Age checks to be enforced on video sharing platforms from July
Video sharing platforms based in Ireland will face new regulatory obligations to verify users' ages before showing adult content from July, according to Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Commissioner.
Speaking on Prime Time, Niamh Hodnett said the commission will be "supervising" the platforms to "see what measures have they put in place" from 21 July.
The new measures are part of Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code, which requires that platforms hosting pornographic or violent material ensure such content is not accessible without robust age checks.
Platforms "have an obligation in relation to age assurance and also parental controls as well as content rating," Ms Hodnett said.
"What we require from the July date is either age estimation or age verification, and it has to be effective," Ms Hodnett said.
"To date, all the measures have been self-declaration... That's not an effective form of age assurance or age verification."
Ms Hodnett also outlined several approaches that could meet the new standards.
"That could be done by facial recognition, for example, or cognitive skills, or capacity testing - a maths or puzzle skill or something like that. It can also be done by hard age verification... uploading IDs, whether they're digital IDs or actual copies of passports or driver's licenses."
The Commission will not mandate any specific technology, but Ms Hodnett said the systems must be "robust, privacy-respecting, and holding data for no longer than it is necessary".
Concerns around privacy were also addressed. Ms Hodnett explained that age verification could be handled through secure intermediaries, not directly by the platforms themselves.
"It can be provided to an API or almost like a middleman," she said. "That would just give a signal or a token to the platform as to yes or no, that person is over 18. You wouldn't be sharing your passport or your driver's license with the particular platform... these interfaces or these APIs can just give that signal, and that can be done in a privacy-compliant way."
The Commissioner confirmed Ireland is working with European and UK regulators to align age assurance standards. "Together with the European Commission and fellow regulators across the EU... and our colleagues in Ofcom in the UK... it's all coming together this year in relation to effective age assurance."
She also pointed to the EU's planned digital identity wallet, which is expected to launch by the end of 2026, with a test version available later this year. The system will allow users to verify their age without sharing personal identification with platforms.
While age verification has dominated headlines, Ms Hodnett was clear that it is only one part of Ireland's broader online safety strategy.
"It's not the silver bullet to solve all problems of online safety in this space," she said.
"There are other measures that we require in our code, such as effective parental controls... restrictions on who can contact a child or whose content can be seen in relation to a child, because we're concerned also about grooming and child sex abuse material."
Asked whether stricter enforcement could drive young users toward the dark web, Ms Hodnett acknowledged the risk but said public education was also key.
"We provide tools and information on our website...guidance for parents, for children, indeed for all of us," she said.
"We also have education materials that we shared with every school in the country."
The first enforcement deadline under the Online Safety Code begins 21 July, when granular requirements for age assurance and other safety measures come into force.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Age checks to be enforced on video sharing platforms from July
Video sharing platforms based in Ireland will face new regulatory obligations to verify users' ages before showing adult content from July, according to Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Commissioner. Speaking on Prime Time, Niamh Hodnett said the commission will be "supervising" the platforms to "see what measures have they put in place" from 21 July. The new measures are part of Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code, which requires that platforms hosting pornographic or violent material ensure such content is not accessible without robust age checks. Platforms "have an obligation in relation to age assurance and also parental controls as well as content rating," Ms Hodnett said. "What we require from the July date is either age estimation or age verification, and it has to be effective," Ms Hodnett said. "To date, all the measures have been self-declaration... That's not an effective form of age assurance or age verification." Ms Hodnett also outlined several approaches that could meet the new standards. "That could be done by facial recognition, for example, or cognitive skills, or capacity testing - a maths or puzzle skill or something like that. It can also be done by hard age verification... uploading IDs, whether they're digital IDs or actual copies of passports or driver's licenses." The Commission will not mandate any specific technology, but Ms Hodnett said the systems must be "robust, privacy-respecting, and holding data for no longer than it is necessary". Concerns around privacy were also addressed. Ms Hodnett explained that age verification could be handled through secure intermediaries, not directly by the platforms themselves. "It can be provided to an API or almost like a middleman," she said. "That would just give a signal or a token to the platform as to yes or no, that person is over 18. You wouldn't be sharing your passport or your driver's license with the particular platform... these interfaces or these APIs can just give that signal, and that can be done in a privacy-compliant way." The Commissioner confirmed Ireland is working with European and UK regulators to align age assurance standards. "Together with the European Commission and fellow regulators across the EU... and our colleagues in Ofcom in the UK... it's all coming together this year in relation to effective age assurance." She also pointed to the EU's planned digital identity wallet, which is expected to launch by the end of 2026, with a test version available later this year. The system will allow users to verify their age without sharing personal identification with platforms. While age verification has dominated headlines, Ms Hodnett was clear that it is only one part of Ireland's broader online safety strategy. "It's not the silver bullet to solve all problems of online safety in this space," she said. "There are other measures that we require in our code, such as effective parental controls... restrictions on who can contact a child or whose content can be seen in relation to a child, because we're concerned also about grooming and child sex abuse material." Asked whether stricter enforcement could drive young users toward the dark web, Ms Hodnett acknowledged the risk but said public education was also key. "We provide tools and information on our for parents, for children, indeed for all of us," she said. "We also have education materials that we shared with every school in the country." The first enforcement deadline under the Online Safety Code begins 21 July, when granular requirements for age assurance and other safety measures come into force.
Irish Independent
8 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Kraken becomes first crypto giant to get Mica licence from Central Bank
The move means that Kraken can now trade across the 30-member European Economic Area as a fully-regulated entity. Andrew Mulvenny, the Dublin-based general manager of trading platform for Kraken, described the move as a 'huge milestone and a massive achievement'. It comes after a run of bad news for Ireland in the crypto space, with Coinbase following Gemini out of Ireland as its main regulatory hub in recent months. Coinbase chose to switch its EU regulatory base to Luxembourg, saying it preferred the regulation climate there to Dublin. Gemini said the same thing, favouring Malta. Both of the crypto giants had originally established their European regulatory hubs in Dublin in 2023, before Central Bank governor Gabrioel Makhlouf described cryptocurrencies as a 'Ponzi scheme'. IDA chief executive Michael Lohan said Kraken's Mica licence from the Central Bank here was important. 'This landmark moment strengthens Ireland's standing as a leading fintech hub in Europe,' he said. 'We value Kraken's ongoing investment and engagement and we look forward to further collaboration as the digital finance sector continues to grow in Ireland and across the EU.' The chair of Blockchain Ireland, Lory Kehoe, also put a positive light on the Kraken news against the background of regulatory uncertainty in recent months. 'This is a win for the Irish ecosystem,' he said. 'It strengthens Ireland's position in the EU's digital finance landscape, creates pathways for high-quality jobs and gives clarity to start-ups, institutions, and investors building in Ireland.' ADVERTISEMENT Mr Kehoe also predicted that more Mica licences would be issued by the Central Bank. A spokesperson for Kraken said that the Mica licence represented a 'pivotal milestone' for the San Francisco firm. 'Being the first major global crypto platform to receive authorisation from the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) affirms Kraken's commitment to building for the long term,' said Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi. 'Over the past several years, our team has worked tirelessly to meet the CBI's gold standard regulatory expectations. This licence reflects that effort and places us in a strong position to expand our product offering, grow our institutional and retail client base and deliver secure, accessible and fully regulated crypto services to millions more people across the EU.'
RTÉ News
9 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Inside the face scanning tech behind social media age limits
As age restrictions on social media gain political momentum, biometric software is being explored as a way to effectively enforce any potential laws. However, critics warn that privacy and surveillance issues could arise if these tools become more widespread in policing the internet. So, should this technology be used to build a safer, more secure internet? Politicians in Australia are pushing ahead with plans to ban under-16s from social media, and early findings from a government-backed trial suggest biometric software could be central to enforcing a ban. Yoti, a London-based tech firm, is a leader in age estimation technology and participant in the Australian research. Already used by platforms like Instagram, Yoti says its software can scan faces to estimate age without storing personal data. It says it can tell the age of 13 to 17-year-olds within an median margin of error of 1.3 years and 18 to 24-year-olds within 2.2 years. Better, it says, than human judgment. The face scanning technology captures a live selfie and apps and websites embed the software and apply their desired age threshold. Prime Time visited Yoti's headquarters to test the system. It correctly identified that I was over 18 but like most users I wasn't given the opportunity to find out exactly what my estimated age was, just that I had met the threshold. Yoti CEO Robin Tombs said the software has a vast capacity to look at patterns, making it "much more accurate at estimating age than a human would be." While the Australian government-commissioned trials backed the use of age assurance technologies, it did raise issues with the accuracy of some systems. People tend to misunderstand what working effectively means, Mr Tombs explained, adding that an accurate estimate to within a number of months of age is "very, very hard to do." Yoti says that 99.3% of 13 to 17-year-olds are correctly estimated as under 21. Companies using the software often set a higher buffer age to account for the technology's limits; however this increases the risk of wrongly restricting access of some adults. Dublin social media star Edel Lawless explained to Prime Time what happened when she failed a digital age test on TikTok. The platform requires users who want to broadcast live to verify that they are over 18. After being directed to take a live selfie to prove her age, Ms Lawless, who was 18 at the time, told the programme she was rejected. "I think my baby face didn't allow it. I don't think it's a very good way of estimating someone's age." The now 19-year-old had to submit a photo of herself holding her age card before she could proceed. Yoti contends that notwithstanding false negatives or positives in its age estimations, the vast majority of people benefit from ease of use and not having to submit documents to prove their age. It is also very hard to game or trick the system, Mr Tombs said. The live selfie process limits the potential for AI generated images to be used while the software is also sophisticated enough to recognise if someone is wearing a mask or other disguise. But digital rights campaigners have warned that age estimation systems can contain biases. "It's a normalisation of biometric surveillance that we've worked against for many years," Ella Jakubowska, Head of Policy at European Digital Rights told the programme. Biometric software has been historically trained on white, male faces. In 2021, Facebook apologised when an AI image tool was identifying black men as non-human primates. Yoti insists the technology has improved in the last decade and the 125,000 images it bases its model on cover all ages, three skin types and both genders. The company's own test results show that although there are differences in the age estimation between different groups "they are not material," according to Mr Tombs. UK Digital rights group Big Brother Watch described the moves towards age assurance technologies as a knee jerk reaction to a more complex and wider discussion around internet safety and moderation. The rate of false negatives threatens free speech and free access to the internet, the group believes. "There are many people who are above the age of 18 but may for a host of reasons not pass an age assurance test. Adults have an important right to access legal content online," Advocacy Manager, Matthew Feeney told Prime Time. "I don't think we want to lurch into a world where the most powerful communications platform we have in the history of our species is one where you need to step through a security booth in order to access it." Requiring a face scan or age documents for adults to access certain content, potentially of a sensitive or adult nature presents risks of surveillance, the group contends. "We don't want to live in a world where people feel like they cannot visit information they want or say what they believe because they don't feel like they have privacy online," Mr Feeney added. Activists have also raised concerns over how facial scans are processed and stored. The Yoti database is derived from an earlier product, a digital ID app in which users uploaded their image and proof of age with permission for the company to build up a large, anonymous database. It insists the selfies uploaded today are not saved and privacy is paramount. Stricter regulation is also being implemented in many jurisdictions around storing and processing personal images. "Regulators are requiring faces to be destroyed, deleted immediately, and not used for any other purpose. I think people do trust that if a regulator requires that, it would be very risky for a big brand or Yoti to not comply with those regulations," CEO Robin Tombs said. But even if the software is effective and properly regulated, the risk of adding age restrictions to parts of the internet could lead to a less vibrant online society and a tech environment with safeguards that may not achieve what they're intended to, according to Big Brother Watch. "What I'm worried about is that these kinds of regulations are going to incentivize children to go into the dark web, to use encrypted web browsers, to get into places where it's actually much, much harder to moderate where they're going," Matthew Feeney explained. "There are websites all across the world that make YouTube, Instagram look relatively tame." Social media ban debate Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said its world-leading legislation will protect young people from the "harms" of social media adding that the onus will be on platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access to those under 16. A similar law should be considered here, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said, describing smartphone use as a "ticking time bomb". The Irish Medical Organisation also debated a motion to consider such a move at its recent AGM. But there isn't consensus on the merits or efficacy of such bans. In the UK, the Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has backed away from following the Australian path. Campaigners argue social media platforms themselves should police their content and algorithms to be less harmful for everyone, not just children. "It feels like a really unsophisticated solution," Ella Jakubowska of European Digital Rights told Prime Time. "Any sledgehammer approach that tries to cut young people out of the internet is missing the point that there's a lot we need to do to keep all people safe from platforms. Imposing age gates on internet access will disempower both adults and children, she argued. "All the evidence shows that young people are the most resilient and the most able to deal with online harms when they have a parent or guardian or other adult figure that they can confide in that helps them navigate the internet safely and in ways that build resilience, not just shutting them out," Ms Jakubowska said. Distinct from any potential social media ban, next month the first age assurance regulations will come into force in Ireland requiring video sharing platforms that allow pornographic or gratuitously violent content to have "effective" age assurance. Self-declaration by users will not be accepted. However, as most social media companies that are based here already prohibit such content and most adult sites are based outside of the country, users are unlikely to see a significant impact in the short term. Europe, meanwhile, is moving towards more harmonised age assurance standards with some countries like Germany and France already requiring stricter age verification. The Commission has recently recommended that the highest form of age assurance – age verification with documentation – is necessary in certain cases such as alcohol, pornographic content, or gambling. A digital identity wallet is being developed to let users verify their age without directly sharing personal information with online platforms. The plan is for identity documents to be securely stored in an EU-wide app. The large tech companies are also steeling themselves for a battle over how future age assurance requirements are enforced. Social media platforms have argued that such verification should be done at the app-store or operating system level, rather than by each individual app. Digital rights campaigners remain concerned about the use of facial scanning generally. Oppressive States have historically exploited data putting campaigners and members of marginalised groups, among others, at risk, Ella Jakubowska said. "I'm aware that we can sometimes sound as if we're being a bit cynical or doomsdayish but it's legitimate to be aware of the potential of creating mass surveillance systems," Ms Jakubowska said. Beyond social media Regulators are also now grappling with broader questions around AI and what decisions it should be allowed to make. Should AI be permitted to decide who gets a job or a bank loan? Or what about who is served in a retail store? Ireland's largest shop-fitting company expects new age estimation screens to be in stores within months. At the showroom of Mercury Retail Services, MD Garry Doyle explained how vape stores are among the potential clients of the new technology. "With the growth of age-restricted sales it's really important that a retailer is able to give their staff the tools they need to be able to make the decisions at the till," Mr Doyle explained. A tablet screen is positioned facing customers to scan their face and indicate if they meet a set age threshold. When I tested the system, it accurately verified that I was over 21, confirming this with a green light after scanning my face. It gives business owners a tool to show they are taking their responsibilities seriously, Mr Doyle said. "It's not saying you can't serve this customer. It's helping the retailer make an informed decision of whether they need to ask for identification." Contending that Ireland is a long way away from a purely autonomous 24-hour store, Mr Doyle added: "I don't think you'll ever get to a situation whereby you are replacing shop staff with AI because retail in Ireland is about the experience and relationships that retailers have with their customers." As biometric age estimation technologies become increasingly integrated into online platforms and everyday interactions, governments and regulators will be tasked with navigating a complex and delicate balance - ensuring that measures designed to protect vulnerable users, particularly children, do not come at the expense of individual privacy, civil liberties, and digital freedom.
