
If you think the Defund movement failed, you're missing the bigger picture
On Sunday, we remember the life of George Floyd and reflect on the summer of 2020, when movement builders activated as many as 26 million people into the streets to demand an end to the state's violent disregard for Black lives. Many people will opine today about the perceived failures of that time and the years that followed, focusing on how corporate pledges to increase diversity have since been revoked or zeroing in on how many police departments did not cut their budgets, all in an effort to decide whether the summer of 2020 was really as powerful as it felt.
But to make any assessment of wins or losses, we have to look back beyond 25 May 2020. And more importantly, we must analyze several key social, cultural and political factors, not just those deemed paramount by elected officials or news pundits.
Before George Floyd was murdered in 2020 and the image of Derek Chauvin's knee on his neck bore into the collective memory of millions, organizers in Minneapolis were combating the city's longstanding refusal to invest more in systems that would pour resources into vulnerable communities.
Before there was George Floyd, we lost Philando Castile, shot by a police officer while being pulled over during a traffic stop. There was Jamar Clark, shot by police who responded to a paramedic call. Christopher Burns, strangled when two officers used a chokehold, and David Smith and Terrance Franklin and Marcus Golden and Fong Lee and so many more.
Before 2020, Minneapolis organizers fought for many changes, including a review of the Minneapolis police department (MPD) by Barack Obama's Department of Justice and settlements to change police training and approved tactics. They even got the Minneapolis city council to shift $1.1m from the MPD and reallocate it toward community-based public safety initiatives. That work, rooted in the desire for safer, flourishing communities, distended when Floyd was murdered on 25 May. The painful realities of Covid-19 and the state's abysmal response, combined with the murders of Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor, cracked open an opportunity for transformative change. Echoing loudly out of that moment was the powerful demand to 'Defund the Police', calling not just for an immediate divestment from police departments, but from the institutions and systems failing to keep us safe.
Under the banner of Defund, Black movement illuminated a new vision of community safety that didn't have to include policing and the broader carceral and militaristic systems, but instead could prioritize care, restoration, and prevention. The Movement for Black Lives (M4BL) had already developed a comprehensive Vision for Black Lives, the north star guiding the organizing of hundreds of Black-led organizations around the nation. One key element of that vision is divestment from the systems that harm us and the investment in the systems that would help our communities thrive.
United behind that vision, we fought hard and organized people in the hundreds of thousands. Public opinion shifted, elected officials began considering our demands, investments in community safety increased, and we saw more radical budgets and policy proposals than ever before. Since the Minneapolis ballot amendment placing the police department under the jurisdiction of a department of public safety did not pass in 2021, many would say that Defund failed. They could not be more wrong. On that day, 62,000 people in Minneapolis voted for a different vision of safety; that was 42% of the vote and more people than voted for the mayor, who opposed the amendment.
That many people imagining something different for public safety is a huge win for our movement, as it is evidence of abolition's growing popularity with the public. Key pieces of M4BL's omnibus bill, the Breathe Act, were introduced in Congress and inspired legislation across the country. We forced what was widely considered a fringe leftist position into the mainstream, making it a viable political stance. We were the spark that ignited protests around the world, from the UK to Indonesia, Colombia to South Africa, enraged as much by the murder of George Floyd here as they were by the deadly police-inflicted violence being committed in their home countries.
Through the organizing of Black movement's Defund campaign, we won over $840m in direct cuts from US police departments and at least $160m in investments in community services. More than 20 major cities reduced their police budgets in some form, and in 25 cities, officials removed police from schools.
Some look at the landscape today, where fascism is tightening its grip on our civil and human rights, and think this must mean this fight was lost. But if you're seeing it that way, you're not thinking big enough. The systems we fight are centuries in the making, and the power they've amassed won't be torn down by one summer of protest. Every major win Black movement has had, from the abolition of slavery to the civil rights movement and beyond, was decades in the making through sustained organizing, strategy, and powerbuilding. It required persevering through the vicious backlash of American white supremacy, capitalism and other ills. The same is true now.
As we prepare for the next season of movement building, we're learning from history, elders and ancestors on how to endure this political moment. We must understand that, though it might seem like the time to retreat, our survival is dependent upon us uniting across race, region, demographic and issue, building community, and fighting back fiercely together.
We have not lost. The movement is not over. It is our very power that has them working so hard to erase our wins and our history. Our efforts in 2020 mattered, not allowing George's murder to be ignored mattered, and all 26 million people who took to the streets should be proud. Now, it's time for the next step toward freedom. So let's go.
M Adams, Co-Executive Director, Movement for Black Lives & Miski Noor, Publisher of the Forge and former Co-Director of Black Visions
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
MSNBC pundit George Conway compares Trump to ‘Tony Soprano' over DC crime crackdown
George Conway, a conservative and leading critic of President Donald Trump, has compared the Republican to a fictional mobster when discussing the DC streets takover. Conway and former Homeland Security official Miles Taylor appeared on MSNBC Wednesday to discuss Trump's takeover of Washington, D.C. Trump placed the D.C. police force under federal control and deployed the National Guard to the nation's capital. Trump has claimed the move was in response to 'out of control' crime that is getting worse, though data shows violent crime in D.C. has been declining since it hit a peak in 2023. In response, Conway compared Trump to Tony Soprano, a fictional crime boss from the TV series The Sopranos. Conway has long criticized Trump and was once married to Kellyanne Conway, who served as an adviser to the president during his first term. 'We don't have Ronald Reagan anymore,' Conway told MSNBC, referring to the former conservative president. 'We have Tony Soprano. He's holding people up, threatening them, bullying them, doing things that are beyond his legal power to do. And that scares people.' The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. Conway went on to argue that the president intimidates and threatens his perceived enemies. 'We see the intimidation of people who have had the courage, like Miles [Taylor], to speak out and criticize the president,' Conway said. 'There is no limit to how low he will go, and what he will do to intimidate and to threaten and to assert power over things.' Taylor served as the Department of Homeland Security Chief of Staff under Trump's first administration. In 2018, Taylor penned an anonymous op-ed titled, ' I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.' Taylor wrote that many Trump appointees 'have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump's more misguided impulses until he is out of office.' Trump signed an executive order in April targeting Taylor, stripping him of his security clearance and ordering the Justice Department to investigate his conduct. At the time, Taylor told The Independent that he predicted Trump might target him. Taylor's attorneys then sent a letter to inspectors general at the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security calling on them to investigate Trump's executive order. Taylor described the ordeal as destructive to his personal life. 'This has not been made easy, because once you are on the president's blacklist, all sorts of things in your life start to implode, businesses, relationships, friendships, financial, you have an army of lawyers,' he told MSNBC. Later in the segment, Conway went on to say he's concerned about federal involvement in local law enforcement throughout the country. This comes after Trump revealed Wednesday that his actions in D.C. will 'serve as a beacon for New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other places all over the country.' 'I also think it's important that people understand why it is that this kind of federal overreach is bad, and it's bad because it consolidates power in a federal government. And as Americans, we have never, never wanted that to happen,' Conway said. 'We've always had a federal system where local authorities handle local things like crime and safety on the streets, public safety.' 'For the federal government to get involved in that stuff — it's just a prescription for potential abuse, because they can do it all over the country, and there are no checks,' he added. 'So that's why we have to really draw the line here and fight back.' Trump also said he wants to extend the federal takeover of the D.C. police past its 30-day limi t, which would require Congressional authorization. Trump said he expects 'the Republicans will do it almost unanimously.'


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Canada is boycotting US alcohol over Trump's policies. It will leave American companies' bottom lines dry
Canada 's moves to boycott imported American beers, wines and spirits in response to President Donald Trump 's tariff aggressions is reportedly beginning to take its toll. Anti-Trump sentiment remains strong in Canada after the natives took exception to the president's alarming talk earlier this year about annexing their country and making it the 51st state, a mood that ushered in the moderate Mark Carney as its new prime minister in March while right-leaning opposition leader Pierre Poilievre lost his seat. Canadian stores have since cleared bottles of Jack Daniel's, Maker's Mark and Sailor Jerry Spiced Rum from their shelves and replaced them with domestic alternatives like Maverick Distillery's Barnburner Whisky and Kavi Reserve Coffee Blended Canadian Whisky. The impact of the snub, a patriotic show of defiance in the face of Trump's 35 percent tariffs on Canadian goods, is now beginning to be felt, according to The Wall Street Journal. The newspaper reports that the Distilled Spirits Council estimates that American liquor sales in Canada have plummeted 62 percent year-on-year for the first six months of 2025. The Liquor Control Board of Ontario, which is responsible for the 688 stores licensed to sell alcohol in the country's most populous province, is meanwhile reporting zero sales of American goods, representing the obliteration of what was last year a $700 million industry. Meanwhile, in California, the wineries belonging to the Golden State's Wine Institute trade group say their products have lost more than $173 million in export value in the first half of this year, no surprise given that Canada was the destination for 35 percent of its exported cases. 'The absence of U.S. wine from Canadian stores is not just a market disruption, it's a breakdown in a trusted relationship built over decades,' the institute's CEO Robert Koch told the WSJ. 'This is not just about wine. It's about farming families, rural jobs and businesses that depend on access to international markets.' Another California business, Hope Family Wines, said its sales to Canada are down 10 percent since Trump returned to the White House in January. 'It's definitely going to hurt us personally,' said executive vice president Gretchen Roddick of the president's trade war. In Baltimore, Sagamore Spirit's CEO Robert Cullins said 10 percent of his company's rye whiskey was shipped north before the president commenced his second term, but no longer, adding that the $2 million loss in sales that represents is 'pretty significant' to a small craft distillery. On the other side of the coin, the boycott has inspired a 14 percent uptick in sales of Canadian liquor in Ontario. Trump has responded to his trade policy backfiring by griping that America's neighbor is 'mean and nasty to deal with' but Alberta, for one, has moved to reintroduce sales of American brands in June – albeit with a 25 percent retaliatory tariff of its own slapped on for good measure. Sales of U.S. bourbon and wine have duly rebounded despite that, according to one Calgary store owner, who told the WSJ: 'People are scared that maybe they won't be able to get them again.'


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Florida Republican tells Joe Rogan that DC has proof of things ‘not created by mankind'
Florida Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna claimed on the Joe Rogan Experience that Congress possesses evidence of "interdimensional beings" capable of operating across time. Luna asserted her claims are based on credible witness testimony and photographic evidence, indicating the existence of phenomena not created by humanity. She, alongside Rep. James Comer, formally requested briefings from government officials regarding unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) records. The congresswoman leads a task force within the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, focused on declassifying federal secrets related to UAPs. Luna criticised the intelligence community for withholding information, suggesting the US has reverse-engineered non-human technology, amidst ongoing congressional investigations into UAPs.