Nation, a conglomeration of three nations that were a part of either Treaty 4 or Treaty 6, is located about 115 kilometres northwest of Saskatoon.
WATCH | Prime Minister Justin Trudeau combats U.S. President's claim that country will annex Canada:
Canada is never going to become 51st state, Trudeau says
12 days ago
Duration 1:40
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the government has to take U.S. President Donald Trump's threats to annex Canada seriously — even if it's 'never going to happen' — and 'fold that into our thinking' as the country deals with escalating trade threats from the U.S.
In a long statement, Chief Rodger Redman of Standing Buffalo Dakota Nation, located northeast of Regina, said hearing Trump's comments about Canada becoming a 51st state led him to pause and consider Indigenous history of resistance.
"Our connection to these lands isn't just historical — it's living, breathing," Redman said, in part.
"Our ancestors fought to protect these lands. We honour them by ensuring that our sovereignty remains intact today. So, when I hear talk of a 51st state, I don't just hear politics — I hear a reminder of why we stand strong, why we continue to assert our rights."
Redman said while the community is open to collaboration, especially on cross-border issues, it has to be done respectfully.
"Our message is clear: our sovereignty isn't negotiable."
That issue of autonomy is also important to Chief Robert Head from the Peter Chapman Band, a part of the James Smith Cree Nation located 165 km northeast of Saskatoon.
"It doesn't come from a president, or a prime minister, it comes from the Creator himself, so that's a right that can't be taken away," Head said of Indigenous Peoples' sovereignty.
"It's our right that we're born with."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
6 minutes ago
- Global News
Quebec government renews promise to make changes to forestry reform bill
See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook The Quebec government is renewing its promise to modify a forestry bill that has provoked blockades and growing tension in the province. Indigenous Affairs Minister Ian Lafrenière said Tuesday evening that the forestry reform bill must be amended to take into account the rights of First Nations. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy His social media statement came after a six-hour meeting with First Nations leaders and representatives of the forest industry. He and Natural Resources Minister Maïté Blanchette Vézina are expected to meet today with the Assembly of First Nations Quebec–Labrador and the office of Premier François Legault. The legislation would designate certain areas of public land as forestry zones, but Indigenous leaders say it infringes on their rights. A series of blockades in recent months in opposition to the bill has disrupted operations for some in the forestry sector.
Winnipeg Free Press
37 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. What's happening? The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. Why would Trump do this? In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit? That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' Why would Intel do a deal? The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Would this deal be unusual? Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. Would the government run Intel? U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. What government grants does Intel receive? Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Calgary Herald
37 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: PM needs to end his government's war on worker bargaining power
Defending worker bargaining power is particularly urgent in the context of the current affordability crisis. No political party or government can legitimately say they're on the side of working people if they don't have a plan to maintain or expand worker bargaining power. If they're doing the reverse — as is the case with Section 107 — then they're part of the problem, not the solution. Article content The fear among Canadian unions is that if the Liberals get away with watering down the right to strike at the federal level (which has legislative responsibility for about 10 per cent of Canadian workplaces), it will only be a matter of time before provincial governments draft their own versions of Section 107 for provincially regulated workplaces. Article content We see this as an existential threat to the post-Second World War 'Great Compromise,' which saw workers agree to swear off wildcat strikes in exchange for a regulated system of labour relations that promised fair outcomes for both workers and employers. Article content Article content This is why Air Canada workers defied the back-to-work order prior to a tentative agreement reached Tuesday. If the system created by the 'Great Compromise' can no longer be counted on to deliver fair outcomes for workers, why should workers respect it? Article content If Prime Minister Carney really wants labour peace — and if he doesn't want to go down in history as the prime minister who weakened workers' bargaining power at the worst possible time — then he needs to repeal Section 107.
