logo
How Democrats' potential presidential contenders are scoping out different paths to 2028

How Democrats' potential presidential contenders are scoping out different paths to 2028

NBC News11-04-2025

Democrats are at a crossroads. And different potential party leaders are already scoping out different potential paths back to power in a few years.
After the party lost November's presidential election, its image has slipped to historic lows, and it lacks significant power in Washington to push back against President Donald Trump's efforts to bend the federal government to his will — even as Democratic voters warm to the idea of an all-out fight against Trump.
It's against that backdrop that key Democratic leaders are making early, yet important, moves about how to position themselves as the party looks toward a wide-open 2028 presidential race. Some seek to resist Trump at all opportunities, others concede victories to Republicans on cultural issues, and still more hope to split the difference — working with Trump when necessary and criticizing him when they disagree.
The early moves are, in many cases, nuanced and layered, and it's clear that not everything these Democrats do should be viewed solely through the lens of potential presidential campaigns. Here's a look at some of the high-profile ways key Democrats have been handling Trump and Republicans in the early months of the administration — and how those moves could set up future presidential campaigns.
Grab a slice of conservatives' pie
Two days after Election Day, California Gov. Gavin Newsom convened a special legislative session that his office declared in a news release was intended to 'safeguard California values and fundamental rights in the face of an incoming Trump administration.' And he has been vocally criticizing Trump over tariffs, asking countries to exclude California-made goods from retaliatory tariffs.
But he has also been making headlines for podcast comments like saying transgender athletes' participating in women's sports is 'deeply unfair,' as well as for hosting former Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon on his podcast, letting Bannon's false claims about the 2020 election go unchallenged and emphasizing populist policies on which they agree.
After days of criticism from the left for letting Bannon slide, Newsom responded on his podcast in an interview with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz: 'We can dismiss the notion of election denialism, we can completely dismiss what he did on Jan. 6, but I don't think you can dismiss what he's saying — reminds me a lot of what Bernie Sanders was saying, reminds me a lot of what Democrats said 20, 30 years ago.'
Meanwhile, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has prompted unfounded speculation that he could consider switching parties, a possibility he has forcefully shot down. But he has notably broken from his party with his ardent support for Israel in its war against Hamas in Gaza, he met with Trump at his Florida home, and he was among the dozen Senate Democrats who backed a high-profile federal law requiring Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain undocumented immigrants who have been arrested or convicted or who face certain charges locally.
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis has been a trickier case. He was among the few Democrats who sang the praises of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., extolling his work in having 'helped us defeat vaccine mandates in Colorado' — before he later posted in support of getting vaccinated.
But while Polis said in his State of the State address in January that he hoped to work with Trump on securing the border, he warned against 'efforts to deport American citizens, to target those on pending legal status, to break up families,' and he has since pressed the administration over the detention of an undocumented immigration and labor activist in the state.
He has also been a vocal critic of Trump's tariffs, taking a shot at another potential Democratic candidate, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, over the issue.
Resist Trump at all costs
Some Democrats are fashioning themselves as the tip of the spear in the Democratic Resistance 2.0 against Trump, in and outside Washington. While some aren't necessarily seen as surefire potential presidential candidates, their attempts to step into the party's leadership vacuum are garnering notice.
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has spent much of his political career positioning himself as a potential Trump foil. Now, he has repeatedly invoked Nazi Germany as he launches broadsides against Trump, and he has also been fiercely critical of billionaire Elon Musk. Pritzker also blocked anyone who took part in the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol from working in state jobs.
Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut is taking a similar tack: He has spent almost $1.9 million this year on Meta ads alone (more than twice the amount he spent from the middle of 2019 through 2024), largely attacking Trump, all while he has been front and center in the Senate and in news interviews warning that Trump is a threat to American democracy.
Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, who ran for president in 2020, gave deflated Democrats an emotional boost with his record-breaking 25-hour floor speech that excoriated Trump and his policies.
Walz, who had second billing on the ticket that lost to Trump last fall, has made direct broadsides at Trump a centerpiece of his message since he has re-entered the national political fray. He has held town halls in Republican districts in states like Iowa and Wisconsin, and he has criticized Trump as an 'arsonist,' a 'caricature that had a reality TV show that pretended like he knew how to run a business' and the 'worst possible business executive' in a recent appearance on MSNBC.
Then there's Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, who has for years been lionized among progressives who see her as an heir-apparent to Sanders' political movement. The 2028 presidential election will be the first in which Ocasio-Cortez, 35, will be old enough to run for president, and she has been barnstorming the country with Sanders, I-Vt., in recent weeks. She has also been spending heavily on social media to get her message out. But it's unclear whether she would take such a big swing to try to jump to national office.
Head down and govern
Yet another group of Democrats are threading the needle between expressing outright support for Trump or joining The Resistance 2.0, evaluating their approach to him case by case while still sending a message of willingness for bipartisan collaboration.
Whitmer, the governor of Michigan, has joined several of her fellow Democratic governors in seeking to strike a balance, saying in a speech in Washington on Wednesday, 'My oath to the people of Michigan is to continue to show up ... no matter who is at the other side of the table.'
Whitmer made the remarks hours before she met with Trump at the White House for the second time in less than a month and stood by in the Oval Office while he signed executive orders targeting his political critics. Whitmer's presence drew swift condemnation from some fellow Democrats, while her spokesperson was quick to make it clear that she wasn't aware the executive orders would be signed while she was there and that her presence in the Oval Office was 'not an endorsement of the actions taken or statements made at that event.'
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who has been very critical of Trump's tariffs, is also performing a balancing act in approaching the Trump administration, telling HBO's Bill Maher in an interview this month, 'I think it is a false choice to suggest you need either/or — either you need that resistance, that fight, that opposition, or you need to find ways to compromise and come together.'
In a budget address to state lawmakers last month, Shapiro announced his intention to work with Republicans when he can: 'Folks in this building have been talking about cutting taxes for years. But here I am, a Democratic governor with an aggressive plan to cut taxes, ready to work with you to get it done.'
Days later, Shapiro invoked his 'job as governor to protect Pennsylvania's interests' when his administration sued the Trump administration after it halted federal funds that had previously been committed to the state.
While Shapiro and Whitmer, Democratic governors of states Trump won last year, navigate the tightrope of working with Trump on some issues and working against him on others, other Democrats who govern in states Vice President Kamala Harris won by double digits aren't heeding their optimistic calls to work alongside the new administration.
In his State of the State address this year, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said that he hoped to 'work together [with the new presidential administration] to make progress for Maryland' but that 'if the policy decisions of these past few weeks are any preview, I fear that our most charitable expectations will be met with harsh realities.'
Since then, Moore has been at odds with the Trump administration over tariffs, the imperiled future of the FBI headquarters' move to Maryland and Trump's executive order targeting the Smithsonian Institution, which Trump said was influenced by 'a divisive, race-centered ideology.'
'Loving your country does not mean lying about its history,' Moore, Maryland's first Black governor, told CNN. 'Loving your country does not mean dismantling those who have helped to make this country so powerful.'
Charting their own paths
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear delivered his State of the Commonwealth address in early January, days before Trump's inauguration — and didn't mention him at all, instead arguing that the state has 'made progress by pushing out that national noise, by working together.'
But Beshear has since waded into criticism of Trump not just on tariffs but more broadly, too.
'His policies are going to specifically hurt my people. Tariff policy is going to hit Kentucky harder than just about anywhere else,' he said last month on an episode of the liberal podcast 'Pod Save America.'
'People should be alarmed in the very least that we have a president who apparently does not believe in his oath of office and doesn't value the fact the Constitution only makes him one branch of government.'
Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who for years has been seen as a possible presidential hopeful, spent last summer touring steel and coal towns trying to connect with rural workers. Khanna has spent recent months laying out a road map for Democrats that includes grounding the party in prioritizing workers while keeping up the pressure on Trump and not demonizing those 'who have differing viewpoints on social or cultural issues.'
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg made some veiled criticism of Trump in a Substack post explaining his decision not to run for the Senate or governor in Michigan in 2026, clearing the way for him to pursue another presidential campaign in 2028.
But after The Atlantic revealed that senior Trump administration officials used a Signal chat to discuss planned strikes against Houthi rebels, Buttigieg has been more direct.
'From an operational security perspective, this is the highest level of f--- up imaginable. These people cannot keep America safe,' Buttigieg, a former Naval Reserve intelligence officer, wrote on X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio marks Russia Day, reaffirms calls for peace with Ukraine
Rubio marks Russia Day, reaffirms calls for peace with Ukraine

Reuters

time42 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Rubio marks Russia Day, reaffirms calls for peace with Ukraine

June 12 (Reuters) - The United States supports Russians' aspirations for a brighter future, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on the occasion of Russia Day, reaffirming a desire for constructive engagement in efforts to bring about peace in the war with Ukraine. The Russia Day holiday marks the country's 1990 declaration of sovereignty, more than a year before the collapse of the Soviet Union. "The United States remains committed to supporting the Russian people as they continue to build on their aspirations for a brighter future," Rubio said in a statement on the State Department website. "We also take this opportunity to reaffirm the United States' desire for constructive engagement with the Russian Federation to bring about a durable peace between Russia and Ukraine," he added. "It is our hope that peace will foster more mutually beneficial relations between our countries." On Wednesday, Russian news agencies said Moscow's new ambassador to the United States, Alexander Darchiev, pledged to work to fully restore ties with Washington as he formally presented his credentials to President Donald Trump. Ties between Moscow and Washington have improved since Trump took office, as the two discuss a possible resolution to the Ukraine conflict.

Israel considering military strike on Iran, sources say
Israel considering military strike on Iran, sources say

NBC News

time43 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Israel considering military strike on Iran, sources say

Israel is considering taking military action against Iran — most likely without U.S. support — in the coming days, even as President Donald Trump is in advanced discussions with Tehran about a diplomatic deal to curtail its nuclear program, according to five people with knowledge of the situation. Israel has become more serious about a unilateral strike on Iran as the negotiations between the U.S. and Iran appear closer to a preliminary or framework agreement that includes provisions about uranium enrichment that Israel views as unacceptable. A unilateral strike or action by Israel against Iran would be a dramatic break with the Trump administration, which has argued against such a step. The renewed threat of an Israeli strike comes as the Trump administration is awaiting a response from Iran on a proposed framework of a nuclear deal, and as the president has publicly said Tehran has become more hardline in its negotiations. The notion of a new front in a simmering conflict has prompted the Trump administration to order all embassies within striking distance of Iranian missiles, aircraft and other assets (including missions in the Middle East, Northern Africa, and Eastern Europe) to send cables with assessments about danger and about measures to mitigate risks to Americans and U.S. infrastructure, according to two sources familiar. U.S. and other officials are on alert awaiting the possibility of Israel striking Iran, the officials said. The White House has not briefed senior lawmakers on the issue, according to that aide and a U.S. official. One major concern is Iran retaliating against U.S. personnel or assets in the region for any action. Israel, which relies on intelligence or other direct and logistical assistance from the U.S., may be in a position to take unilateral action against Tehran, the source familiar said. The sources familiar and officials were not aware of any planned U.S. involvement in the possible action. The U.S. could support with aerial re-fueling or intelligence sharing rather than kinetic support but the sources and officials were not aware of plans for that either at this point. U.S. officials have announced that the voluntary departure of non-essential employees from the region. And the Pentagon announced the voluntary departure of military families from locations all across the U.S. Central Command area of operations. CENTCOM Commander General Erik Kurilla was due to testify on the Hill on Thursday, but the hearing was postponed late Wednesday without explanation. A source familiar said Kurilla had to focus on this unfolding situation. Another possible factor: Iran is rebuilding its strategic air defenses, and manned strikes will soon be exponentially more dangerous for Israeli pilots. In October, Israel damaged nearly every one of Iran's strategic air defense systems (mainly S-300s) but much of the damage was to the radars or other parts that can be rebuilt. It's possible Israel's window for manned strikes, without being threatened by Iran's coordinated strategic air defenses, is closing. While Israel would most likely prefer U.S. military and intelligence support for strikes — especially against Iranian nuclear facilities — they showed in October that they can do a lot alone. Michael Knights of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said the evacuation of non-essential staff at the U.S. embassy in Iraq will send a message to Tehran that Trump will not necessarily hold Israel back from launching a threatened attack on Iran. 'It's about trying to get Iran to respect the president's wishes,' Knights said. Iran has failed to meet a two-month deadline set by Trump to reach an agreement on the country's nuclear activities, and the president is frustrated, he said. Both Knights and a source with knowledge of the matter said it was unclear if Israel would undertake a limited military strike now or wait until nuclear negotiations played out further. Trump has expressed growing frustration over Iran's stance at recent indirect talks, portraying Tehran as inflexible and slow moving. 'They're just asking for things that you can't do. They don't want to give up what they have to give up,' Trump told reporters on Monday. 'They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment.'

Brent Council defends decision to twin with Nablus
Brent Council defends decision to twin with Nablus

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Brent Council defends decision to twin with Nablus

A north-west London council has defended its decision to twin with an occupied city in the West a full council meeting held in May, Brent Council voted to twin with Nablus to promote "cultural, social, economic, and educational exchanges".Since then, a petition has been set up against the move, saying the twinning did not give due regard to the effects this decision would have on all of its Labour council leader Muhammed Butt said it "was not taken lightly" and that it "followed a period of public engagement, including a petition signed by more than 2,000 residents". In an email response to residents, Butt said he wanted to "acknowledge the pain and trauma that continue to affect Jewish communities both here in Brent and around the world following the horrific terrorist attacks committed by Hamas on October 7th".He said the decision to twin did not represent "support for any political group or administration in Nablus"."Rather, it reflects Brent's humanitarian values and a desire to connect with ordinary people in another part of the world who, like us, strive for peace, education, dignity, and progress for the next generation," he said. Nablus sits in the West Bank, a landlocked territory illegally occupied by Israel in a war in 1967, along with the Gaza Strip. Hamas has controlled Gaza, while Fatah administers most of the West Bank. The two groups are rivals; the Hamas movement was founded to challenge the Fatah-led Palestinian Liberation Organisation and took control of the Gaza Strip in has recognised Israel, said it renounced terrorism in 1988 and seeks a two-state solution for a Palestinian homeland; Hamas is committed to the destruction of Israel and killed more than 1,200 people and took 251 hostage in a cross-border attack on 7 October then, more than 50,000 people have been killed in Gaza, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry. 'Raise awareness' Brent's Labour group leader Ihtesham Afzal spearheaded the campaign for the partnership. He called the decision "momentous" and "significant"."We'll be doing cultural exchanges, sharing art, history, culture, tradition, poetry, language along with architecture," he said."We'll be collaborating for the mutual benefit of both Brent and Nablus."He added the scheme would "raise awareness about what's happening in Palestine" and that it was first mentioned in 2021-22. "This has not been triggered over what happened in the last couple of years, it's been a long time coming," he money would come from the council's budget and council workers' time would not be spent on it as it was a community project, he added. According to the 2021 Census, Brent has the second highest Arab diaspora in England and Wales, second only to Birmingham with Arabs making up 5.3% of the Brent population (17,924 people)."This is a non exclusionary project. This is showcasing what we're about in Brent; we have Muslim people, Christian people, Jewish people, Hindu, Sikh - we have everybody across the board. We are a melting pot," said asked if he had heard back from the Jewish community on taking part, he said "not in relation as to whether they'll be part of this initiative"."When out on the marches, we have Jewish people, Christian people, Muslim people, Hindu, Sikh, everybody is out. People of all faiths and no faiths and we have that evidence of the support (of the twinning) from the grassroots individuals in the community." 'Particularly dangerous' But Conservative councillor Michael Maurice, who opposed the move, said he was "disappointed" with the decision and that it would be "dangerous" for Brent residents to go to Nablus on exchange trips. "When the motion was first put forward back in November, I proposed a counter motion that Brent should twin with a city or town possibly in Israel which had a mixed Jewish, Arab, Christian community."I'm not opposed to twinning with any particular cities, but I think Nablus is particularly dangerous." On Tuesday, the Israeli army launched a raid on the city, killing two Palestinians according to the Palestinian ministry of health. The Israeli army said it was undertaking a counterterrorism ministers have recently approved new Jewish settlements which are widely seen as illegal under international law, though Israel disputes said twinning was also a question of exchange visits. "In other words, we will go to them and stay with them and take part in their programme and they can come to us and take part in our programmes but it would be very dangerous for us to go there."The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office travel currently advises against all but essential travel to Nablus. Motasem Zaid, a Palestinian engineer who lives in Brent, said he was overwhelmed by the support and solidarity he was shown by people in the believed twinning was about forming a long-term relationship that would last beyond the conflict."It can be and it will be hopefully beneficial for both communities economically, culturally, even with the exchange between the educational institutions between the two communities," he said."The twinning is not meant to exclude anyone. It's meant to do the opposite, it's meant to include everyone."It's not going to cost the council or the taxpayer anything. So to me, if I'm taking this solidarity part out of the equation, it's a risk-free investment."Jewish resident Ian Collier said the twinning was not started the petition against the decision and is calling on the council to reconsider. "Everybody that I spoke to was quite disgusted, as I was, about the idea and the concept," he said."We felt it was just totally out of character with what a council should be doing for its residents."We don't believe it's in the interest of some elements of the community and it does put a number of people in the community at physical harm."At the last count, there were 3,700 Jews living in Brent. I believe that each and everyone of them will feel more threatened because of any particular influence that people in Brent, or worse still the children of people in Brent, receive from having correspondence or interaction with the people of Nablus." Retired GP Jonathan Fluxman, who represents a different Jewish voice in Brent, said twinning would foster understanding."We've heard the stories over and over again," he said. "Othering of Palestinians, of Arabs, of people from the Middle East. 'They're not like us. They don't share our values'. "I think that's nonsense. We are all human beings. We all share a common humanity, and what we need to do is interact with each other and understand each other."There's been a lot of talk about Jewish fears of safety and being made uncomfortable. I have no sense of fear about this." According to the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) the UK has approximately 2,000 twinning links, which are legal or social agreements between two cities, towns or villages, to boost trade and tourism, promote peace and cultural exchange. The LGIU said such arrangements were "good for fostering business connections and mutually beneficial economic partnerships".Brent has also been twinned with South Dublin County Council since 1997.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store