Teachers at closing school in dispute over pay
Members of a teachers' union at an independent school due to close next month have declared an industrial dispute, claiming they have been told they would not be paid for the second half of the final term.
Fulneck School, in Pudsey, Leeds, announced in March that it would close on 8 July due to a decline in enrolment and rising costs.
The NASUWT said its members had been informed after the May half term that the school could no longer afford to pay them, but they must continue working until the closure.
Responding, the school said staff would be paid up until 8 July, with a spokesperson for the school's trustees adding that they remained committed to a "regular and open" dialogue with staff.
The independent day and boarding school, founded by the Moravian church, has been teaching for more than 270 years.
Announcing the closure earlier this year, the school blamed "a continued decline in enrolment, combined with rising operational costs" for making it "increasingly challenging to maintain financial viability".
Announcing the dispute, a spokesperson for the NASUWT said many of its members at the school had had long careers there, often "making sacrifices" to keep it running, such as forgoing pay increases.
"As a result of the school's decision not to pay them for the last half term, Fulneck teachers stand to lose 14% of their annual salary," a union spokesperson said.
"Even if they are able to secure positions at other schools, they will go from July to the end of September with no pay – despite the fact they have earned that money."
Matt Wrack, acting general secretary of the NASUWT, said union members at the school had "pulled out the stops to support their struggling pupils this term, and it has come – quite literally – at their own expense".
"After years of sacrifice for the good of the school, losing months of pay is a real kick in the teeth," he said.
Tim Toepritz, the union's national executive member for Leeds, said the school's teachers had undergone a "collective trauma".
"They have spent the last term supporting panicking pupils through exams and school transitions, all the while frantically searching for new roles themselves," he said.
"On top of that, they now face unpaid bills over the summer.
"But Fulneck teachers are strong, and they won't go down without a fight. The school needs to abide by its church's mission statement and pay up."
However, according to the school, staff would be paid up until 8 July – the proposed date of the school's closure and planned insolvency - and in line with the school's legal obligations as an employer.
The percentage calculated by the NASUWT did not reflect the entitlements for staff through redundancy and notice pay, which would be processed through the government's Redundancy Payment Service and triggered following the school's planned liquidation, it said.
A spokesperson for the school's trustees said their priority was to ensure a "fair and transparent process" for everyone affected.
"The trustees have provided ongoing support throughout the school's operation and closure process," they added.
"Communication channels remain open for staff to raise concerns, and the trustees are committed to ensuring all legal obligations are met.
"No further comments can be made while the formal consultation process is ongoing."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
NASUWT – The Teachers' Union
Private school to shut after 270 years of teaching
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Klopp Praises Wirtz as Liverpool Make Statement with Record Signing
Klopp Reflects as Liverpool Invest Big in Florian Wirtz New Era, Familiar Ambition at Anfield The summer of 2025 has already delivered a statement of intent at Anfield. Liverpool, now managed by Arne Slot, have secured the signing of Florian Wirtz in a deal worth £100 million plus £16 million in add-ons, a record fee for a British club. The move, completed ahead of a number of Europe's elite, has captured attention not just for the player involved, but for what it symbolises: Liverpool's continued evolution without Jürgen Klopp. Advertisement For many, it felt like a new chapter written in the same bold ink. Wirtz, 22, has been Germany's outstanding player for the past two seasons. His signature was hotly contested, with Bayern Munich, Manchester City and Real Madrid among the interested parties. Liverpool's ability to complete the deal speaks volumes about their standing under the guidance of Slot and the club's recruitment structure led by Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes. Klopp on Wirtz: Praise and Perspective With such a high-profile signing, scrutiny inevitably follows, especially when past remarks are unearthed. Jürgen Klopp, now watching events unfold from the sidelines, once said he would walk away from a club that paid £100m for a player. That statement has been referenced widely since Wirtz's arrival. Photo: IMAGO Advertisement But the former Liverpool manager has clarified his position and thrown his support behind the move. 'We all agree that we are talking about a great player here,' Klopp told German publication Welt. 'I know that I once said that I'm out if we pay £100m for a player. But the world is changing. That's just the way the market is.' It's a measured response from a coach who always balanced idealism with realism. Markets shift, values rise, and clubs must adapt to remain competitive. Klopp's words are not a retraction, but a reflection of modern football's demands, and Liverpool's place in it. Midfield Shaped for the Future What remains to be seen is where exactly Slot will deploy Wirtz. Klopp himself acknowledged the tactical uncertainty but left little doubt over the player's talent. Advertisement 'I don't know for which position Arne has planned for Florian exactly. He is an outstanding player who can give something big to any club.' Photo IMAGO Wirtz offers versatility across attacking midfield and forward roles. With Dominik Szoboszlai, Curtis Jones, and Harvey Elliott already competing for time, Slot will need to manage rotation and role definition carefully. Yet it's precisely this depth, and competition, that elevates a squad from contenders to champions. Wirtz Transfer Highlights Market Realities Liverpool's investment in Wirtz is about more than numbers. It is a message of intent: that they are still a force among Europe's elite. After years of carefully calibrated business under Klopp, this move feels like both continuity and change, building on past success while adapting to new realities. Advertisement 'Whether he will make the reigning English champions even better, however, remains to be seen,' Klopp concluded. His comment isn't laced with doubt, but with the wisdom of someone who knows football's unpredictability better than most. What is clear is that Liverpool now have a player capable of shaping matches at the highest level. Whether that leads to another title, or just a reinvention of their attacking identity, only time will tell.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer: Foreign affairs delayed me dealing with welfare rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer has said he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs. He also said he took ownership for his decisions and believed as leader he should 'carry the can' when things do not go well. The Prime Minister said he was occupied with the G7 and Nato summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks. He said he was 'heavily focused' on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend and that his 'full attention really bore down' on the welfare bill on Thursday. He defended the eventual U-turn, which came after more than 100 MPs launched a bid to kill the legislation with an amendment. 'Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome,' Sir Keir told The Sunday Times. He said all the decisions were his and that 'I take ownership of them'. There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the Government's approach. Sir Keir said: 'My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can. 'I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't.' Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions made leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn. On Saturday, the Prime Minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. He said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch will hit out at Sir Keir as 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he backed down on his plans. The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but the Prime Minister was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say in a speech next week. The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. As a year in office nears, more than half of voters think Labour has underperformed in that time, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Sports, M&S and Sainsbury's to face shareholder pressure over low pay
Major high street retailers are set to face pressure from shareholders over low pay in their workforce, including third-party contractors. ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, has put forward resolutions on the issue, which will be voted on by shareholders at M&S and JD Sports' annual general meetings (AGMs) on Tuesday and Wednesday respectively. While the group is not filing a resolution at Sainsbury's, shareholders will directly question the board about pay transparency at the supermarket's AGM on Thursday. The companies are facing questions over wages that do not meet the 'real living wage' of £12.60 per hour nationally and £13.85 per hour in London for those aged 21 and over. These wages, which are set by the Living Wage Foundation to reflect the true cost of living, exceed the 2025/26 legal minimum wage of £12.21 set for the whole country including London. ShareAction argues the real living wage boosts stability, productivity and brand value, and has long been campaigning on the issue across the retail sector. Catherine Howarth, chief executive at ShareAction, said: 'We urge investors to support the shareholder resolutions going to a vote at the AGMs of M&S and JD Sports. 'Votes in support will endorse good governance and risk management whilst recognising the workers who keep these businesses running.' The resolutions ask M&S and JD Sports to disclose information on the number of employees earning below the real living wage and staff turnover rates as well their approach to setting base pay for contracted staff and a cost/benefit analysis of setting the real living wage across their workforce. While M&S pays direct employees at least the real living wage, it argues that third-party contractors are independent and set their own pay. M&S's board is recommending shareholders oppose the resolution, citing its recent investments in employee compensation of more than £285 million since 2022 and an increase to the standard hourly rate by more than 26%. On third-party contractors, it also said the vast majority of colleagues are paid at or above the real living wage. At the AGM, M&S could also be questioned about the major cyber attack it suffered earlier this year, which halted website orders, disrupted contactless payments, left some shelves empty and saw personal customer data taken by hackers. The company said the incident is likely to drag its group operating profits down by around £300 million this year but it expects this to be reduced through cost management, insurance and other reactions. For JD Sports, the activists argue that the firm only guarantees the legal minimum wage and lacks transparency on contractor pay. The board has advised shareholders to vote against the proposals, saying the firm complies with legal requirements and has invested more than £75 million over the last three years in removing the age banding as well as enhancing the remuneration and benefits of lowest-paid workers. Further reporting adds no value, reduces flexibility, raises costs and may harm competitiveness, the retailer said. Pensions & Investment Research Consultants (PIRC), which is Europe's largest independent shareholder advisory consultancy, is supporting the resolution at both companies' AGMs. PIRC said that while M&S has made progress on pay, there is still room to improve in formally committing to wage standards and increasing transparency for contractor pay. For JD Sports, the consultancy argues that legal compliance is not best practice and that pay transparency is needed to assess risks and resilience. It follows an identical resolution filed at Next in May, which gained the support of over a quarter of shareholders. While not legally binding, support for shareholder resolutions can put pressure on business leaders to respond to the matters raised, and more than 20% of dissent against the board can be considered a rebellion. During Sainbury's AGM, shareholders plan to stand up and ask the board to commit to disclosing the composition and pay of their workforce, employee turnover, and the feasibility of paying the real living wage for all staff, including all third-party contractors. An M&S spokesperson said: 'In addition to paying the real living wage, we offer an industry-leading range of benefits which, when taken with hourly pay, is worth up to £15.40 an hour. 'In regards to on-site third party contractors, which we use for specialist roles and to support the inherent seasonality in retail, a vast proportion of colleagues are paid at or above the real living wage and we go to great lengths to ensure they are all treated as part of the M&S family. 'While we support and act on the principle that all M&S-related colleagues should be paid well, we do not believe it is right to divest responsibility for setting pay and benefits away from businesses and their shareholders to a third party, as ShareAction would propose.' A JD Group spokesperson said: 'Our highly competitive UK colleague package is specifically designed to address the needs of our predominantly young workforce. 'We remain committed to providing fair wages and acting in the best interests of all stakeholders and have been engaging with shareholders ahead of our AGM on July 2 to outline our holistic approach to reward and benefits and are grateful for their supportive response. 'We are proud of our role as one of the UK's largest employers of young people, often giving them their first jobs and teaching them skills and disciplines that stand them in good stead for the rest of their working lives, including long-term opportunities with JD.' The PA news agency has contacted Sainsbury's for comment.
