logo
Here's how your phone could save your life if an earthquake hits

Here's how your phone could save your life if an earthquake hits

USA Today6 days ago
A worldwide Android smartphone-based earthquake detection and early warning system can detect seismic activity in real time
Could your smartphone save your life? If an earthquake is occurring, it just might.
A worldwide Android smartphone-based earthquake detection and early warning system can detect seismic activity in real time – and deliver life-saving alerts that are just as effective as that of traditional seismic networks, according to a new study published July 17 in the journal Science.
The Android Earthquake Alerts (AEA) system, which was developed by engineers at Google and the University of California-Berkeley, uses the phones' sensors to detect seismic activity and deliver early-warning alerts to users before dangerous shaking begins.
"Earthquakes are a constant threat to communities around the globe," wrote Google engineer Mark Stogaitis on a Google blog post about the new study. "While we've gotten good at knowing where they're likely to strike, we still face devastating consequences when they do."
"What if we could give people a few precious seconds of warning before the shaking starts? Those seconds can be enough time to get off a ladder, move away from dangerous objects and take cover," he wrote.
Safety: This is what to do before, during and after an earthquake
Indeed, the widespread use of smartphones globally has created a powerful platform for sensing and delivering earthquake alerts, according to a statement from Science. "While the sensors in smartphones are not as precise as those in traditional seismic stations, they are still capable of detecting ground shaking during significant earthquakes."
How does it work?
According to Google, "the accelerometer in an Android phone, the same sensor that flips the screen when it's turned sideways, can also detect the ground shaking from an earthquake. If a stationary phone detects the initial, faster-moving 'P-wave' of an earthquake, it sends a signal to our earthquake detection server, along with a coarse location of where the shaking occurred."
The system then quickly analyzes data from many phones to confirm that an earthquake is happening and estimate its location and magnitude. The goal is to warn as many people as possible before the slower, more damaging "S-wave" of an earthquake reaches them.
The system sends out two types of alerts:
How successful has it been?
According to Google, feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. Of the more than 1.5 million people who responded to a survey, 85% found the alerts to be "very helpful."
Overall, during its first three years of operation (2021-2024), the AEA system detected an average of 312 earthquakes per month, spanning magnitudes from M 1.9 to a maximum of M 7.8 across 98 countries, according to the study.
"The system has now detected over 18,000 earthquakes, from small tremors of M1.9 to major quakes reaching M7.8," Stogaitis wrote. "For the events significant enough to warn people, alerts were issued for over 2000 earthquakes, culminating in 790 million alerts being sent to phones worldwide.
This included more than half-a-million people in Turkey and Syria who received an alert on February 6, 2023, just before a magnitude 7.8 earthquake struck. according to a Phys.org report.
The impact has been a greater than tenfold change in the number of people with access to earthquake early warning systems. "In 2019, only about 250 million people had access. Today, thanks in large part to the Android system, that number has increased to 2.5 billion," he said.
As an example, in the magnitude 6.2 earthquake in Turkey in April 2025, the first alert was issued 8 seconds after the earthquake began. People who experienced moderate to strong shaking had a warning time of a few to 20 seconds. In this event, over 16 million alerts were delivered.
'Comparable to established national systems'
Stogaitis concluded that "what's most exciting is that our system is constantly learning and improving... In the future, this system could not only provide warnings but also deliver rapid post-earthquake information to emergency responders, helping them to quickly assess the areas most in need."
According to the study, "AEA demonstrates that globally distributed smartphones can be used to detect earthquakes and issue warnings at scale with an effectiveness comparable to established national systems. (However,) large earthquakes remain the most important and challenging for all earthquake early warning systems."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google Neutralizes Its Rivals… For Now
Google Neutralizes Its Rivals… For Now

Gizmodo

time12 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Google Neutralizes Its Rivals… For Now

For over two decades, 'Google it' has been the default way to find answers online. Now that dominance is being tested by a new wave of AI tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and upstarts such as Perplexity, which deliver conversational answers instead of a list of links. These disruptors are being cast as a mortal threat to Google Search, long the undisputed king of the internet. But on Wednesday, Google CEO Sundar Pichai delivered a powerful counter-narrative, armed with staggering new data that suggests the AI 'threat' is actually making its core product stronger than ever. The story Google is telling is not one of defense, but of offense. Far from cannibalizing its search business, AI is encouraging people to search more, ask new kinds of questions, and engage more deeply with the platform. 'We see AI powering an expansion in how people are searching for and accessing information, unlocking completely new kinds of questions you can ask Google,' Pichai said in remarks for the company's Q2 earnings call. 'Overall queries and commercial queries on Search continued to grow year over year. And our new AI experiences significantly contributed to this increase in usage.' Pichai revealed that the company's new AI features are now driving 'over 10% more queries globally' for the types of searches that show them, a clear sign that AI is expanding the pie, not just slicing it differently. At the heart of Google's strategy is a two-pronged approach designed to serve both casual users and power users simultaneously. The first approach is AI Overviews, the AI-generated summaries that now appear at the top of many search results. This feature has been rolled out at a massive scale, now serving, Pichai claims, over 2 billion monthly users across more than 200 countries and territories. It's the mainstream integration designed to make everyday search faster and more efficient for the masses. The second axis is AI Mode, an end-to-end conversational search experience for more complex and nuanced questions. While still rolling out, this power-user tool has already attracted, the CEO says, over 100 million monthly active users in the U.S. and India. This is Google's direct answer to the advanced capabilities of its new competitors—ChatGPT and Perplexity— offering a space for deeper exploration within Google ecosystem. Is This the End of Google As We Know It? According to Google, this evolution of search is resonating most strongly with the users who will define the next decade of the internet: young people. Pichai emphasized that the growth in new search behaviors, particularly multimodal search—using tools like Google Lens or Circle to Search to ask questions with images—was 'most pronounced among younger users.' By integrating AI in a way that feels intuitive and powerful to a generation that has grown up with visual communication, Google wants to make sure it stays relevant. The ultimate validation of this strategy lies in the numbers. In a direct rebuttal to fears that AI would kill its golden goose, Alphabet reported $54.19 billion in second-quarter search revenue, up 12% year-over-year. The AI-powered experience is proving to be not just engaging, but highly lucrative. Chief Business Officer Philipp Schindler noted during the earnings' call with analysts that advertisers using the company's new AI-powered tools are seeing tangible benefits, with AI Max campaigns delivering '14% more conversions' on average. This proves that a more complex, AI-driven search experience can be even more valuable for advertisers, he claimed. OpenAI's ChatGPT and smaller players like Perplexity AI are winning early adopters who prefer direct, conversational responses over Google's traditional list of blue links. These platforms summarize and synthesize information instantly, bypassing the need to click through multiple sites. This shift threatens Google's core business model: search advertising. A shift from traditional search to AI-generated answers could reshape how people consume information online. Instead of clicking through multiple sources, users may rely on a single AI response, potentially concentrating power in fewer platforms and reducing traffic to independent publishers. For Google, the challenge is to evolve fast enough to keep its users while preserving the revenue streams that make up the bulk of its business. 'We'll focus on the organic experience for the near term,' Pichai told analysts. Google is not simply adding AI to its old search box to keep competitors at bay. It's building an entirely new information engine, one designed to answer questions people never even thought to ask. The AI race has forced Google to evolve fast, and it could make Search more indispensable, and more profitable, than ever. Google wants to stay the gatekeeper of how we access information.

Is ChatGPT making us stupid?
Is ChatGPT making us stupid?

UPI

time14 minutes ago

  • UPI

Is ChatGPT making us stupid?

Although research is limited, passively consuming AI-generated content may discourage intellectual curiosity, reduce attention spans and create a dependency that limits long-term cognitive development. ChatGPT. File Photo by Wu Hao/EPA Back in 2008, The Atlantic sparked controversy with a provocative cover story: Is Google Making Us Stupid? In that 4,000-word essay, later expanded into a book, author Nicholas Carr suggested the answer was yes, arguing that technology such as search engines were worsening Americans' ability to think deeply and retain knowledge. At the core of Carr's concern was the idea that people no longer needed to remember or learn facts when they could instantly look them up online. While there might be some truth to this, search engines still require users to use critical thinking to interpret and contextualize the results. Fast-forward to today, and an even more profound technological shift is taking place. With the rise of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Internet users aren't just outsourcing memory -- they may be outsourcing thinking itself. Generative AI tools don't just retrieve information; they can create, analyze and summarize it. This represents a fundamental shift: Arguably, generative AI is the first technology that could replace human thinking and creativity. That raises a critical question: Is ChatGPT making us stupid? As a professor of information systems who's been working with AI for more than two decades, I've watched this transformation firsthand. And as many people increasingly delegate cognitive tasks to AI, I think it's worth considering what exactly we're gaining and what we are at risk of losing. AI and the Dunning-Kruger effect Generative AI is changing how people access and process information. For many, it's replacing the need to sift through sources, compare viewpoints and wrestle with ambiguity. Instead, AI delivers clear, polished answers within seconds. While those results may or may not be accurate, they are undeniably efficient. This has already led to big changes in how we work and think. But this convenience may come at a cost. When people rely on AI to complete tasks and think for them, they may be weakening their ability to think critically, solve complex problems and engage deeply with information. Although research on this point is limited, passively consuming AI-generated content may discourage intellectual curiosity, reduce attention spans and create a dependency that limits long-term cognitive development. To better understand this risk, consider the Dunning-Kruger effect. This is the phenomenon in which people who are the least knowledgeable and competent tend to be the most confident in their abilities because they don't know what they don't know. In contrast, more competent people tend to be less confident. This is often because they can recognize the complexities they have yet to master. This framework can be applied to generative AI use. Some users may rely heavily on tools such as ChatGPT to replace their cognitive effort, while others use it to enhance their capabilities. In the former case, they may mistakenly believe they understand a topic because they can repeat AI-generated content. In this way, AI can artificially inflate one's perceived intelligence while actually reducing cognitive effort. This creates a divide in how people use AI. Some remain stuck on the "peak of Mount Stupid," using AI as a substitute for creativity and thinking. Others use it to enhance their existing cognitive capabilities. In other words, what matters isn't whether a person uses generative AI, but how. If used uncritically, ChatGPT can lead to intellectual complacency. Users may accept its output without questioning assumptions, seeking alternative viewpoints or conducting deeper analysis. But when used as an aid, it can become a powerful tool for stimulating curiosity, generating ideas, clarifying complex topics and provoking intellectual dialogue. The difference between ChatGPT making us stupid or enhancing our capabilities rests in how we use it. Generative AI should be used to augment human intelligence, not replace it. That means using ChatGPT to support inquiry, not to shortcut it. It means treating AI responses as the beginning of thought, not the end. AI, thinking and the future of work The mass adoption of generative AI, led by the explosive rise of ChatGPT -- it reached 100 million users within two months of its release -- has, in my view, left Internet users at a crossroads. One path leads to intellectual decline: a world where we let AI do the thinking for us. The other offers an opportunity: to expand our brainpower by working in tandem with AI, leveraging its power to enhance our own. It's often said that AI won't take your job, but someone using AI will. But it seems clear to me that people who use AI to replace their own cognitive abilities will be stuck at the peak of Mount Stupid. These AI users will be the easiest to replace. It's those who take the augmented approach to AI use who will reach the path of enlightenment, working together with AI to produce results that neither is capable of producing alone. This is where the future of work will eventually go. This essay started with the question of whether ChatGPT will make us stupid, but I'd like to end with a different question: How will we use ChatGPT to make us smarter? The answers to both questions depend not on the tool but on users. Aaron French is an assistant professor of information systems at Kennesaw State University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in the commentary are solely those of the author.

Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

The Verge

time14 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month

Google will officially deprecate links generated with its URL shortening tool next month. On August 25th, 2025, all links in the ' format will no longer work and return a 404 error message. Google shut down its URL shortener in 2019, citing 'changes we've seen in how people find content on the internet.' Links created with the tool continued to work since then, but Google announced last year that it would begin deprecating them as traffic to the shortened URLs declined. 'In fact more than 99% of them had no activity in the last month,' Google said in its July 2024 blog post. At the time, Google also began displaying a warning page when users click on a shortened URL, saying 'this link will no longer work in the near future.' With the shutdown of ' links just a month away, now would be a good time to transition your URLs to another shortener if you haven't already. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Emma Roth Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Web

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store