Forum: Guest lists should be screened when ministers attend private events
While ministers Ong Ye Kung and Chee Hong Tat have clarified that they did not know Su and were invited by a mutual acquaintance, such situations can present reputational and security risks, regardless of intent.
When ministers attend private social functions where unknown individuals are present, without clarity on their background or motives, it exposes them to potential security threats and can invite public doubt, undermining trust in governance.
Singaporeans expect our ministers to uphold not only the highest standards of conduct, but also to avoid any situation that could be perceived as compromising.
It is timely for the Government to review and strengthen existing protocols for ministers' attendance at non-official events, particularly those involving guests outside their professional or community circles. Implementing measures such as guest list vetting, having a security or official aide present, and risk screening will enhance transparency, safeguard ministerial integrity, and reassure the public on matters of both personal and national security.
Our ministers' dedication is not in question. But today, perceptions can matter as much as intent.
Cheong Wing Kiat
More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Russian attack hit energy facilities in central Ukraine, Ukrainian energy ministry says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox KYIV - Ukraine's energy ministry said on Tuesday an overnight Russian attack hit energy facilities in the central Ukrainian region of Poltava, causing large fires. The ministry said a gas transport facility was targeted by several dozen drones, which caused damage. "Russian occupation forces launched another massive attack on energy infrastructure facilities in the Poltava region, using cruise missiles and strike drones simultaneously. The attack resulted in large-scale fires," the ministry said on Telegram. The ministry did not specify what other facilities besides gas infrastructure were attacked. Russia's Interfax news agency reported that the defence ministry had carried out a strike on an oil refinery that was supplying fuel to Ukrainian armed forces. The Poltava region is home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, Kremenchuk, which has been repeatedly attacked by both drones and missiles. Local media and Kremenchuk's mayor published videos of city neighbourhoods against a smoke-filled sky. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Fairprice apologises after woman finds worm in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore CPIB nabs 9 suspects for alleged match-fixing in national basketball league Singapore Live Singapore-raised seafood on sale at 3 Giant supermarkets from Aug 19 Singapore Singapore seals carbon credit deal with Thailand, its first South-east Asian partner Asia Singaporean man sentenced to 72 years' jail in Malaysia for murdering wife and stepson Singapore Court to assess if teen who advertised vapes for sale on WhatsApp can receive probation Kyiv authorities have not reported whether the refinery is operational. The ministry noted on Tuesday that Russia attacked Ukrainian oil refining infrastructure twice in June. Russia has launched massive attacks on Ukrainian oil depots and fuel storage facilities since the first days of the war. As a result, Ukraine's fuel needs were completely covered by imports, mainly from European countries. The ministry said that Ukrainian energy facilities had been attacked 2,900 times since March 2025 alone. Russia has repeatedly said it does not attack civilian infrastructure. REUTERS
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Overnight Russian attack shows Putin does not want peace, Ukraine says, World News
KYIV — Russia attacked the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight, the city mayor said on Tuesday (Aug 19), calling it a sign that Russian President Vladimir Putin does not want peace. The reported assault came a day after US President Donald Trump met European leaders and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Washington, saying the US would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. After the meeting on Monday, Trump said he telephoned Putin and begun arranging a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy, to be followed by a trilateral summit among the three presidents, with the aim of reaching a peace deal. "At the very same time when Putin was assuring Trump over the phone that he seeks peace, and when President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was holding talks at the White House with European leaders about a just peace, Putin's army launched yet another massive attack on Kremenchuk," Vitalii Maletskyi, mayor of the city that lies in the Poltava region, said on the Telegram. "Once again, the world has seen that Putin does not want peace — he wants to destroy Ukraine," he said. The overnight attack on Ukraine was the largest so far in August with Russia launching 270 drones and 10 missiles, according to the Ukrainian air force. Maletskyi said scores of blasts shook the city, targeting energy and transport infrastructure, leaving hundreds of people in the Poltava region without power. The Ukrainian air force said it downed 230 drones and six missiles but recorded strikes at 16 locations. Poltava Governor Volodymyr Kohut said that the attack damaged administrative buildings of a local energy infrastructure operation. "Fortunately, there were no casualties," Kohut said on Telegram. He said that in the Lubny district nearly 1,500 residential and 119 commercial customers were left without power. A Tuesday morning drone attack by Russia on Ukraine's Chernihiv region also damaged infrastructure with power cuts reported in parts of the northern region, according to Governor Viacheslav Chaus. There was no immediate comment from Russia. Both sides have been targeting infrastructure key to the military in their strikes during the war on each other's territory, including energy infrastructure. Russia said on Tuesday that Ukraine's overnight drone attack sparked fires at an oil refinery and a hospital roof in the Volgograd region. [[nid:721493]]
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Amid big AI push, technology must not render human capability and intelligence irrelevant
THAT artificial intelligence (AI) will form the bedrock of the Singapore's economy was abundantly clear from Prime Minister Lawrence Wong's National Day Rally speech on Sunday (Aug 17). AI featured prominently in his discussion of the economy and its challenges as well as how Singapore and Singaporeans can thrive in this new environment. At the Global-City Singapore: SG60 and Beyond conference last month, PM Wong said that Singapore could harness new technology to create new jobs. The city-state's small size and the strong tripartite relationship between the government, employers and unions meant that it could discuss redesigning jobs and retraining workers, even before new technology is rolled out. He also said that given the broad-based adoption of AI 'we have no choice' but to follow suit. AI to be pervasive On Sunday, PM Wong hinted that the Singapore Economic Resilience Taskforce – chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong and tasked with reviewing and rejuvenating the country's economic strategies – would recommend that innovation and technology be made more pervasive in the economy. PM Wong emphasised that while investing in and developing cutting edge technology were necessary, equally important was how quickly new technologies were 'to raise productivity and create new value through every part of the economy'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up He was confident that AI could be rolled out in the same way as the nationwide computerisation drive in the 1980s, resulting in a win-win outcome for the economy and workers alike. He acknowledged the concerns that AI would replace entire jobs. He assured Singaporeans that they would 'always be at the centre of everything we do' in this push to embrace emergent technologies, and that there will not be a headlong rush to adopt new technology. It is an understatement that Singapore's leaders consider AI and other emergent technologies as having the wherewithal to be the next engine of growth. This was clear from the 'National AI Strategy 2.0: AI for the public good for Singapore and the world' in launched 2023. This drive sought to have Singapore at the forefront driving global innovation in technology. PM Wong described AI as 'a defining technology of our time (that) will fundamentally change the way we live, work and interact with one another'. Timely to consider AI's impact on society Considering how AI will feature in every facet of life, it was a missed opportunity for PM Wong not to have outlined how the game-changing technologies will impact Singapore's social compact and its societal ethos. Perhaps, this could be fleshed out in the President's Address, its addendum and the subsequent debate when the 15th Parliament opens in September. Although there is no one inevitable path in the development of new technology, new productive technologies complemented workers in the past by enabling them to work more efficiently, perform even higher-quality work, and to accomplish new tasks integral to productivity growth. Given the tremendous capabilities of new technologies, there is no doubt that how they are used matters immensely. Technology must augment human capabilities and intelligence, instead of rendering human capabilities and intelligence irrelevant, or for people to be subjugated to non-human intelligence and imperatives. Undoubtedly, how we use AI to augment human competencies and values will define whether technology enables or disenables society. The issues posed by AI are new, and yet not so new. AI is not a mere technological phenomenon. As it also operates within market capitalism – the dominant mode of organising the economic realm – this amplifies AI's growth, development and influence. This concatenation of technology and capitalism can be described as 'technological capitalism'. Technological capitalism cannot do without the guardrails of ethics and values. An economic system anchored in the logic of profit maximisation needs to be tempered with the imperative of sound values to ensure that the common good is promoted even as technology disrupts the status quo. Need for values in our use of AI For AI to generate sustainable societal value and be a force for good, the role of values in AI governance and regulation is increasingly recognised by governments, regulators and businesses. Where it deliberately involves stakeholders, values can help to deal with governance deficits and gaps in regulatory environments and to manage the allocation of risks and costs. If properly practised and imbibed as part of the DNA of a smart nation, values will catalyse beyond a compliance mindset to one which recognises that effective 'values governance' in AI must be anchored in an ethical spine where responsibility, transparency and accountability are evident, recognised and supported. The issue is not whether technology operates within a robust scheme of laws and values, but how to operationalise and practise values in a purposeful manner. This requires that values function not as a mere add-on or afterthought in AI development, governance and regulation. An AI framework of values (or, values in AI) can be the humanising force because it is grounded in moral reasoning and leadership. It also recognises that AI operates in the human environment - an ecosystem where interdependence and trust are essential. The question is not why we need AI but how to ensure that appropriate individual, corporate and governmental conduct are manifested while ensuring that profits coexist within the framework of long-term sustainability. Making AI a humanistic enterprise The challenge for Singapore is to ensure that AI is a humanistic enterprise, in which value (economic and financial) and values (ethical and corporate) are not mutually exclusive but are symbiotically connected. To this end, the imperative of values such as fairness, openness, human dignity, public accountability are of fundamental importance. These values, if properly given effect to, will grow trust and provide confidence that powerful technologies can be a force for good, of our economy and our wellbeing. Ultimately, as we seek to deploy AI pervasively, it is timely that we ask ourselves the fundamental question: How do we want technology to serve us? This entails that we develop, share and nurture a common understanding of our core civic values vis-a-vis technology. Without that, what the future portends can be scary. The history of technology has shown that shared purpose alone is inadequate in ensuring a technology is used properly. Its shared purpose must be disciplined and moulded by shared values. In the push for Singapore to be an AI nation, the Singapore Spirit that PM Wong had described might offer an insight to how we can engage the powerful and disruptive new technologies. 'Singaporeans will have to take responsibility for one another and to shape the character and future of our society', he said. This must be the imperative as we embrace AI. The writer is associate professor of law at the Singapore Management University where he co-teaches an interdisciplinary course on harnessing new technologies for business and society.
