logo
Parents fined nearly £1m over school absences

Parents fined nearly £1m over school absences

Yahoo3 days ago

Derbyshire County Council has generated nearly £1m from fines issued for unauthorised school absences, a Freedom of Information Act request has revealed.
The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) obtained figures which show the authority issued 20,487 penalties since 2021, totalling £961,320, over the three academic years since 2021-22.
The county council said the fines had been issued at the request of head teachers and according to the law.
However, mother-of-two Natalie, from Marehay near Ripley, has started a national campaign, called Fight School Fines, to get the law changed.
She has started a petition, so far signed by 161,000 people, calling for parents to be entitled to 10 days of term-time leave without a fine.
"A lot of these fines that are being issued and prosecutions for unauthorised absences aren't due to just going on holiday because they want to get it cheaper, which is the media narrative," Natalie said.
"They are marking things down that should fall under exceptional circumstances.
"For example, we are seeing loads of stories from parents where they have asked for authorised leave to visit family members who are poorly, or they have gone to a funeral overseas and they are not marking it as authorised, they are refusing it."
The number of fines issued in Derbyshire in 2021 was 3,175 and that rose to 10,505 in 2023-24.
Fine amounts stand at £160 per parent, per child, with this fee reducing to £80 if paid within 21 days.
The council said 16,064 fines were for first-time offenders and 1,567 for second offences, with parents only able to accrue two penalties in a three-year rolling period before being prosecuted in court.
Council figures show 1,016 Derbyshire parents have been prosecuted in the past three complete academic years , with six cases being withdrawn.
Court fines do qualify as a criminal conviction and are attached to a criminal record, which would need to be added to a DBS check, the LDRS said.
"I am not surprised to see it going up," Natalie said.
"They say it will act as a deterrent, but clearly it is not doing because people still need to take leave during term-time.
"Even if it is a cost thing, they are doing it to save money, we don't know the reason why they can't afford to go in the holidays.
"It is not so black and white as people make out. Some people work seasonal jobs or run their own businesses, they can't just shut up shop.
"It doesn't act as a deterrent.
"It is criminalising parents.
"Many parents don't know that what comes with that court fine is a criminal record.
"Most of the time, parents are doing it because it is the best decision for them and their children. They are our children, they are not the state's.
"Having a criminal record for this is one step too far.
"I know families need to access term-time absence and that will never stop.
"This isn't just about being on holiday and getting a cheaper holiday."
The LDRS said it asked the county council if it felt the penalties were serving as a deterrent, if they could respond to the perception that the penalties were criminalising parents, and if parents were saying they were willing to accept the fines to gain term-time holiday savings.
A council spokesperson said: "Headteachers ask us to issue the fines, so this is one for schools and not the council.
"We respond to headteacher requests, we do not make the policies that schools make that lead to fines being issued.
"The government sets the penalty fines amounts.
"This is the law and not the council's decision," the spokesperson added.
The Department for Education, responding to Natalie's petition in December, said: "We sympathise with parents who, for a variety of reasons, face barriers to securing their children's school attendance.
"This government is taking a new approach to tackling absence based on responsibility, partnership and belonging."
It said that involved working with schools and councils to remove barriers to attendance.
The spokesperson said: "The government takes seriously its responsibility to ensure that schools are equipped to meet children's needs and help them succeed, but that is matched by parents' legal responsibility to send their children to school every day that they can.
The department said it acknowledged some children had long-term physical or mental health conditions or special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) which affected attendance.
The spokesperson added: "However, all of these children have the same need and right to a full-time education as any other pupil."
Follow BBC Derby on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
'Paying £240 holiday school fine was a no-brainer'
School holiday fines at a record high
Derbyshire County Council
Department for Education
Local Democracy Reporting Service

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations
As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations

Chicago Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

As residents and dogs again fill Chicago parks, data shows fewer than 1 in 4 reported bites result in citations

Ed Wolf doesn't quite recall the moments between being knocked off his bike and losing a chunk of his face in November 2023. But he remembers the phone call he made to his wife: 'I said, 'You have to come get me. I've been attacked by a pit bull,'' Wolf said. 'And she goes, 'Are you kidding?'' A day and 50 stitches later Wolf, 68, went to the police station to report the bite and found himself navigating a morass of different systems as he tried to draw official attention to the dog's owner. An officer at the Morgan Park District (22nd) police station helped Wolf get started on a bite report, which kickstarts an investigation at Chicago Animal Care and Control. The city department received some 6,435 bite reports between January 2020 and April 30 of this year, according to a Tribune review of data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. For that same period, data shows that CACC has issued about 1,516 citations, for 'unrestrained violations,' to animal owners. The violations cover dogs found to be off-leash in public areas, but not every violation issued pertains to a bite. All of the investigations save a single one were marked closed, leaving residents and city officials alike to complain that the path to hold owners to account after dog attacks is opaque at best and useless at worst. Wolf's was one of them. An animal control investigator spoke with Wolf about the attack, but stated in the report that Wolf didn't know the owner or how to reach him. Someone was trying to locate better information on the dog's owner, according to the investigation report. The Beverly resident said he tried to follow up with Animal Control but never heard back. A copy of the investigation associated with Wolf's bite report showed the inquiry was marked completed, with no listed resolution. 'I would have liked for there to be some consequences to this,' he said. In the 19th Ward, where Wolf lives, canine attacks have been a problem since a woman jogging in the Dan Ryan Woods was mauled to death by a trio of vicious dogs in 2003. More recently, city data shows that bites are up in that ward and citywide since agency received 1,267 bite reports in 2023 and just over 1,300 reports in 2024, according to Chicago Animal Care and Control data. But the number of unrestrained citations it issued dropped by more than half over the same period — from 390 to 177. A CACC representative said in a statement that the department was reviewing Wolf's case and one other closed case listed in a request for comment. The department acknowledged it can be frustrating for the public to deal with multiple agencies in the reporting process, but said it largely relies on the Chicago Police Department for accurate information to push cases forward. CPD representatives didn't respond to multiple requests for Care has been without a permanent leader for more than two years, since then-Mayor Lori Lightfoot appointed Susan Capello as acting director in January 2023. CACC has cut back on its hours for members of the public to bring in animals and is sounding the alarm on a flood of pet surrenders that is testing the capacity of its space and its staff. On Thursday, it reported on social media that 75 animals entered its shelter over a single day. As for why more than three-quarters of the animal bites reported to the agency are closed without a clear resolution, Animal Care and Control Operations Manager Angela Rayburn said investigators contend with missing or inaccurate information in bite reports. 'We have no other way to find the person other than what we're seeing in the official police (report),' she said. Even with the correct information, Rayburn acknowledged, investigators will mark probes closed if they are unable to reach a bite victim or a dog owner. They can reopen investigations if someone calls them back, she added, but said callbacks after the first 24 hours are rare. 'We would probably have over 100 open bite (reports) if we're waiting on people to call us back,' she said. 'We don't want to wait months just to leave it open for someone that's probably never going to call.' A department spokesperson said CACC officials and CPD were working to update a 2019 police order governing how officers handle animal-related incidents. That order directs officers to determine whether biting animals belong to anyone, and fill out bite reports for city and county animal control officials, among other obligations. If an officer can identify an owner, the order requires him or her to cite the owner for any alleged violations of city code. CACC investigators will also work with animal owners to 'address concerns rather than defaulting to citations' when appropriate, according to the statement. 'That said, our ability to issue citations or take enforcement action depends on verifiable information, including victim/witness cooperation and confirmed ownership.' People who have tried to make reports complain of a confusing and frustrating process involving multiple agencies. That can include CPD, Animal Control and potentially Cook County Animal Care and Control, which handles rabies investigations. Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, has resorted to getting personally involved on behalf of his constituents who need help getting bites reported and investigated. 'There seems to be a lot of confusion,' O'Shea said. 'But when I'm on the scene or I'm on the phone, or I'm getting an email from someone who was just viciously attacked, and there's a whole lot of 'Oh, that's not us' on the other end, that's a problem.' One of those constituents was Kevin Conroy. Conroy, 37, wasn't even sure where he was supposed to report the attack that left his dog Liam with a half-dozen puncture wounds and a $1,300 vet bill while the pair was out for a run on the Major Taylor Trail last fall. Conroy first called 311, he said, and was then told he needed to go to the police station. He ended up calling the Cook County Forest Preserve to report the bite, which cares for the property on which he and his dog were attacked, and filed a bite report through the Police Department. 'That was the last I heard of that,' he said. A Cook County Forest Preserve spokesperson, reached for comment, said Forest Preserve police documented the attack but didn't get any more information after the initial phone call with Conroy. According to the investigative file associated with Conroy's bite report, an Animal Control investigator conducted a phone interview but wrote that no owner information was available. The file does not list an outcome.

22 nabbed for suspected involvement in government official impersonation scams
22 nabbed for suspected involvement in government official impersonation scams

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

22 nabbed for suspected involvement in government official impersonation scams

SINGAPORE – A total of 22 people, aged between 22 and 56, were arrested for their suspected involvement in the recent spate of government official impersonation scam cases. In a news release on May 28, police said the 17 men and five women were nabbed following islandwide anti-scam operations conducted between March 13 and May 22. Another four men and five women, aged between 22 and 77, are assisting in the investigations. Police said they have received several reports of scam cases involving the impersonation of banks and government officials since early March. The victim would first receive an unsolicited call from a scammer impersonating a bank officer, typically from DBS, OCBC, UOB or Standard Chartered Bank, or an employee of China-based services such as Union Pay and WeChat, police said. The scammer would tell the victim that he or she was suspected of being involved in a criminal matter, then connect them to another scammer posing as a police officer. This 'police officer' would convince the victim to surrender valuables such as cash, jewellery and bank cards to an 'agent' for investigation. In some cases, the victims would be instructed to buy gold bars, which they would then give up to an 'agent'. Preliminary investigations showed that the 31 people had allegedly facilitated such scam cases by collecting the valuables from the victims. These mules would meet the victims in public places to collect the items from them. They would later hand the items over to another mule, or leave them unattended at a public place to be picked up later. 'Victims would only realise that they had been scammed when the scammers become uncontactable or when they sought verification with the banks or SPF,' police said. Police investigations are ongoing. Those convicted of assisting another to retain benefits from a scam could face a jail term of up to three years, a fine, or both. 'The police take a serious stance against any person who may be involved in scams, and perpetrators will be dealt with in accordance with the law,' they added. 'To avoid being an accomplice to crimes, members of the public should always reject requests by others to use your bank account or mobile lines as you will be held accountable if these are linked to crimes.' Government officials will never, over a phone call, ask them to transfer money, disclose bank log-in details, install mobile apps from unofficial app stores or transfer their call to the police, they said. Police also encouraged members of the public to adopt crime prevention measures, such as installing the ScamShield app, setting security features and checking for scam signs with official sources. In 2024, victims lost a total of $1.1 billion to scams – a record high for a single year. Police also saw the highest number of scam reports ever in the same year, with 51,501 cases recorded compared with 46,563 cases in 2023. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here

Biden admin admitted chances of cancer affecting East Palestine residents after Norfolk Southern crash was ‘not zero,' bombshell emails show
Biden admin admitted chances of cancer affecting East Palestine residents after Norfolk Southern crash was ‘not zero,' bombshell emails show

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Biden admin admitted chances of cancer affecting East Palestine residents after Norfolk Southern crash was ‘not zero,' bombshell emails show

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration admitted possible cancer-causing toxins were spread in East Palestine, Ohio, following the Norfolk Southern train derailment in 2023, explosive new emails show, despite the White House insisting residents were safe. 'The occurrence of a cancer-cluster in EP [East Palestine] is not zero,' FEMA recovery leader James McPherson wrote in a March 29, 2024, email to other public health officials — a little more than a year after the crash. 'As you all are aware, the first 48 hours of the fire created a really toxic plume,' he said in the chain of communications, which were first reported by News Nation. 4 'The occurrence of a cancer-cluster in EP [East Palestine] is not zero,' Federal Emergency Management Agency recovery leader James McPherson wrote in a March 29, 2024, email. Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images Just two months earlier, President Biden had excoriated 'multimillion-dollar railroad companies transporting toxic chemicals' for the fiasco — but praised his administration's 'herculean efforts' to resolve the 'vast majority' of East Palestine's problems. The crash spewed harmful chemicals into the air and resulted in 115,000 gallons' worth of carcinogenic vinyl chloride undergoing an open burn — displacing residents and leading to reports of strange illnesses as well as the death of livestock in the weeks following the Feb. 3, 2023, disaster. Michael Regan, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, showed up on Feb. 22 with TV cameras in tow to capture himself drinking from the local water supply, and months later claimed unequivocally that people in East Palestine were 'not in danger.' 4 President Biden excoriated 'multimillion-dollar railroad companies transporting toxic chemicals' for the fiasco — but praised his administration's 'herculean efforts.' AP 'Since the disaster, EPA has collected more than 100 million air monitoring data points and more than 25 thousand samples in and around the community,' Regan said in an Oct. 17, 2023, statement. 'This data collection continues, and ongoing science-based reviews show that residents of East Palestine are not in danger from contaminated drinking water, soil, or air from the derailment.' But a watchdog group that has been investigating the toxic fallout from the train derailment said the Biden administration's approach was 'flawed' from the start — and has now released emails obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests to prove it. 4 Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Michael Regan showed up on Feb. 22 with TV cameras in tow to capture himself drinking from the local water supply. C-SPAN 'They didn't always test for the right chemicals; they didn't test in the right locations; they didn't have the right detection limits,' Government Accountability Project investigator Lesley Pacey told The Post, saying the Biden admin wasn't 'worrying about public health' but, rather 'public reassurances.' 'They delayed testing for dioxin, and then when they did the testing for dioxin — and also did the testing in people's homes for other chemicals — they used Norfolk Southern contractors, and those contractors used equipment that wasn't correct,' said Pacey, who's been investigating the incident. 'They completely botched this event from the very beginning.' So-called 'ASPECT' planes that monitor air quality weren't deployed due to apparent bad weather until four days after the derailment, she added, when they should have been flown within eight hours of the incident. 4 The federal response also lacked robust monitoring of the water supply and ignored agency policies in order to burn the harmful chemicals, according to Pacey, leaving East Palestine natives 'acutely very, very ill.' Bloomberg via Getty Images The federal response also lacked robust monitoring of the water supply and ignored agency policies in order to burn the harmful chemicals, according to Pacey, allowing East Palestine natives to get 'very, very ill.' The new emails — including batches from FEMA, the EPA, the White House, the National Security Council and the Justice Department, which later settled with Norfolk Southern for $310 million to redress harms to the Ohio community — also show that one year after the chaos admin officials were still discussing the need to develop a 'tripwire to identify cancer clusters.' Biden, who was diagnosed earlier this month with an 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer that has already spread to his bones, often claimed that his late son Beau died from a brain cancer possibly caused by exposure to toxic fumes while serving in Iraq. He also claimed in a 2022 speech that he had cancer due to growing up near oil refineries in Claymont, Delaware, though the White House maintained he was referencing 'non-melanoma skin cancers' that had previously been removed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store