Global stocks mixed after Trump accuses China of violating tariff deal
NEW YORK: Global stocks finished mixed on Friday (May 30) after President Donald Trump put US-China trade tensions back on the boil by claiming Beijing had "totally violated" an agreement with Washington.
His social media post came hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said trade talks with China aimed at putting to bed sky-high mutual tariffs, currently suspended, were "a bit stalled".
The development risks renewed trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies.
On Wall Street, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed higher, while the S&P 500 index was flat, and the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite fell 0.3 per cent.
"If it weren't for the trade war, the market would be feeling pretty good," said Tom Cahill of Ventura Wealth Management.
"Inflation is definitely moving in the right direction," he added, referencing the Federal Reserve's favoured inflation gauge, which cooled more than expected last month, according to fresh data published Friday.
In Europe, London and Germany's major indices ended higher, while France's CAC40 closed lower, following declines in Asian markets earlier in the day.
"UNDIPLOMATIC APPROACH"
"If President Trump does slap tariffs back on Chinese imports to the US ... we may see demand for US assets, and the dollar, severely impaired by a chaotic and undiplomatic approach to trade policy," said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB.
Despite rumbling concerns about the US-China economic relationship, the markets were little changed by Trump's criticism on social media, with investors appearing to be largely inured to the US president's now-familiar cycle of making dramatic trade threats and then retreating.
Investors, traders and analysts instead focused on the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index data, which rose 2.1 per cent in the 12 months to April, cooling slightly more than expected.
Despite the good news for the Fed, which is looking to bring inflation down to its long-term target of 2 per cent, analysts warned that the fuller inflationary effects of Trump's tariffs were yet to come, and could cause the Fed to maintain its watch-and-wait stance.
"The true weight of these policies is likely to emerge more fully in the months ahead," said FOREX.com market analyst Fawad Razaqzada.
Investors were also assessing the impact of a US court ruling that invalidated most of Trump's sweeping tariffs, although an appeals court suspended that order and the White House vowed that its tariffs goals would be pursued one way or another.
The result leaves Trump's tariff plans in something of "a legal limbo" said Stephen Innes, of SPI Asset Management, adding that this sort of legal impasse was "the kind that keeps traders awake at night."
In the eurozone, interest rates were in focus after official data showed inflation hovering around the European Central Bank's 2 per cent target.
Consumer prices in top EU economy Germany showed a 2.1 per cent rise in May – the same as the previous month – while they fell to 1.9 per cent in Spain, and to 1.7 per cent in Italy.
The ECB looks set to lower interest rates again on Thursday.
The dollar gained against major currencies, while oil prices were down ahead of a Saturday meeting of eight key OPEC+ members to decide production quotas for July, with some analysts predicting that the cartel could make a larger-than-expected supply hike.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News
US President Donald Trump's tariff decisions since he took office on Jan 20 have shocked financial markets and sent a wave of uncertainty through the global economy. Here is a timeline of the major developments: Feb 1 - Trump imposes 25 per cent tariffs on Mexican and most Canadian imports and 10 per cent on goods from China, demanding they curb the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the United States. Feb 3 - Trump suspends his threat of tariffs on Mexico and Canada, agreeing to a 30-day pause in return for concessions on border and crime enforcement. The US does not reach such a deal with China. Feb 7 - Trump delays tariffs on de minimis, or low-cost, packages from China until the Commerce Department can confirm that procedures and systems are in place to process them and collect tariff revenue. Feb 10 - Trump raises tariffs on steel and aluminium to a flat 25 per cent "without exceptions or exemptions". March 3 - Trump says 25 per cent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada will take effect from March 4 and doubles fentanyl-related tariffs on all Chinese imports to 20 per cent. March 5 - The president agrees to delay tariffs for one month on some vehicles built in Canada and Mexico after a call with the CEOs of General Motors and Ford and the chair of Stellantis. March 6 - Trump exempts goods from Canada and Mexico under a North American trade pact for a month from the 25 per cent tariffs. March 26 - Trump unveils a 25 per cent tariff on imported cars and light trucks. April 2 - Trump announces global tariffs with a baseline of 10 per cent across all imports and significantly higher duties on some of the US' biggest trading partners. April 9 - Trump pauses for 90 days most of his country-specific tariffs that kicked in less than 24 hours earlier following an upheaval in financial markets that erased trillions of dollars from bourses around the world. The 10 per cent blanket duty on almost all US imports stays in place. Trump says he will raise the tariff on Chinese imports to 125 per cent from the 104 per cent level that took effect a day earlier. This pushes the extra duties on Chinese goods to 145 per cent, including the fentanyl-related tariffs imposed earlier. April 13 - The US administration grants exclusions from steep tariffs on smartphones, computers and some other electronics imported largely from China. April 22 - The Trump administration launches national security probes under Section 232 of the Trade Act of 1962 into imports of both pharmaceuticals and semiconductors as part of a bid to impose tariffs on both sectors. May 4 - Trump imposes a 100 per cent tariff on all movies produced outside the US May 9 - Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announce a limited bilateral trade agreement that leaves in place 10 per cent tariffs on British exports, modestly expands agricultural access for both countries and lowers prohibitive US duties on British car exports. May 12 - The US and China agree to temporarily slash reciprocal tariffs. Under the 90-day truce, the US will cut the extra tariffs it imposed on Chinese imports to 30 per cent from 145 per cent, while China's duties on US imports will be slashed to 10 per cent from 125 per cent. May 13 - The US cuts the low value "de minimis" tariff on China shipments, reducing duties for items valued at up to $800 to 54 per cent from 120 per cent. May 23 - Trump says he is recommending a straight 50 per cent tariff on goods from the European Union starting on June 1. He also warned Apple it would face 25 per cent tariff if phones it sold in the US were manufactured outside of the country. May 25 - Trump backpedals on his threat to slap 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU, agreeing to extend the deadline for talks between the US and the block until July 9. May 28 - A US trade court blocked Trump's tariffs from going into effect in a sweeping ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trade partners. The Trump administration said it would appeal the ruling. May 29 - A federal appeals court temporarily reinstates the most sweeping of Trump's tariffs, saying it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. May 30 - At a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump says he plans to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50 per cent from 25 per cent. [[nid:718546]]
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News
China said on Monday (June 2) that US President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the US had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The US government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for US semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25 per cent tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers. [[nid:717864]]
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Trump's brain drain is America's loss, but could be the world's biggest win
INTERNATIONAL: There was a time when Danielle Beckman viewed the United States as the apex of opportunity for researchers and experts. A neuroscientist from Brazil, Beckman accomplished her ultimate desire in 2017 when she joined the California National Primate Research Centre at UC Davis. 'Coming to the US was always the dream,' Beckman said. 'It was always the place to be, where there's the biggest investment in science.' But just a few years later, according to a recent CNN report, that dream has disintegrated. Amid comprehensive slashes to research subsidies, government meddling in academia, and anti-immigrant pomposity, Beckman is now prepared to leave the U.S. Her laboratory has already lost $2.5 million in revoked endowments, and she's now exploring prospects in Germany and France. 'It's the first time since I moved here that I don't feel so welcome anymore,' she said. Beckman is not alone. A rising migration of academics and field experts is in progress, as top inventors and professors in different disciplines are searching for new homes for their work, and their families in nations where science is still guarded and treasured. Countries rush to recruit U.S. scientists As America's academic setting becomes increasingly antagonistic, other countries are making the most of the opportunity. The European Union has guaranteed €500 million ($562 million) to turn Europe into a centre for banished researchers. France is initiating a 'Safe Place for Science' package in Marseille to admit targeted or repressed researchers. In the meantime, Canada, Norway, Singapore, and Australia all have activated parallel endeavours to entice superior talent from the U.S. 'We know these individuals are highly trained, talented, and have much to offer,' said Anna-Maria Arabia, CEO of the Australian Academy of Science. Her group is one of the many tapping into what she calls a 'global hunger' for scientific proficiency, now bolting away from the U.S. in hordes. These worldwide initiatives mark a dramatic setback to the established brain gain America has relished for a long time. The damage, experts caution, could change the global scenario of innovation and research direction. Funding slashed, freedoms threatened, and the toll of Trump's policies. As he entered his second term, President Donald Trump has overturned the connection between the federal government and America's primary research institutions. Federal backing for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF)—once pillars of worldwide systematic management—has been reduced by billions. Nearly 700 NIH endowments totalling $1.8 billion were lost in just a few weeks earlier this year. The Trump government has also planned a 40% decrease in the NIH's 2026 budget. Simultaneously, leading academies like Harvard are embattled for their refusal to pull apart diversity and inclusion agendas. The administration immobilised billions in federal financing and barred Harvard from registering transnational students, a verdict which was swiftly reversed by a federal judge. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt justified the government's rerouting of resources, saying they will coddle 'trade schools and state programs promoting American values,' while disparaging 'LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University.' The message is clear: The U.S. government is becoming increasingly unreceptive and antagonistic to independent science, global students, and the type of academic autonomy that once demarcated its universal standing. The collapse of U.S. scientific leadership? For many decades, the U.S. has long been the world's research steamroller, behind more than 400 Nobel Prizes, many earned by émigrés, and boosted by approximately a trillion dollars in yearly public and private R&D investment. Today, that reputation is now in jeopardy. China, with more than $780 billion in yearly R&D outlay, is quickly closing the innovation gap. The European Union's R&D investments have increased by 50% over the past decade and a half. These nations are now better positioned to engage the world's superior minds. See also Speaker of the House seat up for grabs again The consequence is a flashpoint. Based on a Nature survey from March, 75% of U.S. researchers said they're contemplating exiting the country due to the Trump administration's guidelines. Others, like Yale professors Jason Stanley, Marci Shore, and Timothy Snyder, distinguished academics of fascism, have already transferred to Canada. 'What we are losing is this whole cadre of highly productive, young, energetic, well-trained, knowledgeable, advanced researchers,' cautioned Kenneth Wong, an expert education policy professional at Brown University. 'It's a complete reset of the collaborative relationship between the federal government and our leading research institutions.' For Beckman, whose study centres on how diseases like COVID-19 impact the brain, the choice is now less about politics and more about endurance and survival. 'There is interest in virology everywhere in the world except the U.S. right now,' she said. As the world welcomes U.S.-trained scientists, the question is: will America mend from the impairment, or relinquish its scientific advantage for good?
